I said in the review of book one that I'd recently heard someone say "morally grey male characters in this sort of book are supposed to do bad things for her, not bad things to her. I'm not sure that holds true all the time (dark romance can be very dark at times), but I think it would be the case for this book." I hadn't yet figured out how to articulate why the morally grey characters felt so off in Zanetti's books. I have now.
In a completely unrelated event, I saw a TikTok a few days back that discussed dark fiction on a spectrum from light to pitch black. While where the line is drawn is up for debate, for the sake of my point, I'll use their scale. They broke it down like this: Diet (or light) Dark Romane is when a book has dark themes, but the characters are not bad people. Standard Dark Romance is about good people who do morally grey things that can be justified (like killing bad people), but they love each other fiercely. Pitch Black Romance is where all morals are gone, one of them (and it's usually the male) does bad things and is a bad person, but is obsessed with their romantic partner.
Zanetti writes standard dark romance that leans toward diet even, and then tries to put a pitch black male romantic lead in it. The reader is told again and again how dark and moralless he is, but then every one we see him kill happens to be pimping kids or beating women or a rapist. They lead various organized crime families (the social media empires are just a euphemism for the Mob and Bratva) but refuse to traffic women or kids, institute moral limits within their organizations, and are basically Standard Dark Romance men. He's not really a pitch-black MMC, even though Zanetti tries to convince us he is.
The problems come in when he interacts with the FMC because he acts in a Dark Romance way with her. Without the architecture of pitch black romance in the rest of the book, the domineering way he acts with her feels out of place and flatly abusive, like his abusive persona only comes out at home. Hell, the MMC straight-up SAs the FMC in this book, and there is nothing in the rest of the book to give it the patina of consensual non-consent. She's unconscious when he starts, and then when she wakes, she tells him no repeatedly. After the fact, she states he forced it on her. It's SA, and the book lacks the pitch blackness to contextualize it as anything else or successfully convince the reader that it's really what the FMC wanted. So, the male leads in both books in this series, but especially in this one, simply feel extremely domestically controlling and abusive, and there is nothing sexy about it. Some extremely dark romances, especially those leaning toward horror, pull it off. Zanetti's books do not. They don't even come close. You simply can't have a male romantic lead that is abusive toward her, but working with a moral compass with everything else, and not have it feel like your standard contemporary domestic abuser. Throw in all the stuff about ownership and possession, and you have your misogynist, too.
Plus, on a separate point, when you really break the books down. Books one and two are basically the exact same book. So, even when reading the two back to back, you feel the formulaic nature. I can't imagine I'll read another Zanetti book.