Absolutely brilliant application of the amoral tendency in philosophy to tangible phenomena (art and the art world) that makes this little book seem almost more useful in a lot of ways than those of other philosophers who have wielded the tendency with what can only seem in comparison to be obscurity.
I loved how this essay powerfully and succinctly diagnoses the malaise that has plagued so many aspects of western cultural and political discourse since the late 2010s. Particularly appreciated the identification of ambiguity or the opportunity for individual interpretation as an enemy of the current moral hegemony.
3.5. Quite surface level and a bit too many hyperbolic Twitter-isms in the first chapter which took me out of it. I was hoping it would be a bit more challenging.
Incredibly thought provoking. Balances a lot of ideas about the future of art, identity politics and placing today’s morals on art of the past well while still remaining punchy.