Having lived in the small town of Chetwynd from the mid to late 70’s and having friends in the Hudson Hope area I visited often, I’m very familiar with the Upper Peace River district of British Columbia.
I first read this book in the mid/late 90’s and really didn’t give it much thought; in fact, I think I got bored and never quite finished it.
While downsizing a few months back, I came across the book in a box of old books ready for the donation bins, and thought, what the heck, I’ll read it again.
Time surely can change one’s perspectives!
As an aside, I have read a number of other “back to nature” books including Thoreau’s Walden which as noted in many reviews is liberally quoted from by the authors
I’m not about to denigrate the Angiers since both have passed away and cannot offer a rebuttal. I gave the book only 2 stars due to a number of basic issues I had with the story.
First off was how relatively easy they described their insertion into “wilderness living”—for 2 city folk from Boston who admitted to having minimal outdoor experience, let alone “survival” skills, hmmm, I do wonder. I’ve been an avid outdoorsman all my life and believe me, it can be very challenging to procure shelter, warmth, food and untainted water in the bush all at once. It takes a lsolid pre-prepared plan, a ton of time, a lot of work and plain old good luck(try gathering dry wood and making a fire when it’s been pouring rain all day)
Another reviewer notes Vena’s liberal use of Thoreau’s writings—my goodness, it got to the point where I wondered if I was rereading Walden with the Angiers’ Hudson Hope experiences substituted here and there in place of Thoreau’s experiences of day to day, season to season cabin and wilderness life!
In essence, this book should have been filed under Vena Angier as the author as she wrote the narrative and Bradford just commented now and then but, giving credit where credit is due, he did somehow always save the day when things got sticky
I will not list the numerous experiences the Angiers claimed happened to them I do question if many or all actually happened as described at all!!! ; after all, every author takes some literary license with the real facts. I’m aware there has been comments made that some(many?) of the experiences in the story were “borrowed” from various locals; that’s OK, I can live with that to a degree-keep in mind that the book was written to show Joe/Jill Public that a simple (sustenance) living lifestyle can be very rewarding in a number of ways—but, overall, in my opinion, I do think they made it all sound just a little too idyllic based on my own experiences.
The people I called friends who lived in the Hudson Hope/ Peace region that embraced a “alternative” lifestyle, were either descendents from a deeply rooted family heritage of living in the bush or were highly skilled individuals possessing a certain mindset and personality to embrace this kind of life and be successful doing so.
My final comment is to keep in mind the Angiers wrote 30 some books all told; so, they were definitely perceptive enough to recognize that their relatively short stay in the Peace River region translated into a cottage industry for themselves in the genre of “back to nature”, which, at the time, was a field almost wide open——kudos of course to Henry Thoreau and a few others that were at the forefront
My advice would be that if you are keen on reading At Home in the Woods, focus your attention on the narratives describing the awesome natural beauty of the Peace River area of British Columbia where Vena and Brad lived rather than how well (and arguably how easy), they mastered living (comfortably and thriving) in the wilderness.