Thank you, NetGalley, for providing me with a free copy of this ebook in exchange for an honest review.
I was very excited when I heard that Philippa Gregory was writing a new book from the perspective of Jane Rochford, sister-in-law to Anne Boleyn. I've always had a soft spot for Jane, who has gone down in history as the spurned wife that betrayed her husband and his sister to their deaths, then went mad with guilt. Much like with Anne, Katherine Howard, and Mary I, however, Jane's been undergoing a bit of a feminist reconsideration these past several years, with much of what's been uncovered about her indicating that the image of a twisted, spiteful harridan was more slander than truth.
Gregory has written about Jane twice before, first as a supporting character in The Other Boleyn Girl, and then as a POV in The Boleyn Inheritance. Boleyn Traitor is set parallel to both books, only now Jane is written to reflect recent scholarship, revealing a woman who is neither unpleasant nor depraved. Instead she is the highly-educated daughter of a scholar who can speak more languages than anyone else at court and whose intelligence is valued by everyone from her family to the king himself. She still longs for love, but she and George are more like co-workers than sworn enemies--passionless but cooperative. Gregory doesn't incorporate all of the new theories about the doomed couple (such as George having been abusive or Jane having been promiscuous), but they are a far cry from what we saw in The Other Boleyn Girl.
I recall Gregory saying she regretted her earliest portrayal of Amy Dudley, which depicted Amy as emotionally unstable, and sought to improve it when she wrote The Virgin's Lover. Here, Gregory practically starts over from scratch, writing something that stands apart on its own from the rest of her Tudor series. I admire her willingness to do that, and I also appreciate her ability to make sense of some of the characters' most puzzling actions. Her take on Jane's "madness" is very clever, and there is something quite poignant about Jane's relationship with Kitty Howard, which is driven both by self-preservation and a sisterly love for the young queen. Jane is not perfect, but she is sympathetic, and time and again she is the one who is betrayed--by George and Anne, by her father and her uncle, and ultimately even by Kitty.
My only complaint would be that I wish we had gotten to see more of Jane's marriage with George, given how different it is from every other depiction of the two of them. Well, that and that I wish my copy of this book included an Author's Note (which will presumably be in the published version). I'm eager to know more about Gregory's decision to write this book.
(Oh, and let's hope that Mary of Guise getting name-dropped so many times means there's a book about her in the pipeline. Fingers crossed!)
Audiobook Update
I enjoyed the audiobook for this story, although Gemma Whelan's narration took a little while for me to get used to. I wasn't a big fan of how she read Anne (especially compared to Vanessa Kirby's reading of her in The Other Boleyn Girl) but I thought she brought Cromwell to life in a way that he hadn't been on the page (his "commoner's" accent was a great touch). His scenes with Jane were probably my favorite overall. Interestingly, this is not the first book I've read to suggest that Cromwell may have had a bit of a thing for her.
Certain things stick out more in the audiobook narrations, such as Gregory's love of having her protagonists launch into lengthy inner monologues about the depth of Henry's corruption. This is a feature of nearly every one of her Tudor novels, and is clearly an insert of the author's own ruminations. The second half of this novel, focused entirely on Katherine Howard's short-lived reign, also started to drag a bit during the re-read (Katherine, while very sympathetic, is more than a little annoying), but it still built up to a satisfying conclusion.
As I had anticipated, the finished novel does include an Author's Note discussing how Jane Boleyn has been smeared throughout history for betraying her husband and sister-in-law to their deaths, despite there not being an evidence of this. Gregory says this started during the reign of Elizabeth I, when Tudor loyalists needed someone to blame for her mother's downfall without pointing the finger at Anne's murderer, Henry VIII. The Victorians painted Jane's seemingly inexplicable actions as the work of an inherently wicked women, whereas the progressives of the sexual revolution reconceptualized her as having been driven by sexual depravity. I greatly appreciate Gregory's decision to challenge these caricatures of Jane with a portrayal based on logic and research (she also discussed how many historians now doubt that Kitty ever went so far as to have sex with Thomas Culpepper). What I appreciated less was Gregory's failure to mention that she wrote not one, but two other books portraying Jane as a spiteful, unbalanced nymphomaniac herself. It's all well and good to accuse other writers of stooping to misogynistic stereotypes in their work, but you then need to be willing to admit when you've done the same.