3.5 rounded up to 4
Published in 2008, Chris Bohjalian's historical fiction novel, "Skeletons at the Feast," focuses on the disintegrating state of Nazi Germany in the final months of World War II. The novel seeks to humanize and empathize with German Nazis who fled for their lives as Russia began its military push toward Berlin.
Author Ruta Sepetys chose the same situation and setting in her YA historical fiction novel, "Salt to the Sea," published in 2016. I loved that book. Sepetys's novel made me care about the characters a lot more than I ever cared about the characters in "Skeletons at the Feast."
There are parts of this novel that moved me to tears, but sadly, none of those tears were ever for the main characters. This novel features an omniscient, head-hopping point of view, jumping from a large number of main characters, secondary characters, and tertiary characters. The POV shifts from page to page, scene to scene, and often within the same scene. Rather than following a linear timeline, the novel starts mid-way through the characters' journey, and then narrates the bulk of the novel as backstory, including many long sections of backstory detailing scenes before the war has even begun. The prose seems far more focused on teaching history lessons rather than building up high stakes for the characters. Bohjalian definitely wanted me to sympathize with Anna, Theo, and their mother. I wanted to; I definitely sympathized with the characters in "Salt to the Sea." But in "Skeletons at the Feast," I just didn't care.
Anna's innocence and Theo's innocence were given the most focus, with their mother's innocence a close third. But I didn't care about any of them. Part of that was due to their lack of stakes -- in seeing no reason to care whether they lived or died. Another part was due to the distance in the narrative voice; their emotions often felt buried or nonexistent. Another factor against caring about them was the presence of Cecile's point of view, and constantly reading about the ongoing atrocities against the Jewish people in this book while the German Nazis flee for their lives.
I also felt apathy toward the Nazi characters due to the characters not reading true to life. For example, in the multiple erotic scenes in this book, Anna reads like an adult woman having intercourse, not a teenage girl experiencing her first sexual relationship. Other times, Anna reads like a man writing a woman, not like an actual young woman contemplating her life. I don't know of any teenage girl who would say that boys grow up faster than girls do, but Anna makes comments like that in this book, even though the story is full of graphic rape scenes and the horrific sexual mutilations of women, before they die and as corpses. Girls always grow up faster than boys in the patriarchy, and girls know that. Anyone who doesn't understand that doesn't understand how the patriarchy works.
Tears welled in my eyes when horses died, and when innocent Jews were slaughtered. But when the German Nazis met their fates? Nothing. I won't give away any spoilers, but even when I read what happened to Uri, I felt nothing, though I did care about him. That scene just felt like it was a plot pull to make the book more dramatic; it felt rushed and inauthentic, and therefore, I was not moved. It felt like the author knew that Uri would be the reader's favorite character in the book, and the story wasn't written to make the reader feel good, but to teach a lesson.
Bohjalian did a good job writing horror. Parts of this book reminded me of watching "The Pianist" and "Schindler's List." The Holocaust material was all *very* well done. I was sad that the mass murder of disabled people, queer people, the Roma, and other groups targeted by the Nazis was not included in the text, but I understand that Bohjalian wanted to focus his narrative on the mass murder of Jews.
I just wish I had *felt* more emotion and authentic, internal drama from the main characters. Everything felt so distant and drained of emotional force. David Benioff's "City of Thieves" (2008), Ruta Sepetys's "Salt to the Sea" (2016), and Anthony Doerr's "All the Light We Cannot See" (2014) all took traditional "unlikeable" main characters (to a modern U.S. reader) -- i.e. German Nazis and Russian soldiers -- and narrated history lessons from WWII that felt more immediate and gripping than "Skeletons at the Feast." The other books gave the characters stakes beyond the end of the war, and high human worth -- making me care deeply whether those characters lived or died. Rather than an omniscient POV, the other books had close-third POVs. Emotions -- including confusion, rage, and ambition -- drove the other stories, rather than a narrative voice teaching a history lesson.
Overall, I'm glad this book was written. I've just had better experiences with others, and I'm already very familiar with the WWII history that was described in this book.