3.5 stars with some good takeaways but not as engaging as hoped for.
The secret to any great project is to keep it moving. Keep it from losing momentum. Page 6
Everybody knew there was going to be a fight. I was frightened, but there was nothing to do about it. I took off my coat and started running down the stairs at my enemy. My seeming eagerness must have startled him, for 1 noticed that he wilted just a bit. The fact is, I was expecting to get knocked down and was rushing in to get it over with, but when I saw him flinch, I gained new courage. He gave up after one or two punches.
This minor incident was soon forgotten by almost everyone but me; it taught me a lesson that later applied in business every bit as much as it did in a high-school playground: If you show hesitancy or fear, you may already be half-defeated. If you put on a bold front, and fight with everything you have, you can win. Moreover, once you have won a few battles, you are usually left alone: in the jungle, no animal thoughtlessly attacks the lion. Page 19-20.
I’m glad I experienced running the Monte Carlo, but I feel about it the way a man does with eight daughters. He wouldn’t take 1 million for one of them or give two cents for an additional one. Page 90.
Just as a man living in a mountain valley sees and is closely aware of only a few of the nearest great peaks above him, so, too, is it with a man comfortably settled at some modest elevation in our own society. If he begins to climb, however, he will soon notice from his new perspective that there are actually a great many peaks on all sides around him. What's more, once he has reached a high enough altitude, he will discover something else. He will see that many of the greatest peaks interconnected by high ridges or narrow plateaus-are, at this new level, readily accessible each one to the other. The temptation to keep moving on this high ground can be irresistible. The importance to me of being on the heights was that in an hour I could achieve what previously would have taken a year or more of effort to perform. Otherwise I found the dwellers on the heights little different from their less advantageously placed brethren.
There is a selection process which sees to it that a significant number of upper-level people are smarter, more aggressive, and in some ways more self-assured than the average, but a good many dwellers on the heights got there entirely by accident. They were born there. Others, like lowland birds blown far up a mountain by a sudden storm, found themselves at heights they never expected to reach but which they managed to adapt to. I did find numbers of tough, strong men who had worked their way up from the very bottom, but most they reached. had started out from a place within hailing distance of the height. Since it is generally pleasant to be rich, famous, powerful and influential, the great majority of people, who achieve some promi. nence have a profound interest in maintaining, if not improving, their position. To these ends they sometimes join with and at other times ruthlessly undercut their fellows. Since there are some quite precipitous slopes and occasional ice slides on the various routes to and about the heights, most people there are at core conservative and very much against anyone in any way disturbing their perch or their surroundings I found it possible to join their ranks without discon. moding or unsettling them, for one way to succeed is by aiding and supporting the position of others through new or ingenious ideas or projects. This usefulness to others is in large part the reason for my own success, though there were times when we quite consciously upset other groups for our own and quite often for their own good. Page 106.
When Zeckendorf developed Court House Square in Denver there were three department stores fairly far away and he needed to have a traffic driver that would change people’s walking patterns. He approached a number of local and national department stores and no one wanted to come. Instead of getting too discouraged, he bought on of the local stores, signed a lease at court house square, then sold it again. Page 122
I had them test-core the fill for sand and gravel that we might use for our concrete and for the prefabricated mosaic surface of our build. ings. It turned out that if we used our own material, we could save one million dollars in construction costs. This meant excavating would really cost only two million, while at the same time opening up an enormous space beneath the plaza for a profitable garage. Thus demonstrating the difference between an engineer and an entrepreneur, I told them to excavate, but since we were in Rocky Mountain gold country, over an old creek bed, I also had them test their core samples for gold. If they found gold, we could run it through a sluice while washing off the fill for its sand and gravel. They did find gold. We announced discovery of a small gold-bearing stratum of sand under the square, and this brought on a two- or three-day furor that mus have had the old-time miners roaring in their graves. In all, we got fifty which Marion had a duplicate cast from. I use these now as cufflinks thousand dollars or so from our "mine," and I got one good nugget, and am no longer sure which is the original. Page 124
*****My biggest takeaway from the book is the Hawaiian technique as explained here:
Standing out in the sun, in my bare feet and shorts I thought enviously about how an investment banker acquiring a ten-million-dollar industrial corporation has a much easier time of it than a real-estate man buying a ten-million-dollar building. The investment banker can divide and sell the ownership and rights in a corporation in a great many ways, a piece at a time. For instance, he can sell first-mortgage bonds to an insurance company, at the prime rate of interest. He could also offer debentures, which, though they take a second position to the bonds, offer a higher rate of interest in compensation. For investors interested in a speculative fillip (in case the company does very well), there are convertible debentures that can be turned into common stock. He can issue preferred shares (convertible or straight), which tend to be especially attractive to corporate investors, because preferred dividends passing from one corporation to another are taxed only seven percent. Finally, there is the common stock, the basic equity of a corporation, but the availability of capital does not stop there; there are also bank loans, accounts receivable (which may be financed with a factor), warrants to buy stock, and various other ways to draw investment capital into a corporation. In fact, investment bankers have over the generations invented as many ways of catering to investors as there are investors with particular personal needs, whims, or tax requirements.
While hauling in an empty line from the Hawaiian seaside, it occurred to me that if an investment banker did not have all these ways to reach various kinds of investors, he would be in just as difficult a Position as I was with 1 Park Avenue. If he had to sell a corporation in toto, to one buyer, an investment banker would not get nearly as much money as he did by dividing it up for special customers... the lucky This kind of thinking was not really getting me anywhere; I Pulled back with my rod and cast way out into the water again. Then an idea came to me: "Why can't we break the property up, just the way an investment banker does?"
With a corporate financial structure as my model, I began mentally to divide up I Park Avenue to see how and at what price the building might appeal to various kinds of investors. As the pieces and the arithmetic began to dovetail, I forgot my fishing or even where I was until I suddenly realized I was standing on a Hawaiian beach, in water up to my ankles, with a useless rod and reel in my hands. I went into the house, and in the course of two hours on the telephone I began to make the first application of what was to become known in the trade as the Hawaiian Technique.
In practice, because it involves a long chain of interconnected events and multiple side branches, the Hawaiian Technique can become as complex as some of the long molecule chains chemists work with and link together to concoct new products. In essence, however, like most good ideas, it is simple. I determined how it could work, in the case of 1 Park Avenue, which earned one million dollars in rentals a year and had a ten-million-dollar price tag on it.
Though most homeowners don't think of it this way, a major urban property breaks naturally into two parts- the land, and a lease which gives you a right to the use of the land. A building usually comes with this lease, but as the basic leaseholder and building owner you can alter, tear down, or rebuild on your site in any way you want-as long as you pay your ground rent for the land.
Now, considering only the land, I determined that $250,000 of the total million-dollar income of the property should go to the ground rent. This ground rent, since it must be paid before any other expenses, is the safest of all possible incomes to the property. Capitalized at the rate of five percent, therefore, the ground should be worth five million dollars. I could try to find a buyer directly at this price, or I might do something else: since ground income is so sure, a mortgage on the ground (which would have first call on the already ultrasafe ground rent) would be even more secure. I should have little trouble finding an insurance company or pension fund willing to take a four-percent return for such a safe risk and could therefore sell them a mortgage on the ground for three million dollars which would eat up $120,000 of the land's total income. The remaining $130,000 of income capitalized at the rate of 6½ percent would be worth two million, and for this sum I would sell the land to an institutional or individual investor.
The land mortgagor and land owner would be our equivalent of a corporation's bond and debenture holders, and at this point, having first mortgaged and then sold off our land, we would have five million dollars, plus a building and, of course, a basic lease giving us undis. turbed use of the property.
The earnings on this property, after payment of ground rent, would be one million dollars, minus $250,000, or $750,000. The job now was to properly fraction and sell this leasehold and its income so as to attract particular buyers. What I did, basically, was to create two leases, an inner (or sandwich) lease, and outer (or operating) lease.
Whoever purchased the operating lease would, in effect, be the manager of the building. He would solicit tenants and collect rents. He would get one million dollars in income, pay $750,000 in rent, and keep $250,000 for himself. The holder of the inner lease would, in effect, be the owner of the building. He would get $750,000 in rent, pay $250,000 to the owner of the land, and keep $500,000 for himself.
Before selling the inner lease and its $500,000 income, however, 1 could readily mortgage it with a leasehold first mortgage of 6½ percent for four million dollars. The mortgage payments on this would come to $270,000 per year plus two percent or $80,000 per year for amortiza-tion. This would leave $500,000 minus $350,000, or $150,000, to the building owner. Capitalizing this $150,000 at an attractive six percent, I would readily find a buyer for 2.5 million dollars. Thus the inner lease would bring me four million dollars when mortgaged, plus 2.5 million when sold.
As for the operating lease, with its $250,000 income, we could, at a seven-percent return to investors, get a price of almost 3.6 millon dollars. If we provided the financing, by taking back a mortgage, it might be even higher, but holding things as is (in this simplified case), it turns out we have arranged to: (1) sell and mortgage the land (fos five million dollars), (2) sell and mortgage the inner lease (for 6,5 million dollars), and (3) sell an operating lease (for 3.6 million dollars).
All for a grand total of 15.1 million dollars on a purchase price to us of ten million. In this profitably fractioned property, the holder of the operating costs were fixed (at $750,000), was in a position not unlike that of a common stockholder. He was relatively secure against inflation, and if he could increase sales or rentals, his income would rise phenomenally; a ten-percent rise in rentals, for instance, would give him a forty-percent rise in incomed
The building owner, or innerlease holder, would be in a cash position much like that of a preferred stockholder, with fixed income but with tax advantages even better than those available to corporations that pay only seven percent of their preferred dividends. This, because the building owner can write off the annual depreciation of the building against his cash income from the structure. What with the accelerated depreciation, such investors would be able to pocket their $230,000 income with no tax—and to garner extra tax credits against other income-until such time, of course, as yearly depreciation on the building began to equal amortization payments. At this point the individual owner would likely want to sell his interest in the building (paying only twenty-five percent in capital gains if he sold at a profit), to wind up with an excellent net return.
These, as with a great many other tax possibilities that we realized for investors, were perfectly legal and well within the concepts and spirit of the law as it existed then. They also led to much new legisla-tion, however, because the Internal Revenue Service, upset about the amount of money they were not getting, instituted new rulings to plug the new holes we had discovered.
The example of property-fractioning I have given above is a simplified one. In an actual case there might be quite a number of individual variations and many more investors. For instance, in an inner (or sand-wich) lease, aside from the first mortgage we might create a two-million-dollar second mortgage, this second mortgage to pay interest but no amortization, till the first mortgage had been paid off. Or we might create a dormant mortgage which did not pay anything for tventy-five years. Only after the first mortgage was paid would this dormant mortgage take over, but then, as a first mortgage, it would acquire full value. One might be able to sell such a mortgage for, say, $750,000 to a man who wants to give it to his children twenty-five years hence. Similarly, the operating (or outer) lease, instead of being sold out. right, might be mortgaged, broken into subleases or subsubleases, hedged against various possibilities, and sold to as many as ten or
twelve different investors.
The Hawaiian Technique was so flexible that it became a very powerful tool which often could make two plus two equal to four plus one plus two plus more. I was not the first one to package real-estate deals for particular customers or to use a sale-and-leaseback technique (L, for one, had been doing just such things since the 1930's), but this was the first time anyone consciously and deliberately fractioned a great property off beforehand in order to tap many markets at once.
We used the technique with 1407 Broadway, with West Thirty-fouth Street, with the Graybar Building, and with just about every other one of our major properties. The Hawaiian Technique, because it er-mitted us to anticipate and make early use of the future earnings of our properties, became the principal tool of Webb & Knapp expansion.
And, as the technique spread and was adapted by others, it brought a new liquidity and flexibility to real-estate financing in general. ******* Page 144-148
The last time I saw Howard Hughes, he had already surrounded himself with the phalanx of competent, honest, and thoroughly humorless young Mormons who served as the gate-keepers, errand boys, and contact men. Through them he wards off and deals with much of the rest of the world. Page 155
Since we had only $25M of our own money and fifty million promised from Metropolitan Life, we were twenty. five million short of our project cost estimates, but I gave the go-ahead signal. My observation has always been that after a certain key point You must move ahead as if a project were assured-in order to assure it-because if you wait around for all the pieces of the puzzle to fit before closing a deal, you can wait forever. Counting on our own abilities and the evident worth of the project to bring in the additional capital we needed , we let the first construction contracts. Page 179
For all my technically trained and talented young helpers, I was principal troubleshooter for Webb & Knapp and would not have it any other way. Financing and building a great project is a bit like building a road through mountain country; around every bend there is a surprise, and a great part of the excitement and interest in a development, aside from its conception, lies in the challenge of finding new ways around the many difficulties that crop up. In Montreal we had a fair sampling of every minor and major form of dificulty that a great project can encounter, some of which I shall now detail. Page 183
In matters great as in matters small, around the world as in Montreal, I find it is not logic but emotions, sometimes carefully rationalized to resemble logic, that more often than not decide most issues. Page 186
The trouble was that the law concentrated only on housing. It takes much more than the razing of slums and putting up of clean new apartments to revitalize a great area stricken with a combination of social and economic ills: revitalizing parts of a city's core calls for a change in is human chemistry. The best way to achieve this is through new or better land use (as happened in Montreal). Housing can, and in mot instances should be, a key part of this change, but you also have to create supporting commercial and aesthetic elements in the area or have them already available nearby, otherwise your housing will eventually succumb to the decay around it. 203
There is a great exchange on pages 238-241 about the roles of developers and financiers in determining architecture. Basically, in order to have good architecture people have to be willing to take a risk.
If Irving has crossed a bridge in their own minds and were planning to go uptown, I could offer them the properties at a fire-sale price and not get a nibble. But when they began bidding $7.5M, I knew they had crossed a different type of bridge; they were not going uptown, I knew then they would have to pay the nine million or change their policy, and $1.5M was not enough to force a change in that kind of policy; 1.5M in the total land cost might have constituted five percent of the total cost of a new building and I felt this was pretty good ground on which to stand pat. I stood my ground, and we got nine million. The negotiators for the Irving Trust handled themselves beautifully. In that sense it was a classic series of negotiations, but after a certain point they knew and I knew what the land was worth to them, and we settled at a worthwhile figure; land values are only a relatively small portion of the total cost of a new structure. Page 271
Meanwhile, on another flank, the coming of the jet age was indeed changing American travel patterns, but not at first in the ways some of us had anticipated. The jets brought much more travel business to key American cities. I think they were a background factor in the continued growth of New York as the corporate capital of America.
But the jets, because they were so fast, actually cut back a bit, at first, on New York's hotel business. It turned out a businessman could fly in from Chicago or St. Louis, do his business, and fly back home in the same day instead of staying in New York overnight. Page 296.