Wild Cards—This collection of shor t stories is generally good, though, there are some things that bother me about it, but the quality of writing and much of the content are things that I like in stories, especially short stories, as are the subjects highlighted by the writing. It’s not all done as I prefer however. I’ll get into that shortly.
The premise of “Wild Cards” is that an advanced (in some ways) alien culture had become aware of earth and, because earthlings had similar physiology to theirs, wanted to experiment on how to unleash and improve upon some genetic talents. One of these aliens was opposed to this kind of experimentation and set out to stop them. In the process, he destroyed the alien ship but the germs cell had already made it to the planet surface. In a very good short story by Martin himself, despite the best efforts of World War II Hero “Jet Boy,” an evil comic book thug releases the virus on New York City (Manhattan) and people start mutating. Fun fun.
Most die from the virus. The next largest group is affected by the virus in unusual ways and gain powers manifest in their own bodies un grotesque ways. Later we find out that this form and power is plucked from their psyche by the virus and overdeveloped, so, in a way, their lifestyle chooses their fate for them. Jokers are haunted, feared creatures who become second class citizens very similar to Black Americans during the Second World War. The smallest group are those who become “Aces.” Aces keep their human form, mostly, and also have a power. The distinction of what makes a person an Ace and what makes them a Joker is generally how humanlike they remain.
The world setting for Wild Cards was very reminiscent of the setting for the illustrated novel and cult icon “The Watchmen” series that was written towards the end of the cold war and was set in a decidedly dark earth where crime was at an all-time high and belief and faith in the good nature of fellow humans was at an all-time low. All of the stories save, one, shared this view of the dark underbelly of man and, perhaps of the United States in particularly.
I’m not going to list each story separately. There were a lot of stories, for two reasons. 1) There are a lot of them and not all of them are memorable, some of them are redundant and some bring up points of our society that I rather disagree with (more on that later). 2. There is a rumor that George R. Martin, the author of “Game of Thrones” had a heavy hand editing these. I don’t know if that’s true, but it is true that, especially towards the end, with one exception, I had a hard time telling when we had changed authors and when we were getting more of the same story. That lends itself to feed the rumor and, yep, you guessed it, more on that later.
Okay, the general lowdown on Wild Cards. “Wild Cards” is advertised as sort of a comic book thieves world. As in the famous “Thieves’ World” series each of these short stories is set on the same developed story earth and can (and does) involve some cross characterization where one author builds on, or uses a character started by another. This formula worked very well in “Thieves’ World” which was edited by Robert Lynn Asprin. For the most part it works well here. There are two differences between these two anthologies of similar design. First the stories in Thieves’ world each maintained their own integrity and the different styles of the authors were easy to distinguish. This made Thieves’ World” a rich anthology and added to the fun. Second, there was more interaction with characters in “Thieves’ World” and more overlapping of stories. Though the chronology of each story seem more like reading the movie “Memento” where the scenes worked backwards in time and were sometimes hard to follow, it was more like reading chapters of a book than individual short stories.
Most of the stories meshed so well, that you could not tell when Ms. Snodgrass (Martin’s co-editor at large) or Martin’s stories started and others by different authors began. I liked the world concept because it had a wonderful, artistic flair to it. This dark side of humanity, the mental depression that followed a huge important victory of Nazi Germany and Imperial Japan was well made and in a way I liked turned the general view of the late 1940s and 1950s on its ear. The world building was bold, if dark and, socially charged, even if you didn’t agree with the issues, and wildly imaginative given the nature of “jokers” and how they changed the world, well New York City anyway.
I particularly enjoyed how the authors, or George Martin and Ms. Snodgrass, infiltrated McCarthy-ism and the Wild Cards. In this alternate earth, McCarthy was not only after Communists, he was after anyone with a power, be they joker or ace. They also managed to replace what we normally think of when we observe racism with a different kind of prejudice of Normal Human vs. Wild Card. Slums and Ghettoes were now populated by Jokers and Aces and those fighting for “Human Rights” for all. To me this is what I call well done. By deemphasizing the story of the plight of Africian Americans (without eliminating them from the landscape) or by playing minority America against Wild Card America we are able to look into the heart of racism for what it is, without those personal dilemmas that cloud the issue now. We can, if you’ll excuse the expression, “call a spade a spade,” without insulting Americans who live every day trying to support equal opportunity while fighting a daily battle with embedded bias in their character that they have yet to acknowledge or realize. In many ways, this is like crossing the Book, Thieves’ World with the wonderful Academy Award Winning Movie “Crash.”
I even like the way martin wrote in the Counsel for Un-American Activities and had them turn on the Aces who had, for all intents and purposes, served as heroes with questionable principles until failing to turn Mao Tse Tung in China. The marriage between the hunt for Communists by McCarthy and the wild paranoia over Jokers and Aces that fit well with McCarthy-ism. There are two important points that almost nobody gets when looking at this era and this book, like so many others, failed to get as well. That is, (A) there really were militant communists and socialists groups operating in the US and Europe in the 1950s. Because McCarthy used a broad brush to paint any communist or socialist as an enemy of the state, he wound up violating the rights of, or defacto authorizing the violation of rights for thousands of harmless, Americans simply because they had a different philosophy. I wouldn’t give credit to McCarthy, and I’m embarrassed to say “my country, right or wrong, still my country” when it involves such impulsive paranoid thinking as standing up a “Counsel on Un-American Activities.” My understanding of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights is that, as long as you are operating within the law, all political activities, even the distasteful ones, such as Nazis and white supremists, are actual, American Activities. It should never be wrong, in the United States, to espouse a political opinion, or an opinion on how the country should be run, especially if it is not popular. I also believe that there is enough “good” in the average citizen and enough knowledge or willingness to learn in the average citizen that, if they listened to Nazis and White Supremists spout their hate speech and ideas of government that they would ultimately have less support, not more support every time they speak or organize. The problem here is that everyone wants the Government, or Communists, or Nazis or Jokers or Aces to be painted in two colours... black and white. There is a lot of gray in the world and very little white and only slightly more black than white.
We have known about the militant communists and socialists since the Spanish Revolution that started well before Second World War. What is hard to display is that our government supported those and helped them get into and involved in the Spanish Revolution even to the point that they drove out and villainies Democratic Socialists who, by nature are more like Bernie Sanders than Carl Marx. These are groups that included the Famed Author Arthur Blair, better known as George Orwell. This was a political party, not a revolutionary warlike group. Of course an even more dangerous group of radicals won that affair, the Stalinist Communists backed by Russia. Yes, (see my review of 1984) I think Orwell wrote 1984 about his experience in the Spanish Civil War and the decades to follow. Even as late as 1994 the shots have been fired (metaphorical shots mostly) between Democratic Socialists and Stalinist Communists that had once been supported by the United States. Stalin ordered the history of the Spanish Civil war re-written just like Wilbur Smith was assigned to re-write history at the Ministry of Truth in Orwell’s book.
My point with this is, that substituting a new vision of 1950s America and highlighting old atrocities with a new black and white version of events, even if it’s fictitious only allows for gray areas on one side. Contrary to popular belief, black cannot hide gray any more than white can.
And always the government is villainised for being elitist and prejudice as a governing body, with no acknowledgement that there was an actual threat, albeit a relatively small one, that somebody should have been guarding against. Without exploration of the idea, our martyrs are left gray, and the government black so no hero goes untarnished and the government is again incapable of doing any good.
B) McCarthy’s paranoia is likely do to what we call Korsikov’s syndrome. He was a barely functioning alcoholic who was struggling to stay alive, actively getting totally bombed on weekends and white knuckling it through the weekly hearings suffering from DTs and other symptoms of withdrawal treated at the Navy Medical Center at Bethesda every Sunday Evening. A person in this condition suffers from paranoia and, is not the best choice for heading a committee that looks at people and possible “un-American activities.” The hearings became so abusive of citizens’ rights and liberties in a major part due to McCarthy’s poor health and advancing substance abuse problems. “Just answer the question, answer the question, let the record show that the witness is not answering the question.”
The other major issue I had, as in “if this was so well written, why give it 3 stars instead of 4 or 5?” is the characterization and use of sex and women. Only one story, set in 1980s depicted a female who was not “overcome” by her power, sanity corrupted, or a helpless used thing. Prostitution was the most notable and discussed profession, joker, nap or Ace. Even as Martyrs the female characters are helpless and hopeless and unable to take command of their own fate or, if they do, they are painted as a villain and an opportunist.
It may be a good artistic part of the darkside of our society to see the value placed on sex. The American obsession with sex and beauty, though often unhealthy, is not always a function of the oppression of women. I’m not going to argue that women haven’t ever gotten an equal shot in the United States as far as choosing their fate or inclusion and getting an equal share of governing and opportunity. In this story, the female characters either did not matter, or were, in some way, addicts, damsels in distress, or prostitutes or all of the above. The few exceptions include Blanche, one of the original Aces who went crazy, and The Invisible Girl (who was really a Marvel Comics Kitty Pride seem-a-like) who turned out to be the only normal super-heroine type in the book in a story that stood out as being unique to the others.
Now, I get the idea that this is characterizing them against modern society and our obsession with beauty and sex and the female form. I get that a poor girl, turned exotic isn’t going to get that job at the cash register at Denny’s. I even get the idea that everybody has to loosen or change their standards in times of intense stress like abject poverty and pandemic, though I don’t agree that means women become prostitutes, it is likely. I could have managed the theme of oppressed women struggling to make it in a world that only values their looks as the 1950s and 1960s often were for so many women. I was giving high praise to this story until I stumbled into “The Succubus.” The depravity was still manageable until the riot when the desire that the Succubus inspired in men flew out of control and she was torn apart in the ensuing enthusiasm. On top of the already thickly spread themes of oppression, sexual value over personal value and uglier themes this was too far over the top.
The problem here is more complex than simply depicting women as only able to effectively care for themselves if they are prostitutes and not finding a broader role for them. It’s compounded by the parallel that has been drawn between how minorities were treated in the same era and these poor women Jokers and Aces. That parallel is as insensitive to minority women as it is to those in the story. Is Martin and the gang suggesting that this was all poor black women could manage, or Hispanics? The association with poverty and opportunity was there, but this is not backed up by reality. Or is this saying that, if they were white women, this is all they can do but Black women and other minorities have other options?
I found the ending of the Succubus and what it meant with the long running distasteful theme of sexuality, perversion and women, so unsettling my estimation of this group of stories dropped from 4.5 stars (I give lots of credit for artistic story telling skill) to barely 3 and even now I’m inclined to look at 2 or 2.5 stars. And, accusations and rumors of heavy handed word-smithing(editing) by Martin and Snodgrass made a lot more sense. For these themes to be so prevalent as they were is hard see as a matter of coincidence or that there is a huge body of sci-fi writers out there who see the plight of women in the same vein so any random selection results in a group that produces such lopsided insensitive writing.
In the second story, written by Roger Zelazny, I wondered why Zelazny had his character pack his bags and head for the hills (actually go into very deep cover). Zelazny’s story stands out as one with a recognizable style, his character was likable, if flawed, and the story had another unique twist on the Wild Card Virus and how it affected everybody. Later, another author (possibly Martin himself) write Zelazny’s character in to the story as an addict who, by the force of addiction trapped himself as a Joker, when he could have been an Ace. I liked twist on Zelazny’s story but , at the same time, I could tell that Zelazny did not write it. Perhaps Zelazny wanted to distance himself from the other stories in the book or the overall plot and theme of the developing narrative.
I’d even say that it is near impossible to tell when one writer stopped writing and another began.
In the end, the story about the man who suspended time and saved Major Powers from the Russians, the Invisible Girl, and the Jet Boy story (first story) along with the strong anti-war themes which, I may not agree with, but I think were well done here, helped me keep this as a 3 star read. There is a lot of “art” in these stories. There is a lot right with them. There is a lot wrong with them. If you like dark themes filled with sex, violence, drugs and strange apparitions and creations, then this is for you. If you want a positive uplifting read, or see themes as less black and white, less degrading towards women that show some positive motion towards hope, this may not be for you.
Read at your own risk.
Warning:
Lots of sex, sex SEX, violence Violence, anger and ugliness. Lots of government paranoia and hoplessness too, all well written but unavoidable.
3.0 stars.