Any book that makes me want to throw it across a room deserves one star.
Never before have I encountered an instructional book so verbose and full of itself. Yes, it was originally written in the '80s, but the language was so high-brow and self-important, I actually had to go back and see if it wasn't written 100 years ago! Are we sure the author wasn't paid by the word?
100 years ago when serial fiction was all the rage and writers were paid by the word, it made sense to use this sort of language. That's what readers expected. But no book discussing how best to write a thriller should sound like Charles Dickens and Sherlock Holmes on drugs.
For example,
"But many (writers) know that the process of creating characters from a handful of dust does not stand close examination while true faith in this miracle (as contrasted to lip service induced by fear of the libel laws) can be an important impediment to the regular and consistent creation of varied, individual characters."
This is the author's style throughout the book. I had to read whole paragraphs over and over again to get through all the extra words, just to find the point! The book goes on and on and on in this manner. One statement takes five lines of the page.
My takeaway? Boy, am I glad I didn't spend money on this!
Go study any of the writing books by James Scott Bell instead. At least he is a best-selling and successful novelist who can point to his own catalogue as examples of how to write. Oh, and he doesn't try and claim that an adventure story is a thriller. (Pro tip, kids, the two genres are vastly different!)
This book is only good to put under a table leg to stop the wobble. Or fire starter.