In honor of Chastity Month, I have decided to finally read Augustine's treatise on virginity. A few years ago, I listened to the Librivox audiobooks of a couple of church fathers' views on virginity, but this was very early in my autodidactic journey, so I retained precious little from what I read, and left no notes. The one thing I did remember was a distinction between physical and spiritual virtue in regards to virginity, which means that one can be outwardly (physically) a virgin while inwardly (spiritually) being unchaste (and vise versa). This vise versa is important, because it gives rape victims comfort, and, on the obverse side of the coin, it chastises incels who think that merely not having sex is enough to be truly chaste.
I was glad to see a similar distinction made by Augustine early on in this treatise, specifically paragraph 2, which ends with "virgin both in body and spirit;" as stated above, I find this distinction helpful for many reasons, but the largest that Augustine dives into throughout the work is reinforcing humility in the face of virginity. One of his largest worries is that people will, like arrogant incels, remain chaste outwardly but neglect the other virtues. He wasn't necessarily worried people would feel left out as virgins; strangely enough, he was worried in the other direction, namely that people would think too highly of themselves as virgins, and look down on married couples as somehow "sinful." Augustine spills the vast majority of the treatise's ink on clarifying this, and I'd like to shout out the translator for doing an absolutely abysmal job. Basically, this seems to have been one of the most literal translations I've ever read, because nearly every sentence went on for too long and pushed too many verbs or negations to the end. I'm not sure if the problem is Augustine's writing, or the translator being lazy, but either way that's why one star was deducted. The other was for how tediously long Augustine spent on debunking the supposed sinfulness of marriage. I'm thankful that we don't have to debate whether sex within marriage is sinful, but nowadays we have much more virulent debates raging which weren't even being debated back then. Strange how times change.
Backtracking just a moment, in the preface to the treatise Augustine calls virginity "God's gift;" this conception couldn't be farther from the contemporary view of virginity as a curse which one must be rid of as soon as physically possible (ha get it). By contrast, Augustine points out that virginity should be the status quo, and, if one absolutely cannot handle it, one may marry. The reason for this hierarchy is scriptural, in that continence is valued above marriage both in Paul's writings and in Jesus' words. Another extremely important point is that Augustine on at least three occasions explicitly states that virginity is the goal for both men and women, exploding the myth that only women are to be virgins. That in reality is a holdover from pre-christian paganism, not anything that Christianity ever commanded. In fact, Christianity was often attacked by the pagans for its insistence on monogamy, because that puts equal sexual limitations on both men and women. Christians who do hold the view that women are uniquely meant to be virginal while men don't have to be betray their lack of scriptural knowledge, a more general lack of wisdom, and their proclivity to pagan heresies.
The only possible way one might get that women-only view of virginity is through the image of the Virgin Mary, and the Church's emphasis on her. Augustine helpfully points out the beauty of her paradoxical place: she remained a virgin AND YET was fruitful; the rest of the church, by contrast, must choose one or the other. Augustine links those who remain virgins to Mary, as such: "That Birth of the Holy Virgin is the ornament of all holy virgins; and themselves together with Mary are mothers of Christ, if they do the will of His Father." This is an extension of Christ's admonition that his followers are his family, and it combines that with the gendering of the Church as Christ's bride. Augustine seems to float back and forth comfortably between discussing virgins as male and female: the latter (she/her) is most commonly used with regard to Mary and the Church metaphor mentioned previously, and the former (he/him) when discussing Eunuchs for the sake of the Kingdom, and Christ's own virginity. Augustine stresses that point about Christ being a virgin, and he goes so far as to point out that only virgins may follow precisely in Christ's steps; everyone else imitates him but receives a slightly lesser reward on that one point: "He set forth in Himself, what behooved for us to imitate. And many things in Him are set forth for all to imitate: but virginity of the flesh not for all;"
One thing I did enjoy throughout was Augustine's emphasis on grace, not works (lest any should boast, which formed the main thrust of his attack against pride), and his emphasis on scripture (essentially, if you disagree with him, you disagree with scripture, and you got bigger problems bub). I see why Luther loved him so much. One especially fun part was something I wish I could convey to certain people who love cherry picking the bible:
just as a case shall come to hand, wherein to defend their own perverse opinion: and thus, while they had rather defend than amend their own opinions, they essay to break the authority of holy Scripture, whereby alone all proud and hard necks are broken.
This is a clunky way of saying "instead of defending your own proud, defiant opinions, seek wisdom in the Word." Augustine uses such talk of wisdom as coming from God to help tie things back to the point he made at the start about virginity being a gift: just as wisdom, which comes from God, is a gift, so too is virginity. Like all good things, virginity comes from outside of ourselves, and the moment we start bragging about it (or worse, looking down on others who lack it) is the moment we need to realize we're the pharisee and not the tax collector in the parable (which he also ties in at the end). All around, this treatise would have been amazing if it was half as long, better translated, and would have belabored a few points less. Despite that, it was great food for thought and a good source of reflection and wisdom.