Lance Richardson’s True Nature: The Pilgrimage of Peter Matthiessen is both an act of biography and an act of tracking. The subtitle is precise. This is not simply a life of Peter Matthiessen, though it is unapologetically that — from his Old New York lineage to his death in 2014 in Sagaponack, Long Island, surrounded by family and Zen students. It’s something narrower and, I think, more honest: an account of the pursuit that animated that life. The chase. The longing. The way he spent decades trying to get free of himself and never fully did.
Richardson opens with the problem that plagued almost everyone who knew Matthiessen: he was many men at once, and all of them were “true,” depending on which day you met him. There is the privileged son of the East Coast establishment — St. Bernard’s, Yale, a name in the Social Register he later renounced in disgust. There is the young expatriate in postwar Paris, co-founding The Paris Review while secretly on the payroll of the CIA, gathering literary gossip and political intelligence in the same breath. There is the commercial fisherman on Long Island, the obsessive naturalist in the field notebook sense of the word, the antiwar and Indigenous rights activist, the advocate for prisoners and tribal sovereignty at the height of federal repression of the American Indian Movement. There is the seeker, shuttling from sesshin to sesshin, eventually ordained and transmitted as a Zen teacher, and in the end a roshi, “Muryo Roshi,” still admitting that he remained thick with anger, vanity, lust, and foolishness even after decades on the cushion.
The book’s method is to braid those selves without softening the edges between them. Richardson doesn’t write like an apologist, and he doesn’t pose as a judge. He writes like someone who has done the walking. He hiked where Matthiessen hiked. He read the journals that weren’t meant for public eyes. He interviewed the wives, lovers, children, editors, comrades, enemies. He follows the body. He notes the temperature in the Catskills zendo where Matthiessen sat through pain after the death of his second wife, Deborah Love, in January 1972. He notes the smell of rot and raccoon scat in the gutted Sagaponack writing shack, years after Matthiessen’s death, where a fading Sasquatch poster still leaned against a wall. The physical trail matters because the book is arguing something: that Peter Matthiessen did not exactly evolve; he accumulated.
We watch him accumulating vows. We watch him accumulating harm.
A through-line of True Nature is that Matthiessen was driven by a restlessness he could neither satisfy nor outrun. He names it himself, in different decades, as “deep restlessness,” “hunger,” “unease,” “the need to get rid of myself.” He spent his life trying to burn that off. Sometimes he tried to burn it off in disciplined forms — meditation, sesshin, Zen vows, the work of taking the precepts and receiving a Buddhist name, Ishin (“One Mind”), then later the transmission that made him Muryo Sensei and finally Muryo Roshi. Sometimes he tried to burn it off in the field — the Amazon in flood season, New Guinea highlands, the shark-thick shallows of Australia, blue sheep country in the Himalayas, the ice-blind passes of Dolpo that produced The Snow Leopard. Sometimes he tried to burn it off with love and sex, in quick, consuming attachments that he rationalized as tenderness and which often left wreckage, especially for the women who loved him and the children who watched him drift away again.
Richardson is clear on something that many admirers of Matthiessen’s environmental and political writing tend to glide past: he could be cruel at home. The portrait of his second marriage, to Deborah Love, is devastating without feeling lurid. We see her dying of cancer, chanting with their Zen teacher as she goes, and Peter, in the aftermath, unmoored in his Long Island house, not eating, dishes stacked, children drifting, friends finding him effectively catatonic. We also see, within mere months of Deborah’s cremation, the same man writing to another woman, swearing he wants nothing inappropriate from her and then, in the next breath, calling the note “a love letter.” Richardson doesn’t use this to accuse him of hypocrisy. He uses it to show the split at the heart of Matthiessen’s character: the man in robe and rakusu, vowing to dedicate his life to compassion, and the man who could not tolerate aloneness for very long, even when that aloneness was the cost of honesty.
That tension becomes even starker in the last act of his life. In Chapter 25, as Matthiessen is dying of acute myeloid leukemia in 2013–14, Richardson shows the household under siege — Maria, his third wife, furious and gutted as another woman in his Zen orbit grows close to him; Peter, frail and terrified, clinging to both of them in different registers; their students and friends circling in grief, loyalty, resentment, and disbelief. The book does not romanticize any of that. There is no halo around the “spiritual teacher in winter.” There’s a man who has taught for years that clinging is the source of suffering, and who, at the end, still clings: to being needed, to being desired, to being consoled. It is unsparing, and it feels true.
Matthiessen’s public life is equally complicated, and True Nature is at its best when it sets that complexity in motion instead of flattening it out. His career in nonfiction can be read as one long argument: that environmental devastation, racism, colonial extraction, and labor exploitation are not separate crises but one crisis, expressed in different places and against different bodies. He came to that position through experience. In the Everglades and Ten Thousand Islands, he traced how the plunder of a place went hand in hand with the terrorizing of Seminole and Black communities, and with the mythmaking that later cleaned the story up for polite retelling. In South Dakota in the late 1970s and early 1980s, following the American Indian Movement and the Black Hills Alliance, he documented how uranium companies, state officials, and the FBI converged on Lakota land rights and community resistance, and how the prosecution of Leonard Peltier fit into that convergence. He staked his name on In the Spirit of Crazy Horse, an investigation into the Pine Ridge shootout and its aftermath, and took blows for it: multimillion-dollar libel suits from the governor of South Dakota and an FBI agent, a publisher spooked into pulping copies, years of stress.
Richardson does not mythologize this as martyrdom. He notes that Matthiessen, in those years, shifted from skeptical distance about certain “radical Indians” to an explicit partisan stance: “I’m on the side of the Indians,” he said, arguing that neutrality in the face of state power was itself a dishonest pose. The book treats that shift not as a fall from journalistic grace but as a choice — a political, ethical choice — about what the work of a writer is for. That has obvious relevance now. And Richardson is careful to include the counterpoint voiced by Native scholars and writers who admired Matthiessen’s advocacy but bristled at his tendency to idealize “Traditional Indians” in almost mythic terms, collapsing many nations and internal disagreements into one pure figure of ecological wisdom. They called that move its own kind of appropriation. The book lets that critique stand.
There’s a similar refusal to sand down contradiction in how True Nature handles Matthiessen’s Zen life. We follow him from the early 1970s, when Zen is still half-exotic Manhattan counterculture, through his immersion in a New York sangha under a charismatic Rinzai teacher, Eido Shimano, who would later be accused — credibly and repeatedly — of using his position to pressure and manipulate female students into sexual relationships. When those accusations detonated, and Shimano reacted by blaming his students and trying to purge dissenters, Matthiessen left. He was shaken enough to wonder, privately, whether the same teacher had ever crossed a line with Deborah Love. That is a brutal moment in the book, because it shows how betrayal in a spiritual hierarchy back-propagates into memory: it can stain even your grief.
From there, Matthiessen moves west, into contact with Bernie Glassman and Hakuyu Taizan Maezumi Roshi in Los Angeles. The Zen he finds in Maezumi’s orbit is less theatrical, more workmanlike: predawn chanting in converted houses in Koreatown; “encouragement sticks” instead of punitive blows; koan practice embedded in a neighborhood where you walk past laundry lines to reach the zendo. We see him, in his fifties and sixties, not as a celebrity dropping in for enlightenment hits, but as a man doing dishes, sewing robes, insulating walls for a Zen monastery in the Catskills, arguing with his teacher about whether the beavers on monastery land have a right to remain. He will later receive shiho, then inka, formal transmissions that authorize him to teach and eventually recognize him as a roshi. He uses that authority to officiate weddings, funerals, and memorials, and to sit with people in moments of national crisis — Oklahoma City, 9/11 — and ask how to respond without hate.
The book could have turned that into a redemption arc. It doesn’t. Richardson shows how power inside a spiritual community complicates intimacy. By the 1990s and 2000s, Matthiessen is running a regular zendo in the Hamptons, giving dokusan (private interview) upstairs in a converted barn, wearing robes in front of a homemade altar, and setting rules about perfume and ego display for locals who might otherwise treat “Zen with the famous writer” as a novelty. At the same time, the work of being the stable one for everyone else leaves him exhausted, short-tempered, and constantly in danger of slipping into the same pattern of being “needed” by women students that caused so much trouble in Zen communities before him. By the end of his life, the sangha itself is showing hairline cracks of jealousy and hurt. Richardson does not pretend that transmission papers erase human appetite.
One of the strongest sections of True Nature is the long middle stretch on the Watson books. Matthiessen’s decades-long obsession with Edgar J. Watson — the Everglades planter and suspected killer shot dead by his neighbors in 1910 — becomes a kind of case study for the whole biography. He first heard the Watson legend as a boy, fishing those waters with his father. He carried it for most of his adult life. The material eventually swelled into Killing Mister Watson, Lost Man’s River, and Bone by Bone, and finally into Shadow Country, the single-volume reworking that he completed late in life. Richardson walks us through that process as both artistic discipline and psychological self-dissection. To render Watson — brutal, magnetic, exploitative, self-mythologizing — Matthiessen had to wade into ideas of manhood, race, labor, and violence that repelled and fascinated him. He had to listen to families in the Ten Thousand Islands who still carried fear and shame a century later. He had to accept that telling this story honestly would mean reopening wounds for people who did not necessarily want an outsider with a New York name to define their dead. The Watson work nearly broke him, and the book makes that cost feel concrete.
Late chapters are quiet, and they’re the ones that have stayed with me. Richard¬son writes about the final winter of 2013–2014 with the kind of detail you only get when you’ve sat in the same rooms. Matthiessen is in and out of hospitals, cycling through chemo for acute myeloid leukemia that he knows will not cure him but might buy months. He is still doing interviews for what will be his last novel, In Paradise — a book set at a Bearing Witness retreat at Auschwitz, where participants sit in meditation on the grounds of extermination and try to make sense of the idea of compassion in a place built for annihilation. He is trying to hold his zendo together, asking his Dharma heir, Michel Engu Dobbs, to carry the sangha forward. He is frightened of pain. He is explicit about that. Not death, exactly — pain.
In the last days, drugged, oxygen mask on and off, he begs for release. His children insist he be brought home. He dies in Sagaponack, in April 2014, in a bedroom converted to hospice, with chanting nearby — the Kannon Sutra he had carried in his pocket on Himalayan trails and recited for others in mourning. His ashes are buried beside Deborah Love. The grave is marked with shells and feathers, not marble.
After his death, Richardson returns to that property years later. The zendo is swallowed by vines. The writing shack is collapsing. The big whale skull he once hauled up from the beach sits weathered. The human presence is already fading; what remains is weather, birds, the weeds pushing through the floorboards. The image is not sentimental. It’s ecological. It invites a thought Matthiessen raised again and again as a teacher: when the “small relative mind” dissolves — the personality called Peter Matthiessen — what’s left is the larger field of awareness he called Buddha Mind, which is not a person and doesn’t need a name. That is, in effect, his faith.
If there’s a meaningful criticism to level at True Nature, it’s that at times the biography can feel, for lack of a better word, overfull. Matthiessen lived like he was cramming four or five different lives into one frame, and Richardson refuses to thin any of them down for comfort. The result is a book that can feel, in places, like moving through thickets of correspondence, expedition journals, lawsuits, Zen transmissions, and domestic blowups without much air between. You can understand why the author resists cutting — because part of his argument is that Matthiessen never stopped moving, and to simplify him too aggressively would be to lie. But there are stretches where the sheer density of movement risks emotional numbness. You are told, in meticulous detail, what Matthiessen is doing and saying and swearing to do next, and you can start to lose the pulse of how it feels in that exact moment, to him and to the people near him. That’s not constant, but it happens.
Still, the achievement here is large. Richardson delivers the first full biography of a figure who, for half a century, seemed to exist in legend even while alive. The book is clear-eyed about the harm Matthiessen caused — which matters, because too many nature-sage myths sand that down — and generous without being forgiving. It also gets at why Matthiessen mattered, beyond the usual line about The Snow Leopard being beautiful. It shows why his work on Native sovereignty and on environmental justice in places like the Black Hills and Pine Ridge helped redefine what literary nonfiction could be: not just description of landscape, but testimony against systems built to erase people living on that landscape. It shows how his Zen practice was not an ornament but a scaffold he kept rebuilding, sometimes painfully, so that he could keep going. It shows the way he tried, however imperfectly, to fuse attention, ethics, and craft into one act.
Most importantly, True Nature does something that feels rare in literary biography: it refuses to sell you the fantasy that the subject solved himself. In these pages, enlightenment is not a finish line, activism is not an absolution, art is not a cleansing fire. Matthiessen dies still wrestling with ego and desire. He dies afraid. He dies loved and resented, revered and doubted, needed and accused. He dies mid-conversation. And yet, in the quiet of that last room, with the chanting and the salt air off the Atlantic, he also dies more or less on his own terms, which were simple: at home, among his people, without pretense.
That honesty is the book’s real gift. It makes True Nature not just a biography of Peter Matthiessen, but a record of a very American kind of pilgrimage: from privilege into self-reproach; from ego into service and back into ego; from the romance of wilderness into the politics of land, water, labor, and law; from mystical hunger into day-to-day caregiving; and, finally, from the story of “me” into whatever comes after the story ends.
My rating: 88 out of 100.