The Optimistic Child lays out Martin Seligman's programme to "innoculate" children against depression, by using cognitive and behavioral techniques to develop in them a sense of optimism and personal mastery. Seligman criticises the approach of the self-esteem movement as wrong-headed and flawed; self-esteem is a combination of doing well AND feeling good. But the contemporary focus on telling children that they are unique, special and awesome in all they do (even if the results suggest the opposite) merely focusses on feeling good (the end), ignoring the part about doing well (the means). He argues that the increasing rates of depression in the US stem from its shift from being "an achieving society to a feel-good society…the feel-good society, as it overtook the doing well society, created new opportunities and new freedoms along with new perils (i.e. the greater risk for depression that these new opportunities bring)."
Seligman dismisses traditional definitions of optimism centred around positive thinking as manifestations of optimism; instead, the basis of optimism lies in the way one thinks about causes, in one's "explanatory style". There are three facets to one's explanatory style:
- permanence (permanent causes vs temporary causes): does a child think of their failures, rejections in terms of "always" and "never", or "sometimes" and "lately"? Conversely, does a child believe that good events have permanent causes rather than temporary ones?
- Pervasiveness (specific vs global): does a child see the cause as specific (e.g. this particular teacher was hard on them, they performed worse on a particular task compared to others) or global (all teachers are unfair, they are losers and suck at everything)
- Personal (internal vs external): does a child blame themself primarily or can they blame other people or circumstances. This is not to say we should teach children to be external about bad events. Rather, children need to be discerning and not blame themselves whenever things go wrong whether it is their fault or not. They need to learn "how to see themselves accurately, so that when problems are their fault, they take responsibility and try to correct their behaviour, whereas when the problem is not their fault, they still feel worthwhile"
Parents shape their kids' explanatory style in the way they criticize their kids, and also in the way they themselves respond to challenges and failures. Do you criticize accurately, or take on more self-blame than warranted? Do you criticize with an optimistic or pessimistic explanatory style? Seligman suggests that "a single, crucial event…can markedly alter pessimism or optimism by changing the child's theory of who he is and what he is worth." He describes it as the "Hoving effect", after Thomas Hoving, the former curator of MoMA, based on this brilliant anecdote of Hoving: Hoving was 19 at Princeton University, "flunking out, anxious, low of self-esteem, and unsure of judgement." But before dropping out, he decided to take an upperclass sculpture seminar. On the first day, the professor placed on the podium a gleaming metal object with streamlined fingers and asked the 8 students to comment on the aesthetic merits of the piece. An Ivy Club senior said "mellifluous fluidity", a junior described it as "harmony of the spheres" and so on until Hoving, who said it was "too well tooled, too mechanical, too cold, and too streamlined, It's too functional. This isn't art." It turns out it was an obstetrical speculum and Hoving said "after that, there was no stopping me!"
Part Four gets into the meat of the book - How To Raise Children to Optimism and Mastery - where Seligman describes the approaches he and his team took in the 1990 launch of the Penn Prevention Programme:
- The ABC model: ABC stands for Adversity, Beliefs and Consequences and Seligman includes some exercises to build awareness of how our beliefs have profound influence on the consequences/outcomes of a problem. If we can learn to "catch" our beliefs aand internal dialogue and reframe them, we can change how we respond to the situation.
- Teaching kids to understand the different facets that shape one's explanatory style and to differentiate between permanent/temporary, specific/global, internal/external and consider the accuracy of their beliefs in this context
- Teaching kids to gather evidence to effectively dispute their (flawed) beliefs, generate alternatives to view the adversity, "decatastrophise" or accurately evaluate the implications of the adversity, and finally to develop a plan of attack to tackle the adversity (e.g. correct the mistake, improve the situation, control the damage). This takes practice so kids can learn to respond rapidly and effectively to the negative talk in their head. (Adversity - Beliefs - Consequence - Disputation - Energization)
- Boosting kids' social skills: kids with good social and problem solving skills make new friends, are comfortable in new situations, maintain friends, cooperate and are therefore set up better to succeed. This entails being assertive and being able to articulate what they want clearly, being able to negotiate and compromise (figure out what you want, so long as it is reasonable and also listen to what the other person wants, then work out a compromise)
- Boosting kids' problem solving skills: Slowing Down; Perspective Taking; Goal Settting (what outcome do you want); Choosing a Path
The Optimistic Child pulls together resources for parents - the Children's Attributional Style Questionnaire (CASQ) to assess a child's optimism, the Depression Child (CES-DC) test to get a sensing if one's child might be depressed, questionnaires to assess a child's problem solving and social skills - to assess their children's proclivity for depression and offers exercises to help build up emotional resilience and "innoculate" them against depression. Overall, it's a useful book and my only complaint is that the examples are understandably very American and would need to be rejigged for other cultural contexts.