My roommate lent me this book, I was interested since I recognized the author from her Instagram page. I have very mixed feelings. This is going to be long, most likely.
To start, I don’t think this book needed to be almost 300 pages long. The content becomes extremely repetitive after the first 1/3rd, with a lot of filler paragraphs. At the end of each chapter, the author sums up the previous chapters/ethos of the book. She also does so in between the sections of each chapters, AND intermittently throughout. Because of this, the middle section dragged on & it was incredibly hard to get through for me. There are also copious typos, which does not make a good impression & contributes to the sense that the manuscript was rushed.
The book could benefit from more selective citations of scientific research, as well as more in-depth descriptions of the specific practices she references for body/mind consciousness. The author makes too many scientific claims without providing enough support to back them up. I think it should have been left as a “spiritual” text, because the science angle she provides is weak. A lot of the claims are pseudoscientific - she often describes physiological phenomena using vague & ambiguous language, without citing any scientific sources.
LaPera struggles to differentiate between her own personal spiritual theories, emerging scientific research that potentially supports such theories, and scientifically proven or quantitatively measurable observations of our body’s functioning. Thus we have statements like “it’s our heart, not our brain, that interprets the electromagnetic signals from (…) the world around us” with no source cited.
Or, “with heart coherence, our heart sends our brain (…) nerve impulses, hormones, neurotransmitters, and electromagnetic energy, all of which lower our perceived stress and increase our stress resiliency.”
This is just lazy and sloppy writing, as 1) our heart and brain do this all the time, these are biological processes to ensure our body’s basic physiological functioning, regardless of how relaxed or grounded we are. 2) all hormones & neurotransmitters are not created equal. For example, increased cortisol, adrenaline, and even dopamine will not lower our perceived stress, at least in the short term. I am still unsure whether or not heart coherence is a “real” scientific term, or what it actually means.
Ok, onto what the book is actually about. On the one hand, it can be hard to engage with because my tendencies to be in my head and analyze prevented me from fully hearing & feeling the messages LePera gives us about our body. There were many good reminders here to “drop in” and listen to ourselves. Some of the exercises are quite useful, however I do find them superficial for the most part.
My biggest issue here is that all trauma is not created equal – and LePera offers no distinction between “normal” trauma (aka attachment issues) and trauma that is clinically significant. Our insecure attachment to our primary caregivers is given a lot of attention, weight, and importance. While attachment theory is undoubtedly important, I feel that it is overemphasized here. I have to say, I find it a bit of a cop out to pin our neurological wirings entirely on our parents & caregivers, especially in a world that is increasingly stressful on our nervous system (lights, noise, screen time for kids, food deserts, the turmoil of inner city life). At times it feels a bit like a 19-year-old having an identity crisis & blaming everything in their life on something their parents did wrong (guilty).
I find that at times the book veers into unrelatable territory because of this. There isn’t really any mention of trauma suffered later in life, or of childhood trauma not stemming from parental “neglect”, or of trauma rooted in circumstances that are violent, unusual, or extreme. No discussion of PTSD either, beyond a brief mention in passing. In a book that allows us to describe “trauma” as “your parents not paying enough attention to you,” it is incredibly flawed, in my opinion, to completely gloss over the topic of CLINICAL trauma. Fearing for your survival is a completely different situation than craving your parent’s approval, and the ramifications will naturally be more severe. And I mean, yeah, this is a self-help book not a PTSD treatment guideline… but still.
I also don’t like her insinuation that if your needs are not met physically, you cannot advance mentally/psychologically or spiritually. I feel that it discredits the COUNTLESS people who are “doing the work” every single day despite suffering under systemic poverty, racism, violence… spiritual, material, physical & emotional needs are interwoven. Our body is a vessel that we need in order to carry out the rest of our mission. But we can sustain ourselves spiritually and emotionally in times of physical lack. In fact; many people do so constantly. It is a tragic state to be in, but it is possible to do so. It happens all the time.