PROS
+ Excellent investigation and discernment when it comes to New Age and Catholic Mysticism.
+ Well-structured book.
CONS
- While he employs a great discernment regarding the core topics mentioned in this book, he tragically sends the reader into another deception, namely Calvinism. Although he is in this book more decent about it than in his book 'Simple Answers', he still includes problematic endorsements:
- In detail, he endorses the problematic Francis Schaeffer (Presbyterian) who is one of the 3 founders of the Seven Mountain Mandate (an idea which also developed in the Swiss Alps at L'Abri and which was further developed by Lance Wallnau and Bill Johnson) and who has brought us the New Age teacher Sarah Young (book 'Jesus Calling', she converted at Schaeffer's L'Abri and is also Presbyterian).
- Endorsement of the problematic teacher John MacArthur (Figurehead of Augustinian-Calvinism; Cessationist ...):
"Pastor and author John MacArthur summed up this profound and imminent danger brilliantly in his book, Reckless Faith ..."
- Endorsement of the problematic teacher Spurgeon ("I believe there will be more in heaven than in hell", strong embrace of ecumenism, follower of the Knights Templar Bernard of Clairvaux, Augustinian / Calvinist ...).
- Promotion of the Pelagian & Lutheran doctrine of 'Faith & Grace Alone':
"Salvation is entirely a gift of grace bestowed on whoever believes in Jesus' sacrifice on the Cross as both G-d and man. Consequently, we must receive Him as Lord and Savior, understanding that it is by grace and grace alone that we are made acceptable in Christ before a holy G-d. [...] Nothing else can be added to this."
What actually saves a person (Past Salvation) is THEOS' grace, love, mercy and resurrection, together with our hearing of the Word, believing in IESOUS and His resurrection, having faith, repenting from being a sinner and confessing with your mouth, usually expressed in an immediate baptism on the very same day (how far have we deviated from the ideal ...). Present Salvation further includes the regular taking of communion, denying of yourself, putting everything else second to THEOS, obedience & discipline, growing of faith, making disciples and becoming holy.
SECONDARY ISSUES
- He erroneously claims that Cain brought a wrong offering:
"The account of Cain and Abel is a classic biblical example of spiritual infidelity. Both of Adam's sons wanted to please G-d, but Cain decided he would experiment with his own method of being devout. Cain must have reasoned to himself: "Perhaps G-d would like fruit or grain better than a dead animal. It's not as gross. It's less smelly. Hey, I think I will try it!" As you know, G-d was not the least bit impressed by Cain's attempt to create his own approach to pleasing G-d. The Lord made it clear to Cain that G-d's favor would be upon him if he did what is right, not just what was intended for G-d or G-d-focused."
This is plainly wrong, because the Bible clearly states that he "brought it rightly", but did "not rightly divide it". Gen 4:7 in the Greek OT reads: "Hast thou not sinned if thou hast brought it rightly, but not rightly divided it? Be still, to thee shall be his submission, and thou shalt rule over him."