What do you think?
Rate this book
Shannon Matthews - Betrayed From Birth
The full story of one of the most shocking crimes of the twenty-first century, now the subject of a BBC drama, The Moorside, starring Sheridan Smith.
On 19 February 2008, a nine-year-old girl disappeared while making her way home from a school swimming trip. The 999 call made by her mother alerted the police to the nine-year-old's disappearance and sparked the search for Shannon Matthews that spread from the Dewsbury estate where she lived across the north of England. The story dominated newspaper headlines and television news for the weeks that followed and there was even an offer of a GBP 50,000 reward for the person who found Shannon.
Twenty-four days later, Shannon was found, concealed in the base of a divan bed in a flat about a mile away from her home in West Yorkshire. The truth that unfolded over the subsequent weeks horrified the public, who had sympathised with the seemingly stricken mother and even helped in the search for Shannon. It transpired that the supposed kidnap of the innocent girl had been a wicked hoax dreamed up by her own mother, Karen Matthews, in league with an accomplice, her stepfather's uncle, Michael Donovan. For almost three weeks, she was kept hidden in his home and given temazepam and travel sickness tablets to subdue her. While Shannon suffered this horrendous ordeal, her captors came up with a plan to release her in Dewsbury Market, and for Donovan to find her and claim the reward money. Shannon was finally discovered when neighbours told police that they had heard a child's footsteps coming from Donovan's flat.
Shannon Betrayed from Birth examines the investigation and its repercussions for an innocent girl caught in the lies and greed of those supposed to be caring for her and the community that they deceived.
On 19 February 2008, a nine-year-old girl disappeared while making her way home from a school swimming trip. The 999 call made by her mother alerted the police to the nine-year-old's disappearance and sparked the search for Shannon Matthews that spread from the Dewsbury estate where she lived across the north of England. The story dominated newspaper headlines and television news for the weeks that followed and there was even an offer of a GBP 50,000 reward for the person who found Shannon.
Twenty-four days later, Shannon was found, concealed in the base of a divan bed in a flat about a mile away from her home in West Yorkshire. The truth that unfolded over the subsequent weeks horrified the public, who had sympathised with the seemingly stricken mother and even helped in the search for Shannon. It transpired that the supposed kidnap of the innocent girl had been a wicked hoax dreamed up by her own mother, Karen Matthews, in league with an accomplice, her stepfather's uncle, Michael Donovan. For almost three weeks, she was kept hidden in his home and given temazepam and travel sickness tablets to subdue her. While Shannon suffered this horrendous ordeal, her captors came up with a plan to release her in Dewsbury Market, and for Donovan to find her and claim the reward money. Shannon was finally discovered when neighbours told police that they had heard a child's footsteps coming from Donovan's flat.
Shannon Betrayed from Birth examines the investigation and its repercussions for an innocent girl caught in the lies and greed of those supposed to be caring for her and the community that they deceived.
242 pages, Kindle Edition
Published November 2, 2009
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 2 of 2 reviews
March 9, 2026
This book took me quite a while to read, and I considered not completing it, but was stubborn and made it to the end.
I've read a good deal of true crime books, and most of them keep you on the edge of your seat, or at least, retaining interest even during the drier bits; John Glatt and Ann Rule are good examples of this.
This one was not.
The book started out fairly strong, but dwindled down to dull prose, repetition, and details that had me feel like I was trying to force down dry toast. A book about such an intriguing case should not be so boring, but this one certainly was not fast paced or exciting.
While I'm aware that some aspects of investigations etc are not the most exciting, this book reads more like a outline of a sequence of events and an opinion piece than like it was written with the reader in mind. A good author writes so well you feel like they are speaking to you, even if it is not in the first person. This one read like the author didn't have the faintest idea about..or didn't care..who would read it when they were finished. Of course, your mileage may vary, but that was my impression; and that's from a total nerd who reads case studies at leisure, so glean from that what you will.
The class prejudices in the book were very apparent. Karen Matthews, the woman that most of the book centres on, is a low-income Yorkshire woman with a difficult past (in the eyes of the world, that is.) She has a borderline IQ level (and we all know how accurate those are../sarcasm), grew up in poverty, dropped out of school, and has six children by seven different men, or something like that. Karen is now living with a man called Craig, and some of her children, others either with relatives or living in foster care (from what I recall). Karen is characterized as a stereotype of someone on income assistance/welfare benefits; the author reminds us over and over again that Karen spends her days parked on her sofa, watching hours of TV and/or going on the internet, spending money on alcohol, junk food, and cigarettes that she supposedly chain-smokes like a living chimney. We are also constantly reminded about Karen's appearance, which is described as overweight, slovenly, pale and "gormless".
Karen, Craig, and the children live in "council housing", which is the UK term for what North Americans call public/gov't/subsidized housing.The author oddly brings to the forefront the very real situation of class prejudice in Britain (and elsewhere), but at the same time, seems to be perpetuating those prejudices by their not so charitable description of Karen and her neighbours.
Karen is described as a lazy parent, not interacting with the kids that much, and there are conflicting reports over whether they look neat and clean or are filthy and smelly when they go to school. Maybe it's both. Social Services has become involved a couple of times, but could not find evidence of abuse.
Craig is described as 10 years younger than Karen, not very bright, and spending his days the same way she does, sitting on the couch and smoking or drinking. I believe Craig is the step parent to the children.
Don't get me wrong. Karen and Craig certainly aren't parents of the year, and what she ultimately does is despicable, but I found that the author was often playing up the idea that these were poor, negligent parents with low IQ's who were "lazy", and more than hinting that this is what the "council" people were like. The author contrasts the media coverage of Madeline McCann's disappearance with that of Karen's daughter, Shannon Matthews, and mentions how many felt that the McCanns' , being doctors with comfortable lives, got more coverage due to class prejudice. I'd agree with that..it's also known as "missing white woman" syndrome among women of colour, referring to how white women going missing get far more attention than minorities.
But, the way the author contrasted the two.."slim, attractive" Kate vs "fat, slovenly " Karen (to paraphrase), was quite insulting. There was too much emphasis on what the people looked like and what their economic/personal lifestyle was than on their actions. I also thought it was gross that at one point, the author says that Shannon was not "cute" like Madeline, so didn't get as much attention. Photos of Shannon prove that's not true, but even if it were, judging a nine year old's appearance is just gross.
In short, the story tells us some background info about Karen , Craig Meehan, and Craig's uncle, Michael Donovan. The description of Donovan is probably the least charitable in the book, which is saying a lot; we hear about how he looks "Creepy", how those that had assessed him wondered how he ever learned to drive when he was learning or intellectually disabled, remarking that he didn't , for example, know how to use an oven, and focusing on his weight loss and gaunt appearance in court that made him look even "creepier".I don't think I have time to explain all that is wrong with that.
Karen is in debt and desperate for money. She hatches a scheme with Michael that they will stage a kidnapping of her nine year old daughter, Shannon. Michael will pick up Shannon and hide her at his home until the reward money reaches 50 thousand, and then they will "find" her and collect the money.
Michael picks up Shannon after her swim outing at school, telling her they're going to the fair, which broke my heart, especially when Shannon was ok with just going to his house because the fair was "cancelled due to weather" according to Michael.
At Michael's house, Shannon has a bizarre set of rules that are printed all over the apartment, is allowed to play Super Mario and watch some tv, and is horrifyingly kept drugged and sedated so she is disoriented. Michael also suspends something like a leash from the ceiling so Shannon cannot go too far, which is stomach-churning.
Yorkshire police and beyond go into high gear looking for Shannon. They want to ensure that they are not accused of being prejudiced against her due to her background. Funds are collected, t shirts distributed, streets combed with cadaver dogs. They have vigils and press conferences. People notice Karen acting oddly, i.e. sobbing when the camera is on her and then switching back to her usual self when it's off. Karen's also seen making inappropriate jokes and placing priority on getting her benefit cheque cashed rather than worrying about Shannon. It's disturbing to some of the police, but it's not enough to form a real basis for suspicion. Karen's neighbours staunchly defend her and the author does mention how the council communities tend to stick together.
Through a series of tips, Shannon is found after 24 days of going missing, aeons for a missing child case. She's found hiding in the hollow space under a bed in Michael's home, along with Michael, when police arrived. They learn of her abuse as I mentioned, but thankfully it does not sound as if Michael was sexually assaulting her.
Craig is arrested around this time for having possession of child sexual abuse imagery on his computer, and gets a disturbingly small sentence, most of which was time served. Karen goes back and forth condemning him and then claiming he was innocent. Craig is fired from his job at a fish shop as a result.
Very little is said about Shannon, except that she is in a safe place and kept from her mother while they investigate. The first huge red flag noticed by detectives is that Karen seems content to view her daughter through a 2 way mirror and not see her when she is found, and only remarks, "She's got new clothes on" when she sees her.
Karen's once stalwart friends start to suspect her, and agree with the detective to confront her with the detective present. Karen spills out the truth..sort of. She claims she was planning to leave Craig, who she now says is abusive (and prior called him her "rock" and that he was all she had to keep her strong.) and that Shannon was only supposed to be there "Temporarily" while Karen left Craig. This phony story folds like a house of cards.
When Karen is finally found guilty and sentenced, she only gets around 6 years ,much of which is time served.
Michael is also found guilty and is the brunt of harassment at the prison due to his being known as a child kidnapper.
We don't learn what becomes of Shannon, except that she is somewhere safe and her identity is protected. She would be an adult today. I've seen interviews with one of her sisters and a childhood friend, they don't really mention her, but I hope she is well.
One telling line from the book is when the author suggests that a lot of people weren't aware that people like Karen existed..not that she arranged to have her own child kidnapped, but her lifestyle while living in poverty. I really rolled my eyes at that one. British people, like anywhere else in the world, are aware there's poor people and likely how they live. That was just ridiculous.
Curious, I looked up photos of Karen, Craig, Michael, and Shannon. To me, Karen looked quite ordinary, not the unattractive "slob" that she is painted to be in the book. Craig looks like an ordinary guy. Shannon is a cute little girl. Michael does look haunted and have an unusual appearance, but they are not the spectres that the author made them out to be.
The book seemed to do the opposite of what it claimed to be trying to do in certain spots; the author was pointing out class bias, and in the same book, heck, often in the same line, plays into the stereotypes by posting judgmental info about Karen etc. The author does not do this by quoting, but through their own descriptions.
The book made me think of one I read in University, "Manufacturing Bad Mothers", by Karen Swift, which discusses how the press and society play into the stereotypes of what a "bad" parent looks and acts like, and doesn't take into account other factors. It's a fascinating read.
If you want to know more about the story, I'd suggest checking out some of the documentaries online and skipping this book. But, as LeVar Burton always said on "Reading Rainbow"; "You don't have to take my word for it!"
I've read a good deal of true crime books, and most of them keep you on the edge of your seat, or at least, retaining interest even during the drier bits; John Glatt and Ann Rule are good examples of this.
This one was not.
The book started out fairly strong, but dwindled down to dull prose, repetition, and details that had me feel like I was trying to force down dry toast. A book about such an intriguing case should not be so boring, but this one certainly was not fast paced or exciting.
While I'm aware that some aspects of investigations etc are not the most exciting, this book reads more like a outline of a sequence of events and an opinion piece than like it was written with the reader in mind. A good author writes so well you feel like they are speaking to you, even if it is not in the first person. This one read like the author didn't have the faintest idea about..or didn't care..who would read it when they were finished. Of course, your mileage may vary, but that was my impression; and that's from a total nerd who reads case studies at leisure, so glean from that what you will.
The class prejudices in the book were very apparent. Karen Matthews, the woman that most of the book centres on, is a low-income Yorkshire woman with a difficult past (in the eyes of the world, that is.) She has a borderline IQ level (and we all know how accurate those are../sarcasm), grew up in poverty, dropped out of school, and has six children by seven different men, or something like that. Karen is now living with a man called Craig, and some of her children, others either with relatives or living in foster care (from what I recall). Karen is characterized as a stereotype of someone on income assistance/welfare benefits; the author reminds us over and over again that Karen spends her days parked on her sofa, watching hours of TV and/or going on the internet, spending money on alcohol, junk food, and cigarettes that she supposedly chain-smokes like a living chimney. We are also constantly reminded about Karen's appearance, which is described as overweight, slovenly, pale and "gormless".
Karen, Craig, and the children live in "council housing", which is the UK term for what North Americans call public/gov't/subsidized housing.The author oddly brings to the forefront the very real situation of class prejudice in Britain (and elsewhere), but at the same time, seems to be perpetuating those prejudices by their not so charitable description of Karen and her neighbours.
Karen is described as a lazy parent, not interacting with the kids that much, and there are conflicting reports over whether they look neat and clean or are filthy and smelly when they go to school. Maybe it's both. Social Services has become involved a couple of times, but could not find evidence of abuse.
Craig is described as 10 years younger than Karen, not very bright, and spending his days the same way she does, sitting on the couch and smoking or drinking. I believe Craig is the step parent to the children.
Don't get me wrong. Karen and Craig certainly aren't parents of the year, and what she ultimately does is despicable, but I found that the author was often playing up the idea that these were poor, negligent parents with low IQ's who were "lazy", and more than hinting that this is what the "council" people were like. The author contrasts the media coverage of Madeline McCann's disappearance with that of Karen's daughter, Shannon Matthews, and mentions how many felt that the McCanns' , being doctors with comfortable lives, got more coverage due to class prejudice. I'd agree with that..it's also known as "missing white woman" syndrome among women of colour, referring to how white women going missing get far more attention than minorities.
But, the way the author contrasted the two.."slim, attractive" Kate vs "fat, slovenly " Karen (to paraphrase), was quite insulting. There was too much emphasis on what the people looked like and what their economic/personal lifestyle was than on their actions. I also thought it was gross that at one point, the author says that Shannon was not "cute" like Madeline, so didn't get as much attention. Photos of Shannon prove that's not true, but even if it were, judging a nine year old's appearance is just gross.
In short, the story tells us some background info about Karen , Craig Meehan, and Craig's uncle, Michael Donovan. The description of Donovan is probably the least charitable in the book, which is saying a lot; we hear about how he looks "Creepy", how those that had assessed him wondered how he ever learned to drive when he was learning or intellectually disabled, remarking that he didn't , for example, know how to use an oven, and focusing on his weight loss and gaunt appearance in court that made him look even "creepier".I don't think I have time to explain all that is wrong with that.
Karen is in debt and desperate for money. She hatches a scheme with Michael that they will stage a kidnapping of her nine year old daughter, Shannon. Michael will pick up Shannon and hide her at his home until the reward money reaches 50 thousand, and then they will "find" her and collect the money.
Michael picks up Shannon after her swim outing at school, telling her they're going to the fair, which broke my heart, especially when Shannon was ok with just going to his house because the fair was "cancelled due to weather" according to Michael.
At Michael's house, Shannon has a bizarre set of rules that are printed all over the apartment, is allowed to play Super Mario and watch some tv, and is horrifyingly kept drugged and sedated so she is disoriented. Michael also suspends something like a leash from the ceiling so Shannon cannot go too far, which is stomach-churning.
Yorkshire police and beyond go into high gear looking for Shannon. They want to ensure that they are not accused of being prejudiced against her due to her background. Funds are collected, t shirts distributed, streets combed with cadaver dogs. They have vigils and press conferences. People notice Karen acting oddly, i.e. sobbing when the camera is on her and then switching back to her usual self when it's off. Karen's also seen making inappropriate jokes and placing priority on getting her benefit cheque cashed rather than worrying about Shannon. It's disturbing to some of the police, but it's not enough to form a real basis for suspicion. Karen's neighbours staunchly defend her and the author does mention how the council communities tend to stick together.
Through a series of tips, Shannon is found after 24 days of going missing, aeons for a missing child case. She's found hiding in the hollow space under a bed in Michael's home, along with Michael, when police arrived. They learn of her abuse as I mentioned, but thankfully it does not sound as if Michael was sexually assaulting her.
Craig is arrested around this time for having possession of child sexual abuse imagery on his computer, and gets a disturbingly small sentence, most of which was time served. Karen goes back and forth condemning him and then claiming he was innocent. Craig is fired from his job at a fish shop as a result.
Very little is said about Shannon, except that she is in a safe place and kept from her mother while they investigate. The first huge red flag noticed by detectives is that Karen seems content to view her daughter through a 2 way mirror and not see her when she is found, and only remarks, "She's got new clothes on" when she sees her.
Karen's once stalwart friends start to suspect her, and agree with the detective to confront her with the detective present. Karen spills out the truth..sort of. She claims she was planning to leave Craig, who she now says is abusive (and prior called him her "rock" and that he was all she had to keep her strong.) and that Shannon was only supposed to be there "Temporarily" while Karen left Craig. This phony story folds like a house of cards.
When Karen is finally found guilty and sentenced, she only gets around 6 years ,much of which is time served.
Michael is also found guilty and is the brunt of harassment at the prison due to his being known as a child kidnapper.
We don't learn what becomes of Shannon, except that she is somewhere safe and her identity is protected. She would be an adult today. I've seen interviews with one of her sisters and a childhood friend, they don't really mention her, but I hope she is well.
One telling line from the book is when the author suggests that a lot of people weren't aware that people like Karen existed..not that she arranged to have her own child kidnapped, but her lifestyle while living in poverty. I really rolled my eyes at that one. British people, like anywhere else in the world, are aware there's poor people and likely how they live. That was just ridiculous.
Curious, I looked up photos of Karen, Craig, Michael, and Shannon. To me, Karen looked quite ordinary, not the unattractive "slob" that she is painted to be in the book. Craig looks like an ordinary guy. Shannon is a cute little girl. Michael does look haunted and have an unusual appearance, but they are not the spectres that the author made them out to be.
The book seemed to do the opposite of what it claimed to be trying to do in certain spots; the author was pointing out class bias, and in the same book, heck, often in the same line, plays into the stereotypes by posting judgmental info about Karen etc. The author does not do this by quoting, but through their own descriptions.
The book made me think of one I read in University, "Manufacturing Bad Mothers", by Karen Swift, which discusses how the press and society play into the stereotypes of what a "bad" parent looks and acts like, and doesn't take into account other factors. It's a fascinating read.
If you want to know more about the story, I'd suggest checking out some of the documentaries online and skipping this book. But, as LeVar Burton always said on "Reading Rainbow"; "You don't have to take my word for it!"
This entire review has been hidden because of spoilers.
December 20, 2025
This was a difficult read, but an important one. It left me feeling heartbroken, angry and reflective. Rose Martin writes with care and restraint, allowing the facts to speak for themselves. This is not an easy book, but it is one that deserves to be read.
Displaying 1 - 2 of 2 reviews