Generally an okay book to get you started or if you are curious about edible plants in and around North America. But as the book cautions, this should not be your final authority. There is a high amount of emphasis on using this book with a qualified person familiar with foraging for edible plants. Additionally, author Jim Meuninck recommends taking three field guides to assist in positive identification of the plant. Driving it home, the final section has poisons plants, some with similarity to edible plants (such as Poison Hemlock, or Conium maculatum, bearing high resemblance to many in the carrot family) that should not be eaten else they could prove fatal.
This book is supposed to be used in tandem with a video, which is partially why the images may be just drawings. Even so, I was able to recognize a few of these plants in my area as well (both edible and toxic). Some even surprised me. Meuninck includes the Latin names, how he or others cook with them (aside for salads and cooking, be prepared to read a lot of butter, frying, and even cream cheese references for cooking/preparing). He also includes potential medicinal uses he included for fun (cautions he is not an authority and cannot recommend it). The other thing that impressed me is that he included some plants may even be carcinogenic, even though they are considered edible. He does sometimes include his own personal experience with the plant and goes as far as including warnings on parts that cannot be eaten in several plants—either due to (critical) warnings or just being straight inedible. He also lists bland or undesirable survival foods.
Sadly, many of the poisonous ones did not come with drawings, but considering this is just a minor introductory book with 63 pages of information on plant edibility/toxicity, it was a decent read. Great as a starter if you are showing fleeting interested on the subject, but should not use it as the final authority. Believe it was generally made to be a quick read due to drawings, and few page numbers.
The reason I give it only 3 stars is because it would have been nice to have color photos and because more in-depth information could sometimes be lacking. Also, sparse number of sources, so it is tough to verify where he gets his information outside of personal experience.