I found an interview with Michael Bunker on Jason Gurley’s blog, while researching Greatfall. Simply reading the words “amish scifi” made me buy Pennsylvania. It starts off slowly in an Amish village in Pennsylvania, this was a real shocker. Gradually the characters of Jed, central to the story, and his brother Amos are introduced. While working through their chores on the farm Amos forces Jed to explain why he’s going to New Pennsylvania – a colony world eight light years away from Earth – and how he’s getting there – a ship in which he will remain in suspended animation for the eight year length of the journey. I really liked the way that Bunker introduced the story and showed Jed’s motivations.
Before long Jed is leaving to journey to the station from which his ship is leaving. First, he stops in an airbus station where he’s given extra money, and a note that tells him to keep quiet. Obviously something is afoot. On the bus ride we’re introduced to The Transport Authority, the main force of the state. All priate forms of transportation are illegal which leaves The Transport Authority in control of all movement throughout the world. Jed had the audacity to be told about someone else’s plan to defect to the Amish, which lands him in a bunch of hot water. However, he’s still allowed to board the ship and leave for New Pennsylvania.
Now, it’s worth taking a minute to talk about the society that Jed has found himself in. The Transport Authority requires that everyone use a head implant, a TRID, in order to keep tabs. The TRID also serves as a way of connecting to the internet, facilitated by a drug that most of the population uses regularly. THis is where the issues start. It’s fairly obvious that Bunker is using this as an analogy for the current world and it’s obsession with the internet. And we can all admit that while we may not take a drug and disappear into our own heads for hours on end we do spend plenty of time hunched over our computers, oblivious to the outside world. If Bunker was simply setting up this analogy I would be fine with it, it’s a perfectly reasonable concern and one that’s common throughout fiction. However, as the book progresses he spends more and more time talking about how wonderful the Plain Folk, as the Amish are often referred to, are and how their way of life is superior. Even during the climax of the book the characters participate in a barn raising, complete with pages of descriptions on how the way the Amish band together to help one another makes them better.
All the time Bunker spends on praising the Plan Folk, or complaining about the way the rest of society acts, takes away from the rest of the book. Every time I got to a cliffhanger and was anxious to find it’s resolution I was forced to read several pages about the merits of the Amish lifestyle. It was frustrating. While reading the book I felt that it was just running around in circles, without a concise story, but once I finished it I could easily identify the plot. And the plot was good. I think that I was forced to spend so much time reading about Bunker’s personal philosophies that I kept forgetting what was going on in the story. If he were to cut out ninety percent of the unneeded opinionating the book would flow much better, be far more engaging, and be about thirty percent shorter.
Pennsylvania sets up a sequel, but I’m not sure if I’m going to read it. I spent a lot of time with Pennsylvania without much reward. That’s not to say I didn’t enjoy it, I simply think that there are books out there better worth my time. If you’re curious about the Amish you should certainly read Pennsylvania, but if you’re not I would only read it if you’ve got nothing better to read.