This book is really good. I always prefer hardcovers over paperbacks. The binding is nice. The paper quality is good and the pages are not translucent. I hate the books where you can see the back page's print impression. It decreases readability, isn't it? But this book is not like that. There is enough spacing between lines. The book is not too heavy to hold while you are reading while lying down.
Pongalswamy screamed, "Stop. Stop you moron. When you talk about a book, you don't talk about its binding, its font size, its paper quality. But its content."
Oops. Sorry.
Then.
I wonder who is this book for?
Shekhar Gupta's fans don't need this book. Isn't it that they became his fan by reading his columns? So, this book, which is a collection of his select articles in The Indian Express recounting the times from the rule of Vajpayee to the rise of Modi, provide no new content to them.
Those, like me, who appreciate Shekhar Gupta because of his knowledge on Indian politics, his erudite arguments in TV debates and his Walk-the-Talks, but not fortunate enough to read his articles before, would fail to appreciate this book cause of two reasons - lack of enough contextual information and heavy dependence on reader's memory of Indian Political history as it unfolds since the NDA rule.
I, for one, failed to see what was the point of this book?
And more over why is it called "Anticipating India"? Is it that the author wants to flaunt his "I told you so" smirk? What did I miss?