What do you think?
Rate this book
Where Does It Hurt?: An Entrepreneur's Guide to Fixing Health Care
A bold new remedy for the sprawling and wasteful health care industry.Where else but the doctor’s office do you have to fill out a form on a clipboard? Have you noticed that hospital bills are almost unintelligible, except for the absurdly high dollar amount? Why is it that technology in other industries drives prices down, but in health care it’s the reverse? And why, in health care, is the customer so often treated as a mere bystander—and an ignorant one at that?The same American medical establishment that saves lives and performs wondrous miracles is also a $2.7 trillion industry in deep dysfunction. And now, with the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare), it is called on to extend full benefits to tens of millions of newly insured. You might think that this would leave us with a bleak choice— either to devote more of our national budget to health care or to make do with less of it. But there’s another path.In this provocative book, Jonathan Bush, cofounder and CEO of athenahealth, calls for a revolution in health care to give customers more choices, freedom, power, and information, and at far lower prices. With humor and a tell-it-likeit- is style, he picks up insights and ideas from his days as an ambulance driver in New Orleans, an army medic, and an entrepreneur launching a birthing start-up in San Diego. In struggling to save that dying business, Bush’s team created a software program that eventually became athenahealth, a cloud-based services company that handles electronic medical records, billing, and patient communications for more than fifty thousand medical providers nationwide.Bush calls for disruption of the status quo through new business models, new payment models, and new technologies that give patients more control of their care and enhance the physicianpatient experience. He shows how this is already happening. From birthing centers in Florida to urgent care centers in West Virginia, upstarts are disrupting health care by focusing on efficiency, innovation, and customer service. Bush offers a vision and plan for change while bringing a breakthrough perspective to the debates surrounding Obamacare.You’ll learn • Well-intended government regulations prop up overpriced incumbents and slow the pace of innovation. • Focused, profit-driven disrupters are chipping away at the dominance of hospitals by offering routine procedures at lower cost. • Scrappy digital start-ups are equipping providers and patients with new apps and technologies to access medical data and take control of care. • Making informed choices about the care we receive and pay for will enable a more humane and satisfying health care system to emerge. Bush’s plan calls for Americans not only to demand more from providers but also to accept more responsibility for our health, to weigh risks and make hard choices—in short, to take back control of an industry that is central to our lives and our economy.
238 pages, Kindle Edition
First published May 15, 2014
68 people are currently reading
971 people want to read
About the author
Jonathan Bush
1 book3 followersJonathan Bush is the CEO and cofounder of athenahealth, one of the fastest-growing technology companies in the country. The nephew and cousin of two U.S. presidents, he has worked in health care for two decades. He has an MBA from Harvard and lives in Cambridge, Massachusetts
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 30 of 66 reviews
June 13, 2017
The author has no doubts about his vision for healthcare - he suggests more competition and less governmental influence. "Greed is Good" echoes bush; effective healthcare can only be made possible by letting healthcare - a nearly monopolized business into something like a restaurant business, where providers fight each other out for bringing in more patients to their enterprises by gaining that extra edge over others - cutting costs, offering better services. He also suggests that hospitals have to specialize in one service and master it , rather than providing a bunch of services. Just as you can get sell better bicycles in a specialized store rather than in a shopping mall or a hypermarket. Even though his examples are anecdotal, his reasoning seems to be convincing. These ideas are radical for someone like me ; whose experience with Indian hospital system has led to dissappointment and lack of faith in hospitals and medical care providers.
Jonathan outlines his career and proves that his money is where his mouth is, Athenahealth estimated at a billion dollars, is a cloud service and record management company for providers that according to him is poised to disrupt healthcare by backing new enterpreneurs in this field. Jonathan's wit and humor makes the book an easy read as compared to the other healthcare books that I'm struggling to finish. A good read for anyone dipping their feet into the business of healthcare.
Jonathan outlines his career and proves that his money is where his mouth is, Athenahealth estimated at a billion dollars, is a cloud service and record management company for providers that according to him is poised to disrupt healthcare by backing new enterpreneurs in this field. Jonathan's wit and humor makes the book an easy read as compared to the other healthcare books that I'm struggling to finish. A good read for anyone dipping their feet into the business of healthcare.
September 2, 2014
A light read: this book is about inspiration, not implementation. Jonathan can be inspirational when discussing the future of health data. Those sections are the highlights of the book. Unfortunately, he's not so inspirational when making shallow analogies to argue that minimally-regulated capitalism will solve all health care cost problems. Wish he'd talked more about technology and technology-specific policy.
June 22, 2014
A really eye opening perspective on what is at stake in considering the different philosophies on interoperability in healthcare IT. Also a good commentary on the need for disruption in an industry that consumes almost one out of five dollars generated in the country's GDP and how the industry can better foster a climate of innovation.
July 28, 2014
The introduction is so impressive, it's very engaging. The rest of the book doesn't hold up. By the time you get towards the end he has ridiculous suggestions. He proves to be out of touch with the realities of people's financial choices.
June 19, 2014
Easy to read, right in so many ways, but wrong in the market fixes all conclusion.
September 22, 2019
I’m no expert in health stuff or tech, but I do want to share a couple of random thoughts. First of all, I enjoyed Bush’s hyperactive and earnest writing style. Some other reviewers found it annoying, which I respect. The problem was I had trouble understanding what health care technology, as his company Athena Health provided, exactly means. Probably my own stupidity that held me back from absorbing the rest of what he was saying.
There was something about this book that disturbed me. At times, Bush wrote about the doctors’ and other medical professionals’ and his own desire to serve and help others get the care they needed, and at the most reasonable price possible to the consumer. At other times, he wrote about wanting to make money and how doctors would not want to leave hospitals or adopt some of the other ideas in this book because that would mean they would make less money. Well, which is it? Is altruism the motivator? Or money? I don’t think it can be both. Dr. Rugge wanted primarily to help people, while padding his pockets was a secondary concern at most. The rest of the world is not so selfless.
I also wonder about the idea of saving money by shunting everyone down to the least expensive professional. He says that most women have no complications in childbirth or that most people visiting the ER do not have a serious specialty medical issue to deal with. My problem with this is that some of these people may not know that they are a high risk patient until it’s too late. That’s why we pay extra for the security of a hospital or doctor who can cover whatever needs we may end of having.
Health insurance is an inherently flawed idea, in my view. It wasn’t so untenable when it was invented 80 years ago, but now there are so many more medical treatments available that we can all count on wanting to consume a good number of them in our lifetime. Insurance is meant to be to protect you from something you hope never happens. But most of us can count on a knee replacement, cancer treatment, or at least multiple colonoscopies over the years. Think how crazy it would be if people bought grocery insurance. It wouldn’t insure anything; it would just drive prices up by destroying the laws of supply and demand, just like health insurance does. I don’t know what the answer is, but this book merely hinted at it.
There was something about this book that disturbed me. At times, Bush wrote about the doctors’ and other medical professionals’ and his own desire to serve and help others get the care they needed, and at the most reasonable price possible to the consumer. At other times, he wrote about wanting to make money and how doctors would not want to leave hospitals or adopt some of the other ideas in this book because that would mean they would make less money. Well, which is it? Is altruism the motivator? Or money? I don’t think it can be both. Dr. Rugge wanted primarily to help people, while padding his pockets was a secondary concern at most. The rest of the world is not so selfless.
I also wonder about the idea of saving money by shunting everyone down to the least expensive professional. He says that most women have no complications in childbirth or that most people visiting the ER do not have a serious specialty medical issue to deal with. My problem with this is that some of these people may not know that they are a high risk patient until it’s too late. That’s why we pay extra for the security of a hospital or doctor who can cover whatever needs we may end of having.
Health insurance is an inherently flawed idea, in my view. It wasn’t so untenable when it was invented 80 years ago, but now there are so many more medical treatments available that we can all count on wanting to consume a good number of them in our lifetime. Insurance is meant to be to protect you from something you hope never happens. But most of us can count on a knee replacement, cancer treatment, or at least multiple colonoscopies over the years. Think how crazy it would be if people bought grocery insurance. It wouldn’t insure anything; it would just drive prices up by destroying the laws of supply and demand, just like health insurance does. I don’t know what the answer is, but this book merely hinted at it.
January 23, 2020
A lot of very interesting takes on the medical / insurance industry. Bush gets a little wordy at times with personal anecdotes and stories, but overall interesting content.
August 6, 2025
lol; no.
March 27, 2016
This is a very well written analysis of the issues making American healthcare too expensive, too impersonal, and an overall customer experience disaster. The style is crisp and conversational, and the book is well researched.
My only concern is Bush's absolute, dogmatic belief that the free market can fix all the ills of the system. Firstly, an efficient market depends on rational actors. People simply won't be coolly analytic when it's their health they are deciding on.
The only other significant miss in this book is that he never explains how deregulating healthcare will not lead to the same disaster that deregulating airlines and banks did. The industry is hurt as likely as others to consolidate into an oligopoly to maintain the status quo. (In fairness Bush spends considerable time discussing consolidation, but he does not write of deregulated consolidation and its ability to stifle innovation and throw up high barriers to entry.
Finally he doesn't address the role ever increasing income disparity in the US will play in the deregulated, transparent healthcare market he envisions. As I see it, health can descend into the disaster that is domestic air travel. A pretty damn good experience for the wealthy, but absolute misery for the rest of us. How will the hospital not devolve into the 90/10 divide that is the typical US flight with 30% of the crew fawning over 10% of the passengers, and leaving the 90% in squalid conditions?
Though my vision of the ideal future lies somewhat to the left of Bush's, I highly recommend this book. It starts a discussion that is long overdue in America. I also recommend watching Bush's TED Talk on URQS and large research hospitals prior to reading the book to get a sense of where the author is coming from. I also wish this book was mandatory for medical students.
My only concern is Bush's absolute, dogmatic belief that the free market can fix all the ills of the system. Firstly, an efficient market depends on rational actors. People simply won't be coolly analytic when it's their health they are deciding on.
The only other significant miss in this book is that he never explains how deregulating healthcare will not lead to the same disaster that deregulating airlines and banks did. The industry is hurt as likely as others to consolidate into an oligopoly to maintain the status quo. (In fairness Bush spends considerable time discussing consolidation, but he does not write of deregulated consolidation and its ability to stifle innovation and throw up high barriers to entry.
Finally he doesn't address the role ever increasing income disparity in the US will play in the deregulated, transparent healthcare market he envisions. As I see it, health can descend into the disaster that is domestic air travel. A pretty damn good experience for the wealthy, but absolute misery for the rest of us. How will the hospital not devolve into the 90/10 divide that is the typical US flight with 30% of the crew fawning over 10% of the passengers, and leaving the 90% in squalid conditions?
Though my vision of the ideal future lies somewhat to the left of Bush's, I highly recommend this book. It starts a discussion that is long overdue in America. I also recommend watching Bush's TED Talk on URQS and large research hospitals prior to reading the book to get a sense of where the author is coming from. I also wish this book was mandatory for medical students.
Read
January 26, 2023I fidget in classrooms, and my mind wanders.
if this were a real business, like a pizzeria or a nail salon, the hospital would have to seriously rethink its pricing model. Instead of pegging its invoices to Medicare or Medicaid reimbursements, or whatever it can get from private insurers, it would instead have to focus on the gentleman in my backseat as a customer. The service he needs at this stage in his life is not emergency care, but maintenance. In a free market, maintenance comes out of the customer’s pocket. Could an entrepreneur carve out a business by offering service at a similar price for hypertension or diabetes?
It’s gobbling up money that otherwise would go into wage hikes and productive investments.
From a business point of view, health care is the new oil. Those who can dig down through the morass of rules, paperwork, and bureaucratic obstacles can find new markets.
worth more than $4 billion (Nasdaq: ATHN). I’m cofounder and CEO. Our cloud-based service handles much of the paperwork, billing, and electronic patient records for more than fifty thousand medical providers nationwide.
If you face stage-three colon cancer or an exotic autoimmune disorder or, heaven forbid, find yourself attached Siamese-style to your twin, there’s no better place to be than a name-brand American university research hospital. The feats surgeons pull off burnish their reputations as miracle workers and lifesavers.
And what will they do with this information? It can be summed up in a single word: shopping. This has to do with making choices.
After you’ve read this book, I’m hoping, you’ll look at health care through the eyes of a customer buying a service—and demand alternatives to the elements you hate.
I wanted a career that would provide the lifestyle I grew up with—the comfortable house, college for kids, the vacations in Maine.
I buttonholed Larry and asked for career advice. To save lives, he told me, the best plan was to work on an ambulance and get to know a crack trauma unit. The top one, he said, was at Charity Hospital in New Orleans.
the schools were backward, and good jobs scarce. Practically the only pathway to advancement was to leave.
He went on to tell me that I could work for either device manufacturers or a drug company. Pacemakers and pills. That’s where the money was in health care. Or maybe I could land a job as a junior administrator at one of the university hospitals. (That was a path, as I saw it, to nowhere.)
In the end I landed a consulting job at Booz Allen. Consulting, I figured, would provide a good look at the options in the industry.
health maintenance organizations, or HMOs
From day one, however, I knew that I was a misfit in consulting. I didn’t have the patience to sit in a swivel chair all day, to pore over health industry studies and come up with reports and recommendations. I couldn’t concentrate on it. I couldn’t even spell well. Eventually someone would wake up and fire me.
Competition forces them to innovate continually. It’s why restaurants often change their menus.
The other type of niche operation is the focused factory. To thrive, it must do one narrow job extremely well, more efficiently than its rivals. Why am I telling you this? The old department store still reigns supreme. It is called the hospital. It attempts to offer every service under one roof. Liposuction, colonoscopies, sprained ankles, Csections, geriatrics, retina surgery—hospitals do it all.
And each one represents a market opportunity for a focused competitor who can offer that same service with efficiency, convenience, a smile, and better results. The model for this type of market is LASIK, the popular laser surgery to improve vision. When it was introduced in 1991, LASIK was viewed as risky and expensive. Insurance didn’t cover it.
They advertised—in the face of strict federal law against it. And many of the early customers suppressed their natural fears and distrust only because they had horrible vision. They were desperate. And many of them got only one eye done. This saved money and hedged against blindness. What has fueled its success? The competitive marketplace. Since LASIK surgery is not covered by most insurance plans, people have to compare different services, their satisfaction records, and their prices. In short, they shop around.
women with C-sections spent more days in the hospital, which brought in more revenue.
By 2010, the average price for vaginal deliveries was up to $30,000, and for C-sections $50,000, with insurance companies reimbursing an average of $18,329 and $27,866 respectively.)
Four million babies were born every year in the United States, each representing a potential profit of $1,500. Multiplying those numbers came to a tantalizing $6 billion.
we would run a ruthlessly efficient operation, with a laser focus on costs.
Word of mouth would drive business our way. We would start in one city, learn the ropes, and then expand.
practically everything I could learn at Harvard was relevant.
you have to figure out how to get paid by a confusing web of insurers, private and government alike, who are experts at finding reasons not to pay.
I had leadership skills that were not evident in the business plan.
We bought the San Diego practice from Bill and Mitch’s group of doctors.
Just nail it in San Diego, we figured, then raise more venture funding and take the business national.
written in codes that only the initiated understand.
Software start-ups on the Internet are a shining example. They launch their services on Apple’s app store or Android, or they hitch up with PayPal, and if they catch on, money literally flows into their accounts. They have automatic billing—no invoices, no permissions, eligibility requirements, authorizations, co-pays, no faxes or snail mail, in short, no nightmare. But equally important, they can follow what’s working and what’s not, and make fixes. They literally see what they’re doing. And what happens? Hundreds of thousands of entrepreneurs flock to the industry. They innovate and grow. It didn’t occur to me until later, much later, that solving the misery of payment and clearing the fog had the potential to become even a bigger business than a nationwide network of birthing clinics. The doctors who sold us the practice had many of the same ones, including the challenge of getting paid.
we were only getting paid on about 65 percent of the claims we were submitting.
if this were a real business, like a pizzeria or a nail salon, the hospital would have to seriously rethink its pricing model. Instead of pegging its invoices to Medicare or Medicaid reimbursements, or whatever it can get from private insurers, it would instead have to focus on the gentleman in my backseat as a customer. The service he needs at this stage in his life is not emergency care, but maintenance. In a free market, maintenance comes out of the customer’s pocket. Could an entrepreneur carve out a business by offering service at a similar price for hypertension or diabetes?
It’s gobbling up money that otherwise would go into wage hikes and productive investments.
From a business point of view, health care is the new oil. Those who can dig down through the morass of rules, paperwork, and bureaucratic obstacles can find new markets.
worth more than $4 billion (Nasdaq: ATHN). I’m cofounder and CEO. Our cloud-based service handles much of the paperwork, billing, and electronic patient records for more than fifty thousand medical providers nationwide.
If you face stage-three colon cancer or an exotic autoimmune disorder or, heaven forbid, find yourself attached Siamese-style to your twin, there’s no better place to be than a name-brand American university research hospital. The feats surgeons pull off burnish their reputations as miracle workers and lifesavers.
And what will they do with this information? It can be summed up in a single word: shopping. This has to do with making choices.
After you’ve read this book, I’m hoping, you’ll look at health care through the eyes of a customer buying a service—and demand alternatives to the elements you hate.
I wanted a career that would provide the lifestyle I grew up with—the comfortable house, college for kids, the vacations in Maine.
I buttonholed Larry and asked for career advice. To save lives, he told me, the best plan was to work on an ambulance and get to know a crack trauma unit. The top one, he said, was at Charity Hospital in New Orleans.
the schools were backward, and good jobs scarce. Practically the only pathway to advancement was to leave.
He went on to tell me that I could work for either device manufacturers or a drug company. Pacemakers and pills. That’s where the money was in health care. Or maybe I could land a job as a junior administrator at one of the university hospitals. (That was a path, as I saw it, to nowhere.)
In the end I landed a consulting job at Booz Allen. Consulting, I figured, would provide a good look at the options in the industry.
health maintenance organizations, or HMOs
From day one, however, I knew that I was a misfit in consulting. I didn’t have the patience to sit in a swivel chair all day, to pore over health industry studies and come up with reports and recommendations. I couldn’t concentrate on it. I couldn’t even spell well. Eventually someone would wake up and fire me.
Competition forces them to innovate continually. It’s why restaurants often change their menus.
The other type of niche operation is the focused factory. To thrive, it must do one narrow job extremely well, more efficiently than its rivals. Why am I telling you this? The old department store still reigns supreme. It is called the hospital. It attempts to offer every service under one roof. Liposuction, colonoscopies, sprained ankles, Csections, geriatrics, retina surgery—hospitals do it all.
And each one represents a market opportunity for a focused competitor who can offer that same service with efficiency, convenience, a smile, and better results. The model for this type of market is LASIK, the popular laser surgery to improve vision. When it was introduced in 1991, LASIK was viewed as risky and expensive. Insurance didn’t cover it.
They advertised—in the face of strict federal law against it. And many of the early customers suppressed their natural fears and distrust only because they had horrible vision. They were desperate. And many of them got only one eye done. This saved money and hedged against blindness. What has fueled its success? The competitive marketplace. Since LASIK surgery is not covered by most insurance plans, people have to compare different services, their satisfaction records, and their prices. In short, they shop around.
women with C-sections spent more days in the hospital, which brought in more revenue.
By 2010, the average price for vaginal deliveries was up to $30,000, and for C-sections $50,000, with insurance companies reimbursing an average of $18,329 and $27,866 respectively.)
Four million babies were born every year in the United States, each representing a potential profit of $1,500. Multiplying those numbers came to a tantalizing $6 billion.
we would run a ruthlessly efficient operation, with a laser focus on costs.
Word of mouth would drive business our way. We would start in one city, learn the ropes, and then expand.
practically everything I could learn at Harvard was relevant.
you have to figure out how to get paid by a confusing web of insurers, private and government alike, who are experts at finding reasons not to pay.
I had leadership skills that were not evident in the business plan.
We bought the San Diego practice from Bill and Mitch’s group of doctors.
Just nail it in San Diego, we figured, then raise more venture funding and take the business national.
written in codes that only the initiated understand.
Software start-ups on the Internet are a shining example. They launch their services on Apple’s app store or Android, or they hitch up with PayPal, and if they catch on, money literally flows into their accounts. They have automatic billing—no invoices, no permissions, eligibility requirements, authorizations, co-pays, no faxes or snail mail, in short, no nightmare. But equally important, they can follow what’s working and what’s not, and make fixes. They literally see what they’re doing. And what happens? Hundreds of thousands of entrepreneurs flock to the industry. They innovate and grow. It didn’t occur to me until later, much later, that solving the misery of payment and clearing the fog had the potential to become even a bigger business than a nationwide network of birthing clinics. The doctors who sold us the practice had many of the same ones, including the challenge of getting paid.
we were only getting paid on about 65 percent of the claims we were submitting.
July 19, 2016
Solid primer on the Health Tech industry
I would recommend this book to anyone who would want to learn more about the current state of health care and technology. Busch does a great job of breaking down how everyone plays a part in this overly complicated system and periodically plugs Athena Health.
I would recommend this book to anyone who would want to learn more about the current state of health care and technology. Busch does a great job of breaking down how everyone plays a part in this overly complicated system and periodically plugs Athena Health.
August 2, 2014
Some worthwhile ideas, but it takes some digging to get to them. Also, if you're going to hire a writer to write your book for you, you should probably find one who knows the difference between "regime" and "regimen".
May 26, 2025
Disclaimer: I work for Jonathan at Zus Health; obviously I believe at least some of the positions hold meaningful water.
This is a really interesting book to have read in close proximity to the more recent release of Abundance by Ezra Klein and Derek Thompson. In really broad strokes, Jonathan argues that overbearing government regulation in the health care space stifles innovation, reduces consumer choice, and creates short-term success for the incumbents (complex, tertiary hospitals and their networked organizations), at the cost of consumer satisfaction, better health outcomes, and affordability.
He writes, "the industries we care about the least innovate at the highest speeds, while those we hold dearest to our heart innovate hardly at all." An interesting observation, and a bit of a tautology. I write software; if you've got a new system that no one's using, or it's not deployed in production, then go ahead and push some changes. Run some experiments. There's no risk. Conversely, if your service is relied upon by the entire company, you should still be able to make changes, but you need a lot of testing and guardrails to know that your changes are safe. Downtime of said core service could cost you a lot of money, and depending on what your business is, people could get hurt. We also know that if you avoid updating something that core for a very long time, you're just delaying the inevitable incident, and when it happens, it's going to hurt that much more. Make time for your health or make time for your sickness, as it were.
In business, Jonathan describes this as Upper Right Quadrant Syndrome (URQS) - if the axes are market share and revenue, once you dominate your market, you're disincentivized from assuming new risk via innovation. You want to protect and defend your market, and the lazy but safe way to continue to grow revenue is to raise your prices or buy competitors. Meanwhile the scrappy underdogs of the lower left fight each other (or collaborate) for some time, until perhaps one day one of them grows strong enough to take you down. Again, this seems interesting, and somewhat natural. If you're a business serving your customers in the upper right quadrant, they rely on you for your product or service. You can't necessarily afford to take massive swings reinventing your core business, especially depending on how your margins work.
Anyway, I'm not a business major or a finance guy, so I'll get back to the book. I liked it. If you've ever met Jonathan in person, listened to his podcast, or watched an interview, the narrative voice is exactly what he talks like. The rapid-fire, bouncing anecdotes and quickly twisting trains of thought require a bit of trust to navigate but do ultimately land.There are also several stories which do not paint Jonathan in a flattering light at all, humbly printed all the same.
Jonathan has a specific vision of how the world should work, with all of its lumps, but is happy to highlight and praise the successes of others who are improving healthcare despite vehemently disagreeing with his own worldview. If the goal is a happier, healthier, more abundant society, then maybe the people who get us there should also be allowed to make some money. If the people getting us there don't want to make money, that's their prerogative as well, and more power to them.
Might edit this more later to get some more thoughts down. Other interesting musings include the pure logistics of healthcare in America. The difference between average and non-specialized care and the best in the world for your specific condition is sometimes a matter of a few hundred miles. Would it literally be more cost effective for some hospitals to invest in more helicopters and jets, in order to keep their highly specialized doctors and machines working on what they do best?
There's a section here about how the future aggregation of population health data from things like Fitbits and Oura rings could be a widespread tool for A/B testing of treatment plans (or preventative health measures), and how people could be incentivized to opt in to experimental conditions in order to make testing and discovery all the faster. Really interesting idea, data privacy nightmare.
This is a really interesting book to have read in close proximity to the more recent release of Abundance by Ezra Klein and Derek Thompson. In really broad strokes, Jonathan argues that overbearing government regulation in the health care space stifles innovation, reduces consumer choice, and creates short-term success for the incumbents (complex, tertiary hospitals and their networked organizations), at the cost of consumer satisfaction, better health outcomes, and affordability.
He writes, "the industries we care about the least innovate at the highest speeds, while those we hold dearest to our heart innovate hardly at all." An interesting observation, and a bit of a tautology. I write software; if you've got a new system that no one's using, or it's not deployed in production, then go ahead and push some changes. Run some experiments. There's no risk. Conversely, if your service is relied upon by the entire company, you should still be able to make changes, but you need a lot of testing and guardrails to know that your changes are safe. Downtime of said core service could cost you a lot of money, and depending on what your business is, people could get hurt. We also know that if you avoid updating something that core for a very long time, you're just delaying the inevitable incident, and when it happens, it's going to hurt that much more. Make time for your health or make time for your sickness, as it were.
In business, Jonathan describes this as Upper Right Quadrant Syndrome (URQS) - if the axes are market share and revenue, once you dominate your market, you're disincentivized from assuming new risk via innovation. You want to protect and defend your market, and the lazy but safe way to continue to grow revenue is to raise your prices or buy competitors. Meanwhile the scrappy underdogs of the lower left fight each other (or collaborate) for some time, until perhaps one day one of them grows strong enough to take you down. Again, this seems interesting, and somewhat natural. If you're a business serving your customers in the upper right quadrant, they rely on you for your product or service. You can't necessarily afford to take massive swings reinventing your core business, especially depending on how your margins work.
Anyway, I'm not a business major or a finance guy, so I'll get back to the book. I liked it. If you've ever met Jonathan in person, listened to his podcast, or watched an interview, the narrative voice is exactly what he talks like. The rapid-fire, bouncing anecdotes and quickly twisting trains of thought require a bit of trust to navigate but do ultimately land.There are also several stories which do not paint Jonathan in a flattering light at all, humbly printed all the same.
Jonathan has a specific vision of how the world should work, with all of its lumps, but is happy to highlight and praise the successes of others who are improving healthcare despite vehemently disagreeing with his own worldview. If the goal is a happier, healthier, more abundant society, then maybe the people who get us there should also be allowed to make some money. If the people getting us there don't want to make money, that's their prerogative as well, and more power to them.
Might edit this more later to get some more thoughts down. Other interesting musings include the pure logistics of healthcare in America. The difference between average and non-specialized care and the best in the world for your specific condition is sometimes a matter of a few hundred miles. Would it literally be more cost effective for some hospitals to invest in more helicopters and jets, in order to keep their highly specialized doctors and machines working on what they do best?
There's a section here about how the future aggregation of population health data from things like Fitbits and Oura rings could be a widespread tool for A/B testing of treatment plans (or preventative health measures), and how people could be incentivized to opt in to experimental conditions in order to make testing and discovery all the faster. Really interesting idea, data privacy nightmare.
January 7, 2019
Untimely to be reading Jonathan Bush's book given his recent less-than-graceful exit from the healthcare big stage, but nonetheless this book was worth reading.
Bush's famous vocalness and lack of filter comes through in the prose, and his unabashed pro laissez faire capitalist streak can come across as distasteful if not inappropriate at times on a topic as serious as healthcare, but his perspective is often interesting and insightful.
First of all, for the longest time I felt that healthcare technology suffered from being suffocated by proprietary data formats (see Epic and Cerner), and could use an injection of the open-source ethic from the technology world. My thought was always that someone like Google should buy up an EMR and establish that open-source data standard. Little did I know, AthenaHealth under Bush and colleagues have been fighting that good fight all this time. It's nice to see such a clarion voice argue for open data, patient ownership of data, and greater data fungibility and liquidity. Bush believes, as I do, when health data becomes LIQUID while still remaining secure (no easy task I admit), it will open the floodgates towards innovative use of data, and move through what he describes as the 3 "waves": 1 - data helping healthcare orgs running businesses more efficiently (already starting to happen), 2 - data helping with diagnoses and treatment, the promise of PHM, and 3 - personalized medicine.
His central thesis is that healthcare needs more capitalism and less regulation: if we open up the demand curve sensitivity that laws shield healthcare services from, then we will get better innovation and outcomes in healthcare. The argument is complex, and at times I agree that more market forces will help, but other times he goes too far - naked market forces for insurance policies may unleash more chaos than he is describing, we can get adverse selections of healthy people into bare bones plans, and the sick into toxic risk pools, defeating the point of health insurance to begin with...
He has various other arguments that I like, insight and clearly laid out, with compelling anecdotes sprinkled in.
For example, Bush believes in healthcare we often overshoot the mark and try to make new things too fully formed. He thinks there is a huge "vast middle class soft belly" of healthcare org tech budgets running the in the thousands or tens of thousands, for which there is infinite potential for primitive innovation, technology solutions that solve simple problems in simple ways.
One other argument I like is that at a time in which docs (especially PCPs) are being swallowed up so at lightspeed by hospitals systems, they actually more leverage than they recognize, being at the heart of the next innovations to happen, since they will need to be at the heart of effective technology-enabled care management and care coordination, AND the fact that they still dictate referral flows. Maybe when they collectively realize this, this will impact the shape of the physician corporate landscape, and we'll see a resurgence of powerful medical groups once again counterbalancing the hospital systems, which Bush deems dinosaurs looking up at meteors.
Bush's famous vocalness and lack of filter comes through in the prose, and his unabashed pro laissez faire capitalist streak can come across as distasteful if not inappropriate at times on a topic as serious as healthcare, but his perspective is often interesting and insightful.
First of all, for the longest time I felt that healthcare technology suffered from being suffocated by proprietary data formats (see Epic and Cerner), and could use an injection of the open-source ethic from the technology world. My thought was always that someone like Google should buy up an EMR and establish that open-source data standard. Little did I know, AthenaHealth under Bush and colleagues have been fighting that good fight all this time. It's nice to see such a clarion voice argue for open data, patient ownership of data, and greater data fungibility and liquidity. Bush believes, as I do, when health data becomes LIQUID while still remaining secure (no easy task I admit), it will open the floodgates towards innovative use of data, and move through what he describes as the 3 "waves": 1 - data helping healthcare orgs running businesses more efficiently (already starting to happen), 2 - data helping with diagnoses and treatment, the promise of PHM, and 3 - personalized medicine.
His central thesis is that healthcare needs more capitalism and less regulation: if we open up the demand curve sensitivity that laws shield healthcare services from, then we will get better innovation and outcomes in healthcare. The argument is complex, and at times I agree that more market forces will help, but other times he goes too far - naked market forces for insurance policies may unleash more chaos than he is describing, we can get adverse selections of healthy people into bare bones plans, and the sick into toxic risk pools, defeating the point of health insurance to begin with...
He has various other arguments that I like, insight and clearly laid out, with compelling anecdotes sprinkled in.
For example, Bush believes in healthcare we often overshoot the mark and try to make new things too fully formed. He thinks there is a huge "vast middle class soft belly" of healthcare org tech budgets running the in the thousands or tens of thousands, for which there is infinite potential for primitive innovation, technology solutions that solve simple problems in simple ways.
One other argument I like is that at a time in which docs (especially PCPs) are being swallowed up so at lightspeed by hospitals systems, they actually more leverage than they recognize, being at the heart of the next innovations to happen, since they will need to be at the heart of effective technology-enabled care management and care coordination, AND the fact that they still dictate referral flows. Maybe when they collectively realize this, this will impact the shape of the physician corporate landscape, and we'll see a resurgence of powerful medical groups once again counterbalancing the hospital systems, which Bush deems dinosaurs looking up at meteors.
May 29, 2021
Kudos to the algorithm that suggested this book to me, because I would have never picked up "Where Does It Hurt?" on my own. Relying on an entrepreneur as a guide to the pitfalls of the modern US healthcare system is probably a terrible idea and Jonathan Bush's provenance (yes, he is a Bush Bush) does him no favors.
But despite my reflexive snobbery about 1) business books 2) written by business people 3) who are famous I found this book a really compelling read. The main story of someone trying to take on a bloated broken system easily has enough momentum to carry the reader along. And in all likelihood the ghost writer did heroic work crafting recollections of someone in the thick of bureaucratic battles into something zippy and readable with a coherent narrative.
Plus Bush is someone who is charming and winning even on paper. He is deeply concerned about healthcare and enters the industry as an Army medic and an EMT before becoming a consultant and entrepreneur. One of his key insights early on is that much of medical care can be handled by people without extensive training (medics, midwives, EMT's) supported by an active triage system. He then attempts to apply this insight to creating a series of birthing centers in San Diego that focuses on outcomes, "customer" experience and staffing.
It fails.
It is reborn though as a medical billing and software company that attempts to help other practices focus on medical "service" instead of paperwork (Bush's first company had to do both). It is this second endeavor's success that allows Bush to weigh in on what is wrong with healthcare in the US-the hospital system, which he sees as a cross between a medieval craft guild and an old-school department store.
In Bush's mind, the one-stop-shop of prestigious academic hospitals hinder innovation and prevent the delivery of reliable, low-cost healthcare to many Americans. His vision is that through healthcare technology, the old centers of service will be disaggregated into nimble niche providers that compete on costs and patient satisfaction.
Of course, there are flaws in the argument: does a customer model work when costs are not clear and value is hidden? Can a medical system really allow some patients to go unserved as many consumer business can? What about pharmaceuticals role in driving up healthcare costs? What about private insurance? How do other countries administer healthcare cheaply and effectively?
Bush also engages in the sort of rhetorical silliness that is de rigeur for any business book written in the past 15 years-what is old is bad, what is more like Amazon and Google is good. But the author has a sincerity in his beliefs that is compelling and no doubt his experience has lead him to some key insights about how to address the issues in US healthcare.
But despite my reflexive snobbery about 1) business books 2) written by business people 3) who are famous I found this book a really compelling read. The main story of someone trying to take on a bloated broken system easily has enough momentum to carry the reader along. And in all likelihood the ghost writer did heroic work crafting recollections of someone in the thick of bureaucratic battles into something zippy and readable with a coherent narrative.
Plus Bush is someone who is charming and winning even on paper. He is deeply concerned about healthcare and enters the industry as an Army medic and an EMT before becoming a consultant and entrepreneur. One of his key insights early on is that much of medical care can be handled by people without extensive training (medics, midwives, EMT's) supported by an active triage system. He then attempts to apply this insight to creating a series of birthing centers in San Diego that focuses on outcomes, "customer" experience and staffing.
It fails.
It is reborn though as a medical billing and software company that attempts to help other practices focus on medical "service" instead of paperwork (Bush's first company had to do both). It is this second endeavor's success that allows Bush to weigh in on what is wrong with healthcare in the US-the hospital system, which he sees as a cross between a medieval craft guild and an old-school department store.
In Bush's mind, the one-stop-shop of prestigious academic hospitals hinder innovation and prevent the delivery of reliable, low-cost healthcare to many Americans. His vision is that through healthcare technology, the old centers of service will be disaggregated into nimble niche providers that compete on costs and patient satisfaction.
Of course, there are flaws in the argument: does a customer model work when costs are not clear and value is hidden? Can a medical system really allow some patients to go unserved as many consumer business can? What about pharmaceuticals role in driving up healthcare costs? What about private insurance? How do other countries administer healthcare cheaply and effectively?
Bush also engages in the sort of rhetorical silliness that is de rigeur for any business book written in the past 15 years-what is old is bad, what is more like Amazon and Google is good. But the author has a sincerity in his beliefs that is compelling and no doubt his experience has lead him to some key insights about how to address the issues in US healthcare.
January 18, 2017
Relevant--but far from essential--reading for health professionals and interested patients.
The premise of the book is that healthcare should be disrupted by innovative technologies and competition-oriented business practices. When clinics and hospitals operate like normal businesses, then only the most efficient and cost effective medical providers will survive--to the benefit of the patient. And everybody else.
This vision of healthcare is essentially a free-market utopian fantasy applied to the most high-stakes industry.
This idea might sound obvious or dangerous, depending on your political temperament. Either way, it's interesting food for thought. Occasionally I found myself wanting to be convinced.
After all, there is probably an intelligent case to be made for a hyper-capitalist healthcare system. Just don't look for it in this book. The author does not even analyze the pros and cons of single-payer systems, let alone compare the healthcare systems of other countries to the system that he's proposing.
All in all, I'm glad I read it because it's relevant to my work and provided some new perspectives on the industry--as well as some insight into the branding of Athenahealth.
However, I'm also glad I listened to it on audiobook; I wouldn't have wanted to spend my time reading it in print.
The premise of the book is that healthcare should be disrupted by innovative technologies and competition-oriented business practices. When clinics and hospitals operate like normal businesses, then only the most efficient and cost effective medical providers will survive--to the benefit of the patient. And everybody else.
This vision of healthcare is essentially a free-market utopian fantasy applied to the most high-stakes industry.
This idea might sound obvious or dangerous, depending on your political temperament. Either way, it's interesting food for thought. Occasionally I found myself wanting to be convinced.
After all, there is probably an intelligent case to be made for a hyper-capitalist healthcare system. Just don't look for it in this book. The author does not even analyze the pros and cons of single-payer systems, let alone compare the healthcare systems of other countries to the system that he's proposing.
All in all, I'm glad I read it because it's relevant to my work and provided some new perspectives on the industry--as well as some insight into the branding of Athenahealth.
However, I'm also glad I listened to it on audiobook; I wouldn't have wanted to spend my time reading it in print.
July 2, 2023
Bush makes a few good points and has an interesting perspective on ways to address our broken healthcare system. The vast majority of the ideas Bush advocates for boils down to increasing competition and letting the market work its magic. Unfortunately, many of the authors suggestions are very idealistic and not based in reality. For instance, Bush rails against dialysis centers and claims that they’re not needed and everyone can do dialysis at home. That’s nowhere close to accurate. Additionally, the book ends with a ridiculous idea of eliminating most of the trials that new drugs need to go through and essentially advocates for consumers figure out what drugs work best through a giant Pharm party. I could go on, but it would be redundant. This wasn’t a terrible book but also not one I’d recommend.
October 6, 2021
Reaction: quick read on tangible solutions to alleviate the burden healthcare has on society
Writing Style: conversational, anecdotal, written by a businessman with connections
Argumentation: to be efficient in healthcare, lower the bar of expertise and optimize what personnel is needed per procedure. Could midwives work? Can insurance cover them?
Commendation: unique perspective on the problems of medicine without being too biting
Critique: advocates for one thing, but then reneges on it just as how he wants to make the most money or help the most people by breaking down the job into more manageable positions, give more concrete examples to flesh out the influence of society onto these problems
Writing Style: conversational, anecdotal, written by a businessman with connections
Argumentation: to be efficient in healthcare, lower the bar of expertise and optimize what personnel is needed per procedure. Could midwives work? Can insurance cover them?
Commendation: unique perspective on the problems of medicine without being too biting
Critique: advocates for one thing, but then reneges on it just as how he wants to make the most money or help the most people by breaking down the job into more manageable positions, give more concrete examples to flesh out the influence of society onto these problems
May 25, 2022
Bush's take on healthcare is very reflective of 2014. As I read this nearly 8 years later, it was interesting to note the differences in Bush's predictions of future technology in healthcare versus how it has actually unraveled in the modern-day. Bush pushes for a more market-driven approach with a focus on stimulating a more competitive nature amongst healthcare providers. I applaud his ideas, however, it truly was painful to read this book due to its spelling and grammatical errors – they ultimately hurt the credibility of the book and the author. For example, early in the book, there is an awful error in spelling "health" as "heath" when explaining why people deterred him from starting a health care startup business.
August 31, 2014
Jonathan Bush, the irrepressible CEO and Co-founder of software company athenahealth, has published an engaging professional memoir mixed with a guide to opportunities for health care entrepreneurs.
Where Does It Hurt? An Entrepreneur’s Guide to Fixing Health Care is not the much-needed conservative rebuttal to Zeke Emanuel’s Reinventing American Health Care that I half-expected. Policy-minded readers might be disappointed - in fact Bush quite practically focuses on the areas of health care that can be improved without relying on policy changes - but health care entrepreneurs and investors will greatly appreciate Bush’s observations and exhortations.
(My reactions to Emanuel’s generally excellent book are here)
To the first area, Bush wears his family lineage lightly. He acknowledges being “nursed at the right breast” and mentions his uncle George and cousin George, but reflects an independent, even iconoclastic point of view. The usual entrepreneurial narrative is here - starting a now-major software company in his basement, radically changing business models midstream, holding meetings with large customers and potential employees who had no idea just how shaky the early company was. Bush comes across as delighted to have beat the odds to create a meaningful company in health care and genuinely appreciative of the athenahealth employees who built the company. At no point do the personal or professional stories read like a preparation for the political stage.
As I see it, Bush’s anecdotal history of athenahealth, while interesting to those of us who admire the groundbreaking company, is secondary to his perspicacious identification of trends in American health care, how committed entrepreneurs can build big businesses at their intersection, and why health care will improve as a result.
Bush identifies three major themes, implying that businesses that exploit or accelerate these areas are large opportunities in health care entrepreneurship.
1. “Shopping” - i.e., consumerism
2. Hospital specialization
3. Data shared on networks
Bush passionately believes (as do I) that the single best way to simultaneously improve the quality of health care while reducing its cost is to put the individual at the center, specifically to employ a retail model of consumer choice wherever possible. Whether or not you agree that consumers should be in charge of their own health care decisions, or that “shopping” is a model that should be applied to this most critical and expensive service in the US economy, the health care consumerism ship is sailing. Companies and technologies that help consumers make their own decisions - weighing effectiveness of particular treatments vs. their costs, choosing health plans on public or private exchanges, trading convenience over price when filling a prescription - will flourish in the coming years, and our health care system will be the better for it. (Bush repeats the oft-cited but irrefutable example of LASIK eye surgery as a medical procedure that has become extraordinarily more effective while becoming extraordinarily less expensive - a triumph of the power of “shopping” when unleashed in health care.)
Similarly, hospital specialization might have seemed controversial a few years ago, but seems unavoidable today. The consequences of hospital proliferation and growth are becoming obvious, as increasing numbers of regional hospitals close. It makes sense - not every hospital can be generally great at every kind of treatment. So they’ll start to focus on what the areas where they excel, and not offer services where they don’t. This trend implies that hospitals will need to go outside their immediate geographic areas for customers - and that as these hospitals look more broadly, consumers around the country will start to have better access to the best specialists. Companies that can help hospitals navigate this trend will do well - whether helping hospitals market to new consumers or transport them, helping employers negotiate with the best facilities for their employees’ care, or helping consumers discover where the best care is (and is not!) available.
Athenahealth itself was a pioneer in software provided “in the cloud” - connected to doctor’s offices and insurers via the Internet, rather than being installed on customers’ own servers. Of course interoperable software systems and data exchange have become the norm across all industries - generally health care sadly lags, but is coming along. Closed systems like that offered by Epic, the dominant vendor of hospital software, will go the way of the dodo. Entrepreneurs will profit - and health care will improve - by helping data flow more easily, even to competitors’ software; by empowering consumers to own, control, and share their own health care data; by embracing a highly distributed, interconnected world.
Like Jonathan Bush himself, Where Does It Hurt? is energetic, scattershot, adamant, and ultimately optimistic. It’s worth reading by anyone interested in how technology-driven contemporary business models can improve the business of American health care.
N.B.: it’s not entirely clear if this book is a personal exposition or corporate document - the copyright is credited to athenahealth, with co-writing credit given Stephen Baker, apparently an athenhealth employee (several other athenahealth employees are also thanked for their contributions) - but its excited, ad hoc style certainly reflects Bush’s real world persona.
Where Does It Hurt? An Entrepreneur’s Guide to Fixing Health Care is not the much-needed conservative rebuttal to Zeke Emanuel’s Reinventing American Health Care that I half-expected. Policy-minded readers might be disappointed - in fact Bush quite practically focuses on the areas of health care that can be improved without relying on policy changes - but health care entrepreneurs and investors will greatly appreciate Bush’s observations and exhortations.
(My reactions to Emanuel’s generally excellent book are here)
To the first area, Bush wears his family lineage lightly. He acknowledges being “nursed at the right breast” and mentions his uncle George and cousin George, but reflects an independent, even iconoclastic point of view. The usual entrepreneurial narrative is here - starting a now-major software company in his basement, radically changing business models midstream, holding meetings with large customers and potential employees who had no idea just how shaky the early company was. Bush comes across as delighted to have beat the odds to create a meaningful company in health care and genuinely appreciative of the athenahealth employees who built the company. At no point do the personal or professional stories read like a preparation for the political stage.
As I see it, Bush’s anecdotal history of athenahealth, while interesting to those of us who admire the groundbreaking company, is secondary to his perspicacious identification of trends in American health care, how committed entrepreneurs can build big businesses at their intersection, and why health care will improve as a result.
Bush identifies three major themes, implying that businesses that exploit or accelerate these areas are large opportunities in health care entrepreneurship.
1. “Shopping” - i.e., consumerism
2. Hospital specialization
3. Data shared on networks
Bush passionately believes (as do I) that the single best way to simultaneously improve the quality of health care while reducing its cost is to put the individual at the center, specifically to employ a retail model of consumer choice wherever possible. Whether or not you agree that consumers should be in charge of their own health care decisions, or that “shopping” is a model that should be applied to this most critical and expensive service in the US economy, the health care consumerism ship is sailing. Companies and technologies that help consumers make their own decisions - weighing effectiveness of particular treatments vs. their costs, choosing health plans on public or private exchanges, trading convenience over price when filling a prescription - will flourish in the coming years, and our health care system will be the better for it. (Bush repeats the oft-cited but irrefutable example of LASIK eye surgery as a medical procedure that has become extraordinarily more effective while becoming extraordinarily less expensive - a triumph of the power of “shopping” when unleashed in health care.)
Similarly, hospital specialization might have seemed controversial a few years ago, but seems unavoidable today. The consequences of hospital proliferation and growth are becoming obvious, as increasing numbers of regional hospitals close. It makes sense - not every hospital can be generally great at every kind of treatment. So they’ll start to focus on what the areas where they excel, and not offer services where they don’t. This trend implies that hospitals will need to go outside their immediate geographic areas for customers - and that as these hospitals look more broadly, consumers around the country will start to have better access to the best specialists. Companies that can help hospitals navigate this trend will do well - whether helping hospitals market to new consumers or transport them, helping employers negotiate with the best facilities for their employees’ care, or helping consumers discover where the best care is (and is not!) available.
Athenahealth itself was a pioneer in software provided “in the cloud” - connected to doctor’s offices and insurers via the Internet, rather than being installed on customers’ own servers. Of course interoperable software systems and data exchange have become the norm across all industries - generally health care sadly lags, but is coming along. Closed systems like that offered by Epic, the dominant vendor of hospital software, will go the way of the dodo. Entrepreneurs will profit - and health care will improve - by helping data flow more easily, even to competitors’ software; by empowering consumers to own, control, and share their own health care data; by embracing a highly distributed, interconnected world.
Like Jonathan Bush himself, Where Does It Hurt? is energetic, scattershot, adamant, and ultimately optimistic. It’s worth reading by anyone interested in how technology-driven contemporary business models can improve the business of American health care.
N.B.: it’s not entirely clear if this book is a personal exposition or corporate document - the copyright is credited to athenahealth, with co-writing credit given Stephen Baker, apparently an athenhealth employee (several other athenahealth employees are also thanked for their contributions) - but its excited, ad hoc style certainly reflects Bush’s real world persona.
May 25, 2021
This book is a great story of a health entrepreneurs story and how our system holds back meaningful change. It’s a pretty “capitalist” point of view on how to improve healthcare, which is different than a lot of the other content I read on healthcare policies - it was interesting for that reason. I often feel the right doesn’t present coherent policies on healthcare improvement, but Bush does represent to me what right wing healthcare improvement policies could be implemented to lower cost and improve access. It’s a very interesting and easy read.
January 13, 2021
Fantastic primer that I wish I read years ago. It's really amazing to have lived through some of these problems and ideas that Jonathan Bush proposed, so it was probably better I waited this long to read it because it added so much emotional context to these problems in US health systems.
Nice to also know you can do well in health tech with dyslexia and ADHD... gives hopes to peeps like me :)
Nice to also know you can do well in health tech with dyslexia and ADHD... gives hopes to peeps like me :)
October 5, 2022
Inspiring change
This book advocates for a free market transformation of the healthcare sector. Direct, fact based and comprehensive - recommendations for providers, government, doctors and entrepreneurs - no one is left aside!
This book advocates for a free market transformation of the healthcare sector. Direct, fact based and comprehensive - recommendations for providers, government, doctors and entrepreneurs - no one is left aside!
December 29, 2022
Disagree with the overarching philosophy that giving consumers 'skin in the game' and de-regulating healthcare stakeholders will fix the system.
However, I have to say, Bush has lots of interesting reform ideas and anecdotes in here. He also does a nice job at acknowledging the opposition.
However, I have to say, Bush has lots of interesting reform ideas and anecdotes in here. He also does a nice job at acknowledging the opposition.
January 7, 2023
While I don’t agree that the answer to problems caused by capitalism in American healthcare is more capitalism, Jonathan Bush captures the issues in this area very will and raises some good points. Definitely worth a read even if you will be shaking your head ever so often
July 3, 2018
Interesting read on the business of healthcare.
December 28, 2018
I sometimes read books that reinforce my beliefs rather than expanding my horizons and this was one of those times but this book didn't tell its story that well
May 17, 2021
A free market approach to healthcare
July 30, 2021
I thought this was a really good book that changed the way I see healthcare. Bush's messages are very clear, and sometimes a little repetitive, which is why it lost a star.
Displaying 1 - 30 of 66 reviews