"The Race to Be Myself" is a memoir of cocky (in both a good and bad way) defiance in the face of the mud Semenya has had to forge her way through in order to arrive at who she is today. Understandably, the book is a completely one-sided perspective of the author's fight for her right to run (as a woman) at the highest level in the world. It is also her stated purpose of speaking out and setting the record straight.
Semenya's name will likely ring a bell for most people, whether they be interested in athletics or not. She is arguably the most famous intersex person in the world (although she herself disagrees with the term). Because of this, and as someone who was disgusted by how she has been treated in and by the world media, I was very curious to hear her side of the story.
First off, I was happy to read that she appears to have found peace, happiness, and contentedness after the whirlwind that has been her life since she practically exploded onto the scene of world athletics in 2009.
Secondly, I think it relevant to mention that I personally, going into this book, 1) felt that Semenya should be/have been allowed to compete in women's competitions, 2) had/have serious reservations against allowing male-to-female athletes to compete in women's competitions in most (but not all) sports/events, and 3) firmly believe that these are two separate issues (which Semenya would likely agree with based on the not so PC comments/arguments in the book), and 4) was/is disgusted by how nasty, full of personal attacks and accusations, and public the debates around both these issues have been and remains. In other words, I was very sympathetic to Semenya's experiences and cause.
After (and while) reading, her life story is an interesting one; how she describes what she was put through, abhorrent; her obstacles and her fight, intimidating; and where she has landed, inspiring. The book itself, however, is not very good. Similarly, my impression of her after reading is a more negative one than the one I came into the book with. I'm also not sure if what I have read is reflective at all, of who she really is - and if it is, I don't think I would like her all that much (this doesn't matter, of course, but I do think it's indicative of a not-so-good memoir that my impression of the author deteriorates upon hearing her story in her words).
So, my (main) issues with the book are primarily:
1. The writing, simply, isn't very good.
2. The reasoning surrounding a pretty complicated issue is reductive at best. Mostly Semenya reduces things to frequently subjective rights and wrongs, and she appears to view the world in distinct blacks and whites.
3. She also comes across, as many professional athletes do, as a bit of a prick (even when she's right, and in more ways than the self-centeredness she admits in the book). Yes, this is sometimes warranted and often understandable in light of how she herself has been treated, but it also pre-dates her entry onto the world stage.
4. There's a disturbing feeling throughout the book that the different Semenyas (child, youth, and adult) and their circumstances and experiences are constructs and projections. I'm not sure how much of this is due to the writing itself or not, but it definitely made it difficult to connect with her.
The biggest issue, in terms of impact, is arguably how the book does a disservice to the discussions surrounding the debate of who should and shouldn't be allowed to compete in women's sports, and why or why not. There is zero honest discussion on this. Essentially, Semenya's argument is that she is a woman (as evidenced by, in her words, that she has a vagina) and she should be allowed to compete as a woman, period. Whether one agrees with this or not (and again, I definitely agree on the former - albeit for somewhat different reasons than that she has a vagina and sits down to pee - and definitely lean in agreement on the latter myself), it's just not that simple.
Now, I can understand the defensive posture on this, especially considering what she's been through. However, something she briefly mentions very early on and then never touches on again, women's sports is a protected category. This is highly relevant since that, by its very definition, leads to discussions of who should be included in that category. I think it's a glaring omission that his book doesn't even try to give the impression of an honest discussion on any of the arguments surrounding this. I think the reason behind that omission - unlike the larger issue - is simple; Semenya, in no way, shape, or form, allows for that there is a discussion to be had. Consequently, she doesn't, and instead frames all arguments and questions as unwarranted and vicious attacks on her, her family, and others like her (some of the discussions/arguments are, of course, but that doesn't mean that everything is).
I do want to clarify that I, myself, am very unsure exactly where to draw lines (or if, even), especially since I do not have answers that I find satisfactory - and I am unaware of any definitive conclusions from research of where to draw said lines. But considering the stakes and margins of professional sports, I think it dishonest to not at least allow for a debate. In fact, I think professional sports, where fractions of seconds can make or break an athlete, is the only arena where this matters. In every other aspect of society and life, this discussion should be entirely irrelevant. Respecting people and their privacy should not be up for debate.
And this, of course, is where this book is the strongest. Because, even when the debate is relevant, respect and discretion must be the default. What Semenya went through, how she was treated by sports organizations and media, was utterly disgusting. I don't always agree with Semenya's take on things in "The Race to Be Myself," but the fact that the title is appropriate... that's reason alone to read this book. But with tempered expectations.