"misogyny"...this is not the right book to talk about that.
the author herself says that Tinder is a place where people go to hook up (mainly, JUST sex, translation), but then she goes and asks herself, the world, and men, why you don't end up finding the guy who wants to, basically, get married ("more effort" - a serious relationship? what is the end desire from Tinder? marriage, stability, lies as an opposite to the Tinder-casual, not serious...what most people use it these days for), on the app...where people mainly go looking for, basically, the opposite...honestly, if you don't like the offer, knowing what Tinder is used for, don't be on Tinder. this issue is beyond "misogyny".
second, talk about over-analysing every single thing, again, on a platform where, again, even the author said, people mainly go to hook up...NO DRAMA (as the book said, IN CAPS). most of the things were misinterpreted to some extreme, i assume to prove some point that...men on Tinder should want to marry (?), and put in more than casual effort, when, again, most, as it was said, are there because they want a one-night-stand or something casual. don't be on Tinder if you want something else then, instead of trying to fight all that in a book to convince the world the problem is Tinder and the desire for casual (and that's not quite "misogyny"). then they (the men) should write something in their bio, but then if they write something which the author did not like (or decided to over-analyse), that's also not good...i was barely holding on to the book at this point, it was being a bit hypocritical.
are some people aggressive on Tinder (like on other social media platforms, Twitter being a good example)? yes, it's gonna generally follow the statistics in the population. is it focused on sexual things and the people directly? yes, because...it's the place where people, as it was said, go to hook up. can that make everything look and feel worse? most likely.
i don't particularly like Tinder (although, i understand its purpose/use for people), but i can't say i agree with this book. it's just approaching the subject wrong.
(maybe it's better to go on an app where it's clear that both parties are looking for something serious, then people can avoid being upset that the other does not want what they want, and they can "put more effort" into a relationship, because they actually want it...there are apps for that too, and that's not gonna be Tinder...maybe they should do "Tinder-casual" and "Tinder-serious", as a "switch" button style feature where you set yourself to be visible only for the ones with the same setting...to have people be less disappointed when their expectations are not met...maybe they have that already, i wouldn't know, i've always kept myself away from Tinder...if not, they should all add "lone wolf", according to the book)
1 star, because the subject of "misogyny" is approached wrong here. this book would have been better written as something like: look at all the ridiculous things people do and say on a platform where people go looking for casual sex (and, yes, some would actually classify as sexist, but not really "i'm looking for someone who can hold a conversation", i need to be honest...as a woman, and some men are like that too, i'd also be looking for someone who can hold a conversation, it's only fair, or looking for someone who can make me laugh, or whatever else was criticised as "misogyny" in this book but is actually quite reasonable...or things like the "height", where the author is insisting you should stop having some preference, when you do...this was getting close to telling you you can pick to be gay or straight...what's wrong with liking something specifically, or ideally? this an app where that matters, where the indent is to have you matched with someone who fits what you're looking for...you're not gonna fit every potential's ideal, and that should be ok, it should not matter, i know men who want women close their own height and men who want the opposite, and that's fine...or, there's something wrong with liking tattoos? and having that in your bio...and there's also nothing wrong with paying 50-50...talk about gender roles, the author is critical about gender roles in other chapters, but in here she's implying it's ok for just him to pay, but then she also says it does not matter who pays...that chapter kinda sounded like it does)...and this was written in 2022, not at the beginnings of Tinder (2012).
# inked myself :) it should be ok (definitely not "misogyny", let's be honest).