Hmm… where to start? First of all, small spoilers for the name of the victim in this book. Okay, so I’m torn on whether or not I liked this. Looking back, all I can say is that the mystery is quite good and engaging, but otherwise it was challenging for me to completely enjoy the story as I felt like it held an underlying judgmental tone throughout. Phrases like, “Rose had bitten the very hand that had fed her” and “Heavens. What a transformation! She’d turned into a shrew” weren’t uncommon. Sentiments befitting the time period, I’m sure, but I think it is important to note how certain lower-class female characters are described compared to the main character, Kitty, and her peers who are in the upper echelon of society. Where the whole thing gets really murky was that I was somewhat unsure where the narrative wanted my sympathies to lie, because it clearly wants to portray Kitty’s story as empowering, but doesn’t shine the same sympathetic light on Rose's, who didn’t have anything near the privileged life that Kitty had. Not that it's a competition, but the characters offering a smidgen of empathy would have gone a loo~oong way! I’m not trying to say that I 100% condone the actions of Rose, I just thought there could have been an interesting parallel between her and Kitty that the narrative didn’t seem all that keen on examining. A moment of quiet solidarity if you will. There is a paragraph where Kitty claims that she “feels sorry for Rose,” but... I don't know, it felt like a last-minute addition to me. Unfortunately, for most of the book, discussions about Rose’s circumstances as a woman who was dealt bad hand after bad hand her entire life were either half-hearted, or came across as uncomfortably apathetic.
I guess what I’m also saying is that I wasn’t a big fan of Kitty. Now, normally it doesn’t matter whether or not I liked the main character, because I do believe that a book can be good regardless of the likeability of the characters, but man… she'd always have these hot-takes that felt rich coming from someone who’s living lavish in the upper crust of society. It's always easy to say things don't matter when you have those things. When I’m constantly coming across sentences like, “you should be happy with what you have,” and several more out of touch statements that wouldn’t be out of place in Parasite, it can get a little tiresome. I also noticed that all the characters who are “rewarded” in the story “knew their place” and never tried to “rise above their station.” Hmmm, that sure is an uncomfortable throughline to have in your story. As for the love-interest? There’s really nothing to say other than he’s a stick-in-the-mud who’s vaguely bigoted and says things like “a lady shouldn’t be in this part of town,” hmmmmmm, what are you really trying to say pal? He also fancies himself a knight in shining armor, but is really just weirdly overprotective and controlling. He sucked, basically. Oh yeah, also Kitty meets Ernest Hemingway. This isn’t important to anything else I was saying, I just don’t like historical fiction books that have the main characters meeting a bunch of pre-famous, famous figures from history. I think it’s silly. Anyway, clearly I’m not going to continue this series, but I’d still like to imagine Kitty's future adventures where she'll continue to meet famous historical figures in every subsequent book, which will obviously culminate in her creating a team to solve crimes with all of them, Avengers style. Hey! A guy can pretend, right?
”And what do you hope to gain, Miss Worthington?”
”Enlightenment.”