Preface: I believe that the author is an incredible leader in this field and has been doing very important, groundbreaking work in trauma research and treatment. He's invaluable in the literature, and so I feel guilty for nitpicking below. So I'll start off by saying, it's pretty impossible to make a perfect book, and so the entirety of my criticism really doesn't amount to much! Overall well done, and a book I would recommend regarding the science of trauma.
I was torn between a 3 and a 5 on this book.
The 5 rating:
Excellent, readable, relatable, intelligent. Accessible while educational. Well-organized. Comprehensive citations. An important work.
The 3 rating:
Levine is a great scientist, but I felt that his writing, while very good, could be better from a tech editorial standpoint (i.e., simplification). I struggled with his case studies in that he didn't state their limitations. I would have better appreciated, "Here's an example that illustrates my idea," rather than, "This is what is happening in this particular case" (variables excluded).
All that said, I hate to criticize this book, because Levine *is* very smart, and a very good writer. I am loath to say this, because his writing style is excellent; I just didn't find it as engaging as it could have been (e.g., The Body Keeps the Score, another phenomenal read). I kept thinking of Strunk and White's decree, "Omit needless words!" Still, it was engaging and I read through it quickly.
I also found the chapter re: memory erasure to be problematic. Levine needed to frame it as an ethical or philosophical question, rather than currently, empirically supported. Please check the citations for this chapter: Every legitimate, peer-reviewed study refers to the nature of memory (which he explains well); but all--and I really do mean all--references to the so-called evidence that we already have the scientific ability to erase specific memories are from pop sci (read: unreliable, unsupported, sensational) articles, nothing peer-reviewed--save for one very interesting study on mice. However, this limited study hardly translates to the broader claims made. This would have been an excellent ethical discussion, or suggestion for further research, had Levine not overstated. I do agree that this has fascinating and important research potential. However, we need the research.
My nitpicking aside, I truly believe that Levine is an important voice and leader in the field of trauma, "body memories", PTSD, and so forth. I would be honored to meet him, and I do believe in his work.