What do you think?
Rate this book
النظريّة الدبلوماسية من مكيافيللي إلى كيسنجر
ستبقى الدبلوماسية التي تمارسها وزارات الخارجية في الدول موضوعاً يشغل المجتمعات على الرغم من ظهور ما يسمى الدبلوماسية العامة في المرحلة المعاصرة من تطور الدول.
لقد كرست الدبلوماسية الرسمية تقاليد عمل وأعراف وأفكار ومفاهيم ونظريات غنية، وعرفت مفكرين في هذا الحقل بدءاً بـ مكيافيلي مروراً بـ جوشيارديني وغروتيوس وتريشليو وويكهفورت وبوفندورف وساڤاتو ونيكلسون وانتهاء بـ كيسنجر. مرحلة شغلت نحو سبعة عام بريفها، الأغنى في تاريخ البشرية.
سيجد الباحث والعامل في هذا الميدان والقارئ العام الكثير مما هو مفيد في حل مشكلات كثيرة على المستويات كلها بالتفاوض، هذه الكلمة التي يمكن أن تختصر علم الدبلوماسية وفنها معاً.
لقد كرست الدبلوماسية الرسمية تقاليد عمل وأعراف وأفكار ومفاهيم ونظريات غنية، وعرفت مفكرين في هذا الحقل بدءاً بـ مكيافيلي مروراً بـ جوشيارديني وغروتيوس وتريشليو وويكهفورت وبوفندورف وساڤاتو ونيكلسون وانتهاء بـ كيسنجر. مرحلة شغلت نحو سبعة عام بريفها، الأغنى في تاريخ البشرية.
سيجد الباحث والعامل في هذا الميدان والقارئ العام الكثير مما هو مفيد في حل مشكلات كثيرة على المستويات كلها بالتفاوض، هذه الكلمة التي يمكن أن تختصر علم الدبلوماسية وفنها معاً.
350 pages, Paperback
First published May 4, 2001
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 of 1 review
March 29, 2026
It was in a Senior Leadership meeting that the Head described me as a diplomat. We share a quiet, unspoken interest in politics which surfaced in occasional passing reference to David Cameron or Tony Blair. I took the remark not as casual, but as intentional. A recognition of a craft I have long intended to develop.
In many respects, that is the role I occupy. An ambassador of sorts. Positioned in constant attempt to translate “global” decisions into the lived trenches of corridors and classrooms. Bit of my inner David Brent sneaking in here.
This moment did serve as a catalyst. Like many ideas I have held, the intention to study diplomacy had long been present, but dormant until I had the reason to do so. This was a good moment to start. I came to this book with a clear aim: to begin sharpening a discipline that will define both my current effectiveness and my future direction. From here, I will move on to Henry Kissinger and continue that development with greater depth.
As a starting point, this book is well judged. It is, at times, academic and as dry as they come, but well suited to steady, deliberate Bitesize chunks of reading. It offers a broad and structured account of diplomatic theory and practice, tracing its development from its early modern origins through to more *slightly* contemporary interpretations. In doing so, it draws on the insights of key figures: Ernest Satow, Harold Nicolson, Kissinger, and Niccolò Machiavelli, for example, balancing principle with practice, and theory with lived application.
What becomes clear is the enduring nature of diplomacy. Across time, geography, and political context, the same underlying principles persist. The tools may evolve, but the craft remains consistent. Judgement, timing, discretion, and the careful management of relationships sit at its core. This continuity lends weight to the guidance offered and reinforces the sense that diplomacy is not merely a skill, but a discipline.
That said, this is a foundation rather than a conclusion. To truly internalise its lessons, further study is required. I intend to build on this by engaging more deeply with the works of Kissinger and others, before distilling a set of principles that I can apply with intent.
The road forever goes on and on…
In many respects, that is the role I occupy. An ambassador of sorts. Positioned in constant attempt to translate “global” decisions into the lived trenches of corridors and classrooms. Bit of my inner David Brent sneaking in here.
This moment did serve as a catalyst. Like many ideas I have held, the intention to study diplomacy had long been present, but dormant until I had the reason to do so. This was a good moment to start. I came to this book with a clear aim: to begin sharpening a discipline that will define both my current effectiveness and my future direction. From here, I will move on to Henry Kissinger and continue that development with greater depth.
As a starting point, this book is well judged. It is, at times, academic and as dry as they come, but well suited to steady, deliberate Bitesize chunks of reading. It offers a broad and structured account of diplomatic theory and practice, tracing its development from its early modern origins through to more *slightly* contemporary interpretations. In doing so, it draws on the insights of key figures: Ernest Satow, Harold Nicolson, Kissinger, and Niccolò Machiavelli, for example, balancing principle with practice, and theory with lived application.
What becomes clear is the enduring nature of diplomacy. Across time, geography, and political context, the same underlying principles persist. The tools may evolve, but the craft remains consistent. Judgement, timing, discretion, and the careful management of relationships sit at its core. This continuity lends weight to the guidance offered and reinforces the sense that diplomacy is not merely a skill, but a discipline.
That said, this is a foundation rather than a conclusion. To truly internalise its lessons, further study is required. I intend to build on this by engaging more deeply with the works of Kissinger and others, before distilling a set of principles that I can apply with intent.
The road forever goes on and on…
Displaying 1 of 1 review