A century after his birth and half a century after his death, Malcolm X still speaks to our American condition and to our constant debate about race and belonging. Indeed, it can be argued that he made more of an impact in his afterlife, with his posthumous memoir helping to expose even more people to his story and his message than he managed during the thirty-nine years he had on this planet. And alongside that posthumous legacy, there is the question, still unresolved, of who made the call for his bloody end in February of 1965.
"The Afterlife of Malcolm X," by Mark Whitaker, is not a biography in the traditional sense. It's more of a cultural reckoning with Malcolm's meaning in the wake of his death, when he went from a figure feared by the white majority to an icon beloved by Black communities en masse. Whitaker tells two intersecting stories, really, about the cultural evaluation of Malcolm X and the long investigation into who exactly participated in his murder as well as who may have ordered it. Working these strands into a multi-decade narrative is a challenge, but Whitaker is up to it.
The cultural impact of Malcolm X began long before his death, when he rose to prominence as the spokesman for Elijah Muhammad and the Nation of Islam in the late Fifties. Preaching what many viewed as a separatist, anti-integrationist platform, Malcolm was held in direct contrast to Martin Luther King, Jr. The two men were viewed as rivals, though other books I've read recently show that they had more in common than commentators at the time thought. In time, Malcolm fell out with Muhammad over revelations of the latter's failure to live up to his own moral codes, and at the time of his death had begun to make his own way. He was hard at work on the book that would define him, "The Autobiography of Malcolm X," when he was gunned down on February 21, 1965.
Whitaker shows how, over the decades, Malcolm's legacy was defined by forces both of the right and the left, and how his cultural impact was influenced by factors beyond his family's control (such as the shaping of his narrative by co-author Alex Haley, the cinematic portrait of him in Spike Lee's masterpiece biopic, and multiple biographies by various authors, two of whom were released posthumously by their authors like Malcolm's memoir was). I've read the two books in question, by Manning Marable and Les Payne, as well as the Autobiography, of course. I might say that I'm the one guy in my social or family circle who knows a lot about Malcolm, having asked my mom to buy me a copy of the Autobiography when the film came out (though it took me a few decades to finish it). So this synthesis of cultural history and detailed investigation into the three men who went on trial for Malcolm's murder, was right up my alley.
The story of the murder investigation is the meat of the book, and as such is compelling in its own, true-crime justice-denied kind of way. Three men were brought to trial for the crime, with one man clearly guilty of involvement but two others picked up on a sliver of suspicion. While all three would eventually be granted parole, the two innocent men would not be exonerated until decades after the fact, in no small part due to the efforts of countless people profiled in the book, activists who saw a wrong and tried to right it.
Malcolm X still speaks to the conflicts in our nation, a hundred years after his birth and sixty after his death. "The Afterlife of Malcolm X, " by Mark Whitaker, shows how meaningful his short life was to America, especially as we wrestle with the very problems he spoke out about. It is a timely and necessary examination of his legacy and why he still speaks to us, in various forms.