What do you think?
Rate this book


876 pages, Hardcover
First published March 2, 2023

Climate matters, especially when it changes for the worse. Droughts, ruined harvests, subsequent famines, raging epidemics, and the outbreak of ceaseless conflicts are a recipe for widespread destruction—one that in our day seems to have gathered such speed that the restraining mechanisms are strained to the absolute limit and feel as though they might snap at any moment.
Humanity has never been blind to its own impact regarding resource depletion and environmental destruction (be it the deforestation of the Middle Ages or the destruction of the Amazon rainforest today). Yet, short-term benefits have always been preferred, even though periods and examples of more responsible behavior have existed.
Frankopan has thrown himself bravely into the bottomless pit of the history of climate change and its effects from prehistory to the present day. The result, however, is utterly unsatisfactory.
The chronological method of exposition, combined with a frantic urge to jump to a different corner of the world with every new paragraph for some minor and debatable detail, is infuriatingly distracting and frankly grueling. It is impossible to build a coherent, overall picture! Just as you focus—bam!—there is another chaotic interruption. Repetitions and glaring omissions alternate to such an extent that even the few intriguing facts get lost in the mishmash. It never coalesces into a unified narrative, replaced instead by a hodgepodge of random facts and rather contrived—or, conversely, completely missing—theses (for instance, the stance of the Bible and the Quran toward nature is never made clear) and speculations. Some parts are genuinely interesting (from the 19th century onward), but reaching them requires wading through tons of chaos. In this case, a thematic approach would not just be preferable, but absolutely mandatory.
Due to the sheer chaos of the exposition, the book likely feels much thicker than it actually is. Had it been only half the size and more focused, it would have been far more successful and useful.
An important topic simply squandered. The author is in dire need of a ruthless editor who can cut aggressively and bring structure to thoughts and research that fly off in every imaginable direction.
The UK government's Office for Budget Responsibility recently put it, it is easy to answer the question of how the problem of climate change is solved: it would be nature, rather than human action, that ultimately brings net emissions towards zero. It will do so through catastrophic depopulation, whether through hunger, disease or conflict. [...] Perhaps we will find our way back there through peaceful means; a historian would not bet on it.