A story told across generations, as a 600 strong crew of pioneers leave a dying Earth in their generation ship on a 360 year journey to a new world. This is a gentle study of human behaviour, relationships, and resilience. It has some interesting ideas, but, for me, didn’t quite hit the mark due to slow pacing and a lack of emotional punch.
The pet project of a billionaire, Thaddeus Parsons, to allow some of humanity to escape the inexorable collapse of sustainable life on Earth, “Shipworld” is a massive self-sustaining spacecraft. The book is vague about the collapse on Earth that they are escaping - the usual combination of climate change and societal breakdown. Instead, the story focuses on the life and culture of the crew, as their fortunes ebb and flow throughout their journey.
The society on the ship is egalitarian rather than hierarchical, and the focus is on community rather than self interest. It is clear that Parsons had ascribed the various collapses on Earth to self interest of one kind of another, and had shaped society on Shipworld in an attempt to avoid the same fate. And much of the narrative explores the effect that this has both on the society on Shipworld, and the individuals, with an undercurrent of doubt about whether this can ever really be avoided, or if it is something fundamental about humanity.
While there are moments of jeopardy in the plot, the titles of the final chapters leave little doubt that their journey will have some success. And as the story spans generations, it is clear that most of the characters won’t survive to the end of the book. Perhaps because of this, I never felt particularly emotionally engaged with any of the characters.
Unfortunately, I was also quite distracted by some issues with the basic science, many of which related to the rotation of the ship and its relation to the sense of simulated gravity. Few of the science issues were important to the plot, and I just found myself frustrated that they should either be glossed over (which is absolutely fine if they’re not relevant to the storytelling), or be better researched. For example, when the dimensions and rotation of the ship are specified, it seems like laziness to then get the resulting force of simulated gravity wrong (yes, I was sufficiently distracted by other science errors to do the maths). Please just leave it vague or get it right!
I liked the concept, though - the ways in which such a closed society might develop, and the comments that can be made on human behaviour, motivation, and relationships, are interesting to explore. But, for me, this didn’t quite hit the mark.
Thank you #NetGalley and Bloomsbury Publishing for the free review copy of #HereAndBeyond without obligation. All opinions are my own.