Simon Fowler has written a thoroughly researched book of some 240 pages, on the evolving history of the workhouse, using, in the main, the extensive records of the National Archives. He presents a fascinating and well written history littered liberally with quotes and examples from both well run and unbelievably dreadful establishments. Clearly poor management and a lack of oversight lead to some of the worst abuses of mankind throughout the main period of their history from 1830 to the outbreak of WWI, but whether the blame could be laid at the lack of national policy and too much reliance on local interests is somewhat a subjective judgement. It is clear, though, that only when the worst cases of abuse reached the national press, was the law changed and oversight improved.
Fowler blames the huge increase in poverty on the economic downturn after the Napoleonic Wars in the mid-1810s and takes a Malthusian view that over population is largely to blame for the plight of the poor of this period. He includes a detailed account of the shortcomings of the out-relief system and briefly touches on how the Speenhamland system pushed more and more families to seek relief. (The Speenhamland System of 1795, was a method of giving relief to the poor, based on the price of bread and the number of children a man had but became widely abused and an increasing burden on the local tax payers. “It depressed the wages paid by farmers and removed the incentive for labourers to seek work.” Fowler.) Suggesting that the Poor Law worked well in the 17th and 18th centuries, and blaming the poverty on economic conditions seems to me to be missing the main cause of 19th century poverty.
The 19th Century social reformer, William Cobbett, would have argued with Fowler over this point. When Cobbett returned from 10 years in America, he wrote: “When I saw those whom I had known the most neat, cheerful and happy beings on earth, and these my countrymen too, had become the most wretched and forlorn of human beings, I looked seriously and inquired patiently into the matter …” As Richard Ingrams wrote, in his 'Life and Adventures of William Cobbett', “What had caused the decline? Cobbett instanced two major factors: firstly the continuing series of enclosures, whereby the common lands which traditionally provided labourers with a source of food and fuel to supplement their earnings had been taken over or 'privatised' by the rich farmers and landowners in the interests of 'greater efficiency. Secondly, the newly introduced Poor Laws, known as the Speenhamland System, intended when they were launched in 1795 to help the poorest labourers by making up their pay from the rates, but which had the effect of branding them as paupers, so robbing them of all self-respect. 'The labourers are humbled, debased and enslaved. Until of late years, there was amongst the poor, a horror of becoming chargeable to the Parish … the labourer now, in but too many instances, takes care to spend all as fast as he gets it, makes himself as poor as he can and uses all the art that he is master of to cause it to be believed that he is still more miserable than he really is.”
It is only when Fowler ventures into the causes for the 30% that lived below the poverty line, that the book fails, in my opinion, but that is not the main point of the book, which is to 'reveal the reality behind the legend'. As he writes “these institutional monsters became what the New Poor Law intended – the last resort of the desperate.” In exposing that 'reality' Fowler does an excellent job.
Fowler's Dickens quote summed up the stark choice facing many of the poor of the day: “of being starved by gradual process in the house or by a quick one out of it.”