The story is framed as a documentary-style investigation into a violent, half-abandoned Texas border town called Sterling City. The town has a long history of murders, disappearances, cult rumors, and “bad land.” The narrator compiles police reports, interviews, newspaper clippings, and firsthand accounts to piece together what happened there.
What Sterling City really is
Sterling City isn’t cursed in a supernatural way — it’s a place designed to attract violence.
The town sits on land that has historically been a site of:
• Indigenous displacement
• Brutal labor practices
• Generational abuse
• Repeated acts of cruelty and injustice
Over time, people drawn to power, dominance, or violence keep gravitating back to it. The town becomes a pressure cooker — not because of ghosts, but because violence is normalized, repeated, and inherited.
The giant caterpillar is not a literal monster.
It’s a symbolic image that represents slow, grinding, inevitable violence — violence that changes form but never disappears.
If I’m being blunt:
👉 Sterling City is a book about ideas, not a story that respects reader payoff. If you wanted tension, escalation, or even a weird concrete explanation, it fails by design.
For my fellow readers that have full time jobs and families and want to unwind by reading a story. I would rethink this one… unless literary horror is your jam and that’s how you unwind. For me, I would have enjoyed this story more if I didn’t have anything going in my life, and my brain wasn’t already mush by the time I got home from work. If you’re a bookstagrammer, book-tocker, or book tuber, I’m sure you’ll love this story.
This book caters to the literary horror readers. I like symbolism, but there is a way to do it that doesn’t confuse the reader. But I digress… maybe that’s my own comprehension problem. To me the story felt like driving a stick shift for the first time, with no instructions or help, I’m facing the wrong direction and I need to make a U-turn on a heavily trafficked gravel road. No offense. I will continue to try SGJ books. But so far I haven’t “loved” any of them.