What do you think?
Rate this book


340 pages, Paperback
First published September 23, 2025
...and ribs you could play like a xylophone.
Centipedes ran like veins through the tunnels of the land...I am harshly critical on poor similes and authors' over-reliance on them, but a well-placed simile, such as these, is *chef's kiss.*
Eric sensed he was getting closer. His intuition called him in the right direction, guiding him. He suspected that somewhere down the dark, endless tunnels and within the maze, Alice was held hostage, not by a person but by something otherworldly. Eric would enjoy solving the case, yet he hoped for some extra, peculiar detail to make the challenge even greater.The last sentence is what particularly stuck in my craw. It feels so weirdly matter-of-fact, like a line from a bad fan fiction. It gets the job done, I guess: we know that Eric is a bit arrogant and confident in his skills as a paranormal investigator, but it feels so distant In the previous paragraph, the reader gets some details about how Eric's "ability" (i.e. paranormal sensitivity) manifests, and we know that Eric's spine is cold and that he's sweating despite said cold. The quoted paragraph then feels like a place-holder paragraph, something that you would write in a first draft to come back to later, just so you could maintain the flow of writing. Unfortunately, no one seems to have come back to this spot.
"It's a very commercial Halloween term but I believe it's meant to be the spirit of a supposed monster. Though, that could be argued as being a demon anyway. I know in some cultures the word demon is frowned upon, so it may originate from that."Just from cultural osmosis/the amount of horror media I've consumed, I associated ghouls with eating human flesh and maybe tomb robbing. Just looking at Wikipedia confirmed my suspicions. Calling the word "commercial" feels extra gross because it's creature that comes from Arabic folklore, and the word "ghoul" derives from an Arabic word. I don't think this is meant to make Eric look like an asshole or wrong about the word. The moment doesn't seem to work like that contextually. It's just an incorrect statement that can be fact-checked with the first result on Google that the novel presents as totally accurate. I'm not going to get started on the confident repetition of the 'humans don't use all of their brains' false claim as though it's some brilliant explanation for why some people in this setting can do magic, and I am going to acknowledge my distaste for the mention of "tribal sacrifices" in the Amazon by an unnamed group that eventually "became feral". It's lazy and shows just how much De'Ath leans on tropes without doing anything of interest with them.