What do you think?
Rate this book
No F*cks Given: The new ultimate breakup guide from Sunday Times bestselling author Toni Tone
Are you trying to get over a toxic boy but can’t quite seem to shake him off? Does your ex keep pulling you back in every time you start feeling ready to let go?
Well, fear not because Toni Tone is back in full force with the ultimate breakup guide to help you kick that f*ckboy to the kerb, once and for all.
Speaking from a place of more experience than she’d like to admit, Toni’s most unapologetic book yet is a journey through all the emotions of a breakup – and the tough love you need in order to move on with zero accountability.
Be prepared to laugh, shout in agreement and, by the end, no longer give a f*ck.
Well, fear not because Toni Tone is back in full force with the ultimate breakup guide to help you kick that f*ckboy to the kerb, once and for all.
Speaking from a place of more experience than she’d like to admit, Toni’s most unapologetic book yet is a journey through all the emotions of a breakup – and the tough love you need in order to move on with zero accountability.
Be prepared to laugh, shout in agreement and, by the end, no longer give a f*ck.
94 pages, Kindle Edition
Published September 25, 2025
11 people are currently reading
13 people want to read
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 4 of 4 reviews
October 3, 2025
Toni Tone writes like someone who has seen enough of the world’s nonsense to know that the old models of self-help no longer work. In an era where influencers masquerade as therapists, where productivity gurus tell us to wake up at 4:30 a.m. to “manifest,” and where every Instagram carousel sermonizes about “healing your inner child,” Tone cuts through the noise with a single injunction: give fewer fcks.
It is an aesthetic, a philosophy, and a survival mechanism. And reading it during Durga Puja in Kolkata, amid lights, chants, loudspeakers, flowers, fried food, and crowds pressing in like waves, her minimalism hit me with a paradoxical intensity: to truly honor the goddess outside, one must protect the goddess within.
Tone is not the first writer to urge detachment from toxic patterns — the Stoics, after all, told us centuries ago to distinguish between what is within our control and what is not. Marcus Aurelius could have subtitled Meditations “No Fcks Given.” But what makes Tone’s version distinctly 21st-century is the language.
It is raw, colloquial, dripping with a social-media sharpness that refuses to be mistaken for polite philosophy. She does not coat advice in academic jargon or moral severity. She tweets it, memes it, TikTok-ifies it, but without dumbing it down. In a way, her book is a cross between the Enchiridion of Epictetus and a viral Instagram reel: short bursts of direct speech, anchored by deeper psychological insight.
The central thesis is deceptively simple: your emotional bandwidth is finite, your energy is finite, your capacity for care is finite. To squander it on people who drain you, situations that repeat without resolution, or self-imposed guilt that leads nowhere is to betray yourself. The trick, however, is that the book doesn’t advocate nihilism.
Tone isn’t suggesting a retreat into apathy. Instead, she proposes what I would call emotional minimalism: keep the fcks you give few, but give them fully. Invest in what nourishes you, in people who reciprocate, in causes that matter.
This struck me with peculiar force during Puja, because festivals invert Tone’s principle. They are maximalist. They demand: give, give, give. Money to pandals, energy to processions, time to relatives, attention to the deity, patience to traffic jams, enthusiasm to cultural shows, even tolerance to the uncle who insists on reciting Tagore off-key. Puja is the season of giving until you collapse.
And yet, as I found myself stretched thin between pandal-hopping and work deadlines, Tone’s words landed like a corrective mantra: sharing is not the same as bleeding. Joy requires boundaries. Even devotion involves consent.
One of the strengths of Tone’s writing is that it avoids the brittle optimism of much Western self-help. She doesn’t say “cut toxic people, and life will be perfect.” She admits the ambiguity: sometimes the person draining you is a family member you love, sometimes the job you resent pays your bills. There is no pure exit. What she offers instead are tools: reframe your narrative, adjust your expectations, and above all, stop outsourcing your self-worth to the approval of others.
Her voice reminded me of bell hooks, in the sense of care and self-definition, but it also has the bite of Fran Lebowitz: caustic, witty, unwilling to flatter. It is not therapy-speak, it is friend-speak. And that is why it feels both bracing and intimate.
Postmodern review strategies invite me to ask: how does one read a book about refusing the world’s demands while sitting in a city that is all demand? Kolkata during Puja is the anti-minimalist landscape: neon lights stitched across streets, drums pounding, idols towering, queues never-ending.
The very air vibrates with excess. Reading No Fcks Given under these conditions felt like decoding a paradox — to practice detachment within attachment, to carve out silence within noise, to honor the goddess not only as Durga in the pandal but also as Shakti within my tired body.
Tone also engages (intentionally or not) with feminist redefinitions of selfhood. To say “no” has always been a radical act for women — socially penalized, culturally vilified, but existentially necessary. In her book, Tone reframes refusal not as selfishness but as survival. She deconstructs the old “good girl” script — be nice, be accommodating, be patient — and rewrites it: be whole, be protective, be unapologetic. And because she writes with humor, she sidesteps the earnestness that sometimes makes feminist manifestos heavy. She’s more like Audre Lorde whispering through Beyoncé memes.
But to really understand the power of her manifesto, one must situate it against the backdrop of late capitalism’s attention economy. Every ping, every notification, every request for “just five minutes” is a demand for your fcks. Social media is designed to monetize your emotional energy, to bait you into outrage, envy, or performative engagement.
Tone’s refusal, then, is not just personal—it is political. It is a refusal to be harvested as data, a refusal to feed the algorithm your outrage. “Give fewer fcks” is, in this sense, a form of resistance, a digital strike.
In fact, reading Tone after a session of doomscrolling felt uncanny. I noticed how much of my anxiety came from caring about things I had no control over: celebrity scandals, political shouting matches, trending hashtags. Tone’s prescription was clear: reallocate that energy. It’s not indifference; it’s triage.
And yet, the book does not flatten life into a utilitarian calculus. There are moments where Tone insists on joy, on laughter, on silliness. The paradox is that you free up joy precisely by cutting out what suffocates it. The fewer unnecessary fcks you give, the more space you create for genuine delight. This principle resonates not only with Stoicism but also with Buddhist detachment, which recognizes clinging as the source of suffering. Tone secularizes these traditions for a digital audience, replacing sutras with sass, koans with quips.
The postmodern angle, however, forces me to acknowledge the slipperiness of “authenticity.” Is Tone selling empowerment as a brand, just another product in the self-help marketplace? Of course, yes. Her book is marketed, blurbed, hashtagged, merch-ready. But to dismiss it as commodified empowerment would be to miss its real impact. The text knows it is a product — hence the irreverence, the playful abrasiveness. It undermines the solemnity of self-help even as it participates in it. That irony is its strength.
During Puja, when commercialization is at its peak — billboards of goddesses sponsored by telecom companies, idols draped with corporate logos, puja pandals boasting of “eco-friendly” sponsorships — the irony felt doubly sharp.
Tone’s book mirrored the contradiction I was living: spirituality packaged as spectacle, empowerment packaged as commodity. And yet, both still work. You can still feel awe in front of a goddess despite the neon sponsor. You can still feel liberated by a self-help book despite its Amazon ranking. That doubleness is the postmodern condition: authenticity persists even through commodification.
Tone also has a knack for micro-narratives. She sprinkles her advice with small anecdotes — dating disasters, friendship fallouts, career crossroads — that ground the abstraction. They aren’t extraordinary stories; they are ordinary in the best sense, relatable, transferable. By reading them, you slot your own experiences into her template, rewriting your narrative along with hers. This is where her skill as a communicator shines. She is not speaking from a mountaintop; she is texting you from the couch.
The deeper resonance of her book lies in how it reframes responsibility. By saying “no fcks given,” Tone does not absolve us from caring. Rather, she asks us to own the caring we do. If you choose to give a fck about activism, about family, about art — that’s not weakness, that’s sovereignty. You are no longer being manipulated by guilt or fear; you are acting from choice.
And that, to me, is where the Puja metaphor comes full circle. Durga is worshipped because she chose to fight the demon. Her power is not in limitless giving, but in selective ferocity. She appears when needed, vanishes when not.
She is both nurturing and annihilating. She knows when to give and when to withdraw. Toni Tone’s manifesto, read against that mythological backdrop, becomes almost theological: the art of giving no fcks is the art of becoming divine in your selectivity.
By the time I finished the book — late night, with dhaak drums still echoing in my ears — I realized the gift Tone had given me was not advice but permission. Permission to rest, to refuse, to conserve. Permission to treat my energy as sacred. Permission to believe that boundaries are not barriers but blessings.
In the end, No Fcks Given is less a self-help manual than a cultural artifact: a snapshot of how one woman, writing in the language of the internet age, reinterprets age-old wisdom about detachment, sovereignty, and joy. It is Epictetus rebranded, Buddha with hashtags, Durga with a punchline. And that hybridity, that irreverence, is precisely what makes it linger.
Tone’s book doesn’t solve your problems, but it does something rarer: it changes your relation to them. It reminds you that you are finite, and that finitude is freedom. To live is to choose, and to choose is to disappoint some demands so that you can honor others. In a world addicted to more, Toni Tone’s minimalism is radical.
And so, amid the maximalism of Puja, I found her manifesto not an escape but an anchor. The goddess outside was radiant in light and color; the goddess inside needed darkness and quiet. Both existed. Both mattered. Both were sacred.
It is an aesthetic, a philosophy, and a survival mechanism. And reading it during Durga Puja in Kolkata, amid lights, chants, loudspeakers, flowers, fried food, and crowds pressing in like waves, her minimalism hit me with a paradoxical intensity: to truly honor the goddess outside, one must protect the goddess within.
Tone is not the first writer to urge detachment from toxic patterns — the Stoics, after all, told us centuries ago to distinguish between what is within our control and what is not. Marcus Aurelius could have subtitled Meditations “No Fcks Given.” But what makes Tone’s version distinctly 21st-century is the language.
It is raw, colloquial, dripping with a social-media sharpness that refuses to be mistaken for polite philosophy. She does not coat advice in academic jargon or moral severity. She tweets it, memes it, TikTok-ifies it, but without dumbing it down. In a way, her book is a cross between the Enchiridion of Epictetus and a viral Instagram reel: short bursts of direct speech, anchored by deeper psychological insight.
The central thesis is deceptively simple: your emotional bandwidth is finite, your energy is finite, your capacity for care is finite. To squander it on people who drain you, situations that repeat without resolution, or self-imposed guilt that leads nowhere is to betray yourself. The trick, however, is that the book doesn’t advocate nihilism.
Tone isn’t suggesting a retreat into apathy. Instead, she proposes what I would call emotional minimalism: keep the fcks you give few, but give them fully. Invest in what nourishes you, in people who reciprocate, in causes that matter.
This struck me with peculiar force during Puja, because festivals invert Tone’s principle. They are maximalist. They demand: give, give, give. Money to pandals, energy to processions, time to relatives, attention to the deity, patience to traffic jams, enthusiasm to cultural shows, even tolerance to the uncle who insists on reciting Tagore off-key. Puja is the season of giving until you collapse.
And yet, as I found myself stretched thin between pandal-hopping and work deadlines, Tone’s words landed like a corrective mantra: sharing is not the same as bleeding. Joy requires boundaries. Even devotion involves consent.
One of the strengths of Tone’s writing is that it avoids the brittle optimism of much Western self-help. She doesn’t say “cut toxic people, and life will be perfect.” She admits the ambiguity: sometimes the person draining you is a family member you love, sometimes the job you resent pays your bills. There is no pure exit. What she offers instead are tools: reframe your narrative, adjust your expectations, and above all, stop outsourcing your self-worth to the approval of others.
Her voice reminded me of bell hooks, in the sense of care and self-definition, but it also has the bite of Fran Lebowitz: caustic, witty, unwilling to flatter. It is not therapy-speak, it is friend-speak. And that is why it feels both bracing and intimate.
Postmodern review strategies invite me to ask: how does one read a book about refusing the world’s demands while sitting in a city that is all demand? Kolkata during Puja is the anti-minimalist landscape: neon lights stitched across streets, drums pounding, idols towering, queues never-ending.
The very air vibrates with excess. Reading No Fcks Given under these conditions felt like decoding a paradox — to practice detachment within attachment, to carve out silence within noise, to honor the goddess not only as Durga in the pandal but also as Shakti within my tired body.
Tone also engages (intentionally or not) with feminist redefinitions of selfhood. To say “no” has always been a radical act for women — socially penalized, culturally vilified, but existentially necessary. In her book, Tone reframes refusal not as selfishness but as survival. She deconstructs the old “good girl” script — be nice, be accommodating, be patient — and rewrites it: be whole, be protective, be unapologetic. And because she writes with humor, she sidesteps the earnestness that sometimes makes feminist manifestos heavy. She’s more like Audre Lorde whispering through Beyoncé memes.
But to really understand the power of her manifesto, one must situate it against the backdrop of late capitalism’s attention economy. Every ping, every notification, every request for “just five minutes” is a demand for your fcks. Social media is designed to monetize your emotional energy, to bait you into outrage, envy, or performative engagement.
Tone’s refusal, then, is not just personal—it is political. It is a refusal to be harvested as data, a refusal to feed the algorithm your outrage. “Give fewer fcks” is, in this sense, a form of resistance, a digital strike.
In fact, reading Tone after a session of doomscrolling felt uncanny. I noticed how much of my anxiety came from caring about things I had no control over: celebrity scandals, political shouting matches, trending hashtags. Tone’s prescription was clear: reallocate that energy. It’s not indifference; it’s triage.
And yet, the book does not flatten life into a utilitarian calculus. There are moments where Tone insists on joy, on laughter, on silliness. The paradox is that you free up joy precisely by cutting out what suffocates it. The fewer unnecessary fcks you give, the more space you create for genuine delight. This principle resonates not only with Stoicism but also with Buddhist detachment, which recognizes clinging as the source of suffering. Tone secularizes these traditions for a digital audience, replacing sutras with sass, koans with quips.
The postmodern angle, however, forces me to acknowledge the slipperiness of “authenticity.” Is Tone selling empowerment as a brand, just another product in the self-help marketplace? Of course, yes. Her book is marketed, blurbed, hashtagged, merch-ready. But to dismiss it as commodified empowerment would be to miss its real impact. The text knows it is a product — hence the irreverence, the playful abrasiveness. It undermines the solemnity of self-help even as it participates in it. That irony is its strength.
During Puja, when commercialization is at its peak — billboards of goddesses sponsored by telecom companies, idols draped with corporate logos, puja pandals boasting of “eco-friendly” sponsorships — the irony felt doubly sharp.
Tone’s book mirrored the contradiction I was living: spirituality packaged as spectacle, empowerment packaged as commodity. And yet, both still work. You can still feel awe in front of a goddess despite the neon sponsor. You can still feel liberated by a self-help book despite its Amazon ranking. That doubleness is the postmodern condition: authenticity persists even through commodification.
Tone also has a knack for micro-narratives. She sprinkles her advice with small anecdotes — dating disasters, friendship fallouts, career crossroads — that ground the abstraction. They aren’t extraordinary stories; they are ordinary in the best sense, relatable, transferable. By reading them, you slot your own experiences into her template, rewriting your narrative along with hers. This is where her skill as a communicator shines. She is not speaking from a mountaintop; she is texting you from the couch.
The deeper resonance of her book lies in how it reframes responsibility. By saying “no fcks given,” Tone does not absolve us from caring. Rather, she asks us to own the caring we do. If you choose to give a fck about activism, about family, about art — that’s not weakness, that’s sovereignty. You are no longer being manipulated by guilt or fear; you are acting from choice.
And that, to me, is where the Puja metaphor comes full circle. Durga is worshipped because she chose to fight the demon. Her power is not in limitless giving, but in selective ferocity. She appears when needed, vanishes when not.
She is both nurturing and annihilating. She knows when to give and when to withdraw. Toni Tone’s manifesto, read against that mythological backdrop, becomes almost theological: the art of giving no fcks is the art of becoming divine in your selectivity.
By the time I finished the book — late night, with dhaak drums still echoing in my ears — I realized the gift Tone had given me was not advice but permission. Permission to rest, to refuse, to conserve. Permission to treat my energy as sacred. Permission to believe that boundaries are not barriers but blessings.
In the end, No Fcks Given is less a self-help manual than a cultural artifact: a snapshot of how one woman, writing in the language of the internet age, reinterprets age-old wisdom about detachment, sovereignty, and joy. It is Epictetus rebranded, Buddha with hashtags, Durga with a punchline. And that hybridity, that irreverence, is precisely what makes it linger.
Tone’s book doesn’t solve your problems, but it does something rarer: it changes your relation to them. It reminds you that you are finite, and that finitude is freedom. To live is to choose, and to choose is to disappoint some demands so that you can honor others. In a world addicted to more, Toni Tone’s minimalism is radical.
And so, amid the maximalism of Puja, I found her manifesto not an escape but an anchor. The goddess outside was radiant in light and color; the goddess inside needed darkness and quiet. Both existed. Both mattered. Both were sacred.
September 29, 2025
I read this in one sitting! 😅
Beautifully written, straight to the point, personal and absolutely necessary❤️
Beautifully written, straight to the point, personal and absolutely necessary❤️
October 30, 2025
Liberating to say the least.⛓️💥🆓🧘🏾♀️
I felt seen and understood.❤️🩹📓
A great reminder and reinforcement.🔂🙂↕️🕊️
I felt seen and understood.❤️🩹📓
A great reminder and reinforcement.🔂🙂↕️🕊️
Displaying 1 - 4 of 4 reviews