Summary: Overall a creative and enjoyable book, with a few disappointments. Still 4 stars as most stories were great and I would be happy to recommend it to others overall.
Details:
I enjoyed reading this book. I think this is a creative book, and I think anyone who enjoys literary fiction, folklore, or old fairy tales a la Grimms or Anderson would also enjoy this book and I would recommend it to them. It’s inspired me to buy another book on UK folklore to understand it better.
I’d also recommend this book to someone who wants something creative and occasionally a bit “out there” but in a short space of time. No story took me more than 30 minutes to read, and most only took 10-20 minutes. This was the perfect length to add some reading time into my lunch or coffee breaks for work.
The quality of the short, literary stories that comprise the book varied. Some stories I read twice and would read again, others I was disappointed in.
Below is my take on the individual stories. I tried not to give spoilers, but some do have hints so consider yourself warned.
These Our Monsters:
The plural 1st person POV took some time to adjust to, but once I did I really enjoyed it.
I then read it again and loved it even more. I see why it is the titular story, it is unique and thought provoking and a great way to kick off the book.
The end of the book has some expanded details ano it the legend behind this story and it is very intriguing!
Great Pucklands:
Well written, but to me does not fit within the book. The fairies, the “monsters” of this short story, are barely mentioned and play no significant role in the plot.
It also has thinly-veiled jabs towards religion, which I found jarring. If the author considers faith to be a type of lore, why treat it negatively in a book of lore? I found it very off-putting in this context. In another book, I wouldn’t have minded but it felt out of place here.
Goibert of the Moon:
I LOVED this one. The author did an amazing job creating and presenting such a complex character. I’d have followed this character anywhere plot-wise.
The character was clearly strange, and someone who, if I met in person, I wouldn’t have thought I’d want to spend time with, but all the same in the book I am moved for him and want to see him helped.
His connection with the “monster” is heartfelt and really made me want to believe in it.
The hand under the stone:
Great characters, set up, and incorporation of lore. But a nihilistic ending that takes the wind out of it.
I was hoping for a twist of some kind at the end, but instead what is revealed is exactly what I expected, but without any magic in it. I found it nihilistic, which I don’t like. I don’t inherently mind sad endings, but I need them to be meaningful and make me think, which this ending did not do for me. I see no point in reading something that makes me sad without also making me think. Life does that often enough without books doing it too.
I’d still say to give the story a read. If it was a bad story I wouldn’t have minded a disappointing ending, it is because I loved the set up and characters that I really wanted the ending to live up to it. That’s an accomplishment in such a short story, bravo to the author for that.
The dark thread:
Another one which I really enjoyed. It has a sense of mystery to it and made me want to keep reading. I was actually sad when it was over, I would have happily read a novel about the characters in this short story!
Breakynecky
I found this one a disappointment. It felt too long, because it didn’t have enough story. It felt more that the author had fallen in love with a place and wanted just to describe it, and the sprinkled in a few bare elements of plot to try to stitch it together. On a human level, I completely understanding falling in love with a location and wanting to capture it with description, but as a reader when I pay for a story I want more from it than that.
This, like the rest, was a short story and yet I could have skipped most of it and still gotten the message of the story. You shouldn’t be able to do that. With such a short format, every paragraph needs to be important.
The Loathly Lady:
One of my favorites from the book! Was “weird” in the way Arthurian legends are supposed to be, but given a modern twist with lovely writing.
Out of the whole book, this one to me felt most true to the premise of this collection, it truly is a new version of a folktale.
Capture:
I personally wasn’t able to get into this one. The writing style felt dense, and it made it hard to follow what was happening, which incidentally, didn’t appear to be much. The focus was more within the characters mind rather than on plot. Of course the progress of a character’s mind can be a plot in itself but I don’t think in this example it was able to do so satisfactorily.
I *think* it was supposed to have some coming of age style commentary in it, but the thread got lost. That said, the characters were clearly very well thought-out. The author’s style is perhaps better suited to a longer format where the detail they want to put into the characters’ personalities and perspective can be done without sacrificing plot due to strict length limitations.