After being spoilt by 3Blue1Brown/ViHart/Numberphile, this book doesnt live up to the great standard I am used to.
Half the time I found myself looking up definitions in Wikipedia because the book's definitions were a little too concise...
While the pictures are nice, I found that the authors did little to make the proofs more easily understandable. Rather they were a mixture of natural and formal language. I would have preferred totally formal and well organised proofs, paired with some intuition and explanation via language/visuals.
I struggled to get through this book, I struggled to care. There were few real world examples (at least not enough for me).
For example, to sample a random topic; some regular graphs can be factored into subgraphs. Cool... Maybe I would be more interested if the idea was quite general (you showed me that the factorization can be used as a basis for describing arbitrary graphs), or that there is a real world use, or that the theorems could be connected to other types of math (abstract algebra and symmetry, eigen analysis, ...).
Also, there was a decent focus on the mathematicians of group theory, giving some of their history and biographies. Neither good nor bad.
I guess I am still yet to be inspired and excited by graph theory, at least as presented in this book. To be fair, I didnt really engage much with the book, the exercises etc.