The book starts from the beginning with a real educational purpose. Aristotle, formal logic, basic principles, and the development of the subject. And then the author asks: can critical thinking be taught? Sure - it is more than 2000 years of experience. And then ... can we assess or evaluate progress? Analyzing various tests and tools, the author is skeptical about their efficiency. And as a conclusion, I would say, using bad logic, that one of the proposed answers - to provide educators working in the classroom with the
resources they need to succeed - is not good enough to enlight where do we go from there question.