2.5 stars, and a lot of that is for things that usually are of secondary importance to me, like the visual and structural aspects of the book – but man, the cover design and layout of this book are gorgeous. Like, stupidly gorgeous. It took me months to get into this book, so it was always sitting in my Theoretically Reading Right Now pile or on my bedside table, and the upside of that was that I got to ogle the cover a lot.
The inside, too, is beautifully arranged. The whole thing is structured as an opera in five acts, with third-person flashback scenes arranged as minuets, ballets, duets, ensembles and so forth. Each is followed by a “Recitative” scene in which our titular goddess reflects on events past as a first-person POV whilst verbally abusing the priest she’s telling the whole thing to as a sort of deathbed confession, if something can be called a confession without repentance. I suspect the style is not for everyone but I thought it was a pretty genius choice considering the subject matter. If you’re going to write about the life of an opera diva, might as well choose a style as flamboyant as your heroine.
So yeah. The dress-up of this book is exquisite. Even the sodding font was stupidly pretty.
The content… not so much.
Before reading this book, I’d already heard some of the impressive facts that made up the life of Julie d’Aubigny – swashbuckling 17th century fencing genius, unapologetically, nay, magnificently bisexual crossdresser, adored opera star, breathtakingly gorgeous, set a convent on fire to rescue the nun she was in love with, escaped death at the stake, all-round real-life historical badass, etc. etc. As the author mentions in her afterword, there’s hardly any need to add any dramatics to a life already so thoroughly steeped in them.
What I did wish she could have added is depth. I have no doubt that she did her research and that all of the events Julie recounts are more or less historically accurate. Which, you know, power to Julie, she sounds like she was incredible. But I hardly ever felt like this book was doing anything to make me relate to her as a person. Despite its appealing structure, the style is all tell: scene after scene after scene of people falling for Julie, people worshipping Julie, people admiring (often against their will) all the ways in which Julie is fabulous. Each scene followed by one of Julie’s reflections, which usually consist of some variation on “Why, yes, of course I was fabulous.” As a fencer, a lover, a singer, a diva, she is always exquisite and larger than life. Everyone knows it, she knows it. Julie is so beautiful and so perfect and so adored and so unconventional and so accomplished at everything, blah blah blah.
It got a little tedious.
Instead of peeling back the dramatics and exploring what may have lain beneath, all the book was really doing was embracing the drama. All events occurred in these huge melodramatic bursts – insta-love, duels, suicide attempts, thrilling escapes, more insta-love. The writing itself is very flowery and melodramatic – it suited the character and the setting, for sure, but it, too, rang a little hollow after the umpteenth climactic declaration. Like an opera, it was all larger-than-life passions, delivered in larger-than-life gestures, and I felt like the momentum burned off early and never came back.
Another major problem of the all-tell approach is that none of the side characters are developed to be anything more than bit players in the drama of Julie’s life. She had all these highly intriguing relationships (with the girl sent to the convent, with the Comte she duelled who became her best friend, with the other women at the opera, with the noblewoman who becomes her lover), but you never get a sense of who these people are and what, in fact, Julie sees in them to connect to them so strongly (other than that they're all superbly attractive, natch). Every relationship was a theatrical insta-connection, every emotion an over-stylized theatre prop. Nothing felt real. I think the style could have really worked if the third-person sections had actually delved into some of those other characters as people, not just as mirrors to reflect Julie’s glory. As it was, reading an endless string of “She was a goddess!” alternating with “Oh yes, I was” scenes very quickly lost its appeal.
I do think the intent here was to reclaim this historical figure a bit from her goddess pedestal but I never felt like the author succeeded in that. Even Julie’s flaws (a volatile temper, a tendency towards overly dramatic gestures, a dangerous streak of weltschmerz) are really just more things for everyone (including Julie herself) to admire. Such passion! Such fervour! Such unrepentant, scandalous selfhood! Well, sure. But if you have nothing but accolades to go with it, you don't have any actual character development, or in fact a story beyond what historical records have already provided.
Never thought I’d come away from an account of such a unique and fascinating life feeling thoroughly bored, but sadly that’s exactly what happened. I guess I’m going to stick with ogling the stupidly gorgeous cover some more.