What do you think?
Rate this book


352 pages, Paperback
First published November 11, 2025
I've just finished Project Hanuman by Stewart Hotston, and I'm left with that particular flavour of disappointment that comes from reading something that's good but not quite good enough.
This had been on my radar for a while. I'm a sucker for epic space opera, and the comparisons to Iain M. Banks' Culture novels had me excited. People whose taste I trust were enthusiastic about it. So I went in with high expectations, and that's probably part of the problem. It's not a bad book, it's just not the book I wanted it to be.
The setup is compelling: a galaxy-spanning empire run by AIs, humanity having transcended physicality to exist primarily in "information space", a layer of reality beyond the physical. The Arcology - the name of both the empire and the intelligence that runs it - manipulates information itself as its primary mode of existence. Physical existence is a form of exile, whether chosen or punished. When the Arcology is attacked by another culture that can operate in information space - something that should be impossible - the novel becomes a desperate chase across the universe to save civilisation itself.
On paper, this should be exactly my kind of thing. And there are moments where it really works. The science is interesting, the setting is inventive, and there's a richness to the Indian mythology woven through it (though I suspect I missed a lot of the references and philosophy, not being particularly well-versed in that area). Thematically it's dense with ideas about freedom, humanity, colonialism, and the arrogance of empire.
But the execution lets it down in a few key ways. The writing style is exhausting. It's written in that modern staccato rhythm where everything is broken into single sentences, thoughts never allowed to breathe or develop. Just when you think you're settling into an idea, you're yanked into the next one. For a book dealing with high concept sci-fi, where I really need to understand what "information space" actually is, this becomes a real problem. I need the prose to trust me enough to dwell on things. Instead it loops and repeats, circling the same ideas without deepening them. It felt like it would have benefited from another pass of the editor's red pen.
The bigger structural problem is one of stakes. The novel opens with the end of the world, literally. A ringworld is torn apart across multiple dimensions. It's spectacular and epic and... where do you go from there? The rest of the book is a cat-and-mouse chase across space, structurally reminiscent of that Battlestar Galactica episode where the Cylons return every 33 minutes. But when you start at the top, there's nowhere to escalate to. The stakes remain enormous throughout, but they never rise, and that makes everything feel - I hesitate to say flat, because that implies boring, which this isn't. But there's no arc to the tension. We're at maximum threat from page one, and we stay there.
There's a lot to like here. The characters work, the action is well-executed, and it's doing something relatively original. I enjoyed reading it. But I spent a lot of time wishing it was leaning harder into its strengths - the philosophy, the mythology, the science beneath the spectacle. It's definitely good and I enjoyed my time with it, but my expectations were perhaps a little too high.