What do you think?
Rate this book
Inspector Karen Pirie #1
De verre echo
Schotland, december 1978
In een sneeuwstorm diep in de nacht lopen vier studenten met een dronken kop naar huis. Bij toeval komen ze terecht bij het toegetakelde lichaam van een jonge vrouw. Rosie Duff is verkracht en voor dood achtergelaten op een eeuwenoude begraafplaats. En de enige verdachten zijn zij, de vrienden die haar gevonden hebben.
Vijfentwintig jaar later wordt de nooit opgeloste zaak-Rosie Duff opnieuw door de politie ter hand genomen. Maar tegelijkertijd gaat er iemand met een heel ander idee over gerechtigheid tot actie over.
In een sneeuwstorm diep in de nacht lopen vier studenten met een dronken kop naar huis. Bij toeval komen ze terecht bij het toegetakelde lichaam van een jonge vrouw. Rosie Duff is verkracht en voor dood achtergelaten op een eeuwenoude begraafplaats. En de enige verdachten zijn zij, de vrienden die haar gevonden hebben.
Vijfentwintig jaar later wordt de nooit opgeloste zaak-Rosie Duff opnieuw door de politie ter hand genomen. Maar tegelijkertijd gaat er iemand met een heel ander idee over gerechtigheid tot actie over.
432 pages, Paperback
First published January 1, 2003
2211 people are currently reading
11060 people want to read
About the author
Val McDermid
308 books5,368 followersVal McDermid is a No. 1 bestseller whose novels have been translated into more than thirty languages, and have sold over eleven million copies.
She has won many awards internationally, including the CWA Gold Dagger for best crime novel of the year and the LA Times Book of the Year Award. She was inducted into the ITV3 Crime Thriller Awards Hall of Fame in 2009 and was the recipient of the CWA Cartier Diamond Dagger for 2010. In 2011 she received the Lambda Literary Foundation Pioneer Award.
She writes full time and divides her time between Cheshire and Edinburgh.
She has won many awards internationally, including the CWA Gold Dagger for best crime novel of the year and the LA Times Book of the Year Award. She was inducted into the ITV3 Crime Thriller Awards Hall of Fame in 2009 and was the recipient of the CWA Cartier Diamond Dagger for 2010. In 2011 she received the Lambda Literary Foundation Pioneer Award.
She writes full time and divides her time between Cheshire and Edinburgh.
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 30 of 1,542 reviews
September 27, 2016
As she begins the Karen Pirie series, McDermid offers readers a wonderful introduction to another fast-paced novel and lays the groundwork for what could be an exciting few stories. Scotland, 1978: After a night of drinking, drugging, and partying, Alex Gilbey and his three closest mates stumble upon Rosie Duff, who's been raped and stabbed, bleeding out in the middle of a blizzard. By the time the authorities are alerted and brought to the scene, Duff has died and there is little doubt that the boys must have some involvement. All four adamantly deny anything to do with the murder, though they must admit knowing Duff as the barmaid from their local watering hole. While never able to nail them down to anything concrete, everyone whispers that these four got away with the perfect crime. After twenty-five years, DC Karen Pirie is assigned the cold case review of the Duff murder, which she begins in earnest. A man by the name of Graham Macfadyen comes out of the woodwork to admit that he is a relative of Rosie Duff and wants her killers brought to justice. He is certain that Gilbey and his friends are responsible, hoping that new DNA technology can bring about their eventual arrest and conviction. While the investigation brings back old and awkward memories for Gilbey, he is further unsettled when two of his friends die under mysterious circumstances and a sinister reminder of the Duff case appears at their memorial services. Gilbey cannot rest until the killer is finally put behind bars and the stalking of his friends is put to rest. Could Macfadyen be using this investigation to get the justice that Duff deserved or does he have darker desires, murdering those who will never be forced to face justice? McDermid offers up some interesting twists in this opening novel, which will entertain and intrigue the curious reader.
Having read a number of McDermid's past novels, I rushed to this one in order to see what she might present. The use of the extended flashback not only lays the groundwork for a sensational novel, but allows the reader to connect with the characters on a much deeper level. While all could have been rammed into a preface, McDermid chose to spin the tale out in the first half of the book, giving intricate detail to the struggles that Alex Gilbey and friends faced in the light of the December 1978 murder of young Rosie Duff. Then, to propel the story into 2003-04, with more drama and antics offered the reader a foundation on which to build. Adding Macfadyen to the mix surely offered another interesting aspect to the story, though his connection to Duff is not as controversial, at least in the narrative, as could be expected. While she does appear throughout the investigation, DC Karen Pirie is only peppered throughout the story, perhaps in a way to introduce her to the reader, though she does not take centre-stage, at least not in this novel. It leaves me to wonder if McDermid needed to test the waters before bringing her out in full-force, which has me wanting to rush for the next novel to see what she offers. I will be doing so right away, for this was a great read and highly entertaining throughout. McDermid has a wonderful series on her hands, though I am unsure if it will be entirely 'cold case' centred. I suppose I ought to read on to see what she has to offer.
Kudos, Madam McDermid for an exciting opening novel. I look forward to seeing what you have in store for us next.
Like/hate the review? An ever-growing collection of others appears at:
http://pecheyponderings.wordpress.com/
Having read a number of McDermid's past novels, I rushed to this one in order to see what she might present. The use of the extended flashback not only lays the groundwork for a sensational novel, but allows the reader to connect with the characters on a much deeper level. While all could have been rammed into a preface, McDermid chose to spin the tale out in the first half of the book, giving intricate detail to the struggles that Alex Gilbey and friends faced in the light of the December 1978 murder of young Rosie Duff. Then, to propel the story into 2003-04, with more drama and antics offered the reader a foundation on which to build. Adding Macfadyen to the mix surely offered another interesting aspect to the story, though his connection to Duff is not as controversial, at least in the narrative, as could be expected. While she does appear throughout the investigation, DC Karen Pirie is only peppered throughout the story, perhaps in a way to introduce her to the reader, though she does not take centre-stage, at least not in this novel. It leaves me to wonder if McDermid needed to test the waters before bringing her out in full-force, which has me wanting to rush for the next novel to see what she offers. I will be doing so right away, for this was a great read and highly entertaining throughout. McDermid has a wonderful series on her hands, though I am unsure if it will be entirely 'cold case' centred. I suppose I ought to read on to see what she has to offer.
Kudos, Madam McDermid for an exciting opening novel. I look forward to seeing what you have in store for us next.
Like/hate the review? An ever-growing collection of others appears at:
http://pecheyponderings.wordpress.com/
July 25, 2017
This was my first Val McDermid book and it certainly won't be my last!
Check out all my book blogs at http://constantreaderpauloneill.blogspot.co.uk/
McDermid delivers a fantastic crime / mystery story set in my homeland of Fife, Scotland and she does a great job for presenting the different areas of Fife exactly how they are like in real life.
The story begins when four lads drunkenly stumble upon our victim, Rosie, after a night out who has been left for dead. The book then tells the tale of the murder investigation as the public pin the murder on the four lads. The story then picks up again years later when the case is reopened as a cold case.
Characters
This book is very much about the effects of false blame and how a close group of friends manage to survive during this. Our main characters are all very lovable and real. McDermid does a great job shows the progression from young lads to fully grown men. You can't help but feel for them all throughout their struggles.
Structure
I love how McDermid weaves the story from the past into the present day. You get the full story instead of mere flashbacks.
Writing
The writing was crisp, sharp and concise. You can't ask for much more. All I want when reading thrillers/crime/mysteries is writing that moves the story along quickly using simple language. McDermid certainly achieves this. I enjoyed the odd Scots attitude or saying. It was very well done.
Final thought
To me, this book was a look at how police procedure can hinder where it should help. It told the story from the police and from the other characters point of view. I think this adds a lot more flavour than just having it be about the cops, it made it feel very real.
Overall, a very strong book and I'll be reading more McDermid very shortly.
Check out all my book blogs at http://constantreaderpauloneill.blogspot.co.uk/
McDermid delivers a fantastic crime / mystery story set in my homeland of Fife, Scotland and she does a great job for presenting the different areas of Fife exactly how they are like in real life.
The story begins when four lads drunkenly stumble upon our victim, Rosie, after a night out who has been left for dead. The book then tells the tale of the murder investigation as the public pin the murder on the four lads. The story then picks up again years later when the case is reopened as a cold case.
Characters
This book is very much about the effects of false blame and how a close group of friends manage to survive during this. Our main characters are all very lovable and real. McDermid does a great job shows the progression from young lads to fully grown men. You can't help but feel for them all throughout their struggles.
Structure
I love how McDermid weaves the story from the past into the present day. You get the full story instead of mere flashbacks.
Writing
The writing was crisp, sharp and concise. You can't ask for much more. All I want when reading thrillers/crime/mysteries is writing that moves the story along quickly using simple language. McDermid certainly achieves this. I enjoyed the odd Scots attitude or saying. It was very well done.
Final thought
To me, this book was a look at how police procedure can hinder where it should help. It told the story from the police and from the other characters point of view. I think this adds a lot more flavour than just having it be about the cops, it made it feel very real.
Overall, a very strong book and I'll be reading more McDermid very shortly.
August 23, 2019
Having previously read other books in this series and enjoyed them immensely, I decided to start the series from the very beginning with the novel ' The Distant Echo'. This is the Inspector Karen Pirie series by author Val McDermid, who works in Fife investigating cold cases.
With the development of forensics it is possible to reopen old cases that were previously unsolved as Karen Pirie looks into a 25 year old case of a murdered barmaid named Rosie Duff. Four young men known as Gilly, Ziggy, Weird, and Mondo had been drinking stumble across a body in the snow in the early morning on their way home from a party. The police suspect one or more of the men of raping the woman but cannot get enough evidence to bring it to court and so the case goes cold. Rosie's brothers and the local community believe at least one of the men is guilty causing a lot of bad feeling.
This is an excellent whodunit with a well paced plot and strong characters.
I fully intend to read the remaining books in this series.
With the development of forensics it is possible to reopen old cases that were previously unsolved as Karen Pirie looks into a 25 year old case of a murdered barmaid named Rosie Duff. Four young men known as Gilly, Ziggy, Weird, and Mondo had been drinking stumble across a body in the snow in the early morning on their way home from a party. The police suspect one or more of the men of raping the woman but cannot get enough evidence to bring it to court and so the case goes cold. Rosie's brothers and the local community believe at least one of the men is guilty causing a lot of bad feeling.
This is an excellent whodunit with a well paced plot and strong characters.
I fully intend to read the remaining books in this series.
September 9, 2016
"He always liked the cemetery at dawn. Not because daybreak offered any promise of a fresh beginning, but because it was too early for there to be anyone else around. Even in the dead of winter, when the pale light was so late in coming, he could guarantee solitude. No prying eyes to wonder who he was and why he was there, head bowed before that one particular grave. No nosy parkers to question his right to be there."
The Distant Echo is the first in the Karen Pirie series. The later books in this series make reference to the first book and give away a major spoiler, so if you're looking to try the Pirie series, start with this one (even though the other ones can easily be read as standalones apart from Out of Bounds). However, I'm not sure it is justified to label The Distant Echo as a Karen Pirie book, because she doesn't play a huge part in this story - she merely appears in it.
I will not go into the details of the plot other than to say that this is a story of a murder investigation that takes place in St. Andrews/Fife (East of Scotland) and continues to haunt the people involved for more than 20 years.
It's always a sign of a good book to me when a book manages to draw you in and makes you feel like you are watching the story from within the story. A couple of weeks ago, I posted a question about whether a familiar setting is enough to create that bond between reader and the book that takes you into the story itself. For me it isn't enough. I also need atmosphere that is actually written, not just implied by my own knowledge of the location(s). And I need characters that come to life. That's what makes a good book for me.
Val McDermid's books tick all of these boxes for me. At least, most of the books I have read so far. What amazes me about her writing is that she manages to pitch the tone just right for her characters - all of them are individually distinct, all different, and even after 30 books, including several series, the characters seem to stay themselves and not rub off on each other. Interestingly, I cannot stand McDermid's Tony Hill series (Mermaids Singing, Wire in the Blood, etc.), but it just goes to show how diverse her repertoire of characters really is when I get to be a fan of her other books and series.
Even in this book, there were a couple of characters that I did not like at different times, but as the story progressed, the characters actually developed and changed my appreciation for them. No stylised, two dimensional characters here!
"Alex’s enthusiasm was growing thin. All that kept him going was a dogged conviction that the answer he so desperately sought was out there somewhere. It had to be. He’d covered the south side of the loch and now he was working his way round to the north shore. He’d lost count of the number of fields he’d looked into. He’d been stared at by geese, by horses, by sheep and even, once, by a llama. He vaguely remembered reading somewhere that shepherds put them in with their flocks to act as a defence against foxes, but he couldn’t for the life of him figure out how a big lazy lump with eyelashes a model would die for was going to deter anything as fearless as the average fox."
The Distant Echo is the first in the Karen Pirie series. The later books in this series make reference to the first book and give away a major spoiler, so if you're looking to try the Pirie series, start with this one (even though the other ones can easily be read as standalones apart from Out of Bounds). However, I'm not sure it is justified to label The Distant Echo as a Karen Pirie book, because she doesn't play a huge part in this story - she merely appears in it.
I will not go into the details of the plot other than to say that this is a story of a murder investigation that takes place in St. Andrews/Fife (East of Scotland) and continues to haunt the people involved for more than 20 years.
It's always a sign of a good book to me when a book manages to draw you in and makes you feel like you are watching the story from within the story. A couple of weeks ago, I posted a question about whether a familiar setting is enough to create that bond between reader and the book that takes you into the story itself. For me it isn't enough. I also need atmosphere that is actually written, not just implied by my own knowledge of the location(s). And I need characters that come to life. That's what makes a good book for me.
Val McDermid's books tick all of these boxes for me. At least, most of the books I have read so far. What amazes me about her writing is that she manages to pitch the tone just right for her characters - all of them are individually distinct, all different, and even after 30 books, including several series, the characters seem to stay themselves and not rub off on each other. Interestingly, I cannot stand McDermid's Tony Hill series (Mermaids Singing, Wire in the Blood, etc.), but it just goes to show how diverse her repertoire of characters really is when I get to be a fan of her other books and series.
Even in this book, there were a couple of characters that I did not like at different times, but as the story progressed, the characters actually developed and changed my appreciation for them. No stylised, two dimensional characters here!
"Alex’s enthusiasm was growing thin. All that kept him going was a dogged conviction that the answer he so desperately sought was out there somewhere. It had to be. He’d covered the south side of the loch and now he was working his way round to the north shore. He’d lost count of the number of fields he’d looked into. He’d been stared at by geese, by horses, by sheep and even, once, by a llama. He vaguely remembered reading somewhere that shepherds put them in with their flocks to act as a defence against foxes, but he couldn’t for the life of him figure out how a big lazy lump with eyelashes a model would die for was going to deter anything as fearless as the average fox."
November 9, 2010
Bad nicknames, murdered lass, working class Scottish louts, torture of homosexual youth, angry manhating lesbian, missing evidence, revenge killings, shocking twist, paint chips.
January 5, 2019
Four drunk young men nicknamed Gilly, Ziggy, Weird, and Mondo stumble across a body in the snow at 4 a.m. The police investigate, believing that one or more of the men committed the murder, but the case goes cold. The community, especially the victim’s brothers, has always believed these men were guilty. 25 years later, a cold case review begins and the truth is finally revealed.
As is typical of Val McDermid’s books, the pace is slow and steady. That allows for strong characterization. The four young men were well-developed, both in their early 20’s and in their mid-40’s. The police were portrayed as a small-town, inept force. DC Karen Pirie appears later in the book as a secondary character. I assume she will become more prominent in the second book, which I will read soon.
As is typical of Val McDermid’s books, the pace is slow and steady. That allows for strong characterization. The four young men were well-developed, both in their early 20’s and in their mid-40’s. The police were portrayed as a small-town, inept force. DC Karen Pirie appears later in the book as a secondary character. I assume she will become more prominent in the second book, which I will read soon.
November 20, 2018
Well, this was disappointing. This book started out with a great premise, and then proceeded to do absolutely nothing with it. Every part of this book dragged, even during the final showdown I was impatient, hoping they'd just get on with it. Another problem for me was that I knew who the real murderer was less than halfway through the book, so everything after that was pretty anticlimactic. The characters weren't particularly engaging either, and I kept shaking my head at their sheer stupidity. The ending, once it finally arrived, was supremely satisfying, with a cut away from the action and a brief summary that several murders would not be prosecuted despite a full confession from the murderer.
My one-word summary: disapponment.
My one-word summary: disapponment.
March 22, 2021
The distant Echo Val Mcdermid you know how sometimes you think a story is heading in a certain direction and then it doesn't this is one such story. A cold case crime fiction starting in 1978 4 university students and long time friends discover a dying naked woman in the early hours of the morning on there way home after an all night party, what follows is allegations of murder rape and a cover up by the authorities and the girls brothers begin a brutal crusade convinced the boys did it. Some sketchy evidence pointing blame to them is finally squashed. Lets travel forward 25 years, 2003 and DNA technology will reopen this cold case, but the crucial evidence has vanished, and someone is murdering the 4 grown boys. The kick about this wasn't who the killer was it was pretty obvious early on but it was how to catch the killer without any evidence and then before he killed everybody else but I really thought his plan might be to make the last boy alive commit suicide with a confession note to the murder of Rosie, but this was the right plan but badly executed, so in the end he failed. Had a great time with reminders of late 70s nostalgia the weird loopy criss crossing story my crime addiction fix is abated.
August 6, 2022
Oh- ETA: after writing the review I realized that in good conscience I could not give the book even two stars. In the GR rating system when I started here two stars was 'OK' and one 'didn't like it'. I didn't like it so changed to the one star the book deserves.
Well, it looks like I am in the minority on this one, and I am OK with that, especially since I generously rounded up to two stars. Problems I had with the book:
>it was just really tedious to read - for example, did I really need to know each and every item in each and every one of the three trips that new parents took to the car with the new-baby gear? NO!! Unfortunately, McDermid thought that I did; she was wrong, on that and so many other times.
>The characters are somewhat superficial and none were particularly likeable.
>I am unsure why it is called a Karen Pirie book because she has only the tiniest of parts in the book, and really it was a poor first impression as I thought she was not particularly intelligent, likeable, or interesting. Certainly, I have no interest in learning any more about here in any more books.
>I guessed who dunnit really early on so there was no suspense for me in the book.
>I am really tired of the trope of having people with poor childhoods being made the assholes in the book. Yes, some people who grew-up in abusive homes grow up to be assholes. But, most of us end up as generally nice people, who usually only hurt ourselves rather than other people. And really, as if we do not have a difficult enough time with the stigmas and taboos around being abused as children, let us now also have to deal with the stereotypes created by this type of book. BLARGH!
>It was BORING... just boring. Nothing happens for too many pages except navel-gazing and discussions of navel-gazing. Did no one edit this book?
Normally, I am more generous with first books of a new series. But, this one was not good (and two stars is generous), and this is a seasoned author, and an acclaimed one at that. I think this is my first McDermid book. I am fairly certain it will also be my last.
Well, it looks like I am in the minority on this one, and I am OK with that, especially since I generously rounded up to two stars. Problems I had with the book:
>it was just really tedious to read - for example, did I really need to know each and every item in each and every one of the three trips that new parents took to the car with the new-baby gear? NO!! Unfortunately, McDermid thought that I did; she was wrong, on that and so many other times.
>The characters are somewhat superficial and none were particularly likeable.
>I am unsure why it is called a Karen Pirie book because she has only the tiniest of parts in the book, and really it was a poor first impression as I thought she was not particularly intelligent, likeable, or interesting. Certainly, I have no interest in learning any more about here in any more books.
>I guessed who dunnit really early on so there was no suspense for me in the book.
>I am really tired of the trope of having people with poor childhoods being made the assholes in the book. Yes, some people who grew-up in abusive homes grow up to be assholes. But, most of us end up as generally nice people, who usually only hurt ourselves rather than other people. And really, as if we do not have a difficult enough time with the stigmas and taboos around being abused as children, let us now also have to deal with the stereotypes created by this type of book. BLARGH!
>It was BORING... just boring. Nothing happens for too many pages except navel-gazing and discussions of navel-gazing. Did no one edit this book?
Normally, I am more generous with first books of a new series. But, this one was not good (and two stars is generous), and this is a seasoned author, and an acclaimed one at that. I think this is my first McDermid book. I am fairly certain it will also be my last.
January 11, 2022
Really enjoyed this first part of the series!
Dutch review: https://elinevandm.wordpress.com/2022...
Dutch review: https://elinevandm.wordpress.com/2022...
December 14, 2021
Una historia bien escrita, excesivamente larga y con un desarrollo muy predecible, excepto para los investigadores. Entretenida, al menos.
October 9, 2013
As a female, what struck me most about this book was 'the lads'. I've been heterosexually married several decades but I still find 'the lads' as foreign as I would find walking about under a blue burqa in Afghanistan. So, this book ended up being kind of a National Geographic article for me on a certain level.
I tried to 'connect' with 'the lads' that the author created as the characters we were to be interested in, since they were the victims of prejudice and nefarious plots, but I found myself thinking a lot 'see what a mess you got yourself into?' In the end, I gave up trying for sympathy and read the story as about an exotic culture I cannot understand. I realize many 'lads' do very well later in life and that is when they make sense to me. However, because I kept expecting the four protagonists to die tarnished by their own blaring misdeeds, even if blameless of murder, I couldn't really connect at all. Most of my friends generally have been nerds and geeks, or activists or religious people, not that I haven't been friends with a variety of folks. 'The lads' types in my life did not seem as if they would survive their 20's, and to be their friend was expensive since they seem to destroy every room, every stick of furniture and other belongings or goods, cars, and gambled or drank up or smoked or snorted up their paycheck in a few hours. They invented the modern concept of meaningless sex before girls had a clue. They scared the crap out of me. McDermid obviously has an intimate insiders grasp of what 'lads' are, and kindly allows her lads to be seen as decent young men (deep down) for the first half, and as normal middle-class men later.
Anyway.
The lads are being lads, meaning getting as drunk as they can possibly get between vomiting fits (always makes it a challenge) at a party. They stole (borrowed) a classmate's car to get there, and then they tried very hard to talk the women at the party into a one-night acquaintance in a bed. Having enjoyed reaching a state of mental derangement where walking is peculiar, they stumble through a park after leaving the party and trip over a woman's body. The friends, Alex (Gilly), Tom (Weird), Davey (Mondo) and Sigmund (Ziggy) get her blood all over themselves since being drunk has made the processing of coordination a bit difficult. Being basically wonderful lads, they decide to get a policeman (at least three of them decide - Weird is giggling at how funny the woman looks because he got high on hallucination-causing drugs on top of the alcohol). The policeman takes a look and soon the 19-year-old men are under suspicion of murdering the barmaid. It seems two of them have been trying to get laid by her for some time. It doesn't help their offended and frightened protestations of innocence when the cops find juvenile records of laddy hi jinks and mayhem. The brothers of the murdered girl are not university lads like our heroes, but are pure small-time thugs who decide beating up and dumping our lads individually down into wells where they won't be found for three days will get them to confess when the police are unable to make them talk. However, the police clear up the brothers' muddy sense of injustice with threats of long terms in prison if they try anything like that again, so they slander the lads as much as possible. Three of the lads end up leaving the country when they graduate from college, profoundly affected by the suspicion heaped upon them as well as the vision of the bloody body, which haunts them when they sober up.
The second half of the book finds our lads no longer lads, but respectable family men earning incomes in respectable middle-class work. Then they begin dying one by one in 'accidents'. Oh oh.
A very well-written book which explores the psychological impact of a murder on four friends who never could resolve what happened that night to themselves or others. The quartet breaks up and only two maintain contact as the years pass; but when the quartet starts dying in accidents, the surviving lads know they need to find out who the real killer is. The question for us readers is, who will still be breathing by the last page? Hopefully it will be the one you liked best.
I tried to 'connect' with 'the lads' that the author created as the characters we were to be interested in, since they were the victims of prejudice and nefarious plots, but I found myself thinking a lot 'see what a mess you got yourself into?' In the end, I gave up trying for sympathy and read the story as about an exotic culture I cannot understand. I realize many 'lads' do very well later in life and that is when they make sense to me. However, because I kept expecting the four protagonists to die tarnished by their own blaring misdeeds, even if blameless of murder, I couldn't really connect at all. Most of my friends generally have been nerds and geeks, or activists or religious people, not that I haven't been friends with a variety of folks. 'The lads' types in my life did not seem as if they would survive their 20's, and to be their friend was expensive since they seem to destroy every room, every stick of furniture and other belongings or goods, cars, and gambled or drank up or smoked or snorted up their paycheck in a few hours. They invented the modern concept of meaningless sex before girls had a clue. They scared the crap out of me. McDermid obviously has an intimate insiders grasp of what 'lads' are, and kindly allows her lads to be seen as decent young men (deep down) for the first half, and as normal middle-class men later.
Anyway.
The lads are being lads, meaning getting as drunk as they can possibly get between vomiting fits (always makes it a challenge) at a party. They stole (borrowed) a classmate's car to get there, and then they tried very hard to talk the women at the party into a one-night acquaintance in a bed. Having enjoyed reaching a state of mental derangement where walking is peculiar, they stumble through a park after leaving the party and trip over a woman's body. The friends, Alex (Gilly), Tom (Weird), Davey (Mondo) and Sigmund (Ziggy) get her blood all over themselves since being drunk has made the processing of coordination a bit difficult. Being basically wonderful lads, they decide to get a policeman (at least three of them decide - Weird is giggling at how funny the woman looks because he got high on hallucination-causing drugs on top of the alcohol). The policeman takes a look and soon the 19-year-old men are under suspicion of murdering the barmaid. It seems two of them have been trying to get laid by her for some time. It doesn't help their offended and frightened protestations of innocence when the cops find juvenile records of laddy hi jinks and mayhem. The brothers of the murdered girl are not university lads like our heroes, but are pure small-time thugs who decide beating up and dumping our lads individually down into wells where they won't be found for three days will get them to confess when the police are unable to make them talk. However, the police clear up the brothers' muddy sense of injustice with threats of long terms in prison if they try anything like that again, so they slander the lads as much as possible. Three of the lads end up leaving the country when they graduate from college, profoundly affected by the suspicion heaped upon them as well as the vision of the bloody body, which haunts them when they sober up.
The second half of the book finds our lads no longer lads, but respectable family men earning incomes in respectable middle-class work. Then they begin dying one by one in 'accidents'. Oh oh.
A very well-written book which explores the psychological impact of a murder on four friends who never could resolve what happened that night to themselves or others. The quartet breaks up and only two maintain contact as the years pass; but when the quartet starts dying in accidents, the surviving lads know they need to find out who the real killer is. The question for us readers is, who will still be breathing by the last page? Hopefully it will be the one you liked best.
August 26, 2019
Val McDermid is one prolific crime writer. Probably best noted for her Wire in the Blood mystery series, she's also written the Lindsay Gordon and Kate Brannigan series. The Distant Echo is the first book in another of her series, this one featuring Scottish police inspector Karen Pirie.
I will qualify this by saying that Karen Pirie does not play a major role in this particular story, but I presume it is more of a way of introducing her to the other books in the series. Having said that, as with other McDermid books I've read, this was an excellent thriller / murder story. The book is set during two particular time periods. We begin in the past in 1978, in St Andrew's Scotland. This is where we are introduced to the case that will take up both time frames of the story, that being the murder of Rosie Duff. Near Xmas of 1978, four college students, all childhood friends, are out on a jaunt through the pubs prior to heading off to a drunken revelry at another student's accommodation. On their way back to their own residence early in the morning, they take a short cut and discover the body of Rosie. Before they can summon the police, she dies and even though they are at treated as witnesses, there are suspicions from both the police and Rosie's family that they are the one(s) who have raped and murdered the girl.
The first half of the story follows this initial investigation, lead by ACC MacLennan, who is basically unsuccessful in proving they are innocent or guilty, or in discovering the perpetrator. The four boys lives are turned on end. They are assaulted by the press, by the Rosie's brothers who want to take the law into their own hands, and under suspicion by the police. The first part ends in tragedy, with another death (you can find whose for yourselves).
The second half of the story i in the present where the new ACC, James Lawson, has taken over the cold case squad of the Fife police department. Lawson was a uniform constable who was first on the scene after discovery of her body. Karen Pirie is one of the inspectors on his team who is responsible for investigating Rosie's cold case. The four friends have grown apart and are now being stalked by someone (or so it seems). New information turns up, especially the fact that Rosie had a child when she was very young and he wants more information about the investigation and wants justice for her.
The story, for all of its length, moves along very nicely both in the past and present and is a tense thriller. I have to say that once we got into the second half I was pretty sure I knew who the killer was but it didn't take away from the enjoyment of the story. There were a few times where I shook my head at what seemed incongruous actions but they regularly happen in mysteries but sometimes you just have to shrug them off. They weren't wildly out of place anyway. All in all, it's an interesting story, well-written and tensely presented, with an overall satisfying ending. (4 stars)
I will qualify this by saying that Karen Pirie does not play a major role in this particular story, but I presume it is more of a way of introducing her to the other books in the series. Having said that, as with other McDermid books I've read, this was an excellent thriller / murder story. The book is set during two particular time periods. We begin in the past in 1978, in St Andrew's Scotland. This is where we are introduced to the case that will take up both time frames of the story, that being the murder of Rosie Duff. Near Xmas of 1978, four college students, all childhood friends, are out on a jaunt through the pubs prior to heading off to a drunken revelry at another student's accommodation. On their way back to their own residence early in the morning, they take a short cut and discover the body of Rosie. Before they can summon the police, she dies and even though they are at treated as witnesses, there are suspicions from both the police and Rosie's family that they are the one(s) who have raped and murdered the girl.
The first half of the story follows this initial investigation, lead by ACC MacLennan, who is basically unsuccessful in proving they are innocent or guilty, or in discovering the perpetrator. The four boys lives are turned on end. They are assaulted by the press, by the Rosie's brothers who want to take the law into their own hands, and under suspicion by the police. The first part ends in tragedy, with another death (you can find whose for yourselves).
The second half of the story i in the present where the new ACC, James Lawson, has taken over the cold case squad of the Fife police department. Lawson was a uniform constable who was first on the scene after discovery of her body. Karen Pirie is one of the inspectors on his team who is responsible for investigating Rosie's cold case. The four friends have grown apart and are now being stalked by someone (or so it seems). New information turns up, especially the fact that Rosie had a child when she was very young and he wants more information about the investigation and wants justice for her.
The story, for all of its length, moves along very nicely both in the past and present and is a tense thriller. I have to say that once we got into the second half I was pretty sure I knew who the killer was but it didn't take away from the enjoyment of the story. There were a few times where I shook my head at what seemed incongruous actions but they regularly happen in mysteries but sometimes you just have to shrug them off. They weren't wildly out of place anyway. All in all, it's an interesting story, well-written and tensely presented, with an overall satisfying ending. (4 stars)
December 18, 2020
This well-written book centers on the rape and murder of a young bartender near the University of St. Andrews, Scotland many years ago. Four male students came across her dying body in the snows of winter but despite their efforts in applying first aid she dies a bloody death. The students are immediate suspects but there's little if any clear evidence of their guilt although all have questionable alibis and the police believe one student in particular has a clear motive.
The story moves forward to the early twentieth century and we are presented with the lives of the four friends as adults. Two significant events take place; firstly the Chief Constable re-opens this cold case and mysteriously the son of the dead woman appears. It turns out she had a child when she was fifteen and was sent away to give birth. The boy was adopted.
Unfortunately, the story suffers from an unexciting style of writing; at times it's almost boring. There's too much side detail which detracts from the main plot. It wasn't until I had read about two thirds of the book that the pace picked up. One of the four friends dies in suspicious circumstances and the wife of the main character, Alex, has early severe contractions indicating a premature birth.
From that point onwards, the book becomes more of a joy to read with some red herrings and suggestions as to the identity of the real killer or killers.
This review was written by Shawn Callon, author of The Diplomatic Spy.
The story moves forward to the early twentieth century and we are presented with the lives of the four friends as adults. Two significant events take place; firstly the Chief Constable re-opens this cold case and mysteriously the son of the dead woman appears. It turns out she had a child when she was fifteen and was sent away to give birth. The boy was adopted.
Unfortunately, the story suffers from an unexciting style of writing; at times it's almost boring. There's too much side detail which detracts from the main plot. It wasn't until I had read about two thirds of the book that the pace picked up. One of the four friends dies in suspicious circumstances and the wife of the main character, Alex, has early severe contractions indicating a premature birth.
From that point onwards, the book becomes more of a joy to read with some red herrings and suggestions as to the identity of the real killer or killers.
This review was written by Shawn Callon, author of The Diplomatic Spy.
Read
October 3, 2016This is the book that first got me interested in Val McDermid. It's still one of my favorite of hers.
April 12, 2017
3.5 stars
A carefully woven and paced crime / mystery / thriller. Very enjoyable and I recommend the audio version.
A carefully woven and paced crime / mystery / thriller. Very enjoyable and I recommend the audio version.
July 30, 2019
1.5 stars.
For a novel supposedly about Karen Pirie, she featured very rarely throughout these pages. 🙄
For a novel supposedly about Karen Pirie, she featured very rarely throughout these pages. 🙄
August 15, 2022
4.75 stars
THE DISTANT ECHO is listed as the first book in the Karen Pirie series, but I believe that author Val McDermid meant for this to be a stand-alone novel, the same as “A Place of Execution” published two years earlier. Karen Pirie appears late in the story and plays a minor role.
The novel is divided into two parts. The first part takes place in 1978. Four drunken friends, university students, stumble across the body of a dying woman, someone they slightly knew, a young barmaid at a local tavern. As it is immediately obvious that the barmaid, Rosie Duff was raped and murdered, the four friends are considered suspects by the local police, and because they all have secrets, their final half-year at the university is disrupted by fear and distrust. Their ten-year friendship is irrevocably changed under the spectre of suspicion. Meanwhile, the investigation into the Rosie’s murder goes nowhere.
The second part of the novel takes place 25 years later. A cold case review is undertaken of the Rosie Duff murder, although it is currently at a standstill as the initial physical evidence has been misplaced. Then one of the four university friends is murdered, a new character who is obviously unbalanced appears, and the lives of the three remaining former friends are thrown again into upheaval.
The main character in both parts is Alex Gilbert. He is the only one who is consistently referred to by his real name. The other three friends are usually referred to by their nicknames (Mondo, Ziggy, and Weird), and the reader remembers them by these nicknames and not by their real names. Alex is not a particularly interesting character — he’s rather bland, although his family status does play an important part in the plot. However, McDermid has surrounded him with interesting characters (Mondo, Ziggy, and Weird), and also made him part of the general pattern of suspicion that surrounds the initial Rosie Duff murder investigation. Consequently, having such an unexciting character at the centre of the story does not put off the reader.
I did consider the actual murderer a suspect while reading the first section and was surprised that no one asked pertinent questions about his whereabouts during the time of the murder. In the second section, however, the author’s careful misdirection drew my suspicions away from him. And this is why the blurb advertises this novel as a “masterpiece of misdirection”.
At no point during the story did I consider Karen Pirie a major character. Her nature was only half formed at this point — steadfast and diligent, but without the clearly defined uniqueness (and depth) that is found in the later Karen Pirie books. (I found Jackie, also a minor character in the book, to be far better fleshed out than Karen Pirie. So if McDermid had a clear image of Pirie’s traits in mind while writing this one, she could have done it with a few well-written strokes, as she did with Jackie.)
The book is long but the writing is so outstanding that I never stopped reading it except to rest my aging eyes. The only part that disappointed me, a bit, was the ending, which felt rushed. It was here that the character of Pirie could have been deepened, but instead we receive only a second-hand recounting of the final investigation and arrest. I wonder if McDermid decided to cut down part of the ending so that the focus remained squarely on Alex and how “suspicion” can mar lives.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
My reviews for other books in this series:
Broken Ground (Karen Pirie, #5)
Still Life (Karen Pirie, #6)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
THE DISTANT ECHO is listed as the first book in the Karen Pirie series, but I believe that author Val McDermid meant for this to be a stand-alone novel, the same as “A Place of Execution” published two years earlier. Karen Pirie appears late in the story and plays a minor role.
The novel is divided into two parts. The first part takes place in 1978. Four drunken friends, university students, stumble across the body of a dying woman, someone they slightly knew, a young barmaid at a local tavern. As it is immediately obvious that the barmaid, Rosie Duff was raped and murdered, the four friends are considered suspects by the local police, and because they all have secrets, their final half-year at the university is disrupted by fear and distrust. Their ten-year friendship is irrevocably changed under the spectre of suspicion. Meanwhile, the investigation into the Rosie’s murder goes nowhere.
The second part of the novel takes place 25 years later. A cold case review is undertaken of the Rosie Duff murder, although it is currently at a standstill as the initial physical evidence has been misplaced. Then one of the four university friends is murdered, a new character who is obviously unbalanced appears, and the lives of the three remaining former friends are thrown again into upheaval.
The main character in both parts is Alex Gilbert. He is the only one who is consistently referred to by his real name. The other three friends are usually referred to by their nicknames (Mondo, Ziggy, and Weird), and the reader remembers them by these nicknames and not by their real names. Alex is not a particularly interesting character — he’s rather bland, although his family status does play an important part in the plot. However, McDermid has surrounded him with interesting characters (Mondo, Ziggy, and Weird), and also made him part of the general pattern of suspicion that surrounds the initial Rosie Duff murder investigation. Consequently, having such an unexciting character at the centre of the story does not put off the reader.
I did consider the actual murderer a suspect while reading the first section and was surprised that no one asked pertinent questions about his whereabouts during the time of the murder. In the second section, however, the author’s careful misdirection drew my suspicions away from him. And this is why the blurb advertises this novel as a “masterpiece of misdirection”.
At no point during the story did I consider Karen Pirie a major character. Her nature was only half formed at this point — steadfast and diligent, but without the clearly defined uniqueness (and depth) that is found in the later Karen Pirie books. (I found Jackie, also a minor character in the book, to be far better fleshed out than Karen Pirie. So if McDermid had a clear image of Pirie’s traits in mind while writing this one, she could have done it with a few well-written strokes, as she did with Jackie.)
The book is long but the writing is so outstanding that I never stopped reading it except to rest my aging eyes. The only part that disappointed me, a bit, was the ending, which felt rushed. It was here that the character of Pirie could have been deepened, but instead we receive only a second-hand recounting of the final investigation and arrest. I wonder if McDermid decided to cut down part of the ending so that the focus remained squarely on Alex and how “suspicion” can mar lives.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
My reviews for other books in this series:
Broken Ground (Karen Pirie, #5)
Still Life (Karen Pirie, #6)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
December 22, 2018
The Distant Echo (Audio CD) by Val McDermid.
The 1st in the Karen Perie series.
The mutilated body of a young woman barely clinging to life is found by 4 college students on a blustery cold winter night. One of them frantically runs for help while the others wait with the unconscious victim. The victim, Rosie, is know to them all and they soon become implicated in her murder.
Although there is not enough evidence to convict the students of her murder they continue to live with shadow of suspicion hanging over their heads. They're lives have been changed forever by that gruesome discovery.
Rosie's murder took place in 1978 and has yet to be solved. Then, 25 years later, it's reopened as a cold case. That marks the beginning of 2 more murders. The victims just happen to be 2 of those college students who discovered Rosie's body those many years ago.
I found this story compelling and well paced as it kept me focused on the plot and characters. The character of Karen Perie is not in the forefront of this story, which I found most unusual to most investigated mysteries with an inspector. Val McDermid is an author worth following.
The 1st in the Karen Perie series.
The mutilated body of a young woman barely clinging to life is found by 4 college students on a blustery cold winter night. One of them frantically runs for help while the others wait with the unconscious victim. The victim, Rosie, is know to them all and they soon become implicated in her murder.
Although there is not enough evidence to convict the students of her murder they continue to live with shadow of suspicion hanging over their heads. They're lives have been changed forever by that gruesome discovery.
Rosie's murder took place in 1978 and has yet to be solved. Then, 25 years later, it's reopened as a cold case. That marks the beginning of 2 more murders. The victims just happen to be 2 of those college students who discovered Rosie's body those many years ago.
I found this story compelling and well paced as it kept me focused on the plot and characters. The character of Karen Perie is not in the forefront of this story, which I found most unusual to most investigated mysteries with an inspector. Val McDermid is an author worth following.
September 29, 2021
The first book in the Karen Pirie series opens strongly as four drunk students stumble across a dead body in a cold snowy late December night in 1978.
The victim was barmaid Rosie Duff and the four guys knew her from the pub, which subsequently makes them the prime suspects in this murder case.
Both the freezing Fife landscape and the late 70's attitudes really helped set the scene.
The second half is set 25 years after the events as a 'cold case' review is ordered.
In the meantime two of the four have died in suspicious circumstances.
Whilst the opening part was my favourite I'd really grown attached to Alex and his three friends, the stigma that was attached to them felt even more brutal seeing as they were only trying to help.
Especially as others are happy to dish out some retretribution.
A really strong enjoyable mystery that makes for both a fascinating whodunit and the effects on a person who's been wrongfully accused.
The victim was barmaid Rosie Duff and the four guys knew her from the pub, which subsequently makes them the prime suspects in this murder case.
Both the freezing Fife landscape and the late 70's attitudes really helped set the scene.
The second half is set 25 years after the events as a 'cold case' review is ordered.
In the meantime two of the four have died in suspicious circumstances.
Whilst the opening part was my favourite I'd really grown attached to Alex and his three friends, the stigma that was attached to them felt even more brutal seeing as they were only trying to help.
Especially as others are happy to dish out some retretribution.
A really strong enjoyable mystery that makes for both a fascinating whodunit and the effects on a person who's been wrongfully accused.
January 1, 2016
Best thriller I've read in a while, even if I did guess whodunit midway, it didn't spoil it for me. I enjoyed all the Scottish references and descriptions, and slang - you need to have lived there to get some of them, and liked the two part story. Good characters, great suspense and a satisfying ending.
November 13, 2020
Four college friends stumble across a dead body in the snow on the way home after a night of partying. First as witnesses and then as suspects, the characters fail to generate much endearment. It’s a well written story with various twists and revelatory developments. However, the whodunit is somewhat apparent, yet the police seem unable to solve the crime. This is the first in a series, which a friend recommended but unfortunately it was not an engaging crime drama. Only a three-star rating.
August 13, 2018
I chose this because I have a reviewing obligation for a latter volume in the series, but also because Val McDermid is one of this year's Man Booker judges and I was curious. Far far from formulaic, this promises to be an intriguing series that I'll probably devour if the succeeding stories are as compelling as this was.
November 26, 2019
Liked it, but I totally figured out whodunit.
May 16, 2014
4.5* rounded down.
-- mild spoilers ahead! --
Wow. I really needed reading this one.
First things first, I grade McDermid against herself and against other crime writers I like a lot. If I graded her against the average romance (m/m or else), I'd need dozens of stars to find a just balance.
There's thick plot, an era and a place portrayed so perfectly as to put you right there, and I never guessed at the murderer, even though the red herring was more than just that. But then, I rarely ever guess correctly, so that may be just me, but on the plot and story level this book thoroughly satisfied me. A big solid chunk of a book.
What I also dearly needed was a book cleaning my reader palate of bad, overblown-blowsy, theatrical, over-cute and strainedly "chic" language. I read too much of that lately and it started to clog all my senses and to sour me on books. The amount of genuine Scottish and British expressions was just right to firmly anchor the book (and not so overdone as to read like a direct attempt to dazzle), there were similes and descriptors which worked for me without having to think about it, and she effortlessly creates atmosphere.
Maybe what I find the most enchanting is the way how McDermid writes men, and psychopaths. She managed to have me side and sympathise with four lads, during the earliest era of modern lad culture. And she somehow managed to do that without being in any way forgiving about their faults. These were real, genuine boys and men, without any of the artificial affectations so common in romance, and that felt like a fresh breath.
Oh and the 0.5* lacking from this is because I can't seem to not want Tony or Carol in her books ;P
-- mild spoilers ahead! --
Wow. I really needed reading this one.
First things first, I grade McDermid against herself and against other crime writers I like a lot. If I graded her against the average romance (m/m or else), I'd need dozens of stars to find a just balance.
There's thick plot, an era and a place portrayed so perfectly as to put you right there, and I never guessed at the murderer, even though the red herring was more than just that. But then, I rarely ever guess correctly, so that may be just me, but on the plot and story level this book thoroughly satisfied me. A big solid chunk of a book.
What I also dearly needed was a book cleaning my reader palate of bad, overblown-blowsy, theatrical, over-cute and strainedly "chic" language. I read too much of that lately and it started to clog all my senses and to sour me on books. The amount of genuine Scottish and British expressions was just right to firmly anchor the book (and not so overdone as to read like a direct attempt to dazzle), there were similes and descriptors which worked for me without having to think about it, and she effortlessly creates atmosphere.
Maybe what I find the most enchanting is the way how McDermid writes men, and psychopaths. She managed to have me side and sympathise with four lads, during the earliest era of modern lad culture. And she somehow managed to do that without being in any way forgiving about their faults. These were real, genuine boys and men, without any of the artificial affectations so common in romance, and that felt like a fresh breath.
Oh and the 0.5* lacking from this is because I can't seem to not want Tony or Carol in her books ;P
March 5, 2020
Well, I suppose it's horses for courses, and though I think Val MacDermid is a good writer, she doesn't work for me. It's something to do with the characters, a lack of human warmth, perhaps. There was no one very likeable in this novel, which made it more of an intellectual exercise than an enjoyable read.
It began very slowly, and I nearly gave up, but it did improve later. With all the names and nicknames, it was hard to remember who was who. I distrust crime novels with prologues, but in this case it was necessary, as otherwise a major character would have been sprung on us in the middle. The relations between the four university students reminded me of other fraternity/sorority novels which are, like this, centred on the relationships of a group of not particularly nice people. Karen Pirie, who it was supposed to introduce, hardly appears. It was quite a clever plot with the odd twist, but really, if you can't identify with any of the characters, does it matter? If that doesn't worry you, and you don't mind a rather slow moving plot, I can see you might enjoy it. I didn't.
It began very slowly, and I nearly gave up, but it did improve later. With all the names and nicknames, it was hard to remember who was who. I distrust crime novels with prologues, but in this case it was necessary, as otherwise a major character would have been sprung on us in the middle. The relations between the four university students reminded me of other fraternity/sorority novels which are, like this, centred on the relationships of a group of not particularly nice people. Karen Pirie, who it was supposed to introduce, hardly appears. It was quite a clever plot with the odd twist, but really, if you can't identify with any of the characters, does it matter? If that doesn't worry you, and you don't mind a rather slow moving plot, I can see you might enjoy it. I didn't.
March 31, 2010
Atmospheric, intense, plot twists, great writing, what more could you ask for in a mystery?!!
July 11, 2024
Een heel originele verhaallijn, goed opgebouwd, voldoende gevarieerd en spannend tot op het einde. Zeker een serie om verder op te volgen.
March 18, 2019
The flaw here was in my memory. I did solemnly swear to never read Val McD again after a Book Club obligation a few years back, involving A Place Of Execution. But I forgot this promise to self, or it was eclipsed by the memory of how much I enjoyed the Tony Hill series. Sadly, Val has never written anything again as good as the Wire in the Blood books.
So many Brit Crime writers get away with producing shite by writing an intriguing opening chapter. And then the plot and characterization fails to keep the promise of the first chapter. This lacked any depth of human psychology. The culprit was foisted on the reader in the most heinous betrayal of trust that a crime writer can commit. THAT does not equal a capably executed twist. I rest my case.
So many Brit Crime writers get away with producing shite by writing an intriguing opening chapter. And then the plot and characterization fails to keep the promise of the first chapter. This lacked any depth of human psychology. The culprit was foisted on the reader in the most heinous betrayal of trust that a crime writer can commit. THAT does not equal a capably executed twist. I rest my case.
February 2, 2022
Харесах! Качествен криминален роман, напълно заслужено получил награда "Шерлок".
Много ми хареса историята и начина, по който е поднесена. Допаднаха ми и героите до известна степен (не бяха дразнещи и досадни)...
Това е първият случай на Карен Пири и изненадващо за нея не е отделено почти никакво "екранно време". С нея или без нея - нямаше голямо значение.
Много ми хареса историята и начина, по който е поднесена. Допаднаха ми и героите до известна степен (не бяха дразнещи и досадни)...
Това е първият случай на Карен Пири и изненадващо за нея не е отделено почти никакво "екранно време". С нея или без нея - нямаше голямо значение.
Displaying 1 - 30 of 1,542 reviews