This book was really exhausting to read and I only found 6 of the total 14 chapter essays to be somewhat interesting ("Allrecipes", "The critic hits the road", "I like bubble tea", "Dream home", "Supermarket fugue", "The ice cream age"). In most chapters, Tandoh couldn't figure out how to communicate her ideas in a cohesive manner. I felt like I was reading slop of dates of when x chef wrote x cookbook which showed how to make x food. I also didn't understand her commentary like the vocabulary she was using went over my head (I'm not talking about her commentary on GenZ and Tiktok and all that new age stuff like I understood that perfectly).
Here's an example of a passage I didn't get:
"...people threw banquets, formal Victorian dinners with quantum etiquette, or luxury picnics. Every one of these, from the menu down to the geometry of the napkins, is the ultimate in small-time ambition - silverback stuff, but through the medium of River Cafe 'Chocolate Nemesis Cake'...They're a fairground mirror for the bigger neuroses of the time". Girl what is that? Maybe, it's because I'm not in the cooking world, but I understood like 5% of what she meant.
I think it's really quite something that Tandoh chose to close the book out with a James Baldwin quote while constantly mentioning Yotam Ottolenghi, an Israeli chef who served in the IDF and who says meaningless, empty statements along the lines of "Food has no boundaries" and "This isn't about sides. It's about lives". Tandoh really harps on this idea of how the food you eat isn't really your individual choice and instead, it's the effect of culture, politics, economics, technology, etc. Her main point she was trying to drill in reminded me of the Devil Wears Prada cerulean sweater monologue. So if she recognizes that food is political, I think it was a careless decision to include someone like Ottolenghi in her book.
I found the section titled "The critic hits the road" really interesting. Tandoh begins the chapter talking about Keith Lee's fame and then goes back in time to Duncan Hines, a traveling salesman in the 1940s who published Adventures in Good Eating, a guidebook for reliable restaurants that road-trippers could go. But then, she switches over to writing about Victor Hugo Green, the author of The Green Book, which was a travel guide for African Americans to find safe restaurants, hotels, beauty salons, to be served during Jim Crow. I liked the way Tandoh actually contrasted the reality of Hines and Green instead of not stating the obvious: "Both guides [referring to the works of Hines and Green] came down to risk management, except for Hines' readers the risk topped out at whether you'd be given stale dinner rolls...Green didn't get into the ambience or vouch for the quality of the meals, and many restaurants paid for ads. In Hines' world, trust came from feeling that this was somehow a civic project...In the Green Book, trust was maths: restaurants wouldn't pay to advertise if they didn't want you to come".
I also thought the chapter titled "I like bubble tea" was insightful into how boba was popularized in the UK. I was thinking about the shift from small family-owned bubble tea shops in the UK that only really attracted Asian migrants/international students to now, giant global bubble tea brands that have consumers from all over the world, and how marketing played such a big role (what stuff was intentionally added/what stuff was removed, all for the goal of selling bubble tea). Here are some tidbits I found interesting:
"Word gets around online, through photos and videos of people holding the [boba] cups - always the same shot, the same half-pan and gentle wiggle. The most consistent feature is probably just the cup, which is made of transparent plastic so you can appreciate the best angles of the drink, which is every angle, by the way. In Taiwan, where people know what bubble tea is and like it for what it is, the cups aren't usually see-through. They're opaque, decorated with the branding of whichever shop they're from"
"The stores also worked the novelty angle. It wasn't 'this is traditional in Taiwan' or 'these are great ingredients' but 'Isn't this wild?' At Bubbleology, that means rebranding ordinary bubble tea as some kind of molecular break-through."
I thought it was odd Tandoh didn't entertain ANY mention/hint of cultural appropriation in this section. I think it would've been a fair analysis to make like I'm not asking her to write a hit piece on the founder of Bubbleology, but if you're going to talk about the politics and food trends, then why not directly say that major corporations often succeed because they strip products of their origins (the people who invented it, the cultural importances, essentially the WHO etc) and repackage them to sell. I thought it was lazy, particularly because Tandoh has no problem criticizing how ridiculous and expensive Tiktok food trends can be, but she admits that she's a participant in this frenzy (so if she can make an analysis of that, she could've called out bigger corporations more directly and still talked about how much she drank bubble tea).
Overall, most of the book felt like a series of events that weren't connected by good analysis (a lot of it was repetitive and it didn't really add up to much) and I was pretty much confused on what Tandoh was saying at all bc I didn't get her vocabulary/references.