What do you think?
The Northern Bank Job: The Heist and How They Got Away with It
The true story of one of the biggest bank heists in Irish and British history – and the questions that remain.
On a Sunday evening in December 2004, two young men were at home with their families. Both worked for the Northern Bank's cash centre in Belfast. They heard knocks on their front doors. Within a few minutes, masked men invaded their homes, overpowered their loved ones and disabled their electronic devices. It was made clear to the two bank officials that they had a do what they were told or their families would die.
Over the course of the following day, £26.5 million was stolen from the Northern the biggest cash heist in Irish and British history. The two men whose families were held hostage simply re-labelled vast amounts of cash as rubbish and wheeled huge bags to a van waiting outside in the street, yards from Belfast's City Hall. The robbers' knowledge of the inner workings of the bank was astonishing. They deployed a large crew of drivers, guards, watchers and gunmen.
It was immediately obvious that only one organization had the ability to plan and execute such an audacious, minutely-planned the Irish Republican Army. But the IRA was supposed to be demobilized as a result of the Good Friday Peace Agreement signed six years earlier. The leaders of Sinn Féin (who were also leaders of the IRA) vehemently denied they had anything to do with it.
No-one believed them. The governments in London, Dublin and Washington were outraged. Yet no one was ever been convicted of any crime relating to the heist and little more than two years later, Sinn Féin was in government in Northern Ireland.
As the twentieth anniversary of this bizarre robbery approaches, Glenn Patterson builds on his popular BBC podcast to shed new light on the story of the infamous heist, the victims, the organizers and the abortive, at times comically inept, attempts to find the people who carried it out, provided inside information and laundered huge numbers of banknotes in Ireland, Bulgaria and other exotic locations. His narrative of the events is witty, indignant and brilliantly controlled, the work of a master storyteller.
On a Sunday evening in December 2004, two young men were at home with their families. Both worked for the Northern Bank's cash centre in Belfast. They heard knocks on their front doors. Within a few minutes, masked men invaded their homes, overpowered their loved ones and disabled their electronic devices. It was made clear to the two bank officials that they had a do what they were told or their families would die.
Over the course of the following day, £26.5 million was stolen from the Northern the biggest cash heist in Irish and British history. The two men whose families were held hostage simply re-labelled vast amounts of cash as rubbish and wheeled huge bags to a van waiting outside in the street, yards from Belfast's City Hall. The robbers' knowledge of the inner workings of the bank was astonishing. They deployed a large crew of drivers, guards, watchers and gunmen.
It was immediately obvious that only one organization had the ability to plan and execute such an audacious, minutely-planned the Irish Republican Army. But the IRA was supposed to be demobilized as a result of the Good Friday Peace Agreement signed six years earlier. The leaders of Sinn Féin (who were also leaders of the IRA) vehemently denied they had anything to do with it.
No-one believed them. The governments in London, Dublin and Washington were outraged. Yet no one was ever been convicted of any crime relating to the heist and little more than two years later, Sinn Féin was in government in Northern Ireland.
As the twentieth anniversary of this bizarre robbery approaches, Glenn Patterson builds on his popular BBC podcast to shed new light on the story of the infamous heist, the victims, the organizers and the abortive, at times comically inept, attempts to find the people who carried it out, provided inside information and laundered huge numbers of banknotes in Ireland, Bulgaria and other exotic locations. His narrative of the events is witty, indignant and brilliantly controlled, the work of a master storyteller.
261 pages, Kindle Edition
Published May 8, 2025
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 29 of 29 reviews
June 12, 2026
This book gets off to a promising start on a topic I have always been intrigued by. The account of the raid itself is gripping, and the detail drawn from the trial proceedings. The sections dealing with the families taken hostage are particularly powerful, conveying the fear and uncertainty they endured during a very serious and traumatic event.
Unfortunately, the book loses momentum as it progresses. The police investigation often felt muddled and confusing, making it difficult to follow key developments. I also struggled with the author's attempts at humour. Much of it simply did not land for me and seemed out of place given the gravity of the crimes and the impact on those involved.
Another distraction was the frequent references to the story as a potential stage production. These observations are sprinkled throughout the book and often appear at awkward moments, pulling attention away from the history rather than adding to it.
Overall, there is a fascinating story at the heart of this book, but the uneven tone and confusing presentation prevented it from fully delivering on its early promise.
Unfortunately, the book loses momentum as it progresses. The police investigation often felt muddled and confusing, making it difficult to follow key developments. I also struggled with the author's attempts at humour. Much of it simply did not land for me and seemed out of place given the gravity of the crimes and the impact on those involved.
Another distraction was the frequent references to the story as a potential stage production. These observations are sprinkled throughout the book and often appear at awkward moments, pulling attention away from the history rather than adding to it.
Overall, there is a fascinating story at the heart of this book, but the uneven tone and confusing presentation prevented it from fully delivering on its early promise.
June 20, 2026
Would be more if it stopped after the Heist
August 17, 2026
Starts good but Christ does it get boring and confusing real quick
March 23, 2026
Very interesting but I got slightly lost in all the characters
March 14, 2026
The first half was definitely the most interesting part of this book, the rest I found quite all over the place but I suppose it was a good reflection of how messy this situation truly was, interesting read but I definitely feel like the writing fell apart
April 15, 2025
The Northern Bank Job: The Heist and How They Got Away with It by Glenn Patterson is a compelling nonfiction account of the infamous 2004 Northern Bank robbery in Belfast, where £26.5 million was stolen in what remains the largest cash heist in British and Irish history. Patterson delves deep into the events, the victims, the suspected perpetrators, and the ongoing mysteries surrounding the case.
The book offers a detailed narrative of the heist, including the coercion of bank employees whose families were held hostage, and the sophisticated planning that led authorities to suspect the involvement of the Irish Republican Army (IRA)—an allegation the IRA denied. Despite extensive investigations, no one has been convicted for the robbery, leaving many questions unanswered.
This book is a very interesting read and should appeal to readers interested in true crime, political intrigue, and the complexities of post-conflict Northern Ireland. Thanks to NetGalley and the publishers of this book for providing me with a free advance copy to preview. I am leaving this review voluntarily.
The book offers a detailed narrative of the heist, including the coercion of bank employees whose families were held hostage, and the sophisticated planning that led authorities to suspect the involvement of the Irish Republican Army (IRA)—an allegation the IRA denied. Despite extensive investigations, no one has been convicted for the robbery, leaving many questions unanswered.
This book is a very interesting read and should appeal to readers interested in true crime, political intrigue, and the complexities of post-conflict Northern Ireland. Thanks to NetGalley and the publishers of this book for providing me with a free advance copy to preview. I am leaving this review voluntarily.
January 27, 2026
I found this book very difficult to read based on it being very poorly written. It read more like a news account than a book and I often find this with journalists who who venture into the world of book writing, I also feel like they dragged out the story by inserting themselves as a character. Especially in the trial section. The book is 200 odd pages and it took me months to finish.
November 8, 2025
Started off great, then once the ‘robbery’ part was over, it was almost impossible to keep up with, with irrelevant details, people, murders etc being mentioned. All the details blurred into one. I also did not enjoy the slightly sarcastic tone of the book.
November 19, 2025
Interesting read. I remember it on the news at the time and has facts I never knew. I guess we will never know exactly what happened that day or in the years afterwards.
October 6, 2026
Patterson does an excellent job of telling the story of the heist, how and why it unfolded and the impact it had on the families involved. The dramatic nature is crafted well; with short, sharp sentences and graphic descriptions of the violence (and threat of) creating a real sense of jeopardy.
He also explains the wider political situation in reasonable detail.
Patterson acknowledges that 2005 marked the PIRA's decommissioning pledge and that it was also a time when the true Orwellian nature of Sinn Fein's presence in government became clear. Senior Sinn Fein/PIRA figures were allegedly involved in the heist and events such as the murder of Robert McCartney. Many of those involved also maintained a presence in off-shoot paramilitary gangs such as DAAD/RAAD [Direct/Republican Action Against Drugs], which maintained maiming and killing on the streets of Belfast.
However, the book tails off in the second half.
The trial itself loses all the narrative poise and drama of the first half and I found myself lost in a litany of legal jargon that made flicking through the last few pages a real chore.
Although the author explains Sinn Fein's continuing criminality quite well, I would have liked to have seen this placed in the wider context of Belfast paramilitarism post-Good Friday Agreement. Patterson admits to hailing from a loyalist background and no mention is made of the extensive criminality perpetuated by paramilitaries from this side. The UVF and UDA had been feuding since the late-1990s with both groups responsible for swathes of murders and general violence as each attempted to wrestle control both of the unionist political system and of Belfast's drug trade.
He also explains the wider political situation in reasonable detail.
Patterson acknowledges that 2005 marked the PIRA's decommissioning pledge and that it was also a time when the true Orwellian nature of Sinn Fein's presence in government became clear. Senior Sinn Fein/PIRA figures were allegedly involved in the heist and events such as the murder of Robert McCartney. Many of those involved also maintained a presence in off-shoot paramilitary gangs such as DAAD/RAAD [Direct/Republican Action Against Drugs], which maintained maiming and killing on the streets of Belfast.
However, the book tails off in the second half.
The trial itself loses all the narrative poise and drama of the first half and I found myself lost in a litany of legal jargon that made flicking through the last few pages a real chore.
Although the author explains Sinn Fein's continuing criminality quite well, I would have liked to have seen this placed in the wider context of Belfast paramilitarism post-Good Friday Agreement. Patterson admits to hailing from a loyalist background and no mention is made of the extensive criminality perpetuated by paramilitaries from this side. The UVF and UDA had been feuding since the late-1990s with both groups responsible for swathes of murders and general violence as each attempted to wrestle control both of the unionist political system and of Belfast's drug trade.
February 2, 2026
i wanted to read this, knew i hate owning nonfiction so put it off, then got it off the library. it felt like a real result to me.
i'm like vaguely interested in bank heists like every normal person on the planet and found the beginning of this engaging and propulsive. it's not badly written and it draws things together in a fun way. i liked how it worked with the people involved with the heist (that we know of, i guess, lol). where it started to fall apart was the aftermath. there's even a section the author admits he struggled over and said he hoped it wasn't obvious. it kind of is! i found some of it repetitive and also there's a real temptation to add humour to this. it's a very NI thing. i didn't mind it sometimes and other times i remember going "idk man that's not that funny."
BUT. this isn't very long. i listened to the audiobook too to keep my brain busy when i needed it to be and that's a grand experience. it still talks about a heist that i'm always like LMAO. THAT'S SO FUCKING WEIRD. which, tbf, i guess that's what i wanted and its what i got. totally grand.
i'm like vaguely interested in bank heists like every normal person on the planet and found the beginning of this engaging and propulsive. it's not badly written and it draws things together in a fun way. i liked how it worked with the people involved with the heist (that we know of, i guess, lol). where it started to fall apart was the aftermath. there's even a section the author admits he struggled over and said he hoped it wasn't obvious. it kind of is! i found some of it repetitive and also there's a real temptation to add humour to this. it's a very NI thing. i didn't mind it sometimes and other times i remember going "idk man that's not that funny."
BUT. this isn't very long. i listened to the audiobook too to keep my brain busy when i needed it to be and that's a grand experience. it still talks about a heist that i'm always like LMAO. THAT'S SO FUCKING WEIRD. which, tbf, i guess that's what i wanted and its what i got. totally grand.
Review of advance copy
The details of the robbery itself are interesting but adds nothing new to what has already been reported.
The authors screenplay idea and his repeated reference to it is really distracting.
I found the repeated insertion of asides in brackets annoying and often confusing.
I found his complete acceptance of certain quoted sources strange.
I thought there would be more detail about what happened to the money, how it was laundered and who benefited . Instead I got a long confused account in respect of a small amount in relation to Cunningham etc.
The authors screenplay idea and his repeated reference to it is really distracting.
I found the repeated insertion of asides in brackets annoying and often confusing.
I found his complete acceptance of certain quoted sources strange.
I thought there would be more detail about what happened to the money, how it was laundered and who benefited . Instead I got a long confused account in respect of a small amount in relation to Cunningham etc.
November 10, 2025
Fine, I think - the writing is solid enough and I do appreciate the linkage with Northern Irish politics. It just feels like the archetype of a story "running on rails" with limited dramatic tension.
The only weirdness was Chris having size 6 shoes despite being five foot 8. Does he have hooves?
The only weirdness was Chris having size 6 shoes despite being five foot 8. Does he have hooves?
June 18, 2026
I cannot lie, I did get lost in the multiple cases and names being brought into the story during the discussion of the court case following the heist. But otherwise, really interesting read! Really enjoyed a man being held hostage and his response of being asked if he wanted anything was to ask for a beer.
May 25, 2025
I was gripped by the recounting of the robbery, but then found the aftermath a tough read.
The politics is convoluted and repetitive, I wish I’d realised what I was getting into much earlier.
It’s well written, and if you like your paramilitary history then you’ll love it.
The politics is convoluted and repetitive, I wish I’d realised what I was getting into much earlier.
It’s well written, and if you like your paramilitary history then you’ll love it.
May 14, 2025
This book is witty, wry, chilling, engaging and unputdownable. Glenn's writing style is addictive and his attention to detail is superb. Read the book.
November 14, 2025
Found this fascinating, having actually loved through it, it was great to learn the ins and outs of the whole thing.
November 13, 2025
An interesting read from start to finish.
July 13, 2026
3.5 stars
I listened to this as an audiobook and really liked the narrator, which definitely helped keep me engaged with the story.
Being from Belfast, the Northern Bank robbery is something that has always been on the periphery of my awareness. It's one of those things you hear about and probably hear mentioned in a slightly joking way, but I realised while listening to this that I didn't actually know the full story of what happened, the investigation or the trial. I found the actual facts of the robbery really interesting, especially getting to understand the events in much more detail than I ever had before.
I've seen some people comment that they didn't like the author's humour and sarcasm and felt that it made light of what happened, which I can understand. Personally, I didn't really mind it. I think coming from Belfast probably influenced how I read this. The robbery is something that has become quite casually mentioned here, and often only really talked about in a joking context, so the author's tone didn't feel completely out of place to me.
I did agree with some of the criticism that the sections around the police investigation could become confusing and difficult to follow. At the same time, I think that's partly reflective of the case itself. There are so many unanswered questions and complications surrounding the investigation, which is ultimately part of why the full story remains unresolved.
My main issue was some of the side tangents throughout the book. At times they felt less like they were adding to the story and more like the author was still a bit salty that he hadn't been able to do the project in the way he originally wanted. 😂 I found myself much more interested in the actual events and facts of the case than some of these detours.
Overall, I really enjoyed learning the full story behind something I'd only ever really known about in passing. The audiobook narration was a definite plus, and despite some of my criticisms, I'm glad I finally found out more about a piece of Belfast history that I'd previously only known on the surface.
I listened to this as an audiobook and really liked the narrator, which definitely helped keep me engaged with the story.
Being from Belfast, the Northern Bank robbery is something that has always been on the periphery of my awareness. It's one of those things you hear about and probably hear mentioned in a slightly joking way, but I realised while listening to this that I didn't actually know the full story of what happened, the investigation or the trial. I found the actual facts of the robbery really interesting, especially getting to understand the events in much more detail than I ever had before.
I've seen some people comment that they didn't like the author's humour and sarcasm and felt that it made light of what happened, which I can understand. Personally, I didn't really mind it. I think coming from Belfast probably influenced how I read this. The robbery is something that has become quite casually mentioned here, and often only really talked about in a joking context, so the author's tone didn't feel completely out of place to me.
I did agree with some of the criticism that the sections around the police investigation could become confusing and difficult to follow. At the same time, I think that's partly reflective of the case itself. There are so many unanswered questions and complications surrounding the investigation, which is ultimately part of why the full story remains unresolved.
My main issue was some of the side tangents throughout the book. At times they felt less like they were adding to the story and more like the author was still a bit salty that he hadn't been able to do the project in the way he originally wanted. 😂 I found myself much more interested in the actual events and facts of the case than some of these detours.
Overall, I really enjoyed learning the full story behind something I'd only ever really known about in passing. The audiobook narration was a definite plus, and despite some of my criticisms, I'm glad I finally found out more about a piece of Belfast history that I'd previously only known on the surface.
October 31, 2025
the start about the robbery was very good. what follows in the book seemed a bit of a stretch.
July 3, 2025
A great non-fiction read about the now infamous Northern Bank robbery in Belfast, Northern Ireland.
Really fluently written, the author used a range of source material, including extensive notes taken from court cases around this crime - the largest bank raid on the island of Ireland.
The debate focussed on who or which organisation had the ability, the know-how, the manpower and above all the audacity to pull off this type of heist. Was it or was it not a paramilitary act?
This book is easily digestible, fact laden and comes to a methodical conclusion - but read it and see if it all points in just one direction.
A good read, very engaging, a page turner.
Recommend
Really fluently written, the author used a range of source material, including extensive notes taken from court cases around this crime - the largest bank raid on the island of Ireland.
The debate focussed on who or which organisation had the ability, the know-how, the manpower and above all the audacity to pull off this type of heist. Was it or was it not a paramilitary act?
This book is easily digestible, fact laden and comes to a methodical conclusion - but read it and see if it all points in just one direction.
A good read, very engaging, a page turner.
Recommend
September 5, 2025
There are 3 parts to this book: the crime, the aftermath, and the trial. The first part is excellent, and suits the fast-paced, cinematic style of the text. As the book progresses, though, it becomes a labyrinthine investigation into the Republican underworld. There are far too many threads to follow, too much detail. I'd forgotten all about the robbery and its aftermath, and the shambles of the trial; it was good to read this account, which has the benefit of being written with the perspective that time allows.
October 7, 2025
The author strangely keeps trying to insert himself as a character in the story where he is not one. He keeps writing about his screenplay idea for the robbery for no apparent reason. He also can’t hide his own biases and a lot of his journalism is just spouting anti sinn fein nonsense.
Read
April 17, 2021Absolutely gripping. Huge political insight.
May 5, 2021
Fascinating
June 23, 2025
Couldn't put it down right up until the robbery ended. The last quarter or so felt like loosely related NI political filler unfortunately.
July 28, 2025
Good book to read by the beach
Displaying 1 - 29 of 29 reviews