The book is well researched and engrossing. For me, an otherwise excellent piece of work is spoiled by Phillips' failure to do justice to what Christianity is all about.
In diagnosing the causes of the breakdown of the West, Phillips cites the exaltation of subjective truths and desires, giving rise to “destructive and nihilistic orthodoxies” where moral relativism prevails.
Concerning her proposed remedy, I have a controversy with her treatment of Christianity. She dismisses as "dogma" the heart of the Christian message concerning salvation, Christ's victory over death, and the promise of eternal life. She suggests that the Church should follow an approach found in Judaism and "abandon dogma for open-ended, critical, and inclusive examination of the texts." Christianity has Jewish roots but is separated from Judaism by an unbridgeable gap acknowledged by Phillips. She implies that, unlike Jewish beliefs, Christian beliefs (dogma) don't incorporate reason.
Yet critically examining the scriptures is not incompatible with Christianity's message of salvation through Christ. There are widely used evangelistic programs which involve examining and discussing the scriptures. The apostle Paul persuaded many of his Jewish kinsfolk that Jesus was their Messiah by reasoning from the Hebrew scriptures which Phillips refers to. Christianity’s core beliefs are defended intellectually by apologists like John Lennox, a former Oxford professor of mathematics. In line with Phillips’ recommendation he sets out to "expose high profile atheists and moral relativists to robust intellectual challenge” before large audiences.
To be fair to Phillips, she can hardly be expected to endorse theological beliefs she doesn’t share. She finds it unhelpful that Christianity “tends to put all its eggs in the supernatural basket” which is likely not to resonate with Westerners on the whole. This leaves her with the aim of persuading people towards living according to biblical values. If this is not easy for Christians (as many would attest), what will motivate those without strong religious beliefs?
Perhaps Phillips should have confined herself to discussing only Christian values, leaving out core Christian beliefs, rather than appearing to dismiss these beliefs for lack of resonance. Many people do find the full Christian message, which seeks to transform lives, unacceptable. But commending biblical precepts alone would be unlikely to transform society.
Nevertheless, some good might come from the sort of advice that Phillips has for Christians, involving the practical demonstration of their faith. The Church, which has largely succumbed to secular ideologies inimical to biblical values, should, she writes, create for itself a new counter-cultural narrative and self-consciously oppose the demoralising destructive and nihilistic orthodoxies. This would involve, for example, speaking up for men and the masculinity of which they are made to feel ashamed, arguing against victim culture, and standing up for traditional family values and the reality of biological sex. Christians should also be "providing warmth and acceptance to those who lead alternative lives".
Phillips encourages Christians and Jews to “ launch an intellectual counteroffensive against supersessionism”, the recently resurrected erroneous doctrine that the Church has entirely replaced Israel in God’s purposes, which has fuelled anti-Semitism and anti-Zionism.
I wonder if the Anglican leadership, at least, has gone too far down the road of apostasy to recover.
Despite my reservations, I recommend The Builder’s Stone as well worth reading. It should sell well, yet it might end up like a voice crying in the wilderness.