I was recently diagnosed with Level 1 Autism and ADHD at age 26, and I have two children who are diagnosed with Level 3 Autism, both of whom have high support needs and are nonspeaking. I say that because my lived experience, getting to see things from "both sides of the coin," can make it challenging for me to consume content that glosses over, or leaves out the nuance that exists when discussing autism and disability from the lens of someone with low support needs vs someone with higher support needs.
Since my diagnosis, I have been seeking out content to help me along the journey of unmasking, better understanding, and accepting myself. I went into this book pretty much blindly. The only thing I read was the title, subtitle, synopsis, and I had seen a couple tiktok videos promoting it.
I enjoyed the first couple of chapters, and was already thinking to myself that this would likely be at least a 4-star read. A lot of Price's points resonated with me. However, this book got harder to read consistently after those first couple of chapters. I found myself thinking often "sure, but you're not accounting for ___," or in some cases, completely disagreeing with Price's opinion.
First, I think its important to note that Price is a non-clinical psychologist who has his doctorate in social psychology. I went into this book with the assumption that Price was a clinical psychologist and that this would be a more academic piece, based on how I have heard others discuss it. This book was instead, more like an opinion piece (sometimes rant), with small stories from Price's friends sprinkled throughout. Lived experience stories from autistics are so important, but they should not be falsely attributed to psychological expertise. Price has been misrepresented (whether intentionally on his part or not) as an expert on Autism, which I believe can be dangerous in conjunction with some of the information in this book.
This book seems to have been written for a very specific sub-section of the autism community, and doesn't account for the experiences of others with higher support needs. If the book were titled more appropriately, rather than "discover the new faces of..." and didn't say "we" so often, implying speaking for the autistic community as a whole, I wouldn't take as much issue with this. I feel it's disingenuous for this book to be titled and written in the way it is, while only representing such a small portion of autistic experiences.
Throughout the book, there are many emotionally charged, sweeping generalizations made, as well as many instances where I feel the book criticizes itself.
Price recognizes that many autistic people struggle with consent, yet promotes BDSM and sex work, without any acknowledgement that the struggle with consent he spoke of in earlier chapters could make those things dangerous for many autistics.
Price discourages diagnosis, listing many things that could go wrong if you get professionally diagnosed, but advocates for self diagnosis without acknowledgement of what could go wrong with self diagnosis. (You could get it wrong and not get support for what you really need support with. There's no access to accommodations or treatment without diagnosis.) We should be advocating for better access to diagnostic evaluations, rather than just saying "well, you don't need it anyway."
It really rubbed me the wrong way when he reinforced the idea that "everyone is a little bit autistic."
Price is very anti-ABA, which is fine. You can be anti-ABA. However, he purposefully, and grossly misrepresented modern ABA therapy by equating it to practices that were used several decades ago. I had to go back and check if this was actually written this decade because the information when speaking about ABA is so outdated. I would have been much more receptive, had Price just touched on the current issues with therapies, such as trying to eliminate stims that are not harmful, food reinforcers, etc. It was unnecessary to paint a false picture of ABA as it stands today.
There was also no recognition that certain stims or behaviors ARE harmful to the autistic person, and that autistic people may need help finding healthier methods of stimming or interacting that won't cause harm to themselves or others. I vaguely remember one section discussing someone self-injuring in the same way as hand-flapping or rocking, as if self harming is not a maladaptive coping mechanism that needs to be addressed.
Price states, more than once, that autistic people would likely not be disabled if society accommodated us appropriately. I think only someone with a very limited scope of autism could believe that. Sensory needs can change day to day, moment to moment. I sometimes have a hard time figuring out how to accommodate myself, or what I'm needing or feeling in the moment. To ask society to be 100% accommodating all the time would be asking everyone to be mind-readers and emotional psychics. In a world where I was perfectly accommodated, I would still have sensory problems. I would still have executive dysfunction. I would still have miscommunications. Not to mention, people have varying sensory needs, so you could have an environment that feels very accommodating for one autistic person, but very overstimulating for the other. I feel that this take completely leaves out anyone who doesn't have the lowest support needs, and honestly feels dismissive.
The way Price discusses personality disorders felt like reinforcement of the stigmas surrounding PDs, and there was no acknowledgement that autism and personality disorders can co-occur.
It felt that there was a strong implication that all or most autistics are LGBT+, and I felt it was overdiscussed for a book about Autism. There is a large intersection in the autistic population and LGBT+ community (I am part of that intersection). There are also many autistics who don't understand gender or sexuality topics, and there are many who are cis and straight.
There was a heavy implication autistics can only find safe spaces within queer or neurodivergent groups. While those could be great resources, they arent the end all be all of socialization or belonging for autistic people. At many points, I felt that this book further reinforced the "us vs them," "ND vs NT" mindset.
I had other issues with the book, but others have touched on them in their reviews. I think this is probably a good book for it's actual target audience, and there were some very good points made, as well as many things I resonated with, especially in the opening chapters. However, it's only representative of a small population of the autistic community, and I feel that this book was misrepresented by it's title and synopsis. This book should be read for what it is, an opinion piece/anecdotal story, rather than as an academic piece.