What do you think?
Rate this book
Florenzer: A Novel
Set in Renaissance-era Florence, this ravishing debut reimagines the intersecting lives of three ambitious young men—a banker, a priest, and a gay painter named Leonardo.
“A dazzlingly prescient parable of ambition, greed, and wealth rattling even the firmest foundations. Like the fractured Italy leaping from its pages full of life and sound and smell, Florenzer churns at the quicksilver pace of creation itself.” —Isa Arsén, author of Shoot the Moon
Allstora’s July selection for “The (Very Gay) Book Club”
Longlisted for the Center for Fiction First Novel Prize
Leonardo da Vinci, twelve years old and a bastard, leaves the Tuscan countryside to join his father in Florence with dreams of becoming a painter. Francesco Salviati, also a bastard and scorned for his too-dark skin, dedicates himself to the Catholic Church with grand hopes of salvation. Towering above them both is Lorenzo de’ Medici, barely a man, yet soon to be the patriarch of the world’s wealthiest and most influential bank. Each of these young men harbors profound ambition, anxious to prove their potential to their superiors—and to themselves. Each is, in his own way, a son of Florence. Each will, when their paths cross, shed blood on Florence’s streets.
Fifteenth-century Florence flourishes as a haven of breathtaking artistic, cultural, and technological innovation, but discord churns below the the Medici’s bank exacerbates the city’s staggering wealth inequality, and rumors swirl of a rift between Lorenzo and the new pope. Meanwhile, the city has become Europe’s preeminent destination for gay men—or “florenzers,” as they come to be crudely called. For Leonardo, an astonishingly gifted painter’s apprentice, being a florenzer might feel like personal liberation—but risk lingers around every corner.
Brash and breathtaking, this lush historical drama unfolds the machinations of a city on the brink of a new age as it contends with the tensions between public and private lives, the entanglement of erotic and creative impulse, the sacrifices of the determinedly pious, and the risks of fantastic power. With his “unforgettable characters and an ever-twisting plot, all told with style, skill, and wry black humor” (Tim Leach), Phil Melanson emerges as an enthralling new voice in contemporary fiction.
“A dazzlingly prescient parable of ambition, greed, and wealth rattling even the firmest foundations. Like the fractured Italy leaping from its pages full of life and sound and smell, Florenzer churns at the quicksilver pace of creation itself.” —Isa Arsén, author of Shoot the Moon
Allstora’s July selection for “The (Very Gay) Book Club”
Longlisted for the Center for Fiction First Novel Prize
Leonardo da Vinci, twelve years old and a bastard, leaves the Tuscan countryside to join his father in Florence with dreams of becoming a painter. Francesco Salviati, also a bastard and scorned for his too-dark skin, dedicates himself to the Catholic Church with grand hopes of salvation. Towering above them both is Lorenzo de’ Medici, barely a man, yet soon to be the patriarch of the world’s wealthiest and most influential bank. Each of these young men harbors profound ambition, anxious to prove their potential to their superiors—and to themselves. Each is, in his own way, a son of Florence. Each will, when their paths cross, shed blood on Florence’s streets.
Fifteenth-century Florence flourishes as a haven of breathtaking artistic, cultural, and technological innovation, but discord churns below the the Medici’s bank exacerbates the city’s staggering wealth inequality, and rumors swirl of a rift between Lorenzo and the new pope. Meanwhile, the city has become Europe’s preeminent destination for gay men—or “florenzers,” as they come to be crudely called. For Leonardo, an astonishingly gifted painter’s apprentice, being a florenzer might feel like personal liberation—but risk lingers around every corner.
Brash and breathtaking, this lush historical drama unfolds the machinations of a city on the brink of a new age as it contends with the tensions between public and private lives, the entanglement of erotic and creative impulse, the sacrifices of the determinedly pious, and the risks of fantastic power. With his “unforgettable characters and an ever-twisting plot, all told with style, skill, and wry black humor” (Tim Leach), Phil Melanson emerges as an enthralling new voice in contemporary fiction.
363 pages, Kindle Edition
First published June 10, 2025
299 people are currently reading
6036 people want to read
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 30 of 134 reviews
February 23, 2025
This book is beautifully descriptive. You can almost smell and taste on each page how Italy was at that time! However, it was too dense for me with so many characters to keep track of! It is not a “light weekend” read! You will need to spend a lot of time with this story! 3 Stars ⭐️⭐️⭐️!
April 16, 2025
Set in Renaissance Florence, Florenzer explores the lives of three men who made mark on Florence’s history: an artist, a priest, and a banker.
Leonardo da Vinci, a child of twelve, dreams of becoming an artist while his father wants him to become notary like him. Francesco Salviati, also a bastard as Leonardo, dedicates himself to the Catholic Church. And Lorenzo de’ Medici, a young son of one of the most influential families of its time, soon to be ruling over Florence.
This richly depicted historical drama explores the pursuits of three men who become distinguished in their endeavors. Also, bringing to surface the time when gay men such as Leonardo were often persecuted.
This character-driven story takes time in vivid depiction, giving the reader the front seat to the events. The characters are complex and fascinating revealing their vulnerable side. Thus, as result, touching upon human emotions.
The passion for the subject and the eloquence of the language are evident in this storytelling.
Source: ARC was provided by the publisher via NetGalley in exchange for an honest review.
Leonardo da Vinci, a child of twelve, dreams of becoming an artist while his father wants him to become notary like him. Francesco Salviati, also a bastard as Leonardo, dedicates himself to the Catholic Church. And Lorenzo de’ Medici, a young son of one of the most influential families of its time, soon to be ruling over Florence.
This richly depicted historical drama explores the pursuits of three men who become distinguished in their endeavors. Also, bringing to surface the time when gay men such as Leonardo were often persecuted.
This character-driven story takes time in vivid depiction, giving the reader the front seat to the events. The characters are complex and fascinating revealing their vulnerable side. Thus, as result, touching upon human emotions.
The passion for the subject and the eloquence of the language are evident in this storytelling.
Source: ARC was provided by the publisher via NetGalley in exchange for an honest review.
Read
August 15, 2025I might have enjoyed this more if it had focused solely on Leonardo da Vinci, with Medici and Salviati playing supporting roles. The setting was rendered with lovely details, but overall, the story never grabbed me as I’d hoped (though Salviati's conclusion was chef's kiss 🤌). (more thoughts below 👇)
Florenzer is my second read from the 2025 Center for Fiction First Novel Prize longlist. The story unfolds in 15th century Florence and opens with a twelve-year-old Leonardo da Vinci, who dreams of becoming a painter. Also in the mix is the Catholic Francesco Salviati, who hopes for salvation, as well as Lorenzo de' Medici, who's poised to become a figure of great power and influence. Three young men harboring ambitions, each fated to shed blood on the streets of Florence.
Let's see how they fare, shall we?
THE SETUP
Leonardo (age 12) is a highly observant young man, with an eye drawn to color, and a proclivity for jotting down his observations.
Lorenzo (age 14) aspires to be more and achieve far more than his recently deceased grandfather.
Salviati (age 21) has a cousin pressing him to work at a bank, but Salviati aspires to join the church.
THE MIDPOINT
😮💨 Whew! I wish I could say I'm enamored with this book. But the truth is I'm finding it difficult to stay invested. Medici's chapters are slow, largely concerned with banking matters. Salviati's chapter are even slower. They're full of scheming, so you'd think they'd be more interesting, but alas...
It's Leonardo da Vinci's chapters that have me invested. I enjoy reading the descriptions of various paint colors or watching one of his works unfold in his mind then take shape on the canvas. His relationship with Iac is sweet, but it also puts him at risk, and Phil Melanson's captivating midpoint hinges on that reality.
THE CONCLUSION
The end of Salviati's story is, without question, the zenith of this book. Talk about stellar writing!
Medici's story felt so inconsequential that it could probably be removed from the story entirely without harming the novel in any way.
Da Vinci's story was the most captivating, though as other reviewers have pointed out, this is not a Leonardo who aligns with the one other biographers (most notably Walter Isaacson) have introduced us to. Nonetheless, it was Melanson's descriptions of da Vinci's view of the world, his tenderness toward other men, his fascination with machinery, and his eye for color that made this book worth reading.
Florenzer is my second read from the 2025 Center for Fiction First Novel Prize longlist. The story unfolds in 15th century Florence and opens with a twelve-year-old Leonardo da Vinci, who dreams of becoming a painter. Also in the mix is the Catholic Francesco Salviati, who hopes for salvation, as well as Lorenzo de' Medici, who's poised to become a figure of great power and influence. Three young men harboring ambitions, each fated to shed blood on the streets of Florence.
Let's see how they fare, shall we?
THE SETUP
Leonardo (age 12) is a highly observant young man, with an eye drawn to color, and a proclivity for jotting down his observations.
He commits his curiosities, his stirrings, his whims to paper, loose sheets he tucks beneath his mattress.
Lorenzo (age 14) aspires to be more and achieve far more than his recently deceased grandfather.
Whatever it takes, he thinks, he'll do it. Anything, to be magnificent.
Salviati (age 21) has a cousin pressing him to work at a bank, but Salviati aspires to join the church.
He turns toward the piazza. It is bright and crowded, as it is every day. This city has nothing for him. No amount of his cousin's gold will change that.
He has to leave. Florence is sick, he thinks. He sees it now: God has made His judgement on this marble Sodom.
Save the monuments, and let the plague take the rest.
THE MIDPOINT
😮💨 Whew! I wish I could say I'm enamored with this book. But the truth is I'm finding it difficult to stay invested. Medici's chapters are slow, largely concerned with banking matters. Salviati's chapter are even slower. They're full of scheming, so you'd think they'd be more interesting, but alas...
It's Leonardo da Vinci's chapters that have me invested. I enjoy reading the descriptions of various paint colors or watching one of his works unfold in his mind then take shape on the canvas. His relationship with Iac is sweet, but it also puts him at risk, and Phil Melanson's captivating midpoint hinges on that reality.
THE CONCLUSION
The end of Salviati's story is, without question, the zenith of this book. Talk about stellar writing!
Medici's story felt so inconsequential that it could probably be removed from the story entirely without harming the novel in any way.
Da Vinci's story was the most captivating, though as other reviewers have pointed out, this is not a Leonardo who aligns with the one other biographers (most notably Walter Isaacson) have introduced us to. Nonetheless, it was Melanson's descriptions of da Vinci's view of the world, his tenderness toward other men, his fascination with machinery, and his eye for color that made this book worth reading.
February 21, 2025
Florenzer by Phil Melanson was a departure from my usual reading choices, but I was intrigued by the premise—a novel set in Renaissance-era Florence, weaving together the lives of a banker, a priest, and a young Leonardo da Vinci. When I first picked it up, I thought, Oh, gay 1400s Italy? Sounds fun! However, I quickly realized that the combination of intricate historical detail and dense storytelling required more focus than I had anticipated.
I initially struggled to get into the book, as Melanson’s writing style felt more like a movie script—highly visual and descriptive, but not always immersive for me. That being said, his ability to paint vivid scenes is undeniable. His passion for the subject matter is evident on every page, and I appreciated the meticulous care he put into crafting this world.
The novel picked up for me in the second half as the action intensified. While I wasn’t particularly invested in Francesco Salviati or Lorenzo de’ Medici’s chapters—likely due to my limited prior knowledge of their historical significance—I was completely captivated by every chapter featuring Leonardo. If the book had focused more on him, with Salviati and Medici serving as secondary characters, I think I would have been more engaged from the start. But, of course, that wasn’t Melanson’s vision, and I respect the creative choices he made.
One aspect I truly appreciated was how the novel encouraged me to research historical events and figures. I found myself pausing my reading to look up biographical details, which ultimately deepened my understanding of the time period. My only critique is that the chapter headings, marked only with Roman numerals, made it difficult at times to discern whose perspective I was following. Including character names at the beginning of chapters would have helped with clarity, especially for readers unfamiliar with all three historical figures.
Overall, while Florenzer wasn’t entirely within my comfort zone, I found it to be a beautifully written novel. Melanson is an incredibly talented writer, and it’s clear that this book was a labor of love. I look forward to seeing what he writes next.
Thank you to NetGalley and W. W. Norton & Company | Liveright for the advanced copy.
I initially struggled to get into the book, as Melanson’s writing style felt more like a movie script—highly visual and descriptive, but not always immersive for me. That being said, his ability to paint vivid scenes is undeniable. His passion for the subject matter is evident on every page, and I appreciated the meticulous care he put into crafting this world.
The novel picked up for me in the second half as the action intensified. While I wasn’t particularly invested in Francesco Salviati or Lorenzo de’ Medici’s chapters—likely due to my limited prior knowledge of their historical significance—I was completely captivated by every chapter featuring Leonardo. If the book had focused more on him, with Salviati and Medici serving as secondary characters, I think I would have been more engaged from the start. But, of course, that wasn’t Melanson’s vision, and I respect the creative choices he made.
One aspect I truly appreciated was how the novel encouraged me to research historical events and figures. I found myself pausing my reading to look up biographical details, which ultimately deepened my understanding of the time period. My only critique is that the chapter headings, marked only with Roman numerals, made it difficult at times to discern whose perspective I was following. Including character names at the beginning of chapters would have helped with clarity, especially for readers unfamiliar with all three historical figures.
Overall, while Florenzer wasn’t entirely within my comfort zone, I found it to be a beautifully written novel. Melanson is an incredibly talented writer, and it’s clear that this book was a labor of love. I look forward to seeing what he writes next.
Thank you to NetGalley and W. W. Norton & Company | Liveright for the advanced copy.
August 6, 2025
I'm somewhat at a loss: by rights, I should've been enthralled by a book mostly set in a city I fell hard and fast and permanently for when I lived there very briefly a couple of decades ago. I should, furthermore, have been enthralled by the historical setting: Lorenzo de Medici rules Florence; Leonardo is making art, messing around with a sex-working goldsmith's apprentice named Iac, and also learning the perfectionist's art of agonized procrastination; Francesco Salviati is busy scheming for advancement in Rome, under the della Rovere pope Sixtus IV.
The narrative suffers from its shifts in point of view among these three men, because neither Salviati nor, especially, Lorenzo is any kind of pleasure to spend time with. It's not that I require all the characters in a book to be likeable, but the inside of Lorenzo's head, in particular, is a repellent place and I didn't want to be there. Salviati's scheming is high-stakes for him, less than a draw for someone who doesn't come to the story well versed in curial politicking: it's a writerly trap, I guess, because if a reader's to care about the ins and outs of the papal court she needs to, okay, be rooting for the schemer, and I didn't care enough about Salviati for the stakes to matter. As for Leonardo, he's by far the most sympathetic of the three, but his inner life is tortuous and torturous.
All that having been said, once the Pazzi conspiracy gets going, so does the story. After Salviati's death (that whole sequence is terrific in all senses of the word) the perspective is Leonardo's, and since he's finding his right vocation -- no matter how awful the circumstances -- there's a sense of movement and opening that I found lacking in the book's first half.
I also found myself thinking, often, of K. J. Charles, whose historical settings are impeccably researched and fully realized, but who wears her learning lightly. Phil Melanson's historical setting is impeccably researched and fully realized, but -- I won't say the result stinks of the lamp, but I definitely knew the lamp was there.
But "Florenzer"'s flaws are all owing to its ambition, and how can I object to a writer trying to do something complicated and interesting and not quite succeeding? Three and a half stars rounded up, with thanks to Norton/Liveright and NetGalley for the ARC.
The narrative suffers from its shifts in point of view among these three men, because neither Salviati nor, especially, Lorenzo is any kind of pleasure to spend time with. It's not that I require all the characters in a book to be likeable, but the inside of Lorenzo's head, in particular, is a repellent place and I didn't want to be there. Salviati's scheming is high-stakes for him, less than a draw for someone who doesn't come to the story well versed in curial politicking: it's a writerly trap, I guess, because if a reader's to care about the ins and outs of the papal court she needs to, okay, be rooting for the schemer, and I didn't care enough about Salviati for the stakes to matter. As for Leonardo, he's by far the most sympathetic of the three, but his inner life is tortuous and torturous.
All that having been said, once the Pazzi conspiracy gets going, so does the story. After Salviati's death (that whole sequence is terrific in all senses of the word) the perspective is Leonardo's, and since he's finding his right vocation -- no matter how awful the circumstances -- there's a sense of movement and opening that I found lacking in the book's first half.
I also found myself thinking, often, of K. J. Charles, whose historical settings are impeccably researched and fully realized, but who wears her learning lightly. Phil Melanson's historical setting is impeccably researched and fully realized, but -- I won't say the result stinks of the lamp, but I definitely knew the lamp was there.
But "Florenzer"'s flaws are all owing to its ambition, and how can I object to a writer trying to do something complicated and interesting and not quite succeeding? Three and a half stars rounded up, with thanks to Norton/Liveright and NetGalley for the ARC.
May 22, 2025
Made it to 49% and just couldn't go on.
I’m sure author Phil Melanson did his research, but the Leonardo of “Florenzer” bears little resemblance to the Leonardo of myriad biographies, contemporary reports, and even Leonardo’s notebooks.
For starters, this Leonardo is depicted as a diffident loner who’s mocked by his fellow apprentices for appearing to be a homosexual and as a naif regarding sexuality. In reality, Leonardo was well liked and popular among his peers even before becoming acclaimed. While he was self-conscious about his lack of formal education, particularly his ignorance of Latin, he was not in doubt about his artistic skills.
Then, too, while sodomy was illegal in Florence at that time, it was also accepted, especially between men and youths, in keeping with the ancient Greek philosophy. Given that Leonardo was exceptionally good-looking (“It was the most beautiful face in the world,” enthused 16th-century historian Paolo Giovio) even as a young man, the likelihood that he had not been propositioned during his adolescence are slim.
There are other disturbing lapses. Botticelli most likely never apprenticed with Verrocchio as Leonardo had, and given the age difference they wouldn’t have done so at the same time anyway; also, Botticelli and Leonardo were friends, so the former would not have taunted the latter. Leonardo at one point says the reason babies in paintings were ugly was because they weren’t depicted from life; it’s actually because the vogue was to depict them to resemble the adults they would become, particularly in religious works, as per the homunculus concept.
Maybe I’d be able to overlook this if the prose weren’t so ponderous and pretentious. The myriad descriptions overwhelm the characters and the plot, and the sentence structure is so repetitious. Reading this became a chore. Sad, since I was so looking forward to it.
Thank you, W.W. Norton & Co. and NetGalley, for providing me with an advanced copy in exchange for a (very) honest review.
I’m sure author Phil Melanson did his research, but the Leonardo of “Florenzer” bears little resemblance to the Leonardo of myriad biographies, contemporary reports, and even Leonardo’s notebooks.
For starters, this Leonardo is depicted as a diffident loner who’s mocked by his fellow apprentices for appearing to be a homosexual and as a naif regarding sexuality. In reality, Leonardo was well liked and popular among his peers even before becoming acclaimed. While he was self-conscious about his lack of formal education, particularly his ignorance of Latin, he was not in doubt about his artistic skills.
Then, too, while sodomy was illegal in Florence at that time, it was also accepted, especially between men and youths, in keeping with the ancient Greek philosophy. Given that Leonardo was exceptionally good-looking (“It was the most beautiful face in the world,” enthused 16th-century historian Paolo Giovio) even as a young man, the likelihood that he had not been propositioned during his adolescence are slim.
There are other disturbing lapses. Botticelli most likely never apprenticed with Verrocchio as Leonardo had, and given the age difference they wouldn’t have done so at the same time anyway; also, Botticelli and Leonardo were friends, so the former would not have taunted the latter. Leonardo at one point says the reason babies in paintings were ugly was because they weren’t depicted from life; it’s actually because the vogue was to depict them to resemble the adults they would become, particularly in religious works, as per the homunculus concept.
Maybe I’d be able to overlook this if the prose weren’t so ponderous and pretentious. The myriad descriptions overwhelm the characters and the plot, and the sentence structure is so repetitious. Reading this became a chore. Sad, since I was so looking forward to it.
Thank you, W.W. Norton & Co. and NetGalley, for providing me with an advanced copy in exchange for a (very) honest review.
February 28, 2025
This was one of the most beautifully descriptive books i have read in a long time. It was full of intricate details that made it feel like you had been transported to another world. I found the story incredibly captivating one of those books you just cant put down. My one gripe was with how hard i found it to keep up with the timing i wish there had been more dates throughout the book so i could better keep up with when events were happening. Overall one of the best books I’ve read so far this year
5⭐️
5⭐️
March 24, 2025
Thank you to the author and publisher for giving me a free arc in exchange for a review.
“Sodomy exists anywhere there are men with cocks and men with holes. Which is everywhere, really, except for the convents—and there the nuns have their own methods.”
This was so good I’m actually losing it. I have always been a fan of historical reimagines like this, and I loved the way the author wove the 3 men’s lives together. My favorite was definitely Leonardo, but all 3 narratives were compelling and I never wanted to skip any of them. The descriptions were extremely lush too. I loved the way the art was described, and that expanded to the setting. 100% a must read for fans of Medici (2016) or o’farrells the marriage portrait. Despite being 400 pages it didn’t drag and i couldn’t put it down.
5 stars!!
“Sodomy exists anywhere there are men with cocks and men with holes. Which is everywhere, really, except for the convents—and there the nuns have their own methods.”
This was so good I’m actually losing it. I have always been a fan of historical reimagines like this, and I loved the way the author wove the 3 men’s lives together. My favorite was definitely Leonardo, but all 3 narratives were compelling and I never wanted to skip any of them. The descriptions were extremely lush too. I loved the way the art was described, and that expanded to the setting. 100% a must read for fans of Medici (2016) or o’farrells the marriage portrait. Despite being 400 pages it didn’t drag and i couldn’t put it down.
5 stars!!
December 8, 2025
I attempted to listen to “Florenzer” by Phil Melanson, narrated by Krysten Peck, but the narration made it difficult to stay engaged. The voice and pacing were so monotonous that I often found myself drifting off, and I eventually stopped halfway through.
The story itself, centered on Leonardo da Vinci’s childhood has potential, but the delivery drained much of the energy from it. Unless a different audiobook edition is available, I may need to read the print version or have someone read it aloud to fully appreciate the book.
April 17, 2025
got this arc from netgalley, i love honesty, consider this a disclaimer!
ok so. i think this is my pro-gay bias talking (lol), but i found the leonardo chapters much more captivating than salviati's or lorenzo's. actually, i also really enjoyed salviati because the man is just so, so tortured, and i love to see it. lorenzo was a much more boring character, but i think that's because watching a rich boy destroy the financial empire handed to him when he was too young and egomaniacal to be reasonable about it is kind of boring? it's obvious. maybe that's part of the point, actually. i don't know.
but leonardo? extremely complex compelling. also extremely tortured. my favourite type of character.
i devoured this book. it is beautifully written to my tastes. it seems very historically grounded to me, although i will have to admit i don't know enough about the actual history to know if i am lying about that. it feels very human, and i admire that. i hope phil melanson keeps writing, because i would love to see what else he can do. i don't have a long, analytical review because i don't have anything to nitpick and i don't know how to compliment books beyond recommending them to people. i already told my dad to read this when it comes out. that's how good my opinion is. so, absolutely do recommend, would read again, etc.
ok so. i think this is my pro-gay bias talking (lol), but i found the leonardo chapters much more captivating than salviati's or lorenzo's. actually, i also really enjoyed salviati because the man is just so, so tortured, and i love to see it. lorenzo was a much more boring character, but i think that's because watching a rich boy destroy the financial empire handed to him when he was too young and egomaniacal to be reasonable about it is kind of boring? it's obvious. maybe that's part of the point, actually. i don't know.
but leonardo? extremely complex compelling. also extremely tortured. my favourite type of character.
i devoured this book. it is beautifully written to my tastes. it seems very historically grounded to me, although i will have to admit i don't know enough about the actual history to know if i am lying about that. it feels very human, and i admire that. i hope phil melanson keeps writing, because i would love to see what else he can do. i don't have a long, analytical review because i don't have anything to nitpick and i don't know how to compliment books beyond recommending them to people. i already told my dad to read this when it comes out. that's how good my opinion is. so, absolutely do recommend, would read again, etc.
June 16, 2025
A miss for me in so many ways.
August 19, 2025
hate to say it; this book was rlly disappointing!!! esp because it contains some of my favorites things (italy, riches, homosexuals). commit the cardinal sin of switching between the perspective of 3 disparate characters whose narratives never come together in a satisfying way (or really, any way)
i could complain a LOT. more about this book but i will restrain myself 💕 it was decently well written tho
i could complain a LOT. more about this book but i will restrain myself 💕 it was decently well written tho
March 2, 2025
It was a good read.
December 20, 2025
Simply not for me. This is not a time period I'm interested in, but I hoped I could still enjoy it. Not the case. The story did nothing to endear me to any of the characters. The story itself meanders and takes a back seat to the prose. Which was fine. Most of the writing was very beautiful. But too much over the top bodily descriptions. I never need to read again about a gummy-mouthed Pope, greasy pudgy fingers, lapping tongues, etc. Also Leonardo was a miserable wet blanket. No thanks.
April 12, 2025
Florenzer is a richly atmospheric novel that brings renaissance Florence to life through the lives of Leonardo da Vinci, Lorenzo de' Medici, and Francesco Salviati. Loosely based on real events, it’s a detailed reimagining packed with art, politics, and drama.
Melanson’s writing is so vivid. His descriptions feel like they’re jumping off the page. His prose is poetic, especially when he;s writing about art or the internal conflict of the characters.
The story rotates between the three aforementioned characters but it has an omniscient voice which is interesting since there’s no shift in tone between each POV. This was sometimes difficult to keep track of but also a clearly intentional narrative decision.
Leonardo’s chapters stood out the most maybe due to my own familiarity with him as a historical figure compared to the others. I really appreciated the character list because there is a huge case of characters and it helps to have something to refer to.
If you're into renaissance history (or loved The Marriage Portrait), this one’s for you.
thank you to netgalley for an ARC of this book in exchange for an honest review!
Melanson’s writing is so vivid. His descriptions feel like they’re jumping off the page. His prose is poetic, especially when he;s writing about art or the internal conflict of the characters.
The story rotates between the three aforementioned characters but it has an omniscient voice which is interesting since there’s no shift in tone between each POV. This was sometimes difficult to keep track of but also a clearly intentional narrative decision.
Leonardo’s chapters stood out the most maybe due to my own familiarity with him as a historical figure compared to the others. I really appreciated the character list because there is a huge case of characters and it helps to have something to refer to.
If you're into renaissance history (or loved The Marriage Portrait), this one’s for you.
thank you to netgalley for an ARC of this book in exchange for an honest review!
July 28, 2025
A very fine debut that is well researched and artfully written. It is neither a light or easy read; one finds oneself constantly flipping back to the critical character list page to make sure that one has a semblance of what’s going on. Some of the beauty of the prose shines through despite the packed history and endless accounting of names. The chapters centered on da Vinci are by far the best; I’m curious as to why the focus was divided between da Vinci, whose narrative is driven by pathos, and Lorenzo d’Medici, whose narrative is driven by historical events. The intersections between the two characters alluded to some greater relationship that never materialized, so the conversation that was alluded to in the opening chapter ultimately felt stilted. Take your time with this one!
November 3, 2025
3.5 stars. Beautifully written, expertly researched. I learned a lot and am now more motivated to read Walter Isaacson’s da Vinci biography (and revisit my AP European history textbook). It felt a little directionless, though, and like the moments that were supposed to be climaxes weren’t treated as such. I didn’t realize some moments were so critical until well after the fact. Still, I was definitely transported to time and place, and that’s not always an easy thing to do, especially with a period like Renaissance Florence that is so often portrayed.
July 21, 2025
It was great reading about Leonardo da Vinci and Florence during the 15th century.
June 27, 2025
3.5⭐️
June 13, 2025
I've read a few books set in Renaissance Italy, I've also read a few books that are fictionalized accounts of real people, this is a formula that works for me. I think this was a very interesting trio of people to follow, it showed who held power over whom, and how decisions by the wealthy unfold over the poorer populace. This is much more raw and detailed than any other Renaissance novels I've read so far. I actually learned a lot. You might not pick up many new things if you're very knowledgeable about this era though, I simply have never been taught much about this era, although it does interest me massively. I could easily picture the streets and the atmosphere of Florence.
What made this only a three star for me, is that it was a bit dry. The sentences and the chapters are short, so it’s quite easy to get through, but I wasn't interested in what would happen next. Especially because this is only the beginning of Leonardo's story, we don't get to his successful years. It almost feels like a tragedy from the tone and end of this book. I wonder what Melanson's intentions were, just focusing on these years. The book takes place over a span of just over ten years, but I never experienced much growth in any of the men we follow. I depicted them all being the same age in the end of the book as in the beginning, there could have been more attention paid to the progression of time.
I don't think this is a bad book, but I'm so used to a bit more plot, and the lack of plot made it lose its momentum. Fictionalized retellings of people's lives can still easily have plot, for example in The Marriage Portrait and This Thing of Darkness. I think what would have really could have helped with plotting is to give these men some drive. Only Salviati had this inner drive, the two others just existed, with not much driving them forwards. I never felt connected with them for this reason.
What made this only a three star for me, is that it was a bit dry. The sentences and the chapters are short, so it’s quite easy to get through, but I wasn't interested in what would happen next. Especially because this is only the beginning of Leonardo's story, we don't get to his successful years. It almost feels like a tragedy from the tone and end of this book. I wonder what Melanson's intentions were, just focusing on these years. The book takes place over a span of just over ten years, but I never experienced much growth in any of the men we follow. I depicted them all being the same age in the end of the book as in the beginning, there could have been more attention paid to the progression of time.
I don't think this is a bad book, but I'm so used to a bit more plot, and the lack of plot made it lose its momentum. Fictionalized retellings of people's lives can still easily have plot, for example in The Marriage Portrait and This Thing of Darkness. I think what would have really could have helped with plotting is to give these men some drive. Only Salviati had this inner drive, the two others just existed, with not much driving them forwards. I never felt connected with them for this reason.
July 17, 2025
IF YOU LOVE HISTORICAL FICTION, THIS IS A GREAT NOVEL!
During the Italian Renaissance of the latter half of the 15th century, there were three young men living in Florence who would eventually make history. The most prominent was Leonardo da Vinci who, at age 12, has come to live with his father. He wants to paint. He will do so much more. Although ignored by historians and biographers until just recently, it's now assumed through strong circumstantial evidence that da Vinci was also sexually attracted to men and Melanson in this story will imagine what his love life might have been. At one time, Melanson relates in his afternotes, sodomy was such an open secret in this city of artists, "Florenzer" had become a pseudonym for "sodomite."
There is also Lorenzo di' Medici, still in his 20s, but with the premature death of his ill father, becomes the patriarch of historically famous and richest banking family in Europe at that time. Finally, there is Francesco Salviati who has dedicated himself to the Roman Catholic Church with aspirations to climb its hierarchy into a position of power.
Largely, the book is about the political rivalry which existed at that time between a conflux of city states dominated by Papal State (Rome), Florence, Milan, Venice, and Naples in the south. The pope in Rome was attempting to bend these powerful cities to his (God's) will and was astute at playing one city off against another. If nothing else, this book is full of political intrigue!
The main plotline takes us on a slow burn toward outright conflict between Rome orchestrated by Salviati, now a confidant of the pope, and Medici and his powerful bank in Florence. The Church wants subservience from Florence but needs Medici's purse. Medici is not keen to take orders from the pope, but to openly defy the Church in these times was heresy and could result in all of Florence being excommunicated. It was an exceedingly tricky and complicated affair. In alternating chapters, Melanson skillfully walks us forward toward the showdown! His prose is so authentic. We visualize the abject poor making their way along filthy streets smelling the foul air of open sewers and rotting garbage intermingling with the wealthy class as they pass in their fine attire making their way in opulent carriages to their villas and grand estates.
Intermixed in the intrigue between the pope and the banker, Melanson imagines da Vinci as an apprentice in the shop of his mentor (this is factual), struggling against his middle-class father who thinks his painting will never bring him wealth and respect (also factual). We learn of da Vinci getting his first commissions from Medici and also the Church and his rocky transition from student to teacher. His struggle to start out on his own. I have not read a biography of da Vinci and cannot parse the fact from the fiction in this part of Melanson's narrative. I expect, for this story, much of da Vinci's movements and actions have come from Melanson's imagination.
In the climax of the novel, Salviati and his supporters attempt a coup against Medici. I wasn't sure if this was an actual historical event, so I looked it up. It was. Known as the Pazzi Conspiracy it occurred on April 26, 1478. I imagine much of the dramatic events of that day, certainly that da Vinci was there and got caught up in the violence, came from the well-researched and vivid imagination of this author. You wouldn't necessarily know that though by reading this superbly crafted and engaging novel.
During the Italian Renaissance of the latter half of the 15th century, there were three young men living in Florence who would eventually make history. The most prominent was Leonardo da Vinci who, at age 12, has come to live with his father. He wants to paint. He will do so much more. Although ignored by historians and biographers until just recently, it's now assumed through strong circumstantial evidence that da Vinci was also sexually attracted to men and Melanson in this story will imagine what his love life might have been. At one time, Melanson relates in his afternotes, sodomy was such an open secret in this city of artists, "Florenzer" had become a pseudonym for "sodomite."
There is also Lorenzo di' Medici, still in his 20s, but with the premature death of his ill father, becomes the patriarch of historically famous and richest banking family in Europe at that time. Finally, there is Francesco Salviati who has dedicated himself to the Roman Catholic Church with aspirations to climb its hierarchy into a position of power.
Largely, the book is about the political rivalry which existed at that time between a conflux of city states dominated by Papal State (Rome), Florence, Milan, Venice, and Naples in the south. The pope in Rome was attempting to bend these powerful cities to his (God's) will and was astute at playing one city off against another. If nothing else, this book is full of political intrigue!
The main plotline takes us on a slow burn toward outright conflict between Rome orchestrated by Salviati, now a confidant of the pope, and Medici and his powerful bank in Florence. The Church wants subservience from Florence but needs Medici's purse. Medici is not keen to take orders from the pope, but to openly defy the Church in these times was heresy and could result in all of Florence being excommunicated. It was an exceedingly tricky and complicated affair. In alternating chapters, Melanson skillfully walks us forward toward the showdown! His prose is so authentic. We visualize the abject poor making their way along filthy streets smelling the foul air of open sewers and rotting garbage intermingling with the wealthy class as they pass in their fine attire making their way in opulent carriages to their villas and grand estates.
Intermixed in the intrigue between the pope and the banker, Melanson imagines da Vinci as an apprentice in the shop of his mentor (this is factual), struggling against his middle-class father who thinks his painting will never bring him wealth and respect (also factual). We learn of da Vinci getting his first commissions from Medici and also the Church and his rocky transition from student to teacher. His struggle to start out on his own. I have not read a biography of da Vinci and cannot parse the fact from the fiction in this part of Melanson's narrative. I expect, for this story, much of da Vinci's movements and actions have come from Melanson's imagination.
In the climax of the novel, Salviati and his supporters attempt a coup against Medici. I wasn't sure if this was an actual historical event, so I looked it up. It was. Known as the Pazzi Conspiracy it occurred on April 26, 1478. I imagine much of the dramatic events of that day, certainly that da Vinci was there and got caught up in the violence, came from the well-researched and vivid imagination of this author. You wouldn't necessarily know that though by reading this superbly crafted and engaging novel.
June 10, 2025
Phil Melanson's debut novel, "Florenzer," strips away the burnished glow of Renaissance myth, revealing the true pigments, delicate brushstrokes, and shifting shades of power that shaped 15th-century Florence. Through three perspectives—Lorenzo de' Medici's management of political leadership, Francesco Salviati's pursuit of advancement within the Vatican, and Leonardo da Vinci's quest for artistic truth—the novel examines survival in a system of unstable alliances and carefully managed appearances. The political relationships between Florence, Rome, Milan, Naples, and Venice require careful language and flattery when dealing with papal authority or rival rulers, creating what Lorenzo calls a "game of pretend."
The beating heart of this narrative isn't Renaissance splendor but the criminalization of homosexuality. Florence's judicial persecution of same-sex relationships becomes a political weapon, with hundreds convicted yearly. Melanson explores this through Leonardo da Vinci's relationships drawn from historical records. These unfold under constant threat from informants, the Officers of the Night, and a civic apparatus where "anyone can drop an accusation" into denunciation boxes. These scenes, which include candid portrayals of sexual intimacy, underscore physical danger, not for shock value, but to reveal how queerness was harnessed as a tool of control.
Melanson bases his work on meticulous historical research. Drawing from Florentine judicial archives, he shows power operating beyond formal institutions—in private bedrooms and anonymous denunciation boxes, through banking ledgers and papal decrees. In Florence, we witness Lorenzo navigating the Signoria's republican resistance to his authority while grappling with the Pazzi Bank's challenge to Medici financial dominance. In Rome, Salviati moves through a Vatican where advancement requires pious performance and ruthless calculation. The novel presents Lorenzo's calculated inconsistency, enforcing moral laws when politically expedient, undermining them when personally necessary, not as hypocrisy to condemn, but as the inevitable condition of maintaining authority in a system built on contradictions.
Melanson places his story within the turbulent political web of competing Italian states, where shifting alliances, banking rivalries, and papal ambitions determine public fortunes and private fates. From the opening scene, the aftermath of Cosimo de' Medici's death, leaving Florence nominally a republic yet practically adrift, the novel explores how power is claimed, maintained, and challenged across different spheres of Renaissance society. Lorenzo grapples with the paradox of republican governance and de facto rule, Salviati maneuvers through Vatican intrigues, and Leonardo confronts the limitations imposed on artistic vision by patronage and societal constraints. Historical events like the Volterra alum mine dispute reveal how economic interests drive political decisions, with Lorenzo framing military action as necessary to preserve Florence's reputation among rival states.
The novel tracks Lorenzo's political maturation from defensive protector of Medici interests to shrewd cultivator of lasting influence. A speculative journey, acknowledged in the historical note as intentional invention, dramatizes a more profound truth: legacy is constructed under duress, rarely without compromise. The novel suggests the Renaissance wasn't merely a cultural awakening but a period when power learned to disguise itself as virtue, and virtue to pose as permanence.
Melanson's approach of weaving papal politics, financial intrigue, and artistic innovation directly into his characters' inner lives transcends lesser historical fiction. The three perspectives offer different facets of Renaissance society: political calculation, religious ambition, and artistic struggle. The result is a world where threats accumulate steadily, and political, spiritual, or creative survival depends as much on performance as on conviction. This depth of perspective is matched by Melanson's control over form and style.
Melanson's prose balances density with momentum, shaped by a visual sensibility reflecting his film and marketing background. His sentences carry a rhythm that feels deliberate without being overly ornamental, often layering sensory detail with political or emotional undercurrents. This density sometimes demands patient reading, particularly in passages exploring the intricacies of banking rivalries or Vatican politics. Importantly, Melanson resists the temptation to tidy his narrative arcs. The result is a novel that favors resonance over resolution, offering a literary experience that is as structurally ambitious as it is emotionally precise.
Melanson has crafted a historical novel with edges that cut. It neither flatters its subjects nor contorts itself to please modern sensibilities. Instead, it insists history remains a contested field of memory, image, and survival, and that those who endure its crucible rarely emerge without scars. With the analytical precision of Leonardo's anatomical studies, "Florenzer" lays bare Renaissance Florence, revealing power, desire, and survival as the sinews of its society.
This review is based on an advance reader copy provided by NetGalley and W.W. Norton & Company - Liveright.
The beating heart of this narrative isn't Renaissance splendor but the criminalization of homosexuality. Florence's judicial persecution of same-sex relationships becomes a political weapon, with hundreds convicted yearly. Melanson explores this through Leonardo da Vinci's relationships drawn from historical records. These unfold under constant threat from informants, the Officers of the Night, and a civic apparatus where "anyone can drop an accusation" into denunciation boxes. These scenes, which include candid portrayals of sexual intimacy, underscore physical danger, not for shock value, but to reveal how queerness was harnessed as a tool of control.
Melanson bases his work on meticulous historical research. Drawing from Florentine judicial archives, he shows power operating beyond formal institutions—in private bedrooms and anonymous denunciation boxes, through banking ledgers and papal decrees. In Florence, we witness Lorenzo navigating the Signoria's republican resistance to his authority while grappling with the Pazzi Bank's challenge to Medici financial dominance. In Rome, Salviati moves through a Vatican where advancement requires pious performance and ruthless calculation. The novel presents Lorenzo's calculated inconsistency, enforcing moral laws when politically expedient, undermining them when personally necessary, not as hypocrisy to condemn, but as the inevitable condition of maintaining authority in a system built on contradictions.
Melanson places his story within the turbulent political web of competing Italian states, where shifting alliances, banking rivalries, and papal ambitions determine public fortunes and private fates. From the opening scene, the aftermath of Cosimo de' Medici's death, leaving Florence nominally a republic yet practically adrift, the novel explores how power is claimed, maintained, and challenged across different spheres of Renaissance society. Lorenzo grapples with the paradox of republican governance and de facto rule, Salviati maneuvers through Vatican intrigues, and Leonardo confronts the limitations imposed on artistic vision by patronage and societal constraints. Historical events like the Volterra alum mine dispute reveal how economic interests drive political decisions, with Lorenzo framing military action as necessary to preserve Florence's reputation among rival states.
The novel tracks Lorenzo's political maturation from defensive protector of Medici interests to shrewd cultivator of lasting influence. A speculative journey, acknowledged in the historical note as intentional invention, dramatizes a more profound truth: legacy is constructed under duress, rarely without compromise. The novel suggests the Renaissance wasn't merely a cultural awakening but a period when power learned to disguise itself as virtue, and virtue to pose as permanence.
Melanson's approach of weaving papal politics, financial intrigue, and artistic innovation directly into his characters' inner lives transcends lesser historical fiction. The three perspectives offer different facets of Renaissance society: political calculation, religious ambition, and artistic struggle. The result is a world where threats accumulate steadily, and political, spiritual, or creative survival depends as much on performance as on conviction. This depth of perspective is matched by Melanson's control over form and style.
Melanson's prose balances density with momentum, shaped by a visual sensibility reflecting his film and marketing background. His sentences carry a rhythm that feels deliberate without being overly ornamental, often layering sensory detail with political or emotional undercurrents. This density sometimes demands patient reading, particularly in passages exploring the intricacies of banking rivalries or Vatican politics. Importantly, Melanson resists the temptation to tidy his narrative arcs. The result is a novel that favors resonance over resolution, offering a literary experience that is as structurally ambitious as it is emotionally precise.
Melanson has crafted a historical novel with edges that cut. It neither flatters its subjects nor contorts itself to please modern sensibilities. Instead, it insists history remains a contested field of memory, image, and survival, and that those who endure its crucible rarely emerge without scars. With the analytical precision of Leonardo's anatomical studies, "Florenzer" lays bare Renaissance Florence, revealing power, desire, and survival as the sinews of its society.
This review is based on an advance reader copy provided by NetGalley and W.W. Norton & Company - Liveright.
September 17, 2025
I started this book at the end of April, before it's publication, and only finished it yesterday.
For any other book taking me this long I probably would have decided to drop it two and a half months ago, but I just had to finish this one. The plot isn't necessarily what drew me in because this is a very character-driven story, hints of a narrative thread linking the three main characters actually only appear in the second half of the book, for most of it I was simply along for the ride. BUT it was a great ride!
The writing of this book is absolutely fantastic. If you like descriptions, go right ahead. I was continuously amazed by how vivid and real everything all seemed. Genuinely one of the most impressive writing styles I have come accross. So impressive in fact that it does get a little dense at times, hence the 4 star review rather than 5. I had to pull up a few wikipedia pages despite the character list in the beginning.
Leonardo was obviously my favourite protagonist, but I also had a soft spot for Salviati :).
Thank you to NetGalley and the author for providing me with an eARC of this book!
For any other book taking me this long I probably would have decided to drop it two and a half months ago, but I just had to finish this one. The plot isn't necessarily what drew me in because this is a very character-driven story, hints of a narrative thread linking the three main characters actually only appear in the second half of the book, for most of it I was simply along for the ride. BUT it was a great ride!
The writing of this book is absolutely fantastic. If you like descriptions, go right ahead. I was continuously amazed by how vivid and real everything all seemed. Genuinely one of the most impressive writing styles I have come accross. So impressive in fact that it does get a little dense at times, hence the 4 star review rather than 5. I had to pull up a few wikipedia pages despite the character list in the beginning.
Leonardo was obviously my favourite protagonist, but I also had a soft spot for Salviati :).
Thank you to NetGalley and the author for providing me with an eARC of this book!
September 26, 2025
When I saw the chart listing the cast of characters, I thought, “uh oh! Will I be able to keep up?” But once you get your bearings, it’s really a wild ride.
The story itself is fascinating and emotional, with plenty of humanity (with sex, violence, and connections) to propel the reader. I liked the chapters from different perspectives, skillfully linked by Melanson to flow from one to the next, and how each section was marked with a different sketch.
By exploring Da Vinci’s sexual awakening within the context of social and religious/political turmoil, the author taps into the larger truth that Queer people have been ostracized and criminalized by governments (political and/or religious)…that is until the service of an artist or musician is needed, and so long as their sexuality is cloaked. We see just how easily people in power can be bribed, and the manipulation of people in power.
Also—daddy issues. And left-hand dominance as a form of otherness.
Melanson paints beautifully with words (but you’ll want to have your phone handy to look up the unfamiliar ones)! I also appreciated the short chapter lengths.
Looking forward to his next novel!
The story itself is fascinating and emotional, with plenty of humanity (with sex, violence, and connections) to propel the reader. I liked the chapters from different perspectives, skillfully linked by Melanson to flow from one to the next, and how each section was marked with a different sketch.
By exploring Da Vinci’s sexual awakening within the context of social and religious/political turmoil, the author taps into the larger truth that Queer people have been ostracized and criminalized by governments (political and/or religious)…that is until the service of an artist or musician is needed, and so long as their sexuality is cloaked. We see just how easily people in power can be bribed, and the manipulation of people in power.
Also—daddy issues. And left-hand dominance as a form of otherness.
Melanson paints beautifully with words (but you’ll want to have your phone handy to look up the unfamiliar ones)! I also appreciated the short chapter lengths.
Looking forward to his next novel!
March 9, 2025
Reading this as an ARC may prove to be a significant difference to reading it in its final form. Pieces that i believe will be added or included in the final book (maybe images or formatting specification) were obviously missing from the ARC which I believe is the reason I struggled connecting the dots. There are three(?) points of view here from a single omniscient narrator, so voice doesn’t change and the beginnings of chapters (in this form) didn’t directly state which character the narration moves to. I spent time trying to figure that out rather than connecting with story.
Aside from that, the story is very engaging, the setting is strong. There are a million characters that are hard to keep straight but the character list at the front intends to help with that.
Aside from that, the story is very engaging, the setting is strong. There are a million characters that are hard to keep straight but the character list at the front intends to help with that.
October 2, 2025
Beautifully written, well researched, and boring as hell. I felt no connection with any of the characters (well, Leonardo was an exception) and the book, well before the halfway point, became so tedious, I looked at picking it up and reading as a chore. Not recommended.
November 26, 2025
3.5/5
Some good historical fiction, but not without some hangups.
Ultimately, there's comfort in knowing that even someone as monumental as to human history as Leonardo Da Vinci struggled with self-doubt and artistic ruts.
Some good historical fiction, but not without some hangups.
Ultimately, there's comfort in knowing that even someone as monumental as to human history as Leonardo Da Vinci struggled with self-doubt and artistic ruts.
October 16, 2025
Oh, Leonardo!
This is a thick, laborious read, also glorious, in language like a painting, stroke by stroke. The complex relationships unfold, enfold, and go their ominous paths. But, Leonardo does not triumph here, arrive at his vaulted state as a painter, architect, engineer, renowned for The Last Supper, the Mona Lisa, yet awaiting him in Milan and elsewhere. We meet the young man, the florenzer, struggling through life as a misfit. This is a classic rendition of growing up gay, rejected by his father, disappointing to all those who don’t understand. We know he will emerge triumphant as the greatest of Florence, as we leave him here en route to Milan.
This is a thick, laborious read, also glorious, in language like a painting, stroke by stroke. The complex relationships unfold, enfold, and go their ominous paths. But, Leonardo does not triumph here, arrive at his vaulted state as a painter, architect, engineer, renowned for The Last Supper, the Mona Lisa, yet awaiting him in Milan and elsewhere. We meet the young man, the florenzer, struggling through life as a misfit. This is a classic rendition of growing up gay, rejected by his father, disappointing to all those who don’t understand. We know he will emerge triumphant as the greatest of Florence, as we leave him here en route to Milan.
April 6, 2025
The story of the lives of Leonardo da Vinci and Lorenzo Medicine and how they intertwined. Loosely based on true life events.
Enjoyable read. I think would have enjoyed more if I was familiar with the events of the time.
Received free from Goodreads giveaway.
Enjoyable read. I think would have enjoyed more if I was familiar with the events of the time.
Received free from Goodreads giveaway.
August 11, 2025
Really wanted to like this but it came off lukewarm. There's a rich eye for detail and I liked the characters but the jumps between POV were disorienting when they didn't need to be. This is especially egregious considering the book is about the early masters of perspective.
Displaying 1 - 30 of 134 reviews