An Intelligent Person's Guide to History

by J.R. Vincent

A polemical introduction to history by one of the most controversial practitioners working today A critically-acclaimed guide by one of Britain's most compelling and controversial historians. John Vincent has often been accused of political incorrectness, but never in his writing of history, where his work has been rightly praised for its 'verve, excitement, wit and original thought'. In this sometimes contentious study, Professor Vincent goes to the very heart of the complex issues raised by the subject. An Intelligent Person's Guide to History provides a comprehensive examination of the philosophy and evolution of history. It explores the nature of historical evidence, meaning and imagination, together with morality, causality, bias and hindsight. This is a controversial work, packed with ideas. Penetrating, incisive and provocative, it will prove both a vital text for the scholar and a stimulating guide for the general reader. This revised paperback edition includes an account by the author of the critical reception that greeted the book's original publication, and the controversy that it generated.

Genres: History, Nonfiction

128 pages, Hardcover

First published April 1, 1993

Reviews

[Peter · Rating 4 out of 5]

An interesting book, a treatment of the study of history, both practical and philosophical. Vincent is insightful, and not afraid to criticize his profession. He makes some interesting insights into how History is taught and presented. Some of his commentary I disagreed with, some I agreed with, some I applauded.

[Bibliofuk · Rating 5 out of 5]

I cannot intelligently comment on its content yet. I will need to read it a second and third time to fully digest it, but I know enough, after a first reading, to know that it merits a second and third reading.

[Gary · Rating 1 out of 5]

More like a guide to British history. I got it for cheap at a book fair in Canberra so I can’t complain I guess. I just thought it was boring.

[Nicholas · Rating 3 out of 5]

He provides some interesting viewpoints on historiography, however the book is dating fast and a bit too skewed. he seems like too much of an attention seeker.