What do you think?
Rate this book
Who Knew
A Simon & Schuster book. Simon & Schuster has a great book for every reader.
Audio CD
Published May 20, 2025
546 people are currently reading
3183 people want to read
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 30 of 190 reviews
May 26, 2025
It must be difficult to write a memoir. The author has to examine his life - so far - and be honest about his relationships with family, friends, and the world at large. A good memoirist must intuit what he should include and what he should spare his readers. Far too many people who write memoirs think everything should be exposed.
However, Barry Diller, movie and television wonderkin, was judicious in choosing what to include in his memoir. The book’s title, “Who Knew” is a clever way to address the two questions most readers would want to know the answers to. The first would be Diller’s sexual orientation. “Who knew” if he was gay, straight, or “Diane”? He sensitively explores his life as a man who seems to have compartmentalized his interests, passions, work, and familial relations. His parents were indifferent to their two sons and his older brother was a drug addict who made life miserable to Barry as a child. Not a happy childhood, I think.
Diller opens up about his relationship with Diane von Furstenburg, which began in the 1970’s, and took a ten or so year breakup. He reunited with her in the 1990’s and the two married in 2001. They continue to share their lives, both on land and sea, and her family is his.
“Who knew”, too, about how he made his mark in the entertainment industry? He is open, self deprecating, and funny about the companies he ran, the movies he made, and the technology he embraced. And, of course, the people he met along the way.
I read many memoirs and Barry Diller’s is one of the best.
However, Barry Diller, movie and television wonderkin, was judicious in choosing what to include in his memoir. The book’s title, “Who Knew” is a clever way to address the two questions most readers would want to know the answers to. The first would be Diller’s sexual orientation. “Who knew” if he was gay, straight, or “Diane”? He sensitively explores his life as a man who seems to have compartmentalized his interests, passions, work, and familial relations. His parents were indifferent to their two sons and his older brother was a drug addict who made life miserable to Barry as a child. Not a happy childhood, I think.
Diller opens up about his relationship with Diane von Furstenburg, which began in the 1970’s, and took a ten or so year breakup. He reunited with her in the 1990’s and the two married in 2001. They continue to share their lives, both on land and sea, and her family is his.
“Who knew”, too, about how he made his mark in the entertainment industry? He is open, self deprecating, and funny about the companies he ran, the movies he made, and the technology he embraced. And, of course, the people he met along the way.
I read many memoirs and Barry Diller’s is one of the best.
May 25, 2025
Fascinating and honest story, beautifully written. I was at Universal when Diller briefly took over - he was feared. This is a deeply vulnerable and introspective book. A whole new view.
August 21, 2025
Barry Diller does his best to whitewash and spin his notorious career but isn't very convincing as he blames his distant parents, hidden homosexuality, and jealous coworkers on his infamous reputation. This may be an attempt at an image makeover but it fails--in the midst of all the interesting stories it becomes very clear that Diller is egotistical, demanding, and hogs credit for ideas that belong to others or a group.
Details of his upbringing are refreshingly short and to the point. His rich Beverly Hills parents essentially ignored him and he was a total loser in high school among famous friends like Nora Ephron, Candice Bergen, and the children of many major movie/tv studio heads. The fact that he was practically adopted by the Danny Thomas family, then given his first job at a studio by Thomas despite him unable to do much more than put a stamp on an envelope, is proof that the uneducated guy didn't deserve the breaks he was given.
One after another he is appointed to jobs he isn't qualified for. Diller claims it's because he was good at "serving" and "not having an ego." Hard to believe based on the monster that he became. At age 22 he, with zero qualifications, is appointed assistant to the ABC television programming head and before you know it the inexperienced druggie that sleeps around with other network male employees is helping to decide what to put on prime time.
I appreciate his willingness to reveal how undeserving he was of his positions, but if he's looking for sympathy regarding his poor reputation he won't find it among readers. Diller was simply a rich kid who kissed up to older corporate executives, slept with a few of the right guys, and quickly was promoted despite lacking any real talent.
Then he unfairly takes credit for a few of the biggest moments in television history. First, he claims he came up with the concept of the TV movie. Totally false, of course--NBC had done it first, and all Diller did was push for the concept to be done as a weekly series. Then he says that by 1970, "No one had ever used advertising to sell television shows," an absurd falsehood that allows him to make the laughable claim that he was the first. Then he says he created the TV miniseries--"No television network had ever bought a novel" and turned it into a multipart series, he claimed, ignoring the fact that NBC again had beaten him to it when airing "The Blue Knight" a year earlier.
Along the way he falsely brags about being number one in ratings and being the one to put Roots on the air (failing to acknowledge new ABC programming chief Fred Silverman and others who had roles in getting it on TV). What else do you expect from a guy who never went to college and didn't know anything about the television jobs he was given? Of course he claims to be the first at things since he was so unaware of the history of the industry!
So by the middle of the book I had given up trusting that what he was saying was truth. He was spinning stories that either he knew to be lies or stored in his memory as his own accomplishments when he was just one player in network television groupthink.
His takeover of the movie studio is a funny story where again he acts like a Podunk know-nothing kid who was forced into a situation where he overnight ousted one of the most powerful men in Hollywood. What's odd about his story is that he fails to include the Mafia influence on Paramount in those days, which ultimately impacted his boss's decisions. Namely, like most things in this book, there's more to the story than the author is letting on. The key to Diller's eventual Paramount success is when he hires Michael Eisner and Jeffrey Katzenberg, who start cranking out hits, though the author is very careful to use the word "we" whenever anything happens so that he takes credit.
When it gets to the short section on his heading Fox, Diller rushes and blame-shifts, ignores a couple of major moments (like the Joan Rivers late night show), then takes credit for coming up with the idea for reality TV. You read that right, he states: "I did start the concept of voyeuristic television, which evolved into the endlessly repetitive reality shows that are now everywhere." He says he started it all with the show Cops.
In order to do that he has to ignore the history of television, such as Candid Camera, An American Family, Real People, That's Incredible and other shows that pointed cameras and just let them record real life. It's hard to believe that his uneducated ego is so huge that he takes credit for an entire genre that was already quite alive.
He makes many inaccurate and audacious claims. He takes credit for The Simpsons, wrongly calling it "the longest-running, most successful show in the history of television." He claims to have been the first to leverage a cable network for interactivity in 1992 when he bought into QVC (nope, Warner Cable was doing interactive cable in Columbus, Ohio, in 1977). He doesn't even know what an acronym is (calling QVC one, which of course it isn't because an acronym is initials pronounced as a single word).
All this book proves is that any dumb rich kid can "fake it until he makes it" and run giant media corporations not having a clue what he's doing. The weirdest part is that he repeatedly laughingly admits it in this text, all the way to the bank.
Along the way he ends up tossing everyone he works with under the bus (including Eisner) for lying, misrepresenting, and going back on signed deals. Well, that appears to be business as usual in Hollywood, and the more I read about these rich con men corporate leaders that act like Mafia Dons the more I realized how similar Donald Trump is in his approach to business.
There also are some weird political statements that will make everyone uncomfortable. For the 1972 Olympics, where his Village room was close to the Palestinian terrorists that murdered Israelis, the Jewish Diller states, "the Germans' mistakes had gotten the Israelis killed." Wow. And here I thought it should be blamed on the Palestinians holding the weapons that murdered the hostages!
Even liberals will not be happy when in another section he feels the need to insert, "I think the biggest crime of the Biden administration is that it came in with a pledge to restore a more civilized, selfless and uplifting manner of governance and instead let us all down with its progressive elitism, personal ego, and cynical behavior." Refreshingly true, but a surprise placed in the midst of the making of a 1970s TV movie about homosexuality.
Then there's his own sexuality. If he was confused, think how confounding it is for readers when the author makes numerous illusions to it but doesn't give specifics. All that I could figure out was that he says he started longing for men at age 7, after a childhood where his father lived away from home most weeks and his mother abandoned him at camp in a sad story that resulted in Diller putting up a huge emotional wall to all. He never really dated females, though he kissed a few and he did a little sleeping around with some fellow male employees (which may have been against company policy). He says he had only had one serious relationship (with Chorus Line creator Michael Bennett). But the plot twist, as anyone familiar with Diller knows, is that around the same time he was appointed movie studio chief and done with Bennett, Diller started a relationship with Diane von Furstenberg (who later became his wife).
The author confirms that it was "as strong in its heterosexuality as its opposite had been." Wow. This is where the "who knew?" of the title comes from. What will the gay community do with this, since it doesn't typically believe a homosexual can "change" and become heterosexual? You'll have to read the book to see if you think Diller's explanation is convincing.
The man is a mass of contradictions--he claims that money was NEVER his motivation for any decision. Ha! Is he serious? He also writes, "I had scarcely any ego to speak of, so little sense of self, that it was never even possible for me to act with arrogance." Is this guy delusional? I never worked for him but pretty much everyone (including numerous other books) say the opposite about the standoffish irate dictator.
No footnotes. No index for people to look up names. No outside voices to back up his claims. Then he wraps it all up 30 years ago with only a couple pages summarizing his last three decades? It's a frustrating work but certainly worth reading if you want to get his spin on why he thinks he's misunderstood. But in the end you'll conclude he's kind of an obnoxious jerk who lacks self-awareness. Who knew?
Details of his upbringing are refreshingly short and to the point. His rich Beverly Hills parents essentially ignored him and he was a total loser in high school among famous friends like Nora Ephron, Candice Bergen, and the children of many major movie/tv studio heads. The fact that he was practically adopted by the Danny Thomas family, then given his first job at a studio by Thomas despite him unable to do much more than put a stamp on an envelope, is proof that the uneducated guy didn't deserve the breaks he was given.
One after another he is appointed to jobs he isn't qualified for. Diller claims it's because he was good at "serving" and "not having an ego." Hard to believe based on the monster that he became. At age 22 he, with zero qualifications, is appointed assistant to the ABC television programming head and before you know it the inexperienced druggie that sleeps around with other network male employees is helping to decide what to put on prime time.
I appreciate his willingness to reveal how undeserving he was of his positions, but if he's looking for sympathy regarding his poor reputation he won't find it among readers. Diller was simply a rich kid who kissed up to older corporate executives, slept with a few of the right guys, and quickly was promoted despite lacking any real talent.
Then he unfairly takes credit for a few of the biggest moments in television history. First, he claims he came up with the concept of the TV movie. Totally false, of course--NBC had done it first, and all Diller did was push for the concept to be done as a weekly series. Then he says that by 1970, "No one had ever used advertising to sell television shows," an absurd falsehood that allows him to make the laughable claim that he was the first. Then he says he created the TV miniseries--"No television network had ever bought a novel" and turned it into a multipart series, he claimed, ignoring the fact that NBC again had beaten him to it when airing "The Blue Knight" a year earlier.
Along the way he falsely brags about being number one in ratings and being the one to put Roots on the air (failing to acknowledge new ABC programming chief Fred Silverman and others who had roles in getting it on TV). What else do you expect from a guy who never went to college and didn't know anything about the television jobs he was given? Of course he claims to be the first at things since he was so unaware of the history of the industry!
So by the middle of the book I had given up trusting that what he was saying was truth. He was spinning stories that either he knew to be lies or stored in his memory as his own accomplishments when he was just one player in network television groupthink.
His takeover of the movie studio is a funny story where again he acts like a Podunk know-nothing kid who was forced into a situation where he overnight ousted one of the most powerful men in Hollywood. What's odd about his story is that he fails to include the Mafia influence on Paramount in those days, which ultimately impacted his boss's decisions. Namely, like most things in this book, there's more to the story than the author is letting on. The key to Diller's eventual Paramount success is when he hires Michael Eisner and Jeffrey Katzenberg, who start cranking out hits, though the author is very careful to use the word "we" whenever anything happens so that he takes credit.
When it gets to the short section on his heading Fox, Diller rushes and blame-shifts, ignores a couple of major moments (like the Joan Rivers late night show), then takes credit for coming up with the idea for reality TV. You read that right, he states: "I did start the concept of voyeuristic television, which evolved into the endlessly repetitive reality shows that are now everywhere." He says he started it all with the show Cops.
In order to do that he has to ignore the history of television, such as Candid Camera, An American Family, Real People, That's Incredible and other shows that pointed cameras and just let them record real life. It's hard to believe that his uneducated ego is so huge that he takes credit for an entire genre that was already quite alive.
He makes many inaccurate and audacious claims. He takes credit for The Simpsons, wrongly calling it "the longest-running, most successful show in the history of television." He claims to have been the first to leverage a cable network for interactivity in 1992 when he bought into QVC (nope, Warner Cable was doing interactive cable in Columbus, Ohio, in 1977). He doesn't even know what an acronym is (calling QVC one, which of course it isn't because an acronym is initials pronounced as a single word).
All this book proves is that any dumb rich kid can "fake it until he makes it" and run giant media corporations not having a clue what he's doing. The weirdest part is that he repeatedly laughingly admits it in this text, all the way to the bank.
Along the way he ends up tossing everyone he works with under the bus (including Eisner) for lying, misrepresenting, and going back on signed deals. Well, that appears to be business as usual in Hollywood, and the more I read about these rich con men corporate leaders that act like Mafia Dons the more I realized how similar Donald Trump is in his approach to business.
There also are some weird political statements that will make everyone uncomfortable. For the 1972 Olympics, where his Village room was close to the Palestinian terrorists that murdered Israelis, the Jewish Diller states, "the Germans' mistakes had gotten the Israelis killed." Wow. And here I thought it should be blamed on the Palestinians holding the weapons that murdered the hostages!
Even liberals will not be happy when in another section he feels the need to insert, "I think the biggest crime of the Biden administration is that it came in with a pledge to restore a more civilized, selfless and uplifting manner of governance and instead let us all down with its progressive elitism, personal ego, and cynical behavior." Refreshingly true, but a surprise placed in the midst of the making of a 1970s TV movie about homosexuality.
Then there's his own sexuality. If he was confused, think how confounding it is for readers when the author makes numerous illusions to it but doesn't give specifics. All that I could figure out was that he says he started longing for men at age 7, after a childhood where his father lived away from home most weeks and his mother abandoned him at camp in a sad story that resulted in Diller putting up a huge emotional wall to all. He never really dated females, though he kissed a few and he did a little sleeping around with some fellow male employees (which may have been against company policy). He says he had only had one serious relationship (with Chorus Line creator Michael Bennett). But the plot twist, as anyone familiar with Diller knows, is that around the same time he was appointed movie studio chief and done with Bennett, Diller started a relationship with Diane von Furstenberg (who later became his wife).
The author confirms that it was "as strong in its heterosexuality as its opposite had been." Wow. This is where the "who knew?" of the title comes from. What will the gay community do with this, since it doesn't typically believe a homosexual can "change" and become heterosexual? You'll have to read the book to see if you think Diller's explanation is convincing.
The man is a mass of contradictions--he claims that money was NEVER his motivation for any decision. Ha! Is he serious? He also writes, "I had scarcely any ego to speak of, so little sense of self, that it was never even possible for me to act with arrogance." Is this guy delusional? I never worked for him but pretty much everyone (including numerous other books) say the opposite about the standoffish irate dictator.
No footnotes. No index for people to look up names. No outside voices to back up his claims. Then he wraps it all up 30 years ago with only a couple pages summarizing his last three decades? It's a frustrating work but certainly worth reading if you want to get his spin on why he thinks he's misunderstood. But in the end you'll conclude he's kind of an obnoxious jerk who lacks self-awareness. Who knew?
Want to read
May 11, 2025Bro invented (or at least vigorously promoted) the made-for-tv movie-of-the-week concept - mad respect.
July 11, 2025
Diller's autobiography is fascinating, authentic and suprisingly humble. A rich but unloved kid from Beverly Hills, Diller parlays a relationship with the Danny Thomas family into a mailroom slot at William Morris, and the rest is history ABC (Movie of the Week), President of Paramount, creator of Fox TV, and finally, the incubator behind over a hundred digital brands (including QVC, Tinder, Expedia). In the book, Diller claims his great success came from a certain fearlessness in the industry, as nothing could possibly compete with the fear of being outed as a gay man (he was actually blackmailed). Along the way, Diller works with many of the leaders of the new media, most of whom come off as snakes. Diller's own reputation in the industry is somewhat different. He is known as a screamer, a self promoter, and an incredible money grabber -- his compensation packages set new precedents. In his public comments, he is also a major blowhard, and as he got older -- he is 83 -- he also got overly dismissive. But the book is well edited. He barely talks about money at all. While he is not especially likeable, and you don't feel a need to root for him, he does approach things with a level headedness, and you sense a maturity in him that not only led to business success, but also to $670 Million worth of philanthropy, including the creation of the High Line and Little Island in New York. The book is mostly focused on his TV and Hollywood years, and I would have liked to have seen more about the digital era. There are many more stories to tell! But there is plenty here, and unforgettable, balanced snapshots of many key players, including Sumner Redstone, Rupert Murdoch, Larry Tisch, Ted Turner, Ari Emanuel and Irving Azoff ("the snake of snakes"). There are also many self conscious shoutouts to various "beloved" friends like David Geffen and John Malone. There is also a series of detours here, as he discusses his homosexuality and explains, a little defensively, the very real relationship he apparently has with wife /best friend Diane Von Furstenberg.
September 3, 2025
My first kindle read! I really enjoyed this memoir as it was a perfect blend of personal and business. Barry Diller has such a fascinating life.
June 30, 2025
Fake it, until you make it. That should have been the title bc he says it so many times. It was a book about his lucky career in the movie and tv industry. It was kind of cool to learn the inner workings until you learn it was a bunch of rich men with egos wanting to be the bigger owner. I became bored at the end. It felt like he was writing it to document his wins.. but maybe that is a lot of autobiographies. Overall I would not recommend it.
Read
July 11, 2025Listened via audiobook! I worked for one of Barry Diller's companies (Vimeo at IAC) so was a little more interested in this because of that than the subject matter at hand. It's pretty deep in the entertainment/media world of business with a lot of name dropping, etc. Also woo boy a lot of money to be made! I found it overall interesting but would probably only recommend it if you're super interested in the entertainment/media world of the 1970s and beyond!
July 28, 2025
I saw Barry Diller on Bill Maher's show on HBO talking about his new memoir, and I picked up my phone and ordered the book from the public library while the interview was still underway. That Barry Diller is a great storyteller should come as no surprise. A California rich kid who loved the movies, Barry was drawn to "the industry" and at 18 got his first job, thanks to family friend Danny Thomas, as a mailroom boy at the William Morris talent agency. He masterfully tells his life story, including fascinating California and Hollywood history of the 1940s and '50s, his dysfunctional rich family, his personal life, his struggles as a homosexual, his marriage to fashion designer Diane von Furstenberg, and of course, his huge, consuming, professional life. In his first "big" job at ABC, he invented the movie of the week and then the miniseries. He ran Paramount. He started Fox as the fourth network along with Rupert Murdoch. Oh, the list goes on and on. Now 83 and with plans to never retire, Barry Diller is unique, a brilliant, dynamic titan whose influence is all over our American TV and movie culture. This memoir is a hell of a read.
October 28, 2025
Audiobook - read by Barry Tiller. 4.5 stars! Completely entertaining and fascinating. I am particularly interested in the entertainment industry as my son works in it and I really don't know anything about it. This book is an interesting accounting of Barry's personal life and development, his demons and insecurities, loves, triumphs and failures. Also a great overview of major players, studios and changes to that industry - Peter is going to get a copy of this for Christmas! Shh!
July 18, 2025
DNF’ed at 60%.
I knew from the beginning I wasn’t really interested in this but gave it a try bc reviews were good & said he was very honest, which is rare in Hollywood tales & who doesn’t love gossip.
Barry IS refreshingly honest and self aware of his privilege, faults & failures. The behind the scenes of Paramount during the 70s just didn’t keep my interest. Stories of known stars and his relationship with Diane are interest peaking but don’t hold my attention, so then hearing tales of unknown studio heads, etc certainly don’t get me excited.
I knew from the beginning I wasn’t really interested in this but gave it a try bc reviews were good & said he was very honest, which is rare in Hollywood tales & who doesn’t love gossip.
Barry IS refreshingly honest and self aware of his privilege, faults & failures. The behind the scenes of Paramount during the 70s just didn’t keep my interest. Stories of known stars and his relationship with Diane are interest peaking but don’t hold my attention, so then hearing tales of unknown studio heads, etc certainly don’t get me excited.
November 3, 2025
I listened to an interview of Mr Diller and was fascinated by him in the interview. And indeed the first part of his book was fascinating. But I’m just not that interested in Hollywood, movie making or anecdotes. It’s not a terrible book it just wasn’t for me.
December 26, 2025
4.5/5
Barry Diller’s “Who Knew” is both a memoir and a surprisingly great crash course in how media/entertainment evolved from the 1960s onward, narrated through his career in ABC, Paramount, Fox Broadcasting, and then the eventful pivot into building and owning. I loved seeing the industry shift over time, especially once technology changes the whole game, and how Diller ends up creating IAC with that “anti-conglomerate conglomerate” approach. One theme that really clicked for me was his early fascination with “interactivity”, the idea that screens aren’t just for telling stories, they can also be interactive, and how that mindset quietly foreshadows everything he builds later.
What really stuck with me, though, is how personal and candid it is. He’s unusually open about his sexuality and his unconventional relationship/marriage with Diane von Furstenberg; it’s genuinely authentic. I also appreciated his honesty about not being “aspirational” about tech; he wasn’t chasing a trend, he just wanted to build something of his own (and he gives plenty of credit to luck and timing).
Personal note: I first learned about Diller from doing an IAC stock pitch during a college internship, and I knew about DVF only because I love fashion. Reading this felt like watching all of that context finally come to life, boldly told and way more human than I expected.
Barry Diller’s “Who Knew” is both a memoir and a surprisingly great crash course in how media/entertainment evolved from the 1960s onward, narrated through his career in ABC, Paramount, Fox Broadcasting, and then the eventful pivot into building and owning. I loved seeing the industry shift over time, especially once technology changes the whole game, and how Diller ends up creating IAC with that “anti-conglomerate conglomerate” approach. One theme that really clicked for me was his early fascination with “interactivity”, the idea that screens aren’t just for telling stories, they can also be interactive, and how that mindset quietly foreshadows everything he builds later.
What really stuck with me, though, is how personal and candid it is. He’s unusually open about his sexuality and his unconventional relationship/marriage with Diane von Furstenberg; it’s genuinely authentic. I also appreciated his honesty about not being “aspirational” about tech; he wasn’t chasing a trend, he just wanted to build something of his own (and he gives plenty of credit to luck and timing).
Personal note: I first learned about Diller from doing an IAC stock pitch during a college internship, and I knew about DVF only because I love fashion. Reading this felt like watching all of that context finally come to life, boldly told and way more human than I expected.
September 23, 2025
One of the best reads for a book of its type. I am not sure I have ever given a book five stars here. Diller always seemed to be on the cutting edge of our digital future and still is. The surprising thing is that without education and, in some cases, experience, he was placed in positions of power and made significant contributions, always with integrity and success. Bravo, Barry!.
July 5, 2025
great story of a mogul and the person
Easy read, amazing story of a series of serendipitous events and street smarts that made the man, the lifetime impact of his disfuncional family and then the love of his life
Easy read, amazing story of a series of serendipitous events and street smarts that made the man, the lifetime impact of his disfuncional family and then the love of his life
September 24, 2025
Very well written, and am close to giving this 5 stars. I wish there were more written on the IAC journey, to be honest. But for what is available here, and given the fact that Diller wants to tell a good general interest story, this is a good book.
September 11, 2025
Barry was the first, and definitely the most terrifying, of the chairmen I worked for at Fox/Disney. After the initial shock of hearing his gravelly voice once again it was interesting to hear more about his life and what makes him tick.
September 21, 2025
Great and vulnerable storytelling. As a former media exec and entrepreneur, I love the people anecdotes (veritable who’s who of entertainment and beyond), personal and professional journey as a leader, and business perspective Barry puts forth. That said, this book lost some sheen for me as it wasn’t forthcoming around how feared he was and how he treated folks in meeting rooms (very harshly from what I’ve heard.)
August 25, 2025
What a journey. I watched him from afar in his paramount years, when he and Eisner famously built brands superior to the rest of Hollywood. I met him when he was first investigating the internet. Wish I’d known all his personal stories then, from childhood traumas to accidental successes and constant effort. He doesn’t capture what separated him from so many others, where his intuitions come from, but even objective biographers rarely capture genius. A good read, and very well read by the author on Audible.
Read
July 5, 2025This book started strong for me but it didn't continue to hold my interest to the initial level.
I was completely aghast at Barry's description of his Mother's upbringing and it must certainly have been a factor to how Barry grew up.
I LOVED Chapter 7's description of his arrival and departure from Fire Island. I have visited Fire Island and frequently visit Sayville so his desciption of landing in Sayville as "a postcard for small-town Americana family life" was spot on for me.
What comes across clearly is how much this man shaped the trajectory of television programming, initially as a VERY young man given alot of influence. He accomplished this over the years after his ascent from the mailroom with attributions to lucky breaks and good fortune where, in his own words, sometimes the dominoes were positioned to fall into his lap. By Barry's admission he didn't start out very motivated to do much of anything, but he definitely had a knack for the business and, building on first understanding the history of the business and how things were done, he built on his successes, also developing and maintaining his business relationships.
Recommend.
I was completely aghast at Barry's description of his Mother's upbringing and it must certainly have been a factor to how Barry grew up.
I LOVED Chapter 7's description of his arrival and departure from Fire Island. I have visited Fire Island and frequently visit Sayville so his desciption of landing in Sayville as "a postcard for small-town Americana family life" was spot on for me.
What comes across clearly is how much this man shaped the trajectory of television programming, initially as a VERY young man given alot of influence. He accomplished this over the years after his ascent from the mailroom with attributions to lucky breaks and good fortune where, in his own words, sometimes the dominoes were positioned to fall into his lap. By Barry's admission he didn't start out very motivated to do much of anything, but he definitely had a knack for the business and, building on first understanding the history of the business and how things were done, he built on his successes, also developing and maintaining his business relationships.
Recommend.
September 15, 2025
This memoir is a fast-moving audiobook, read by the author. Hard to stop, eager to resume. Mr. Diller's fifteen year effort to record his story is remarkably compact. Re some of book's reception, note that despite the first chapter this is not significantly a book about homosexuality (not that there's anything wrong with that) and it's in no way lurid.
It has significance, if not always exact, as media history. Here's a first person media history, told by a participant rather than observer. Diller is a Zelig-like presence whenever technology shifts (VCRs. broadband etc.) and meaningfully alters our media choices. Diller's story takes you across these decades at high speed. Technology as protagonist. If you're looking for a book about film/TV storytellers, you may be disappointed. Barry Diller was one of the first to jump from screens telling stories to full consumer interactivity, demonstrating an instinct for form both superceding and becoming content. Marshall McLuhan would approve.
Luck, being in the right place (Beverly Hills) at the right time (before thousands of Boomers competed for positions in the industry) launches the Diller story. I wouldn't say "privilege" was his friend. He grew up with distant parents, a junkie brother, and sexual guilt culminating in a nervous breakdown. He gets lucky skipping college and pivots into the mailroom of a major talent agency, educating himself with years reading all the files and deal memos stored there. Industry wisdom is says it's a relationship business, but it's also a business business and what better place to learn it?
Finally he meets someone at a party and lands a job as an admin when shazam, timely happenstance gets his boss (Leonard Goldberg) an unexpected promotion to the top of ABC. Diller modestly admits to being just a very conscientious employee but of course he's an original thinker, a "think outside the box" guy, and well suited to a field where non-conformists could once rise fast.
A job negotiating ABC's acquisitions of movie reruns gives him a chance to meet the studio chiefs of that time. They put such high prices on their movies that Diller seizes an opportunity to put made-for-TV originals on the prime time schedule. I'm surprised that Mr. Diller doesn't talk more about the films of his little boutique studio, because many were quite good and they put up good numbers. One he does cite (with Pride) is "That Certain Summer", a breakthrough film about a family coming to terms with the coming out of a sympathetic gay family man. The film deserves to be seen more today. (The made-for-television movie genre had much to say in its early years, and shouldn't be judged alone by the 1990's Amy Fisher trifecta or today's Hallmark hall of tame.)
I do wish the author had shared more of his views on the nature of storytelling, the responses of various audience demographics, and the specifics of his own personal taste. He does mention that ABC rises to the top of the ratings, and when miniseries like "Roots" are counted in, Diller is indisputably a major reason for ABC's 1970's rise. Weekly series, however were what made ABC #1 most weeks. Fred Silverman's extraordinary executive team after Diller left deserves a mention. So do creatives like Aaron Spelling, whose shows were business partner Goldberg's finest "hours" in ABC's rise. Comedy series from Garry Marshall's company were also a major tentpole of ABC's weeknights. Either Barry Diller just doesn't like self-contained half-hours and hours (longform snobbery?) or maybe he just had the wisdom to entrust those profitable genres to others.
Later on, discussing feature films after his fast ascent in the movie business at Paramount, he's quite dismissive of audience research. If his complaint were based on inaccurate data he'd make a better case, but at no point anywhere in the book does he talk about the audience. He serves several generations of customers over the years, and it would be interesting to hear his thoughts on how the audience's taste evolved (or devolved!) during his years in what many now call "legacy" media.
Diller does know that good storytelling benefits from larger than life characters. Enter Charlie Bludhorn, poobah-in-chief of Gulf + Western, Paramount's owner. What a great character! (Bludhorn was a character in "The Offer" a recent Paramount miniseries set behind-the-scenes of "The Godfather.") While in no way a sophisticated cineaste, Charlie's sensible enough to keep still-young post-ABC Barry around long enough for his team to begin developing hit movies.
This is where the book becomes really interesting, and really incomplete. There's a passionate and well told story arc involving Diller's relationship with Diane (pronounced dee-AHN) von Furstenberg, in parallel to the career story. They "meet cute" (actually snoot) then get a second chance thanks to superagent Sue Mengers. Running Paramount and hanging out with DvF gets Diller to opening night at Studio 54, but not past its infamous doorkeeper, under instructions to admit only celebrities and the most beautiful. Diane and entourage get in, but not Barry. At the last second the owner comes running out apologizing, and Diller joins the elite inside. He's quickly in his element there. Sure enough, he goes on to encourage the development of "Saturday Night Fever." The film becomes a breakthough commercial success for Diller's team, while promulgating the disco phenomenon across the fruited plain. [As a mid-60s rock fan I consider disco a cultural wart on the tush of the American Century.] Whatever your view, know that Diller rarely discusses the social impact of the stories he gatekeeps. Later, at Fox, he even brags about hiring an executive infamous for shamelessly exploitative, low-aiming "reality" competitions ... but I digress.
The 1970's were, as Diller acknowledges, a great era in American cinema. He and his team (Eisner, Katzenberg, and many parties unnamed) did a great job, and some of the better titles are noted. However, we hear more about Bludhorn and his wicked successor Marvin Davis than about the movies. Diller's management style -- creative conflict, i.e. vociferous argument -- is mentioned. (Fear-inducing screamer or open-minded leader of a team of rivals -- you decide.)
I do wish he'd included the upgrades at Paramount TV during his time running the studio, and after. Eventually that division developed an historic academy of quality comedy there, a virtual ATM in rerun riches too, from the mid-1970's through the end of the century. If Diller hired Gary Nardino to run that shop, maybe a paragraph on how Diller supported the operation would have been worthy of inclusion. Diller acquaints us well with the corporate and social heights. A few more words about the organizational contributors to entertaining us in our homes would strengthen his history.
Then it's on to running Fox for Rupert Murdoch, after surviving another useless boss named Davis, the gluttony-prone Marvin. Diller makes the creation of the 4th major broadcast network sound like his own idea, and yes, he deserves plenty of credit. The acquisition of the Metromedia station group by Murdoch was key, and it's great to be inside meetings with the likes of John Kluge and Michael Milken. We don't hear about the preceding ad hoc networks (which Paramount supplied with miniseries) strung together by TeleRep's Al Masini, who also supplied the station satellite dishes for the daily syndication hit, "Entertainment Tonight." We don't hear about Ronald Reagan's deregulation regime, which made Fox's many formerly indie and UHF affiliates strong enough to build sizeable audiences in the 1980's. There are so many key pieces of broadcast history adjacent to Barry Diller's orbit, that perhaps it's unfair to ask him to map out all the context to his many wins.
Over at Fox we do learn key details about "Raiders of the Lost Ark", and Diller makes a point of mentioning his support of "Cocoon", an excellent film which, no surprise, one appreciates more and more as one ages. On the TV side the well-reported history of "The Simpsons" is once again told, and mention is made of the pivotal counterprogramming hit, "Married, With Children." The latter deserved more detail, not just about what went on behind the scenes but also on the key role played by a Michigan housewife who campaigned against an episode visiting a sex shop. This controversy exploded as a national media event, prompting many to ask the question, "Fox, what channel is that on?" Unreported in Diller's account of the fourth network's emergence is also the efficient, gripping and consequential early success on the network of "America's Most Wanted." In addition to strong ratings the show put away hundreds -- no, they're in the thousands now -- of bad guys. It's really worth a mention in the book's untold story of social consequences.
Diller's relationship with Mr. Murdoch is told with respect and admiration. Thankfully we don't learn Diller's perspective on Murdoch's highly profitable venture into counterprogramming cable news. Just as well Diller doesn't go there. Where he does go is off the Fox lot, and into the hinterlands of home shopping at QVC, so as to -- at long last -- have the last word, and work not for one mogul more as a top level underling. It's Ms. von Furstenburg who calls his attention to small but profitable Pennsylvania network as a showcase for her famous schmatas. She keeps turning up like a guardian angel in his story. Since their relationship takes such a unique path, her appearances encourage the reader to hope her next appearance will be more than a brief cameo.
In an era when Amazon delivers just about anything in hours not days, it's almost quaint to hear once again (the New Yorker did a piece long ago) of Diller's fascination with QVC's live, on air, interactive merchandising. Business students should pay close heed to this phase of Diller's career, and especially to his relationship and deals with John Malone, who Diller properly acknowledges as the smartest media giant of them. [Malone's autobiography is certainly next on my reading list.]
Either Simon & Schuster said "enough already" about Diller's internet enterprises, or the author just tired of writing about making money at this point. The closing chapters compress the most recent quarter century of Mr. Diller's business career into a fast-motion overview. I'd have liked to hear much much about his sojourn at USA Network/Universal, but at this point the perspective is mogul-to-mogul, and neither Mr. Bronfman of Seagram's nor the Vivendi group hold interest. A story about Universal's executives spurning budgetary efficiences for fear of cuts to the following year's production budget is a sorry but significant tale. Where Dr. Jules Stein and Lew Wasserman ruled, now MBAs bring Powerpoints. Sad.
There's barely a full hour of audiobook on how Mr. Diller became an internet multibillionaire leading ventures in concert tickets, travel booking, matchmaking, and swiping for hookups. I'm sure many younger readers may identify more with these efforts, and will thus be disappointed. So why so little on the details of those businesses here? Perhaps in the author's head, the tech superstar's AirPods play Ethel Merman belting out "There's No Business Like Show Business," and Mr. Diller knows she's right.
In a sense, the Barry and Diane love story is this memoir's triumphal final act, and deservedly so. Their love of each other, and of sailing around the world together, and also giving back to their adopted city of New York strengthens the bond with the reader. We even get to hear Diane's voice on the audiobook. No, the word "bisexual" is never uttered in this book. There's so much more to the central romance here than its (definite, discreetly mentioned) physical dimension. If the reader believes that the most important thing in life is love, which can suddenly (who knew!) surprise you and transform your life, then maybe their romance is the central story here, and one of the most amazing careers in business is a perfectly satisfying "B" story subplot.
It has significance, if not always exact, as media history. Here's a first person media history, told by a participant rather than observer. Diller is a Zelig-like presence whenever technology shifts (VCRs. broadband etc.) and meaningfully alters our media choices. Diller's story takes you across these decades at high speed. Technology as protagonist. If you're looking for a book about film/TV storytellers, you may be disappointed. Barry Diller was one of the first to jump from screens telling stories to full consumer interactivity, demonstrating an instinct for form both superceding and becoming content. Marshall McLuhan would approve.
Luck, being in the right place (Beverly Hills) at the right time (before thousands of Boomers competed for positions in the industry) launches the Diller story. I wouldn't say "privilege" was his friend. He grew up with distant parents, a junkie brother, and sexual guilt culminating in a nervous breakdown. He gets lucky skipping college and pivots into the mailroom of a major talent agency, educating himself with years reading all the files and deal memos stored there. Industry wisdom is says it's a relationship business, but it's also a business business and what better place to learn it?
Finally he meets someone at a party and lands a job as an admin when shazam, timely happenstance gets his boss (Leonard Goldberg) an unexpected promotion to the top of ABC. Diller modestly admits to being just a very conscientious employee but of course he's an original thinker, a "think outside the box" guy, and well suited to a field where non-conformists could once rise fast.
A job negotiating ABC's acquisitions of movie reruns gives him a chance to meet the studio chiefs of that time. They put such high prices on their movies that Diller seizes an opportunity to put made-for-TV originals on the prime time schedule. I'm surprised that Mr. Diller doesn't talk more about the films of his little boutique studio, because many were quite good and they put up good numbers. One he does cite (with Pride) is "That Certain Summer", a breakthrough film about a family coming to terms with the coming out of a sympathetic gay family man. The film deserves to be seen more today. (The made-for-television movie genre had much to say in its early years, and shouldn't be judged alone by the 1990's Amy Fisher trifecta or today's Hallmark hall of tame.)
I do wish the author had shared more of his views on the nature of storytelling, the responses of various audience demographics, and the specifics of his own personal taste. He does mention that ABC rises to the top of the ratings, and when miniseries like "Roots" are counted in, Diller is indisputably a major reason for ABC's 1970's rise. Weekly series, however were what made ABC #1 most weeks. Fred Silverman's extraordinary executive team after Diller left deserves a mention. So do creatives like Aaron Spelling, whose shows were business partner Goldberg's finest "hours" in ABC's rise. Comedy series from Garry Marshall's company were also a major tentpole of ABC's weeknights. Either Barry Diller just doesn't like self-contained half-hours and hours (longform snobbery?) or maybe he just had the wisdom to entrust those profitable genres to others.
Later on, discussing feature films after his fast ascent in the movie business at Paramount, he's quite dismissive of audience research. If his complaint were based on inaccurate data he'd make a better case, but at no point anywhere in the book does he talk about the audience. He serves several generations of customers over the years, and it would be interesting to hear his thoughts on how the audience's taste evolved (or devolved!) during his years in what many now call "legacy" media.
Diller does know that good storytelling benefits from larger than life characters. Enter Charlie Bludhorn, poobah-in-chief of Gulf + Western, Paramount's owner. What a great character! (Bludhorn was a character in "The Offer" a recent Paramount miniseries set behind-the-scenes of "The Godfather.") While in no way a sophisticated cineaste, Charlie's sensible enough to keep still-young post-ABC Barry around long enough for his team to begin developing hit movies.
This is where the book becomes really interesting, and really incomplete. There's a passionate and well told story arc involving Diller's relationship with Diane (pronounced dee-AHN) von Furstenberg, in parallel to the career story. They "meet cute" (actually snoot) then get a second chance thanks to superagent Sue Mengers. Running Paramount and hanging out with DvF gets Diller to opening night at Studio 54, but not past its infamous doorkeeper, under instructions to admit only celebrities and the most beautiful. Diane and entourage get in, but not Barry. At the last second the owner comes running out apologizing, and Diller joins the elite inside. He's quickly in his element there. Sure enough, he goes on to encourage the development of "Saturday Night Fever." The film becomes a breakthough commercial success for Diller's team, while promulgating the disco phenomenon across the fruited plain. [As a mid-60s rock fan I consider disco a cultural wart on the tush of the American Century.] Whatever your view, know that Diller rarely discusses the social impact of the stories he gatekeeps. Later, at Fox, he even brags about hiring an executive infamous for shamelessly exploitative, low-aiming "reality" competitions ... but I digress.
The 1970's were, as Diller acknowledges, a great era in American cinema. He and his team (Eisner, Katzenberg, and many parties unnamed) did a great job, and some of the better titles are noted. However, we hear more about Bludhorn and his wicked successor Marvin Davis than about the movies. Diller's management style -- creative conflict, i.e. vociferous argument -- is mentioned. (Fear-inducing screamer or open-minded leader of a team of rivals -- you decide.)
I do wish he'd included the upgrades at Paramount TV during his time running the studio, and after. Eventually that division developed an historic academy of quality comedy there, a virtual ATM in rerun riches too, from the mid-1970's through the end of the century. If Diller hired Gary Nardino to run that shop, maybe a paragraph on how Diller supported the operation would have been worthy of inclusion. Diller acquaints us well with the corporate and social heights. A few more words about the organizational contributors to entertaining us in our homes would strengthen his history.
Then it's on to running Fox for Rupert Murdoch, after surviving another useless boss named Davis, the gluttony-prone Marvin. Diller makes the creation of the 4th major broadcast network sound like his own idea, and yes, he deserves plenty of credit. The acquisition of the Metromedia station group by Murdoch was key, and it's great to be inside meetings with the likes of John Kluge and Michael Milken. We don't hear about the preceding ad hoc networks (which Paramount supplied with miniseries) strung together by TeleRep's Al Masini, who also supplied the station satellite dishes for the daily syndication hit, "Entertainment Tonight." We don't hear about Ronald Reagan's deregulation regime, which made Fox's many formerly indie and UHF affiliates strong enough to build sizeable audiences in the 1980's. There are so many key pieces of broadcast history adjacent to Barry Diller's orbit, that perhaps it's unfair to ask him to map out all the context to his many wins.
Over at Fox we do learn key details about "Raiders of the Lost Ark", and Diller makes a point of mentioning his support of "Cocoon", an excellent film which, no surprise, one appreciates more and more as one ages. On the TV side the well-reported history of "The Simpsons" is once again told, and mention is made of the pivotal counterprogramming hit, "Married, With Children." The latter deserved more detail, not just about what went on behind the scenes but also on the key role played by a Michigan housewife who campaigned against an episode visiting a sex shop. This controversy exploded as a national media event, prompting many to ask the question, "Fox, what channel is that on?" Unreported in Diller's account of the fourth network's emergence is also the efficient, gripping and consequential early success on the network of "America's Most Wanted." In addition to strong ratings the show put away hundreds -- no, they're in the thousands now -- of bad guys. It's really worth a mention in the book's untold story of social consequences.
Diller's relationship with Mr. Murdoch is told with respect and admiration. Thankfully we don't learn Diller's perspective on Murdoch's highly profitable venture into counterprogramming cable news. Just as well Diller doesn't go there. Where he does go is off the Fox lot, and into the hinterlands of home shopping at QVC, so as to -- at long last -- have the last word, and work not for one mogul more as a top level underling. It's Ms. von Furstenburg who calls his attention to small but profitable Pennsylvania network as a showcase for her famous schmatas. She keeps turning up like a guardian angel in his story. Since their relationship takes such a unique path, her appearances encourage the reader to hope her next appearance will be more than a brief cameo.
In an era when Amazon delivers just about anything in hours not days, it's almost quaint to hear once again (the New Yorker did a piece long ago) of Diller's fascination with QVC's live, on air, interactive merchandising. Business students should pay close heed to this phase of Diller's career, and especially to his relationship and deals with John Malone, who Diller properly acknowledges as the smartest media giant of them. [Malone's autobiography is certainly next on my reading list.]
Either Simon & Schuster said "enough already" about Diller's internet enterprises, or the author just tired of writing about making money at this point. The closing chapters compress the most recent quarter century of Mr. Diller's business career into a fast-motion overview. I'd have liked to hear much much about his sojourn at USA Network/Universal, but at this point the perspective is mogul-to-mogul, and neither Mr. Bronfman of Seagram's nor the Vivendi group hold interest. A story about Universal's executives spurning budgetary efficiences for fear of cuts to the following year's production budget is a sorry but significant tale. Where Dr. Jules Stein and Lew Wasserman ruled, now MBAs bring Powerpoints. Sad.
There's barely a full hour of audiobook on how Mr. Diller became an internet multibillionaire leading ventures in concert tickets, travel booking, matchmaking, and swiping for hookups. I'm sure many younger readers may identify more with these efforts, and will thus be disappointed. So why so little on the details of those businesses here? Perhaps in the author's head, the tech superstar's AirPods play Ethel Merman belting out "There's No Business Like Show Business," and Mr. Diller knows she's right.
In a sense, the Barry and Diane love story is this memoir's triumphal final act, and deservedly so. Their love of each other, and of sailing around the world together, and also giving back to their adopted city of New York strengthens the bond with the reader. We even get to hear Diane's voice on the audiobook. No, the word "bisexual" is never uttered in this book. There's so much more to the central romance here than its (definite, discreetly mentioned) physical dimension. If the reader believes that the most important thing in life is love, which can suddenly (who knew!) surprise you and transform your life, then maybe their romance is the central story here, and one of the most amazing careers in business is a perfectly satisfying "B" story subplot.
December 23, 2025
I found this book pretty boring. The bits about his personal life were interesting and some tid bits about Hollywood back in the day but everything else about his professional life, I just didn’t care. I think it’s the style it was written. “This happened, and then this happened, and then this next thing happened”. No story telling, just a list of life events and I couldn’t wait for the book to be over. I finished it but I’m shocked I did.
August 9, 2025
I think I added this to my hold list due to his relationship with Diane. I was drawn in right away. When I realized he was a media mogul billionaire, I was wary about continuing because surely you don't reach that without being a giant jerk? But I listened to this on audiobook and the narration combined with the story was too compelling for me to quit. A part of me knows this is also probably ghostwritten and I'd like to research what this writer has also covered.
Also my dad's closest L.A. childhood friend (and funny story, his future stepbrother when they were adults) became a media executive based in NYC. He passed 20 years ago and during this reading, I found myself wishing I could get his take on Diller's story.
Also my dad's closest L.A. childhood friend (and funny story, his future stepbrother when they were adults) became a media executive based in NYC. He passed 20 years ago and during this reading, I found myself wishing I could get his take on Diller's story.
December 17, 2025
Is there a German word that means both insufferable AND fascinating?
Read
July 5, 2025A good story of an interesting life. Obviously very selective — I would have loved to know lots more about IAC and get more anecdotes of his godfather role in the tech industry. And while he's got the moral compass you'd expect of a billionaire who feels he's earned his keep, he's reflective in the book of his luck and privilege throughout, and seems much more morally grounded than pretty much any of the tech billionaires prowling around the public consciousness these days.
The main foci of the book seem to be his role in pivotal moments in Hollywood and TV (and their role in his life), his relationship with DvF, and his sexuality. All of which makes sense, and his continual awe and admiration of DvF is pretty charming.
The main foci of the book seem to be his role in pivotal moments in Hollywood and TV (and their role in his life), his relationship with DvF, and his sexuality. All of which makes sense, and his continual awe and admiration of DvF is pretty charming.
May 27, 2025
Like the author himself: one of a kind, unapologetic, and probably wearing a better shirt than you while writing it.
I was shocked he wrote this—not because he’s lacking in stories, but because he’s definitely not hurting for cash. This isn’t a cash grab, it’s a truth bomb.
From his diamond-encrusted childhood to his “yes-I’m-talking-about-this” openness about sexuality and relationships, to casually reshaping entire industries like he’s just rearranging furniture—this book delivers. It’s like watching a power-lunch unfold in real time, but with better dialogue and fewer calories.
He does not hold back. Deals gone bad? Dragged. Industry titans? If they annoyed him, may God have mercy.
He goes full scorched-earth in Prada loafers.
Whether he’s sinking a deal or sailing on his boat, it’s written so sharply and smoothly it’s like prose with a blow-dry.
Will update with quotes once I recover from the audacity of some of them.
I was shocked he wrote this—not because he’s lacking in stories, but because he’s definitely not hurting for cash. This isn’t a cash grab, it’s a truth bomb.
From his diamond-encrusted childhood to his “yes-I’m-talking-about-this” openness about sexuality and relationships, to casually reshaping entire industries like he’s just rearranging furniture—this book delivers. It’s like watching a power-lunch unfold in real time, but with better dialogue and fewer calories.
He does not hold back. Deals gone bad? Dragged. Industry titans? If they annoyed him, may God have mercy.
He goes full scorched-earth in Prada loafers.
Whether he’s sinking a deal or sailing on his boat, it’s written so sharply and smoothly it’s like prose with a blow-dry.
Will update with quotes once I recover from the audacity of some of them.
October 9, 2025
Barry Diller has led an extraordinary life. His drive took him far and wide in the entertainment business, at times by the seat of his pants p. His personal life has taken turns as he accepted himself as a homosexual and devoted to a unique woman who is his equal.
His creation of Little Island on the Hudson River is a gift New York residents and visitors will enjoy for decades. I’ve had the privilege of exploring this special public park and give him a thumbs up for staying the course making it happen.
I enjoyed his story.
His creation of Little Island on the Hudson River is a gift New York residents and visitors will enjoy for decades. I’ve had the privilege of exploring this special public park and give him a thumbs up for staying the course making it happen.
I enjoyed his story.
August 6, 2025
Barry Diller begins his autobiography by self-deprecatingly describing his dysfunctional family and then pointing out, "Just how unqualified I was..." Who knew that Barry Diller would then turn out to be such a snide, spiteful person who revels in insider gossip and enjoys making disparaging remarks about people he has worked with. I hope never to hear anything about him ever again.
September 17, 2025
Something about it did not ring true to me. Often I sensed that events or even opinions were not how he really felt, but what he thought was palatable to keep him as the hero of his story. But there was some good business advice.
October 15, 2025
He really has led a fascinating life, this Barry Diller. Was excited to read his autobiography as soon as I heard of its existence. Thankfully, Mr. Diller did not disappoint. "Who Knew" takes the reader extensively through Barry Diller's personal and professional life over the course of his eighty-something years. His life's story is filled with trauma, disappointment, alienation, secrets and shame, heroes and villains, sheer luck and serendipity, friendship, success, hard work and broken trust, wealth, power as well as love and family.
It's true, Diller's life, as expressed in "Who Knew" has been filled with an unusual amount of not only high drama, but high-stakes drama as well. Growing up with a cruel and troubled older brother and a set of caring yet reserved and indifferent parents in San Francisco and Beverly Hills, Barry Diller spent most of his life hiding his homosexuality from his family and the world at large. His fear of exposure frightened Diller so much, that he was not afraid of anything else. This proved very helpful in the business world.
A poor student yet a voracious reader, Diller utilized his friendship with neighbor Danny Thomas and his children to gain a job in the William Morris mailroom, and later after moving up the ladder at William Morris as a junior agent, an assistant job at ABC network television. Fate would have Diller moving up the ABC television ladder in record time, eventually achieving great success in pioneering the Movie of The Week and the Mini-Series for television.
After convincing courtship by Gulf+Western leader Charles Bludhorn, Diller left ABC in 1974 to become the head of Paramount Pictures, overseeing and putting into production some of the great films of the 1970's. After Buldhorn died in 1983, Diller contended with a complicated power struggle which led to his jumping ship from Paramount to 20th Century Fox, where he oversaw and put into production another set of successful films as well as starting the Fox Network in the 1980s.
After another power struggle, Diller left Fox in the early 1990s, and jumped on board the QVC shopping channel with help from his billionaire telecommunications giant, John Malone. Not long after, Diller found himself enticed and caught up two giant deals to takeover first Paramount Pictures, then later CBS television. Due to a series of lies and betrayals, both giant deals fell apart, AND he lost QVC in the process. Eventually, with help from John Malone, Diller acquired the Home Shopping Network, merged it with Ticketmaster and the USA channel and eventually the television arm of Universal Studios to form USA Networks.
Yet that organization fell apart as well after Diller's Universal Studios partner (Edgar Bronfman, Jr.) wanted to expand and sold Universal to an unstable French company called Vivendi, which fell apart and had Diller run ALL of Universal Studios for a spell, until it was sold to Comcast NBC, after which Diller left for what he really wanted to do: grow his interactive business and take advantage of the growing technology of the internet and beyond. Today, Barry Diller's IAC inc. is worth billions of dollars, and is compromised of a multitude of digital corporations big and small.
Among villains that populate Diller's "Who Knew" book include his abusive and drug-addicted older brother, Donald for one, as well as Gulf+Western's chairman Martin Davis, billionaire owner of 20th Century Fox, Marvin Davis, and the legendary music manager and executive Irvin Azoff. There are others who didn't come off well in their various misbehaviors and betrayals, whom Diller later forgave and forgot.
The heroes of "Who Knew" include Danny Thomas, Marlo Thomas, various mentors at the William Morris Agency and the ABC Network, friends such as David Geffen and the sometimes contentious John Malone, as most of all...Barry Diller's soulmate and wife: fashion designer Diane von Fürstenberg. Their now fifty-plus year, on and off relationship has been the joy and sanctuary of Barry Diller's complex life. Together they've built both a life and an island together (Manhattan's "Little Island.")
What's clear throughout "Who Knew" is that Barry Diller's tremendous success in life was due to a healthy mixture of keen intelligence, acquired education and knowledge, street smarts, practicality, class, honor, foresight, drive, individuality, ambition and above all else: instinct. His book was an excellent and enjoyable read. Loved reading about all of the DRAMA involved with so many of his business adventures. Diller's personal life admissions were interesting, yet it was his great stories behind-the-scenes at William Morris, ABC, Paramount, 20th Century Fox, QVC and those failed bids for Paramount and CBS, as well as his tenure with USA Networks and Universal that really made the book a truly engaging read.
It's true, Diller's life, as expressed in "Who Knew" has been filled with an unusual amount of not only high drama, but high-stakes drama as well. Growing up with a cruel and troubled older brother and a set of caring yet reserved and indifferent parents in San Francisco and Beverly Hills, Barry Diller spent most of his life hiding his homosexuality from his family and the world at large. His fear of exposure frightened Diller so much, that he was not afraid of anything else. This proved very helpful in the business world.
A poor student yet a voracious reader, Diller utilized his friendship with neighbor Danny Thomas and his children to gain a job in the William Morris mailroom, and later after moving up the ladder at William Morris as a junior agent, an assistant job at ABC network television. Fate would have Diller moving up the ABC television ladder in record time, eventually achieving great success in pioneering the Movie of The Week and the Mini-Series for television.
After convincing courtship by Gulf+Western leader Charles Bludhorn, Diller left ABC in 1974 to become the head of Paramount Pictures, overseeing and putting into production some of the great films of the 1970's. After Buldhorn died in 1983, Diller contended with a complicated power struggle which led to his jumping ship from Paramount to 20th Century Fox, where he oversaw and put into production another set of successful films as well as starting the Fox Network in the 1980s.
After another power struggle, Diller left Fox in the early 1990s, and jumped on board the QVC shopping channel with help from his billionaire telecommunications giant, John Malone. Not long after, Diller found himself enticed and caught up two giant deals to takeover first Paramount Pictures, then later CBS television. Due to a series of lies and betrayals, both giant deals fell apart, AND he lost QVC in the process. Eventually, with help from John Malone, Diller acquired the Home Shopping Network, merged it with Ticketmaster and the USA channel and eventually the television arm of Universal Studios to form USA Networks.
Yet that organization fell apart as well after Diller's Universal Studios partner (Edgar Bronfman, Jr.) wanted to expand and sold Universal to an unstable French company called Vivendi, which fell apart and had Diller run ALL of Universal Studios for a spell, until it was sold to Comcast NBC, after which Diller left for what he really wanted to do: grow his interactive business and take advantage of the growing technology of the internet and beyond. Today, Barry Diller's IAC inc. is worth billions of dollars, and is compromised of a multitude of digital corporations big and small.
Among villains that populate Diller's "Who Knew" book include his abusive and drug-addicted older brother, Donald for one, as well as Gulf+Western's chairman Martin Davis, billionaire owner of 20th Century Fox, Marvin Davis, and the legendary music manager and executive Irvin Azoff. There are others who didn't come off well in their various misbehaviors and betrayals, whom Diller later forgave and forgot.
The heroes of "Who Knew" include Danny Thomas, Marlo Thomas, various mentors at the William Morris Agency and the ABC Network, friends such as David Geffen and the sometimes contentious John Malone, as most of all...Barry Diller's soulmate and wife: fashion designer Diane von Fürstenberg. Their now fifty-plus year, on and off relationship has been the joy and sanctuary of Barry Diller's complex life. Together they've built both a life and an island together (Manhattan's "Little Island.")
What's clear throughout "Who Knew" is that Barry Diller's tremendous success in life was due to a healthy mixture of keen intelligence, acquired education and knowledge, street smarts, practicality, class, honor, foresight, drive, individuality, ambition and above all else: instinct. His book was an excellent and enjoyable read. Loved reading about all of the DRAMA involved with so many of his business adventures. Diller's personal life admissions were interesting, yet it was his great stories behind-the-scenes at William Morris, ABC, Paramount, 20th Century Fox, QVC and those failed bids for Paramount and CBS, as well as his tenure with USA Networks and Universal that really made the book a truly engaging read.
This entire review has been hidden because of spoilers.
Displaying 1 - 30 of 190 reviews