(3/5) First things first, there is nothing heretical or misleading about the content of this devotional. Theologically and doctrinally I found it sound. From an organizational standpoint as well, it contains concise themes, short writings, some scripture, and nice prayers at the end. I have many thoughts on it that are also a culmination of other reflections and critiques on similar devotionals, so bear with me.
To begin positively, there were many days of the devotional that I enjoyed. Those had good reminders of Christ and his attributes with miniature scripture sections to go along with it, and I liked the prayers at the end.
But as another reviewer said already, this felt more like a chatty guy at a coffee shop going off about “his things” that he had on his mind rather than a themed devotional on the advent of Christ. It was, from a high level, as if Tripp had topics of interest and then chatted about it in a way that (not always, but usually) made you want to find an excuse to sit on the other side of the coffee shop.
My sample size of Tripp’s writing is limited as of yet to this devotional, so perhaps it’s not always like this. But reading this devotional out loud was clunky at best. One example is his December 20th devotional that for 10 consecutive sentences the subject is “glory” and said in such needless repetition that it begins to sound like an alien word, as saying certain words over and over is wont to do. In other words, it’s hard to believe this was “proof-read-out-loud” to hear what it sounded like when actually read aloud as Christmas devotionals are so commonly done. And that wasn’t the only example to go by in this book.
He uses Mary’s Magnificat and Simeon’s Song (big points there) but does something I’ve been seeing all too often lately — misses opportunities to actually talk about THOSE characters. He does a little, but the focus is always brought back to Christ (which in and of itself is extremely good and needed). But he does so in a repetitious and flavorless way, speaking on attributes of Christ but repeating them and restating the same theme in each conclusion (more on that in the next paragraph). He also fails to —and I think this the most crucial mistake— speak much at all on these side-characters of the advent story (Wise men, shepherds, Simeon, Mary, Joseph, etc) as well as the story itself. As critical as it is to point back to Christ, the side characters in narratives are there to both point to and expound upon the main character/narrative, not to mention give readers the opportunity to relate. Plus, stories themselves have a way of getting to us in ways we couldn’t with prose, but Tripp does not use much of the classic advent narrative. This is important because WE are side characters in God’s great story and in every other individual’s story — I think Tripp’s devotional could’ve benefitted immensely from even brief encouragements on how to be a good side character.
One last critique is the scope of which he talks about Jesus. He often talks about the birth, life, death, and resurrection of Christ in one breath (see end of December 9th for an example). This I think caused the wrap-up & takeaways to be predictable. His theme for most days was “God has saved us graciously and gloriously in his son Jesus”. This is certainly not wrong! It’s a glorious truth. But it being the takeaway of many days of a 25-day devotional was predictable and bland in a writer’s sense (not in a spiritual sense).
Okay, you got to the end. You didn’t ask for this. I don’t despise this book despite having so many critiques, I suppose I just had high hopes met with mediocre delivery. Overall, I enjoyed some of this free devotional and a few days in particular. I hope to read Tripp more in the future, though not inspired by this book.