A good, but slow, read, for several reasons. I read the paperback edition, and it’s in tiny print for my damaged eyes. Crossan is way more a biblical scholar than I’ve ever been, so I had to think about and review the history and geography that flows freely from Crossan.
Covering Paul through his own writing as well as the writing of the author of Luke-Acts, it was an exercise to face these as different authorships, with different purposes, which are both obviously the case, and commonly ignored. This is a great case study in how to do that.
I think I’ll have to get a kindle edition so the print size is adjustable when I revisit this.