I enjoyed reading Ritual: A Very Short Introduction, although my enjoyment came more in the tone of a vigorous wrestling match than in the sweet comfort of a rest in an easy chair.
A review of any book about ritual needs to begin with the understanding that, for people in our complex culture, ritual is a difficult thing to think about, and even more difficult to write about. Barry Stephenson's effort to undertake this challenge is to be celebrated, and if his review of the subject of ritual is imperfect, it is nonetheless extremely helpful for others who are struggling to articulate a culturally-relevant and coherent understanding of what ritual is and how it works.
The difficulty Stephenson faces in writing this little book about ritual is compounded by the academic mire that has accumulated on top of the study of ritual over the last few decades: The study of actual ritual has become almost completely obscured by the construction of the academic field of ritual studies. The study of actual rituals has diminished as ritual studies scholars have taken more time talking abstractly about the subject of ritual, gummed up in the thoughts of philosophers such as Michel Foucault, who never actually got out in the field and studied culture as anthropologists do, or used to do.
Stephenson's book is not so much an introduction to ritual as it is an introduction to ritual studies. In its summary of the state of ritual studies, it is extremely useful, but by making ritual studies rather than ritual itself its subject, the book becomes infected with the same rambling disconnection that afflicts the academic subdiscipline. So, the reader sees Stephenson take on the elaborate hemming and hawing that is typical of contemporary ritual theorists, "rather than speak of ritual, per se, which connotes a stable, fixed thing". The book isn't to be blamed for this approach, as it is intended to summarize the field, rather than remedy its ailments, but neither is the reader to be blamed for occasionally groaning out loud in exasperation.
Critiquing Johann Huizinga's expansive vision of our own society as saturated with ritual play, Stephenson writes that, "A problem with this line of thinking is that it includes so much that we are left wondering where the “ordinary world” ends and the extraordinary world begins. After all, work, too, is a set-aside space where special rules obtain." It is true that work, as it is constructed in our commercial culture, is remarkably similar in some regards to ritual. This observation would be attended to by a curious researcher, rather than perceived as a reason for theoretical dismissal, as is the case with Stephenson's approach. The dominant ideologies in our culture assert that our society is unlike any other, disenchanted and de-ritualized. Wouldn't it be interesting to consider whether this normative account of cultural reality conceals a contrary operational reality of ritual practiced under any other name?
In dismissing the potential for ritual elements in work, and in other activities developed to a special extent in our complex culture, Stephenson assents to the dominant myth of our time, that of "the relative absence of ritual in modern Western culture". What does not occur to Stephenson, or to the scholars of ritual theory that he represents, is that our complex culture may be enabled by a system of ritualization that is unprecedented in its complexity. He relegates the possibility of present-day rituals to the margins, to times of exception, such as festivals.
Instead, researchers of ritual could look to the remarkable aspects of ritual that are present in the construction of the everyday structures of commercial culture: The movement through school into work, the pilgrimage of the commute, and the astonishing display of symbolic exchange that takes place during shopping, for example. It is my hope that the brief representation of the state of ritual studies found in this book will allow academics in ritual theory to achieve a moment of clarity about the course of their work, inspiring a return to research that is more grounded in the rituals that people actually perform in our own times, to understand not just what ritual has been, but what it is becoming.