If this had been the first book I’d read on the assassination, it might have had greater impact. It is a coherent, common-sense narrative about people with motive, means and opportunity to kill President Kennedy, and how they realized them on November 22, 1963. Johnson certainly had the motive and, based on his wide-ranging, deep influence in Texas at the time of the murder, probably the means and opportunity too. I have no trouble believing LBJ was a de facto accomplice to the assassination, and his actions in the immediate aftermath pointed unmistakably to complicity. To dismiss the notion that he was a culprit is irresponsible.
Unfortunately, after the author has finished giving an extensive first-person account of the grotesque corruption through which Lyndon Baines Johnson and his cronies rose to power in Texas in the two decades or so prior to the killing of JFK, he launches into a detailed explanation of how the crime was specifically carried out, right down to identifying the gunmen, where they were and how they escaped, as if he knows this is what happened. This is where the book begins to fall apart.
In short, the book hypothesizes that the JFK assassination was a purely "local" affair. Johnson was in trouble: rumor had it Kennedy would dump him from the ticket in 1964, thus exposing him to prosecution for a series of crimes under investigation, including the murder of an Agriculture Department official. Johnson's lawyer Edward Aubrey Clark (for whose high-powered law firm the author worked as a young attorney) had too much to lose if this happened, and too much to gain if Kennedy were eliminated. Ergo, the theory goes, Ed Clark organized the assassination of JFK.
To his credit, the author doesn’t accept the "Single Bullet Theory.” He explains that two gunmen (Oswald and Mac Wallace, LBJ's local hit man) were firing at the motorcade from the sixth floor of the Book Depository, while another fired from behind the picket fence atop the Grassy Knoll. While it is hardly worth debating this (the autopsy was so flawed as to be worthless in determining the number of bullets and their trajectories), it is also ridiculous to posit (as the author does) that the bullet that hit Kennedy in the back also exited his throat. This is nonsense. We don't know where the throat wound came from, but to assume it is an "exit wound" caused by a bullet in the back seems very silly to anyone who has studied the assassination in depth. The author speculates that Governor Connally's wounds were caused by a single bullet, which is vaguely possible, but that this bullet did not hit Kennedy first. The kill shot, McClellan claims, came from the Grassy Knoll.
The real problem, however, arises with regard to Oswald and his exit from the Depository. Supposedly Mac Wallace fled the sixth floor and left poor Lee Harvey behind, so that the "patsy" was left looking for his co-conspirator, only to find him gone, panic, hide his rifle, and race down the stairs. The author also thinks Wallace exited that way too, only that he made his getaway seconds earlier. Then Wallace supposedly rendezvoused with another conspirator behind the Depository, brandishing Secret Service credentials to ward off police. Then they made their getaway while Oswald headed to the Oak Cliff section of Dallas to shoot and kill Dallas police officer J. D. Tippit.
I am too deep into the assassination to buy into this pat account, especially when it's just a case of the author trying to put together a neat, coherent version without proper research. It is highly doubtful that the man known publicly as Lee Harvey Oswald, who was ultimately gunned down in the Dallas police station by Jack Ruby, was either on the sixth floor at the time of the shooting or was ever at the scene of the Tippit killing. There are a host of reasons for this, and, suffice to say, even a fairly cursory reading among authoritative authors absolves Oswald of murder on the day. So that part of the book feels old and stale, even if it at least supports conspiracy as the cause of the assassination.
This book's merit is in the insight and detail provided with regard to the murderous corruption of Lyndon B. Johnson and the credibility afforded to the notion that LBJ was at least aware that the assassination would happen. Personally, I think any cabal planning to kill the President would have seen the utility of giving LBJ advance notice. LBJ and his "business associates" in Texas were notoriously connected to the Mafia, which contributed to LBJ's campaigns to a very significant degree. Yet the Mafia (meaning the regional mobs controlled by Santo Trafficante, Carlos Marcello and Sam Giancana) is not even mentioned in this book. Nor, for that matter, is the CIA, even though - to paraphrase former Senator Richard Schweiker - any examination of Oswald reveals the "fingerprints of intelligence" all over the accused assassin. All of this is a great disappointment. However, anyone wanting to know just how crooked high-powered Texas lawyers were in the period up to and after the assassination will find a lot of illuminating material between the covers of this book.