I wanted to like this so much more than I did. I bought it back in England, back when I had endless options for reading material, and carried it far over the snowy hills of Mongolia, all on the strength of a Guardian review which described Belben as a Virginia Woolf for the second half of the twentieth century, and this book as an agonised Modernist tract on celibacy and sexuality, mixed in with a medieval erotic fantasia about Robin Hood laced with the bawdy world of the Middle English ballads. Well, that sounds exactly like Michael Allan's thing. Sadly, I found Dreaming of Dead People to resemble more closely the self indulgent autofiction of the rah-girl Substack author (the poshest person I ever met at Cambridge told me she was going to be the next Annie Ernaux, and in a way she could not know I felt she was speaking generationally there) than what I expected in a mix-mash of Woolf and Chaucer.
Parts of this book, essentially a wounded run-on narration by a childless woman confused and pained by the onset of 'spinsterhood', are rendered with such honesty and acute precision of feeling that I was riveted and struck by own suffocated feelings spoken back to me. I was especially moved by the early admission - 'Don't think I don't mind. I do mind.' - that recurs throughout as a motif. There's something so very liberatory about an obstinate refusal to 'grin and bear it', to 'get on', to refuse to conceal your hurt - and that confession, that you DO mind about all the pain you've endured, is a great vital one for honesty about the intention behind writing, because why else would you write if not because 'you mind'? In my experience, suffering is certainly furthered by the feeling that you must suffocate - or sublimate - your suffering for the sake of someone else; someone who does not really care, or could not know, or is not there, or will not stay.
In today's climate of maximised confusion between the sexes, it is rewarding to read an author say that they DO mind about their romantic failures, they DO mind about their lack of sexual fulfilment, they DO mind about the prospect of a lonely middle and old age stretching out before them, and they DO mind about feeling excluded from the rest of humanity, the couples becoming threes and fours and families of more as they seem to saunter down the road of biological destiny, and you remain One, the forgotten One.
All of this is powerful and worthwhile. Unfortunately that 'precision of feeling', at least on first read, seems to dissipate into vague and unfocused drifts as the chapters move on. This is the problem of inner monologue when unmoored from a character rooted in relationships and place; without that element of abstraction, that separation, I feel I am only being told about lots of different things - the countryside, horses and dogs - that I do not necessarily care about, by someone I do not feel I really know. Yes, you have opinions - but who are you, and why should I care? I never feel this way with Woolf, even at her most obscure, because her observations are coming from a place of character; even when you're unsure of the identity of the speaker, you are hearing a view from SOMEWHERE, and this is interesting because the absorption and owning of the world by a personality is interesting, whereas Belben's lengthy discussions of her dogs are just talk of some rural bitch I do not know. Likewise, although for me the Robin Hood chapters were probably the text's highlight in terms of prose, there was such a disappointing lack of commitment there. She does not give herself over to the language and sound of the Middle English ballad, as Joyce would have - she signals that Medieval Man had a different sensual world, but she hardly tries to give this to us in language. Instead, we hear about the books that the narrator/Belben liked as a child, and how they might have shaped her solitary character.
I think I'm particularly disappointed by my dislike of this one because the republishing was billed, as they often are, as a rediscovery of an unjustly neglected author, and naturally you want to cheer on the continued distribution of the body of work of a writer who has only ever achieved marginal acclaim (especially as an unpublished writer nearing the completion of a manuscript that I suspect will be my last...) I do hope Belben is rediscovered, because I want to snatch all things from the fire, and save everything, even though I know that nothing can be saved. I am probably missing something, and that is my failure.