This book is informative in its discussion of attachment styles, but it was not a reading experience I enjoyed, nor is it one I would recommend. The prologue, written by a scholar whose earlier work the author claims to be extending, attempts to situate the reader in the research. However, the framing feels odd: the scholar essentially indicates that the author is “taking over” his work and that this book represents the continuation of research he himself is no longer pursuing. Rather than grounding the reader, this introduction left me unsure of the book’s scholarly positioning from the start.
While the information presented is at times helpful, the book’s structure is difficult to follow. Sections are not clearly defined, and it is often unclear which attachment style—or what aspect of an attachment style—the author is discussing in a given chapter. This lack of organization made the book feel disjointed and unnecessarily confusing.
What I found most frustrating, however, was the absence of engagement with current scholarship and foundational research on attachment theory. As a researcher, I find it essential to acknowledge prior studies, established terminology, and the broader academic conversation. The author rarely references earlier work or employs common language associated with attachment styles (such as anxious or avoidant), which made it difficult to understand what new contributions, if any, this book was offering.
Overall, although the topic itself is valuable, the book’s lack of structure and limited engagement with existing research significantly undermined its usefulness