Despite the two stars I gave this book, I feel this is a must read for anyone who even remotely enjoys the Illmatic album. Personally, I am a huge Nas fan and I consider Illmatic to be one of the top 5 or 10 artistic achievements of the past 25 years, in any medium... but this book was very disappointing to me for several reasons. The biggest one is that the writers of the essays in the book tend to think that the majority of the album's value lies in what it says, tangentially, about sociology and politics. And while they are often right in their assessments, I find myself growing increasingly annoyed that hip hop as a whole is considered most valuable when it is primarily assessed as a form of social criticism. It frustrates me that critics can't just interpret the best of hip hop as great art and explain what makes it great art in and of itself, regardless of its politics.
The books is divided for about the first two-thirds by essays about inspired by each individual song on the album. Another of my main problems is that most of the essays hardly mention the song that they're supposed to be about. The essay associated with "One Time for Your Mind" for example, spent much more time trying to deconstruct the music video for "I Can", a song released almost 10 years after Illmatic. Regardless, I found that essay to be the weakest amongst all that are presented. It's promotes a feminist argument, and while I don't argue that Hip Hop needs a more "feminine" (for lack of a better word) touch, I think the author glosses over various contradictory events that would weaken her argument. The biggest one for me is the author's assertion that Nas, as well as other hip hop "traditionalists" (again, for lack of a better word)dislike the progression of modern hip hop because they would like to go back to the days when hip hop was a predominately male enterprise. While the author does have a leg to stand on, especially with regards to several of Nas's statements, she also fails to mention that Nas, on the song "Represent", specifically mentions the battle between Shante and The Real Roxanne--a battle between two females that took place during the exact time period that the author uses to illustrate her point of a female absence. Therefore, this inclusion would seem to suggest to me that Nas's comments were merely him calling it as it was (he had something about most women not liking the type of hip hop he enjoyed growing up), and not saying that hip hop necessarily has to appeal to males only. I, myself, have met only a handful of females in my life who like the same hip hop music I do, and I don't like most of the hip hop my female acquaintances enjoy. I personally don't think this is so because I wish to exclude women. Instead, I think it's just because there's something in me, whether nature or nurture, that attracts me to music that makes me want to punch someone in the face... and this sort of music, for whatever reason, just doesn't seem to attract many females.
The best essays were the ones that actually focused on the songs they were supposed to be inspired by. The essays on "Life's a Bitch" and "Represent" and "It Ain't Hard to Tell" come immediately to mind. The essay on "New York State of Mind" was decent, but ultimately disappointing because I see the song as an example of some of the most visual and visceral and vibrant poetry written. And while the author does touch on this slightly, he seems more preoccupied with exploring its sociological and political implications, instead of its art.
The focus on the politics and sociological implications is not necessarily a bad thing ), but I think the authors should've done a better job, on the whole, of discussing the importance of such things being done in an artistic manner.
Ultimately, it was worth the read and several of the articles are superb. The best part of the book for me was the last third which features various interviews, vignettes and elegies associated with the album.